April 30, 2007

“rip off” or homage?

pickleshane44431.jpg
Michael O’Connor Clarke sus­pects Pic­kleshane has been rip­ping off my work. Though I’ve seen peo­ple “borrow” from me many times before [and usually find it quite flat­te­ring], Pic­kleshane seems to be doing it A LOT, without any due attri­bu­tion to me wha­tsoe­ver.
Heh. I’m not pis­sed off about it, I just find it maybe a little odd. Like I said in “How To Be Crea­tive”:

What gives the work its edge is the sim­ple fact that I’ve spent years dra­wing them. I’ve drawn thou­sands. Tens of thou­sands of man hours.
So if some­body wants to rip my idea off, go ahead. If some­body wants to over­take me in the busi­ness card doodle wars, go ahead. You’ve got many long years in front of you

I’m just gues­sing some kid came across my work ran­domly one day, thought it loo­ked like fun, and deci­ded to have a go him­self. I did the same with my favo­rite car­too­nists, when I was young. Whatever.

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

31 Responses to ““rip off” or homage?”

  1. Ben Tamblyn says:

    Homage — Hugh.
    Immi­ta­tion is still the highest form of flat­tery –but hey he’s no “comic strip blog­ger” :)

  2. Johnny C. says:

    Wow. It’s a bit scary how bla­tant he is.

  3. Robert says:

    Hugh,
    You’re a big man to openly take this ‘form’ of ‘flat­tery’ so well. Only someone with a truly kind dis­po­si­tion can do this. Kudos to you.
    Per­so­nally I’d be ran­ting and raving and ready to split open the copier’s head. But then, I am the lovechild of Lucifer!

  4. Keith Handy says:

    It’s a tough call. Part of me wants to say give him time to find his own voice, that we all cop some­body else’s style when we’re star­ting out, and that your work just hap­pen to be his trai­ning wheels right. But then again, he may not have the inner drive to be truly ori­gi­nal and face the unk­nown. Is he being aggres­sive about pro­mo­ting those look-alike comics, or is he just put­ting them up on Flickr for the heck of it?

  5. Thomas says:

    But does he have a “Gaping Void hates cats’ Tshirt? I wore mine just yes­ter­day as mat­ter a fact. Rock on Hugh!

  6. Phil says:

    This is an inte­res­ting one — if you put work of any kind of qua­lity online then you’re pretty much defi­ni­tely going to get copied. I must admit, Hugh, that when I’m dood­ling I some­ti­mes start squig­gling in a very ‘Void-esque style.
    The fact is though that your car­toon is bet­ter. You should only start worr­ying when it isn’t.

  7. K says:

    I remem­be­red the first time someone rip­ped off one of my posts (copied it com­ple­tely).
    First thought was…
    Someone READS my posts?
    Second thought was…
    well, there wasn’t really any,
    I was still ama­zed about the first.
    Seriously, what I did do was reach out to the blog­ger and help the per­son find their own voice.
    I took it as a cry for men­to­ring.
    That blog­ger now has one of my fave sites (besi­des Gaping Void, of course — being one of the Hughet­tes) and we’re link bud­dies.
    A thief once told me that he never stole from peo­ple he liked (‘course he did break into their hou­ses, take pho­tos of him sit­ting on their favo­rite chairs butt naked, and then send them to them…but that’s a whole other story).

  8. mattk says:

    I went through a bunch of his stuff and I don’t have issues with him dupli­ca­ting your style… but there are a TON of comics which are COMPLETE rip offs of comics you’ve pre­viously done.
    That’s not cool and he’s defi­ni­tely cros­sed a line.

  9. Catherine says:

    no-one will ever be you and ever­yone who knows you, knows that to be true… “remar­ka­ble” comes to mind — don’t even phase about someone who can’t think for him­self huh…x

  10. Have to say, I’m genui­nely impres­sed by your dry, con­fi­dent res­ponse to this Hugh.
    In truth, you clearly have nothing to fear. Still, it shows con­si­de­ra­ble strength of cha­rac­ter to be able to res­pond to appa­rent pla­gia­rism with such cool reserve.
    Still no res­ponse from the other chap, alas. Would be nice to hear his side of the story.

  11. Keith Handy says:

    P.S. –
    ”…be his trai­ning wheels right.“
    That was sup­po­sed to say “right now”. :)

  12. RKR says:

    Many artists have lear­ned by crea­ting repro­duc­tions of the mas­ters. Hugh, think of your­self as a “mas­ter”.
    The first car­toon dra­wing I ever made was a naked man pushing a lawn mower.… I hope there isn’t a subli­mi­nal mes­sage I am sur­pres­sing. ;)
    (All men who just shrin­ked up a bit rea­ding that, “relax”!)
    Any­way, if this “pic­kle per­son” needs ideas…

  13. Anonymous says:

    Ever since I met you at a drun­ken din­ner party and basi­cally did nothing but read your busi­ness card car­toon port­fo­lio and break the couch, I’ve wan­ted to copy the card thing. I never could get it right though, neither could that guy. It’s just not the same.

  14. I remem­ber trying to doodle in the man­ner of Don Hertz­feldt once, but no mat­ter how hard I tried, it was always trying too hard — too much detail, too much going on, etc. I couldn’t get the mini­ma­lism right.
    The same thing hap­pens in pickleshane’s. Regu­lar comic art on busi­ness cards: not so hot. The mouth, the ton­gue, the sweat drops, the com­ple­xity of the scrib­ble, all say “point mis­sed”. Maybe not inten­tio­nally, but it mis­ses something that you’d expect copies to miss, because they don’t know how mini­mal is “too mini­mal” and overcompensate.

  15. Samir says:

    Hello Hugh,
    Don’t blame the kid. We all do this. I agree with the peo­ple saying that it honors the mas­ter to be copied by the stu­dent. Naguib Mah­fouz, the best Egyp­tian Nove­list ever (Nobel Prize of Lit­te­ra­ture in 1988) con­fes­sed that when he was young, he would copy entire pages of the French Nove­lists Bal­zac and Flau­bert, just modify a word here and there and claim that this was his own pro­duc­tion. At the end, he found his own voice.
    Cheers|Samir

  16. Love the cards. I can see why someone would want to copy you. Think of it as a com­pli­ment. I’ve had a cou­ple blogs sto­len by copy­blog­ger and that pis­sed me off at first, but really it just means I had a good idea, right?
    I just wish they would give cre­dit where cre­dit is due!

  17. Hugh you are indeed a big man to not take it as anything other than homage (or even parody, why not?). We can be imi­ta­ted but not wholly copied. Like you said, get­ting to where one is takes a lot of work! A con­fi­dent writer/artist knows this.

  18. jon kudelka says:

    Con­si­der your­self really, really, really flattered.

  19. Pat says:

    At the very least, the little bug­ger might sug­gest a rather nice South Afri­can wine to drink.

  20. vinny warren says:

    i found the depth and the extent of the appro­pria­tion of your style oddly fas­ci­na­ting. it’s almost like you could outsource to him, if necessary.

  21. Most of pickleshane’s dra­wings seem to be ori­gi­nal, though clearly ins­pi­red by your work (which isn’t a bad thing). Rip­ping off like that is stu­pid, though.
    But your car­toon made me rea­lize one thing: twis­ted + bit­ter = twitter!

  22. paul says:

    Mar­kes me think of all those junk e-mails I get for replica watches. Looks sorta like the real thing at first glance, but the qua­lity is way sub-par.

  23. jfchabot says:

    I dis­co­ve­red this pic­kleshane per­son this mor­ning going through this post.
    Going through his stuff, I noti­ced a lot of influen­ces (the abs­tract, the pie charts, the sig­na­ture, the toons and the list goes on…).
    From my per­so­nal stand­point, I’m drawn to Hugh’s work of course because of the nice deli­very, but mostly because I find a way to relate to the mes­sage.
    If this Pic­kleshane per­son has something inte­res­ting to say, I’m all eyes and ears. But don’t bite. That ain’t right.

  24. Keith Handy says:

    Rich Laf­ferty: so you’re the guy who did the Pop Tarts com­mer­cials? ;)

  25. KG says:

    He’s clearly “borro­wing” from your style.
    If he’s wor­king on figu­ring out his own voice and style, he should at least cre­dit you. We should all thank our teachers.
    “No man is an island unto him­self…” etc., etc. I think this new­bie would bene­fit from lear­ning that we’re all con­nec­ted, we influence each other, and we should be thank­ful for that.

  26. Tony C says:

    The phi­lo­sophi­cal argu­ment of where flat­tery and coping in artis­tic pur­suits begin and ends has been echoing through the cen­tu­ries. The legal one doesn’t seem ending any­time soon either. I think many artists start out by cop­ying others then when that gets boring find their own style, maybe this fella will do the same thing…if not peo­ple will always come to the source.
    The dan­ger is think anything we create is truly ori­gi­nal. All art comes from somewhere, something or someone else…I’d sug­gest Hugh’s sati­ri­cal eye goes all the way back to Hogarth, the untold thou­sands of poli­ti­cal car­too­nists via Cal­vin and Hob­bes.
    I have to say thought when I first saw it I thought it was an ‘early Hugh’.

  27. Sal says:

    I think Hugh should sue this dude for attemp­ting to usurp his posi­tion as cheap blog­ging hack. There’s only room enough for one lac­klus­ter dood­ler around here.

  28. Edward_zq says:

    Sawadee-krub!
    Check this out!
    *

  29. Coco Chanel says:

    And some more..
    *