March 12, 2007

feldman-macleod

The Feldman-MacLeod Mutual Admi­ra­tion Society con­ti­nues una­ba­ted.
Actually, what Loren Feld­man is doing I think is really impor­tant, even if he’s not quite on “The Sphere’s” radar quite yet.
Just give it time, Lad­die, just give it time…

15 Responses to “feldman-macleod”

  1. Daniel says:

    there’s a quote in my mind for this..
    is from devil’s advo­cate, do you remem­ber the movie with Al Pacino?„ almost in the end..
    - “Vanity„, is defi­ni­tely my favou­rite sin” :P have a nice day„ & really eat some bbq„ is really great in Texas…

  2. Ryan says:

    love the pics but can i recom­mend put­ting a like at the bot­tom of ur page that peo­ple can click to go to the last page/month on cause i have to keep scro­lling back to the top

  3. Steve says:

    OK. So you praise the guy and link to a video of him stro­king you. I trust you’re recom­men­ding him to your rea­ders on the basis of something more than this. No? If so, what? If not, you’ve lost a reader.

  4. hugh macleod says:

    Frankly Steve, I don’t need or want rea­ders who leave com­ments like your own, so bug­ger off with my blessing.

  5. Steve says:

    Com­ments like my own? All I was doing was cha­llen­ging you to explain why you think this guy is so great. No foul words, no insults. I’m sorry if that’s all too much for your fra­gile ego (OK, now I’m being a prick :-) ). Shame, really. I rather liked your blog. Oh well. Good thing I’m not too sen­ti­men­tal. Ta…

  6. hugh macleod says:

    Ooh! Ahh! Cha­llenge! Let’s all shake the middle clas­ses from the com­pla­cency etc.

  7. Steve says:

    Ah! More silly bab­ble that avoids the issue. Life is not one of your car­toons. Some­ti­mes you have to actually say something. Your blog. You get the last word. Have at it. I pro­mise I won’t stick around to read it.

  8. Another Steve says:

    C’mon, Hugh. It *is* sort of cringe inducing.

  9. hugh macleod says:

    Steve 2.0, sure, I agree, Steve 1.0 has a point, or at least, he is well entit­led to his own opi­nion.
    That doesn’t mean I like the way he phra­sed his ques­tion.
    The fact that his momma didn’t teach him pro­per man­ners is not my problem.

  10. Steve says:

    OK. You knew I’d be back :-) You can take issue with my man­ners. But that begs the ques­tion with even grea­ter urgency: what’s there to recom­mend about this Feld­man cha­rac­ter. You care about man­ners? His videos are mostly lou­tish rants about how things suck and are shit. He dis­ses Lin­ke­dIn while put­ting their badge on his site. Ran­ting for the sake of ran­ting, it seems. And this Yue per­son? She’s worse. Insul­ting women all the time. I choose to ignore them, but it’s hard when peo­ple you other­wise enjoy keep pushing these folks. Trust me, I’m giving Pod­Tech just as much grief. So, then, if I ask nicely, will you please tell me one ori­gi­nal thought, pro­vo­ca­tive idea or pio­nee­ring thing Feld­man has had/done? Please!?

  11. hugh macleod says:

    Steve, the fact that you’re not smart enough, or at least, too lazy to figure out why I like Feld­man is not my pro­blem.
    Secondly, before you start dis­sing the work of others, why don’t you tell the class what it is that you do that is so won­der­ful and fas­ci­na­ting? Inqui­ring minds want to know etc.

  12. Steve says:

    I teach. My stu­dents seem to like me and I enjoy it. So if you’re loo­king to change the sub­ject by sug­ges­ting that I’m some low-life cre­tin or “not smart enough,” I’m not sure I can help you there. I would not and did not diss anyone’s work without pro­vo­ca­tion. But you call someone’s work “impor­tant” and sug­gest, in your smug way, that anyone who disa­grees just doesn’t get it, then you’re damn right I’m going to call you on it and tell you what I think. Blogs as con­ver­sa­tions and all that stuff. I don’t ima­gine you’d expect peo­ple to run out an buy Stormhoek just because you say so. Ques­tions like “Is it any good,” and “Why” are legi­ti­mate, right? All I’m asking is this: what is it about Feld­man that you think is impor­tant? You still haven’t ans­we­red the ques­tion. If you so admire Kathy Sierra’s dic­tum to not take your audience for gran­ted, don’t. Don’t hype something without bac­king it up. And if it’s a legit­mate ques­tion, it’s a legi­ti­mate ques­tion whether or not you think I’m a prick. I really do want to know your ans­wer. Pro­vide it and I pro­mise I’ll leave you and your blog alone (actually, I’m not into black­mail. I’ll leave you alone regardless).

  13. hugh macleod says:

    I’m glad your stu­dents like you, Steve. I’m sure they have good rea­son.
    OK, just to shut you up ;-) I’ll tell you why I like Feld­man.
    It’s not his video­blog per se. It’s what he actually does for a living i.e. to pay the bills.
    He has deve­lo­ped a very nice busi­ness model which I think has a good chance of not only wor­king for him­self, but also hel­ping the busi­nes­ses of lots of his clients i.e. “Mom and Pop” busi­nes­ses.… i.e. Dry Clea­ners, Pizza joints, Car­pet Sto­res, that kinda thing.
    We all see lots of VC-funded, Sili­con Valley types do great things with Web 2.0 to trans­form their careers.
    But to me, seeing nor­mal, blue collar peo­ple do the same on a local level is far more exci­ting an idea.
    So Gods­peed to Feld­man, I say.

  14. Steve says:

    Oh. OK. Thanks. And, believe it or not, I agree. About his “day job,” I mean. His Web 2.0 rants, howe­ver, I could do without.

  15. hugh macleod says:

    No worries, Steve. I knew your heart was in the right place. And I do appre­ciate you tena­city ;-)