May 29, 2007

triumph and disaster

vanished222211.jpg

[“Vanished”: One of my all-time per­so­nal favo­ri­tes. New York, 1998. Backs­tory here.]

This is where having stu­died Latin in school comes in handy:
In Ancient Greece, vic­tors at the Olym­pic Games were not given a gold medal. They cer­tainly were not given multi-million dollar media deals. They were simply given a wee hat made out of lea­ves. A “lau­rel wreath”, to be pre­cise.
The wreath’s raw mate­rials would have cost a hand­ful of spare change, in today’s money. Add– I don’t know– a cou­ple of shec­kles to pay some­body to make it– it pro­bably would’ve only taken the per­son a few minu­tes. And the ath­lete would only keep it for a few weeks, tos­sing it away once the lea­ves tur­ned brown.
Why did the Greeks choose to do it this way? Because the lau­rel wreath, unlike a multi-million dollar media deal, sym­bo­li­zed victory’s flee­ting nature.
The Roman Empe­rors wore lau­rel wreaths for the same rea­son, as oppo­sed to the gold and diamond-encrusted crowns pre­fe­rred by Euro­peans Royalty, 1500 years later. Again, it was meant to sym­bo­lize the flee­ting nature of their power. They might be the All-Powerful Ruler of The Empire, but hey, every­body goes even­tually. Perhaps the later Euro­pean Royals were in denial?
I remem­ber seeing Mike Mills, a mem­ber of the famous rock group, REM being inter­vie­wed on the TV one or two years ago. The inter­vie­wer asked him, “So, when did you first feel like you were suc­cess­ful?”
Mike ans­we­red, to paraph­rase, “The only time I felt like we had really cros­sed a line was when, twenty-odd years ago, we rea­li­zed that we could do this full-time. That we wouldn’t need to work in a record store or wha­te­ver. Any ‘suc­cess’ since then was us simply buil­ding orga­ni­cally, piece-by-piece on what we already had going on.”
I can cer­tainly relate. I often find fairly minor fai­lu­res from a decade ago still hit me emo­tio­nally far more strongly than cer­tain major suc­ces­ses I had in the last year or two. Perhaps part of it is simply timing. Perhaps by the time the even­tual pay-off comes, you’re already far too busy worr­ying about the next pro­ject to waste time bas­king in for­mer glo­ries.
Fai­lure, on the other hand, seems dee­per and more las­ting. I’m OK with that; I sus­pect it’s Nature’s little trick to keep us “dri­ven”. Kee­ping us stri­ving for­ward in a world where orga­nic life is for the most part “nasty, bru­tish and short”.
In the great English poem, “If”, Rud­yard Kipling refers to Triumph and Disas­ter as “those two impos­ters”. An utterly beau­ti­ful and power­ful thought, one which I first read aged ele­ven, when my English teacher, Mr. Coa­tes made me memo­rize the poem by heart, as punish­ment for tur­ning in an assign­ment with sloppy handw­ri­ting. Thirty years later and I am only, just only, begin­ning to even slightly understand…

19 Responses to “triumph and disaster”

  1. Tony Goodson says:

    One thing I always recom­mend is when inter­vie­wing peo­ple, ask them about their fai­lu­res rather than their suc­ces­ses. The Big One! Peo­ple can always lie and exag­ge­rate their suc­ces­ses and wins, but fai­lure, oh no!!
    And in dis­cus­sing their fai­lu­res, it shows what they lear­ned and how they boun­ced back, which is a damn sight more rele­vant and inte­res­ting than a faked list of achie­ve­ment words!!
    Funny how a Pro­ject Mana­ger has never gone over time or budget!!

  2. Bernardo says:

    This is defi­ne­tely my favo­rite as well. It has a fan­tas­tic one-hit-wonder feel to it and pretty much sum­ma­ri­zes the worst fears of a lot of people.

  3. Peter Ralph says:

    beau­ti­ful Hugh!
    I also went to a school stee­ped in Impe­rial values — Clive (of India) was an alum­nus — but as a tee­na­ger I found the values of “If” the movie reso­na­ted far more strongly than those of “If” the poem. Time has a habit of pas­sing and chan­ging things
    A quote from another REM, Michael Stipe:
    “We always knew he would be suc­cess­ful, he wasn’t just in it for the money”
    boat drinks

  4. Very power­ful words indeed. “And never breathe a word about your loss;”… ah of all, this is the swee­test reward.

  5. Geoff says:

    Thanks for the link Hugh, great poem and well worth remembering.

  6. One I think about is of the vic­to­rious Roman Empe­ror after retur­ning from war, would take a cha­riot ride through the Colos­seum to a roa­ring crowd. While he did this on his cha­riot directly behind him would be a young man who the entire ride would whis­per in his ear, “You are just a man.”
    We often need those in vic­tory and fai­lure, the remin­der “You are just a man.”

  7. Carolyn says:

    Been rea­ding gaping­void for just over a year & have never taken the time to com­ment. Just a sim­ple ‘thanks’ for remin­ding me about “If” & for making me think with the ‘car­toon’ “Please”. That one always makes me cry… Triumph & Disas­ter, indeed.

  8. RKR says:

    When I dream of my suc­cess, I pic­ture “me” fea­tu­red in a maga­zine article “bare­foot” in my home. This dream will be crushed when I read the article and notice that the maga­zine pho­toshop­ped in someone else’s feet.
    When you are told you may have only 5 years to live, the first thoughts are not about your fai­lu­res or suc­ces­ses. You don’t care about your bank account…the first thing you think of, “is I want more time”. You just want to live, even if you never make it on the For­tune 500 list.
    —PS That was 7 years ago. The second opi­nion was bet­ter than the first doctor’s. I am fine, healthy and just as ornery as ever, but that moment is fore­ver embed­ded in my mind. I feel like I have been given a second chance at life and I have since had seve­ral fabu­lous fai­lu­res!
    —I hesi­tate to send this com­ment, because it seems to smell like Chic­ken Soup. Ah, what the hell!
    Great post as always, Hugh!

  9. Darcy Moen says:

    To quote another bri­lliant indi­vi­dual.
    ‘Where ever you go, there you are’ — Steven Wright

  10. There is no such thing as fai­lure. It’s simply called living.

  11. Mickey says:

    G’Day Hugh and the rest of the Gaping­VOID com­mu­nity. I browse the sight every now and again since I first stum­bled across the “crea­ti­vity” essay writ­ten by your­self Hugh — awso­mely ins­pi­ring and honest.
    It is inte­res­ting to read about the flee­ting nature of suc­cess and vic­tory. And, if this flee­ting nature is an orga­nic fun­ci­ton as we are sug­ges­ting here, then it can equally be applied to emo­tions, fai­lu­res, and any other aspect of human life; Never can you always be con­tent, always be happy, always be right, always be wrong, always be in love.
    This is very com­for­ting to me because some days I hate my wife, some days i hate my life, some­ti­mes i ques­tion my dici­sions, my direc­tions, my dreams…to know that ques­tio­ning them is human is com­for­ting and makes me feel free to ques­tion some more!
    Thanks group

  12. britta k says:

    thanks, Hugh! this post gave me two fun moments:
    a) “triumph:disaster” and the much more gene­ral “everything:nothing” dia­lo­gue well together. as I’ve been dwe­lling on the ten­sions bet­ween the lat­ter pair for a week or so, I’m now con­si­de­ring this added spin. intri­guing.
    b) bliss­fully (and in a non sequi­tur sort of way) remin­ded me of a belo­ved college his­tory teacher from France, who spoke inces­santly about “Julius Caesar’s lau­rel wraith.”
    fabu­lous.
    (p.s. — as a com­ment vir­gin, just want to tell you how much color your blog adds to my world. I share your car­toons at least seve­ral times a week, because… how could I not? cheers!)

  13. Jamie says:

    I have been rea­ding your blog enthu­sias­ti­cally for some time now and must con­fess a dwind­ling of that ear­lier enthu­siasm. Today’s blog, howe­ver, long awai­ted it seems, was one of your best. Okay, I am a Kipling fan who tears up while rea­ding Gunga Din to his kids. Or maybe it is just the old man in me recog­ni­zing your path as somewhat fami­liar. Cheers.

  14. Brian Sexton says:

    That was a great post, Hugh — very thought pro­vo­king.
    Were I dis­tri­bu­ting points, I would give some to you for invo­king your Latin stu­dies and quo­ting Hob­bes. Nicely done, sir. Nicely done.

  15. Nic Darling says:

    Exce­llent post. I par­ti­cu­larly like the seg­ment about the tran­sience of vic­tory as sym­bo­li­zed by the lau­rel wreaths. With that in mind, res­ting on ones lau­rels seems even more foo­lish.
    This also reminds me of a favo­rite quote from Samuel Bec­kett — “Ever tried. Ever fai­led. No mat­ter. Try again. Fail again. Fail bet­ter.”
    Thin­king of your vic­to­ries as “bet­ter fai­lu­res” takes a little of the sting out of defeat and a little of the excess air out of your successes.

  16. clementine says:

    I can’t help but won­der if you still have messy handwriting.….

  17. clementine says:

    well, i can tell from the car­toons that you still sort of do have messy handw­ri­ting. I wouldn’t exactly call it ‘sloppy’ though, so I guess some good came out of it all.
    we have ‘IF’ pos­ted on the fridge…it got me through seve­ral rough spots…had to memo­rize it too, but it was for tal­king out of turn, not handw­ri­ting.
    inte­res­ting that what was given as a punish­ment seems to be so well thought of by so many.

  18. Peter Ralph says:

    Hugh — the folks at Image Enter­tain­ment just announ­ced they are re-releasing the movie “If” next month.
    Do you think they read your blog?
    if you would rather stay with Kipling I can recom­mend “The Man who would be King” — Sean Con­nery & Michael Caine are both great

  19. Prasanna says:

    hey Hugh! you sud­denly seem to make sense.. haha.. Great post by the way.. as ever :)