April 16, 2007

sap and thingamy

thingamybanner001453.jpg

Tho­mas Otter
[Chief Busi­ness Solu­tion Archi­tect at SAP] and Sigurd Rinde [Foun­der of Thin­gamy] have become friends. Tho­mas has some nice things to say about both Sig and Thin­gamy here:

Thin­gamy is well worth having a look at. Sig has wor­ked har­der than anyone I know to focus in on sim­pli­city. He is the zen mas­ter of sim­pli­city.
The appli­ca­tion can run from a USB stick. I’m not a deve­lo­per, but there is something aesthe­ti­cally plea­sing about small and sim­ple. Have a lis­ten to a recent inter­view with Sig here. If I was at SAP ven­tu­res I’d take out the che­que book. Sig is onto something. 

What’s inte­res­ting to me is, Thin­gamy has got­ten most of its big inte­rest in the last few months not from the star­tup Web 2.0 crowd, but by the senior folk in the heavy­weight tech com­pa­nies. SAP is by no means the only exam­ple I could give… but I guess there’s more to life than killer blog apps etc.
[Disc­lo­sure: I have a small stake in Thin­gamy. This has nothing to do with the stuff I’m currently doing with Mic­ro­soft.]

4 Responses to “sap and thingamy”

  1. RKR says:

    As always, something of value! Thank you, Hugh.

  2. Thomas Otter says:

    Hugh,
    Thanks for the link.
    One of many points where Sig and I agree is that making too many assump­tions about who is your tar­get mar­ket is dan­ge­rous, and often if way off the mark.
    One of the best exam­ples of a solu­tion that was plan­ned for one mar­ket but ended up domi­na­ting another one is SAP R/3.
    I quote from an old Hasso Platt­ner inter­view.
    “The first pros­pect in Ger­many for R/3 we thought is a so-called medium sized mar­ket com­pany dea­ling with screws. They are a large screw dea­ler. When we lear­ned more about the com­pany, the com­pany had two billion in reve­nues in 1991. The com­pany was ope­ra­ting in eighty coun­tries in the world. So this mid-sized mar­ket cus­to­mer all of a sud­den had one of the lar­gest warehou­ses in Ger­many, was — as far as tran­sac­tion rate is con­cer­ned — lar­ger than the lar­gest R/2 cus­to­mer in ope­ra­tion. That means from day one all these ideas how we go for the low end of the mar­ket got sta­lled.”
    If you do make assump­tions, you need to be pre­pa­red to change them. Fast.

  3. hugh macleod says:

    Hey Tho­mas, thanks for drop­ping by.
    Agreed with your last sen­tence. Luc­kily for Sig, he has struc­tu­red Thin­gamy to remain extre­mely fle­xi­ble in its early days… to allow wha­te­ver hap­pens, to actually happen.