Archive for March, 2007

March 31, 2007

ffff…

11444661553ffff.jpg
[Click on image to enlarge/download/print etc. Licen­sing terms here etc.]
[Bonus Link:] My favo­rite band at the moment is Mice Parade.

bob the cab driver [update]

zzzzazzdggg12.jpg

One of my favo­rite gaping­void posts, from Sep­tem­ber, 2004:

Bob The Cab Driver.
About once a week, I have to catch the late train home. Bob the cab dri­ver always meets me the at sta­tion and dri­ves me to my house.
Bob’s got what Seth Godin calls ‘The Free Prize’. He’s got what Tom Peters calls “The Wow! Fac­tor”. He’s got something I like that no other cab dri­ver has. It might be his jovial man­ner, it might be I like the fact his car is colo­red red. It might be the fact that he’s very relia­ble. The rea­son doesn’t mat­ter so much. Regard­less, Bob gets my busi­ness 100% of the time. When he can’t make it I let his brother pick me up ins­tead, but that doesn’t hap­pen too often. I call no other cab ser­vice but Bob’s. There are a lot of cab com­pa­nies where I live. Cab dri­ving is a pretty com­mo­di­fied busi­ness. But I call Bob. Every time. I like Bob.
And the minute he pis­ses me off for wha­te­ver rea­son I’ll find another cab dri­ver I like just as much.

I sup­pose the point I was making here is, some­ti­mes the issue isn’t about your pro­duct. The issue is about you.
[Afterthought:] Some­ti­mes you’re sit­ting in a boring mee­ting, and a per­son utterly devoid of per­so­na­lity is blethe­ring on about “Brand Per­so­na­lity”, and you just want to slap the guy…

exactly.

Salient point from Shot­gun Mar­ke­ting:

“When you list mar­ke­ting as step #14 out of 16 steps, it’s no won­der so many star­tups fail”.

March 30, 2007

the week wine club

weekcover6123.jpg
One of Stormhoek’s cus­to­mers, Har­per Wells, is now run­ning The Week Wine Club, the wine club of the popu­lar Bri­tish news maga­zine, The Week. It launches today.
If you join you will auto­ma­ti­cally be ente­red into a com­pe­ti­tion to win a wine con­nois­seur pac­kage of fine wine, glass­ware, sto­rage etc, worth £6000. Offer open to any UK resi­dent aged 18 or over.
A lot of major “ups­cale” publi­ca­tions have wine clubs in this country, inc­lu­ding the natio­nal daily papers. I believe The Sun­day Times wine club has about 250,000 mem­bers alone.
Any­way, good luck to them. Hope they sell some Stormhoek.

March 29, 2007

buying space in someone else’s brain is far harder than buying space in someone else’s media

123999ppp.jpg
How Wei­den & Ken­nedy lost some Nike busi­ness– From Brand Repu­blic:

Some inte­res­ting spe­cu­la­tion from AdAge on why Nike has deci­ded to expand its crea­tive agency ros­ter and begin moving some pie­ces of busi­ness away from W+K:
A cru­cial fac­tor is Nike’s intent to build on the stun­ning suc­cess of its inte­rac­tive ven­tu­res…
…inc­lu­ding the Nike ID web­site crea­ted by R/GA and the company’s part­nership with Apple for the Nike+iPod, which has vir­tually trans­for­med run­ning and demons­tra­ted how a brand can mar­ket itself by offe­ring something use­ful to a com­mu­nity rather than just com­mu­ni­ca­ting its assets.

The ita­lics are mine. I put them there for a good rea­son. Behold the future of adver­ti­sing etc. Buying space in someone else’s brain is far har­der than buying space in someone else’s media etc etc.
[Nice follow-up from Rik:]

And it shows once more that mar­ke­ting should be built into your pro­duct from the start, rather than slap­ped on after­wards in the from of adver­ti­sing. The same can be said for design. And bran­ding. These things should not be an afterthought, but built into your pro­duct right from its birth.

March 28, 2007

blue monster bizcards

changetheworld157.jpg
The Blue Mons­ter is star­ting to make it onto Mic­roo­soft busi­ness cards. Jeff Henshaw explains:

Yes­ter­day I met some new folks from Mic­ro­soft UK, and as we tal­ked about one of the things I’m wor­king on now, we got to tal­king about the poten­tial for sig­ni­fi­cant impact that new ideas can have. This led to her busi­ness card, which I loved so much that I wan­ted to share it…

The virus spreads etc.

just in case crack wasn’t addictive enough.…

You JUST KNOW the Twit­ter jun­kies are going to love this:

“Twit­ter­vi­sion is a brow­ser app using Goo­gle Maps to show Twit­ter com­ments as they hap­pen in (more or less) real time.”

Thanks to Zar­dos over at Meta­fil­ter for the link.

March 27, 2007

the blog post I hoped I’d never have to write…

What hap­pe­ned to Kathy Sie­rra, an utterly glo­wing gem in the blo­gosphere, and a really good buddy to me over the years, utterly horri­fied me.
Rachel Clarke sums it up well:

What the fuck is going on? Why does this hap­pen again and again. The only peo­ple I know (in real life or vir­tually) who have been threa­te­ned and stal­ked have been women. What inse­cure, small min­ded­ness, misogy­nis­tic beha­viour takes over peo­ple to do things like this. Over 50% of the blo­gosphere are women, yet we con­ti­nually get the refrain that they are not A-list, that they are not spea­king at con­fe­ren­ces. This is why. Put your­self out there, show that there is no dif­fe­rence and you get the anger and vitriol poring out from peo­ple from peo­ple who think they are bet­ter just because they have a Y chromosome.

This is why I have no trou­ble wha­tsoe­ver dele­ting anony­mous com­ments, at least, the mean-spirited ones. Iden­tity mat­ters. If peo­ple don’t feel the need to be held per­so­nally accoun­ta­ble for their words, if peo­ple don’t feel that what they say or do should bear any real-world con­se­quen­ces, then I don’t want to talk to them.
Here’s hoping Dear Kath is back in the saddle again, soo­ner than later. Kathy, we love you. Rock on.

[Follow the story on Tech­meme.]

[UPDATE:] Robert Sco­ble left the follo­wing com­ment below:

The pro­blem, Hugh, is that some peo­ple invol­ved in meankids.org DO have iden­ti­ties. Let’s start with Chris­topher Locke. He just wrote on his blog in defense of his part in Meankids.org.
But I just saw for the first time what they wrote about Mar­yam. Totally, totally, vile and hurt­ful things. We’re both quite hurt and pis­sed about it.
I demand a public apo­logy from ALL invol­ved.
They cer­tainly are NOT my friends.

Appa­rently these Mean­Kids folk were taking the occa­sio­nal pop at me as well. Mommy! Mommy! Come quick! A posse of middle aged, self-loathing unde­rachie­vers is being mean to me Boo hoo hoo hoo…
[Afterthought:] Highschool Metaphor: “OK, so you weren’t the actual jock who raped the cheer­lea­der. But it seems you were in the posse circ­ling them, chan­ting ‘Go go go go go go go…’ “
Or am I mis­sing something?

March 26, 2007

advertising 2.0 does not exist

funjob446.jpg
I’ve been having a lot of advertising-related con­ver­sa­tions recently. Here are some thoughts that keep pop­ping up:
1. There will always be a mar­ket for some­body who can sell your stuff bet­ter than you can. Adver­ti­sing 2.0 does not exist. Mar­ke­ting 2.0 does not exist. Wha­te­ver new tech and media comes along, this sim­ple truth remains.
2. It takes at least nine months to con­ceive and launch a full-on, mains­tream Madi­son Ave­nue ad cam­paign. Nine months is a long time, if you ask me. The world chan­ges fas­ter than that. No won­der Madi­son Ave­nue is so damn unhappy all the time.
3. I find both Saatchi’s “Love­marks” and its sequel, “The Love­marks Effect” [links here] utterly unrea­da­ble. Together they form a sha­llow and vapid tra­gi­co­medy, of sorts. Which is a pity, because on another level I quite agree with Saatchi CEO, Kevin Roberts cen­tral Love­marks the­sis, i.e. that Love is what dri­ves our new mar­ke­ting rea­li­ties. And he obviously an extre­mely smart and capa­ble guy. But what star­ted out as a great idea from a lone indi­vi­dual has been utterly butche­red by the grim rea­li­ties of his employer’s already-existing busi­ness model.
cookiecutter124.jpg
4. Have you also noti­ced how on the cover of “The Love Marks Effect”, there’s a pic­ture of all these small metal coo­kie cut­ters, sha­ped like love hearts? What are you saying, Guys? “Coo­kie Cut­ter Love”? I know. Unfor­tu­nate. Sad. Comic. All that.
5. Saatchi & Saatchi: “We’re not an ad agency, we’re an ideas busi­ness.” Right. Oh well, I’m sure they’re trying to get there one day. Maybe they’ll suc­ceed. Who knows.
6. So a lot of clients have been recently asking their ad agen­cies, “So what can you do for us in Web 2.0?” And the agen­cies have been repl­ying, “Lots! Lots and lots and lots and lots!” Bullshit. Ad agen­cies have so far been hope­less in this space. I don’t know of ONE SINGLE piece of work coming out of a tra­di­tio­nal ad agency in the last five years that has been even half­way ori­gi­nal, thought pro­vo­king or effec­tive. Cap­tain Morgan’s? Beyond lame. Juicy Fruit? Beyond lame on ste­roids. Glen­fid­dich? A mis­sed oppor­tu­nity.
7. Bartle Bogle Hegarty, the very fine Lon­don ad agency, used to pitch their clients, “We makes brands famous”. Right. Like movie stars. Like celebs. Like the guys get­ting out of the limos and wal­king down the red car­pet. Like the ones who get all the money and invi­tes to the fancy par­ties. While the rest of us stand behind the vel­vet rope out in the cold, loo­king in with lon­ging. Great. Super. Lucky us.
8. I am totally with Mark Earls, who in his semi­nal book, “Death of Mar­ke­ting”, wrote, to paraph­rase: The word “Brand” is a very silly one. It’s pretty mea­nin­gless. Ins­tead, ask your­self what your enter­prise is actually for. Define your­self in terms of an actual “Purpose-Idea” [I love that term, which he coi­ned btw], ins­tead of an abs­tract object. Think verb, ins­tead of noun.
9. The good news for Goo­gle Adsense is, it seems to work. Or at least, it seems to do what it says it does. The bad news is, if it’s the only game in town, its mono­poly on a cer­tain type of adver­ti­sing [the type that requi­res rela­ti­vely little thought, basi­cally] means with so many peo­ple joi­ning the throng with nowhere else to go, Hello, obs­cene price rises etc.
10. Live by SEO, die by SEO.
11. I’ve never flown on Jet Blue, I’ve never seen a Jet Blue com­mer­cial, I’ve never been on their web­site. But I know all about Jet Blue, and think highly of it. Why? Because blog­gers I know are always tal­king about it. This is exactly what Seth Godin means by “remar­ka­ble” i.e. Peo­ple. Like. Tal­king. About. It. If you hap­pen to have a unre­mar­ka­ble pro­duct, I sup­pose you have no choice but to do a remar­ka­ble ad cam­paign, like Cris­pin Porter’s “Bur­ger King” cam­paign. That is, if your boss or client will let you. Which is unli­kely.
12. If some­body looks like they’re trying to impress you with their “future of adver­ti­sing” cre­den­tials, ask them if they they them­sel­ves have their own blog. If they don’t, they’re full of it. It’s a good acid test. Just my opinion.

March 25, 2007

thank god there’s a texan

thankgod137.jpg
[Click on image to enlarge/download/print etc. Licen­sing terms here etc.]

welcome…

11444661554.jpg
[Click on image to enlarge/download/print etc. Licen­sing terms here etc.]

start blog!

11444661553.jpg
[Click on image to enlarge/download/print etc. Licen­sing terms here etc.]

does everybody think you’re an idiot

11444661552.jpg
[Click on image to enlarge/download/print etc. Licen­sing terms here etc.]

control the conversation

11444661551.jpg
[Click on image to enlarge/download/print etc. Licen­sing terms here etc.]

March 23, 2007

thought for the day.…

When some­body asks, “How does this social media stuff scale”, they really mean, “How do I become a spam­mer?“
[Based on a con­ver­sa­tion I had today with Euan Sem­ple.]

“we are t.v.”

Great speech from Jeff Jar­vis. Here’s the video. Here are the notes.

But we’ve just begun. In the evo­lu­tion of the new TV, this is 1954: Arthur God­frey and Friends, My Little Mar­gie, the Adven­tu­res or Rin­Tin­Tin. That was not the gol­den age of TV. TV then suc­ked. But it got bet­ter. So will ours.
And this means we have a great oppor­tu­nity to rein­vent TV from scratch in an enti­rely new medium with a new rela­tionship with our public, new crea­tive stan­dards, new means of pro­duc­tion and dis­tri­bu­tion, new eco­no­mic models. We can nur­ture an explo­sion of crea­ti­vity and com­merce. But we have to do it right.

thresher update

thresherspike143.jpg
The Thresher Virus 2.0 begins to kick into gear… [SFX: Evil Laugh.]
[DOWNLOAD THRESHER’S 40%-OFF COUPON HERE.]

“shouldn’t have kept you waiting…”

PS3seats213.jpg
From Kotaku UK:

Loyal Kota­kuite John just got home from the PS3 launch at Vir­gin in Lon­don. Seems there were around 50 or so peo­ple there for the bash, but in the midst of a cold, Bri­tish night, con­di­tions weren’t ideal. Luc­kily, some friendly chaps were on-hand giving out free cam­ping chairs to the tired, would-be cus­to­mers [with the words, “Shouldn’t have kept you wai­ting”, and a corres­pon­ding web­site address, shkyw.org prin­ted on the back].
How thought­ful. Until you actually visit the URL.
Cheeky bastards.

[Disc­lo­sure: My friends at Edel­man were behind this one. Yes, the chairs are colo­red green for a reason.]

March 22, 2007

cool brands…

I was loo­king through the Edel­man site ear­lier today, and the whole time a line from a con­ver­sa­tion I had with a friend the other day kept pop­ping into my head:

If you want to have a cool brand, you have to do cool shit.

I don’t think I can put it any sim­pler than that.
P.S. It was also said in the con­ver­sa­tion, “Oh yeah, and you’re not the one who gets to decide what’s cool or not…”

copyblogger

Copy­blog­ger [Brian Clark] notes that I never link to him. Maybe this will shut him up ;-)

March 21, 2007

thresher virus 2.0

threshersbunny444231.jpg
[DOWNLOAD COUPON HERE.]
So here it is: The Stormhoek-Thresher Cou­pon 2.0.
40% Off any wine in any Thresher store for the next week [N.B. Thresher’s is the the lar­gest spe­cia­list wine retai­ler in the UK].
We did Ver­sion 1.0 last Christ­mas, and gene­ra­ted £15 million of sales for Thresher, one of our big clients. Not to men­tion, it made the natio­nal news. So now that Eas­ter has come along…
Unlike last time time, howe­ver we put a little Stormhoek bran­ding on the top. That’s the sha­me­less adver­ti­sing hack in me etc.
Any­way, feel free to down­load cou­pon and blog it and/or e-mail it to as many peo­ple as you like. Thanks.
[UPDATE: The link was bro­ken for about a half-hour. Fixed now. Thanks.]

edelman talk

bloggingconsultant4388.gif

Edel­man
have kindly asked me to come to their Lon­don office today and give a talk about blogs and post-Cluetrain rea­lity for one of their clients. Here are my notes:
SETUP:
1. I’m not here to tell you about your busi­ness. You already know it’s a jun­gle out there. You already how hard it is to fight out there, just to earn a few pen­nies on the dollar. You don’t need me remin­ding you of that. What I would like to do, howe­ver, is pass along what I’ve lear­ned from blog­ging, and explain where I think it can help your cause.
2. To me, The Clue­train is the most impor­tant book about the inter­net ever writ­ten. Why? Because it was the first book that tal­ked about the inter­net the way it REALLY is– i.e. peo­ple tal­king– as oppo­sed to the way busi­ness and the media pre­tend it is– i.e. peo­ple buying.

A power­ful glo­bal con­ver­sa­tion has begun. Through the Inter­net, peo­ple are dis­co­ve­ring and inven­ting new ways to share rele­vant know­ledge with blin­ding speed. As a direct result, mar­kets are get­ting smar­ter — and get­ting smar­ter fas­ter than most companies.

I’ll be blunt: In mar­ke­ting terms, I don’t think anyone can truly unders­tand the inter­net until AFTER they’ve read The Clue­train. Highly recom­men­ded.
3. Nobody cares about you. That last sen­tence terri­fies a lot of cor­po­rate types. We grew up thin­king cor­po­ra­tions and the media was all-powerful. That all a guy in a suit nee­ded to do was snap his fin­gers, buy some TV com­mer­cials, and sud­denly the mas­ses would line up in dro­ves, beg­ging to buy your pro­duct. Seth Godin calls this old world the “TV-Industrial Com­plex”. Those days are over. We’ve got too many choi­ces. We are over-programmed and over­sup­plied with great choi­ces already. In the future, the com­pa­nies that will win are those that can rise above the clut­ter. To rise above the clut­ter you have to offer something remar­ka­ble; something worth tal­king about. A great, award-winning TV ad cam­paign for a lousy pro­duct won’t cut it any more. Peo­ple have got­ten too smart. And like The Clue­train says, thanks to the inter­net, they’re tal­king to each other.
4. You’ve already done “effi­cient”. We’re living in a post-efficiency world now. We already know how to make things bet­ter, chea­per and fas­ter than the pre­vious gene­ra­tion. We already know how to squeeze our sup­pliers till the pips squeak. We already know how to build sys­tems that maxi­mize pro­fits at every stage of the pro­duc­tion and selling pro­cess. We’re already outsour­cing our stuff to China, and so is ever­yone else. Been there. Done that. So where does the growth need to come from? What needs to hap­pen, in order to save your job?
THESIS:
5. The growth will come, I believe, not by yet more inc­rea­sed effi­cien­cies, but by huma­ni­fi­ca­tion. For exam­ple, take two well-known air­li­nes. They both per­form a use­ful ser­vice. They both deli­ver value. They both cost about the same to fly to New York or Hong Kong. Both have nice Boeings and Air­bu­ses. Both serve pea­nuts and drinks. Both serve “air­line food”. Both use the same air­ports. But one air­line has friendly peo­ple wor­king for them, the other air­line has surly peo­ple wor­king for them. One air­line has a sense of fun and adven­ture about it, one has a tired, jaded business-commuter vibe about it. Guess which one takes the human dimen­sion of their busi­ness more seriously than the other? Guess which one still will be around in twenty years? Guess which one will lose billions of dollars worth of sha­rehol­der value over the next twenty years? What para­llels do you see in your own industry? In your own com­pany?
6. If cor­po­rate blogs work, it’s because they help huma­nify the com­pany. I wrote about this ear­lier in an article I called “The Porous Mem­brane”. To paraph­rase: Ideally, you want the con­ver­sa­tion bet­ween cus­to­mers [the exter­nal mar­ket] to be as iden­ti­cal as the con­ver­sa­tion bet­ween your­sel­ves [the inter­nal mar­ket]. The things that your cus­to­mer is pas­sio­nate about, you should also be pas­sio­nate about. This we call “align­ment”. A good exam­ple would be Apple. The peo­ple at Apple think the iPod is cool, and so do their cus­to­mers. They are alig­ned.
When you are no lon­ger alig­ned with your cus­to­mers is when the com­pany starts get­ting into trou­ble. When you start saying your gizmo is great and your cus­to­mers are telling every­body it sucks, then you have serious misa­lign­ment.
So how do you keep misa­lign­ment from hap­pe­ning?
The ans­wer lies the cul­tu­ral mem­brane that sepa­ra­tes you from them. The more porous the mem­brane, the easier it is for con­ver­sa­tions bet­ween you and them, the inter­nal and exter­nal, to hap­pen. The easier for the con­ver­sa­tions on both sides to adjust to the other, to become like the other.
And nothing pokes holes in the mem­brane bet­ter than blog­ging.
7. Blog­ging is not about reaching a mass audience. Blog­ging is not about crea­ting yet another sales chan­nel. Blog­ging is about allo­wing “The Smar­ter Con­ver­sa­tion” to hap­pen.
Why do some com­pa­nies lose, while other com­pa­nies win? Because the lat­ter has a smar­ter “con­ver­sa­tion” with its cus­to­mers. Pret-A-Manger has a smar­ter con­ver­sa­tion about food than Bur­ger King. Starbuck’s came along 20 years ago and began a smar­ter con­ver­sa­tion about cof­fee with millions of peo­ple within a very short space of time. Wal-Mart’s mas­sive growth star­ted from a smar­ter con­ver­sa­tion about pri­ces. Savile Row tai­lor, Tho­mas Mahon came along and, with his blog, had a smar­ter con­ver­sa­tion about $4000 English bes­poke suits.
Blogs allow you to cheaply and quickly begin a smar­ter con­ver­sa­tion. And once you get it going, that con­ver­sa­tion starts blee­ding out into all other areas of your busi­ness– inc­lu­ding adver­ti­sing, PR and cor­po­rate com­mu­ni­ca­tions.
8. Having a “Smar­ter Con­ver­sa­tion” is not an inte­llec­tual deci­sion. It’s a moral deci­sion.
9. Just because the con­ver­sa­tion star­ted out smart, doesn’t mean it sta­yed that way. You have to keep evol­ving your con­ver­sa­tion to keep it inte­res­ting. I always tell peo­ple, “Blogs don’t write them­sel­ves.” This is har­dest part of blog­ging: kee­ping the mojo going.
WRAP-UP:
10. A fairly com­prehen­sive list of cor­po­rate blogs can be found here on Wiki­pe­dia. [UPDATE: The Wiki­pe­dia list seems to have been taken down; but thank­fully there’s another list here.] For exam­ple: even though I know very little about Sun Mic­rosys­tems, I read their CEO, Jonathan Schwartz’s blog pretty regu­larly. So now I have a pretty posi­tive image of Sun. So the trick then beco­mes, how does one take this little piece of gene­ra­ted good­will, and turn it into something big­ger? That ans­wer goes back to the “Smar­ter Con­ver­sa­tion”. Blogs train you to speak to peo­ple the way they should be spo­ken to, simply because you won’t get a res­ponse other­wise. And once you learn that, you can start appl­ying it to all aspects of your busi­nes­ses.
11. Blogs are very cul­tu­rally dis­rup­tive– more so than peo­ple rea­lize. So the ques­tion you have to ask your­self is, what part of your busi­ness are you trying to dis­rupt? Because you have to be ready for it.
12. “Con­ver­sa­tion” is just a metaphor. Then again, no it’s not.
13. Here are some links to give you some food for thought:

A. Robert Scoble’s Cor­po­rate Blog Mani­festo. Requi­red rea­ding.
B. Jeff Jar­vis made blog­ging his­tory when he blog­ged nega­ti­vely about Dell Com­pu­ters. Once the dust sett­led Dell star­ted a blog of their own. Smart move.
C. Mark Cuban’s Blog Mave­rick is a text­book case of how a CEO ought to blog.
D. Microsoft’s Steve Clay­ton is as good an exam­ple of a mid-level emplo­yee blog­ging on his company’s behalf as any I know. And to see a big list of Mic­ro­soft blog­gers, go here.
E. Read everything Doc Searls wri­tes. Shut up and just do it; the man’s a genius [Doc was one of the co-authors of The Clue­train. I’m also a big fan of another Clue­train co-author, David Wein­ber­ger, who also con­sults for Edelman].

14. Remem­ber, our inter­nal dri­ves were hard­wi­red into us long before money was inven­ted. So we’re not doing it just for the money. We’re really doing it to find mea­ning. Just my opi­nion.
15. Thoughts from my day job: “What’s dri­ving inno­va­tion and sales on our end is not a tech­no­lo­gi­cal issue, it’s a cul­tu­ral issue. Get the right cul­ture going, and the tech looks after itself.“
16. I will leave you with the words of NYU Pro­fes­sor, Clay Shirky: “So for­get about blogs and blog­gers and blog­ging and focus on this– the cost and dif­fi­culty of publishing abso­lu­tely anything, by anyone, into a glo­bal medium, just got a whole lot lower. And the effects of that inc­rea­sed pool of poten­tial pro­du­cers is going to be vast.”

March 20, 2007

the soy luck club

soyluckclub2137.jpg
When I was in New York recently I paid my first visit to the Soy Luck Club, which I was tur­ned on to by my favo­rite pas­sage in my favo­rite Seth Godin book, “All Mar­ke­ters Are Liars”:

The Authen­ti­city of the Soy Luck Club
My num­ber one han­gout in New York is a hard-to-find little cof­fee shop run by Vivian Cheng. The Soy Luck Club has fast, free inter­net access, orga­nic oat­meal coo­kies, soy sha­kes and really good tea. They’ve got com­for­ta­ble chairs, a great staff and just the right sort of atmosphere.
Most peo­ple on the street walk right on by and don’t even notice the Club. Others, though, pause, take a quick look at the menu and the layout and peo­ple inside and then walk in as though they own the place. They’ve figu­red out — almost ins­tantly — that this is their sort of place. The frame of Vivian’s story matches their world­view and they’re sold before they even order anything.
How does she do it? I know Vivian well enough to tell you that it’s not an inten­tio­nal gam­bit on her part. The lus­cious pres­sed whole wheat bagels with banana and soy but­ter aren’t on the menu because she’s trying to trick someone into thin­king the place is healthy and funky. It’s there because Vivian likes it and is proud of it.
For­tu­na­tely for Vivian she doesn’t live in India­na­po­lis. In India­na­po­lis, she wouldn’t be able to run a thri­ving busi­ness that so beau­ti­fully matches her sen­si­bi­li­ties. But in this neigh­borhood of New York, it’s per­fect.
The Soy Luck Club is authen­tic in every way because it reflects who Vivian is and what sort of place she’d like to hang out in. So, how does she grow?
She could try to grow by per­sua­ding peo­ple who don’t care about ambience and healthy foods and fluffy couches that this place is bet­ter than Star­bucks. She could grow by per­sua­ding peo­ple to eat more soy so they don’t have a heart attack. Neither approach stands a chance of wor­king. Peo­ple don’t want to change their minds.
Ins­tead, Vivian is gro­wing by reaching out to com­mu­ni­ties that will choose to pay atten­tion, to indi­vi­duals who have a world­view that will embrace the story she’s trying to tell. A block away, the Equi­nox health club gives out dis­count cards to the Soy Luck Club. The assump­tion (a correct one) is that peo­ple notice a dis­count card if it’s given to them by someone they trust. Even bet­ter, peo­ple who pay good money to work out in the middle of the win­ter are sig­ni­fi­cantly more likely to want to believe in a story of healthy nutri­tion right around the cor­ner. So it grows.
Of course, Vivian will really have a home run once her loyal cus­to­mers start telling sto­ries to their friends — friends who might not share the world­view but are eager to do something that others are doing, eager to hang out at a place belo­ved by their best friends. That’s how Star­bucks suc­cee­ded and how the Soy Luck Club will as well.

As a mar­ke­ter, I think there’s more use­ful stuff in that one pas­sage than there is in most entire mar­ke­ting books out there. So for the bene­fit of my rea­ders, I’m re-publishing it. Thanks to Seth for kindly giving me per­mis­sion.
P.S. Yes, the bagels do rock.

March 19, 2007

thesher 2.0

yak7778.jpg
For those of you who may not remem­ber, last Decem­ber Stormhoek relea­sed an online voucher for 40% off any wine or cham­pagne in any Thresher store. And it went viral. Besi­des making the natio­nal news, it gene­ra­ted £15million [Fif­teen million pounds] of busi­ness for Thresher in only a few days. Besi­des that, it tre­bled Stormhoek sales for the time it was run­ning [and not just in Thresher, but everywhere in the UK].
So yes, it was a good out­come. Which is why I want to do it again. Another good out­come is always wel­come around here etc.
Sure, you could argue that Thresher virus was also a fluke. We had zero con­trol over the out­come, all we did was post it online and see what would hap­pen. But that’s why they’re called “viru­ses”: Because they’re unpre­dic­ta­ble. If they were pre­dic­ta­ble, we’d call them something else.
Any­way, I pitched Jason on it already. He’s pretty skep­ti­cal that we can make it hap­pen again– “Light­ning never stri­kes twice” etc. But I’m thin­king it might just work because:
1. There are a lot of peo­ple who already know about the last voucher. So there’s a level of baked-in “fame” already there.
2. There are already a lot of peo­ple out there who used the first voucher. They know what they got out of it, so they might be willing to use it again for simi­lar rea­sons.
3. The peo­ple who mis­sed it first time around might be willing to have a go this time.
In short, I think there are enough peo­ple out there wiling to have another go at redee­ming the cou­pon one more time, even if this time the story isn’t as news­worthy to break into the mains­tream media machine like it did last time.
Thoughts?

“how to be creative” animation


This is very cool. Some stu­dents made a 3-minute You­Tube ani­ma­tion short, ins­pi­red by my “How To Be Crea­tive” mani­festo.
Blurb: “Motion design clip made by c-md stu­dents ins­pi­red by the “how to be crea­tive” mani­fest by Hugh Mac­leod. (made by Toon Goris­sen, Niek Kos­ten & Mar­tijn Pillards).“
Thanks Toon, Niek and Mar­tijn. It rocks!

back in london


My plane arri­ved in Heath­row about 2 hours ago.
Any­way, I uploa­ded a wee 10-minute You­Tube video diary of my US tra­vels– NY, Aus­tin and Miami– for anyone who cares to see it. Enjoy.
[The You­Tube per­ma­link is here.]

March 18, 2007

tell me you love me

manola2346.jpg
[This car­toon was drawn as a gift to Manola, at last Thursday’s Miami Geek din­ner.]

goodbye, miami!

Off to the air­port. In Lon­don tomo­rrow.
Anyone who wishes to reach me, I’ll be on my usual Lon­don num­ber as of Mon­day mor­ning:
+44 (0) 770 309 9462
I had a great trip, I have to say.

kathy sierra’s seven blogging virtues…

mruhsi215.jpg
[Click on image to enlarge/download/print etc. Licen­sing terms here etc.]
I left the follo­wing com­ment over on this post:

“Gee, I work insane hours doing a job I hate, and yet am only just scra­ping by. How come nobody wants to read my blog?”
If what you want are lots of rea­ders, I’d recom­mend ins­tead making insane amount of money, wor­king only two hours a day doing something you love, and sha­me­lessly name-dropping your famous friends on a regu­lar basis.

The fact that there are actual grow­nups bla­ming their lack of worldly suc­cess on other blog­gers I find inc­rea­singly biza­rre [Not with Tony’s post per se, just in gene­ral etc]. It’s like someone bla­ming their lack of suc­cess on other people’s abi­lity to send and receive e-mails. It implies to me a fun­da­men­tal lack of unders­tan­ding how the medium ACTUALLY works.
Seriously, ins­tead of was­ting time par­ti­ci­pa­ting in a non-event that’s going nowhere fast, maybe try this ins­tead: The best advice for buil­ding a suc­cess­ful blog and/or glo­bal mic­ro­brand that I’ve heard recently was Kathy Sierra’s “Seven Blog­ging Vir­tues” that she gave at our panel last week at SXSW. You can check out the PDF here.
Hope it helps.

March 17, 2007

get the right culture going, and the tech looks after itself

lifeis9812.jpg
So I’ve been wor­king for the Stormhoek winery just shy of two years. Here are my tas­ting notes:
1. Two years ago I asked the rhe­to­ri­cal ques­tion, “Why shouldn’t a small wine com­pany see peo­ple like Goo­gle, Mic­ro­soft or Apple as their com­pe­ti­tion? Why should the con­ver­sa­tion be only limi­ted to other small wine­ries? It makes no sense.” At the time, it see­med a really ‘out there’ thing to be asking. Not any more.
2. Stormhoek sold forty thou­sand cases in 2005.
3. This month we’ll ship forty thou­sand cases. At least.
4. Do the math.
5. It was the Stormhoek blog that put us on the map. But it took 2 years of hard graft for it to turn into sales on a mas­sive scale.
6. Two years ago, I esti­ma­ted that a well-executed Web 2.0 mar­ke­ting plan would take about two years to exe­cute. In retros­pect, that was a pretty good call.
7. Yes, I unders­tand that not every­body has two years to play with. Some peo­ple are only as good as their last finan­cial quar­ter. But that is why I work for a small, pri­vate com­pany. If Stormhoek was owned by Wall Street, I’d be dead meat.
8. Com­pa­ring a good 2003 Bor­deaux with a good 2003 Bur­gundy is not much dif­fe­rent than kno­wing who won the 1992 Super­bowl, ver­sus who won the 1985 Super­bowl. The inte­llec­tual barriers to entry are actually quite low. The peo­ple who pre­tend other­wise are weak and pathe­tic.
9. My mother, in her day, was a very suc­cess­ful busi­ness­wo­man in the IT sec­tor. Her best line ever was “Have you hug­ged your cus­to­mer today?” I wish there were hun­dreds of clo­nes of me, all out there on the road, giving cus­to­mers metapho­ri­cal daily hugs.
10. One thing that the Tesco road trip nai­led for me: Most wine is bought by ordi­nary folk. Most of them are women. Most choose the wine because they like the label. Most couldn’t give a hoot about ‘terroir’ or country of ori­gin. Most won’t spend more than $10. And that, my friends, is the mar­ket I am in. Sure, the male-dominated, over-fifty-dollar “snob” mar­ket might be a good wee busi­ness to be in for some folk, but be war­ned: it’s a sur­pri­singly tiny niche.
11. One thing you learn fast in this busi­ness: Supply is not the issue. Whether you’re tal­king two dollars or two hun­dred dollars a bottle, the world is FLOODED with great choi­ces, from every wine-producing country in the world. Unless you have an outs­tan­ding pro­duct at the price point you’re selling at, you’re in serious trou­ble.
12. Because the ave­rage cus­to­mer has so many great choi­ces [too many, some would argue] the trick to this game is to rise above the clut­ter. The way to do that is to build mea­ning­ful brands that con­nect to peo­ple in real-world ways. Anything else is busi­ness sui­cide. Sadly, too many wine­ma­kers only learn this the hard way, AFTER they’ve sunk $20 million and ten years of their lives into the enter­prise.
13. Stormhoek has 15 peo­ple wor­king for it in its glo­bal HQ in Lon­don. We’re tiny. A lot of the wine busi­nes­ses doing the same num­ber of cases as ours will have fifty to a hun­dred peo­ple on the pay­roll. So if I ever look a bit frazz­led and burnt-out to you, now you know why.
14. We can make this as luc­ra­tive and as inte­llec­tually sti­mu­la­ting as we want to. The ball is in our court.
15. It took two years, but Stormhoek is finally star­ting to feel like wor­king for a Sili­con Valley star­tup. Ever­yone is really pum­ped up. Con­trast this with the ave­rage staid, boring sch­tick of your ave­rage “gent­le­manly” wine busi­ness.
16. What’s dri­ving inno­va­tion and sales on our end is not a tech­no­lo­gi­cal issue, it’s a cul­tu­ral issue. Get the right cul­ture going, and the tech looks after itself.
17. When I star­ted wor­king in the adver­ti­sing busi­ness as a young buck in Lon­don, back in the late 1980s, Bartle Bogle Hegarty were con­si­de­red the best game in town, even if they were not the big­gest agency. Every young adver­ti­sing stu­dent aspi­red to have a gig there one day, ever­yone day­drea­med of one day having John Hegarty return their calls. The were con­si­de­red the Prae­to­rian Guard. Within two years from now, I want every smart, dri­ven young per­son in the wine trade to be thin­king the same way about us. That to me would be a far more worthy defi­ni­tion of “suc­cess”, than how many cases we sell.

last night i dreamt

11444661550.jpg

love and goodwill

mighty1762.jpg
Thanks to Alex de Car­valho and all the Miami blog­gers for the great geek din­ner we had on Thurs­day night. I was touched to be so well loo­ked after by so many smart, friendly peo­ple.
One thing that has been occu­rring to me over this entire US trip: To an outside obser­ver, espe­cially to a cyni­cal outside obser­ver, the whole Web 2.0/blogging thing may look a bit strange: a lot of pyjama-clad weir­dos obses­sing into the wee hours about A-Lister backsc­ratching and Tech­no­rati ran­kings.
But on the front lines, it seems to me there’s something far more inte­res­ting going on. The vast, vast, vast majo­rity of good blog­gers I know are not doing it for links and cash, but for sim­ple more pri­mal rea­sons: the need to con­nect. The need to love.
Love and good­will are dri­ving this revo­lu­tion. The sel­fish will be left behind.

March 15, 2007

back in miami…

miamibeach233.jpg
[Miami Beach– the view from the condo.]
Arri­ved back in Miami last night after a very heady 3 days at SXSW in Aus­tin, Texas. Here’s some thoughts on the event, in no par­ti­cu­lar order:
1. It’s the first time I’d been back in Aus­tin since 1999. For those of you who don’t know, I atten­ded Uni­ve­risty of Texas there in the 1980’s, so I know the town well. It was a lot nicer than I remem­ber it… I think that has more to do with me chan­ging, than it chan­ging etc.
2. Back in college I used to draw car­toons for The Aus­tin Chro­nicle. This car­toon here, which this web­site was named after, appea­red there in 1987.
3. Two days ago I had a lovely lunch with Robert Sco­ble and a cou­ple of other friends. Ariel Wald­man, one of my favo­rite blog­gers at the moment was also with us, and took some pho­tos.
4. I have to say, the panel I was on went bet­ter than I expec­ted. It was the first time I met the other peo­ple on it– Dave, Gabe and Kathy, in the flesh. Dave has already writ­ten a nice synop­sis here.
5. Other synopsis’s of the panel here, here and here.
6. There were a lot of great things said by every­body on the panel, but the thing I took away the most was Kathy Sierra’s tip on the impor­tance of “gra­ti­tude” towards one’s audience. It’s so easy to take one’s audience for gran­ted etc. Never a good idea etc.
7. I was very touched that both Tara and Chris came along to the panel, and asked ques­tions at the end. Thanks, Guys…
8. It was seriously cool to hang out and drink cock­tails with John T. Unger and Tony Pierce, among two of my favo­rite blog­gers.
9. Funny story, as told by NPR’s Andy Carvin:

So Chuck Olsen and I had just finished shoo­ting our inter­view with Dan Rather and we were having a drink at the Omni Hotel in Aus­tin, uploa­ding the foo­tage to his lap­top. Then a scruffy guy with an odd American-Scottish accent came over to us and send he was a blog­ger atten­ding the “S-X-S-W” con­fe­rence. We weren’t sure what to make of him but he was nice enough. Then just as he was get­ting ready to leave, Chuck noti­ced he was wea­ring Stormhoek Winery shirt drawn by Hugh Mac­leod of Gaping Void fame.
“Are you a fan of Gaping Void?” Chuck asked.
“I am Gaping Void,” the scruffy Scots­man replied. “I’m Hugh Macleod.”

10. Andy Carvin’s video inter­view of me is here.
10. Tony Pierce inter­vie­wed me here for LAist.
11. The con­fe­rence was HUGE. Appa­rently it’s the lar­gest inte­rac­tive con­fe­rence of its kind anywhere. I can’t wait till next year.

March 13, 2007

austin update


[Texas rain, about an hour ago.]
In Aus­tin Texas. Too busy to write anything. If you’re trying to reach me, again, my num­ber is (646) 704 4509.

March 12, 2007

feldman-macleod

The Feldman-MacLeod Mutual Admi­ra­tion Society con­ti­nues una­ba­ted.
Actually, what Loren Feld­man is doing I think is really impor­tant, even if he’s not quite on “The Sphere’s” radar quite yet.
Just give it time, Lad­die, just give it time…

miami update…

southbeach238.jpg
[A 30th-floor condo view of down­town Miami, from South Beach.]
Had lunch in New York. Currently in Miami on busi­ness. Flying to Aus­tin tomo­rrow mor­ning. Inter­na­tio­nal man of mys­tery etc etc.
[Bonus Link:] It seems ever­yone at SXSW is going nuts over Twit­ter.
Fair enough. One thing you even­tually learn about us Web 2.0 crowd, if you hang out with us for long enough: If we don’t have something to go nuts over every cou­ple of weeks, we start get­ting antsy.
“The memory of a gold­fish, with a bizmodel-on-steroids appli­ca­tion” etc.
“All is vanity” etc.
“Plus ca change” etc.
“I have the need, the need to feed” etc.
You get the picture.

March 11, 2007

new u.s. phone number: (646) 704 4509

stormhoeknnyny.jpg
[Stormhoek Pino­tage is now avai­la­ble in New York… at Best Cellars on Lexing­ton Ave.]
I’ve finally got­ten my new US cellphone. If you want to reach me while I’m on this side of the pond, my num­ber now is (646) 704 4509.
Catching plane to Aus­tin tomo­rrow. Arrive around lunch­time. If you’re in town feel free to give me a call.
P.S. Marshall’s got a good synop­sis of last night’s New York geek din­ner. Kudos to B.L. for orga­ni­zing it.

March 10, 2007

new york update…

chryslerbuilding%20688.jpg
[This photo was taken yes­ter­day.]
1. So I’ve been in my belo­ved New York for roughly 24 hours, after an absence of seven years [I lived in Manhat­tan bet­ween Christ­mas 1997 and Sep­tem­ber 1999]. Besi­des the late, lamen­ted World Trade Cen­ter no lon­ger being here, it is remar­ka­ble how little has chan­ged. Most of my old han­gouts are still live and kic­king, with often the same peo­ple wor­king there. Con­si­de­ring how much I’ve seen Lon­don change over the last decade, it seems rather odd at first. But on another level, I find it quite reas­su­ring.
2. After being here for about an hour, I rea­li­zed that the New York I spent seven years mis­sing so terribly was all inside my own head.
3. Wal­king around Union Square yes­ter­day, I rea­li­zed how much my old job here suc­ked. Dread­ful. Appa­lling. Lousy. I feel so lucky to be doing what I’m doing now.
4. The last time I was here I didn’t have a blog. Hell, I didn’t even have my own web­site. Somehow I find that idea utterly biza­rre.
5. I didn’t look up any friends from the old days. I’m easy enough to find on Goo­gle. Hell, I’m easy enough to find on Goo­gle, even if you spell my name wrong. If they cared, if I cared, we would’ve hoo­ked up again by now. And so much has chan­ged since then. Wha­te­ver.
6. Thanks to Andrei for invi­ting me to his girlfriend’s birth­day party last night. I had a lovely time. Lovely peo­ple. Thank you.
7. I lost my cre­dit card. Don’t worry, I’ve taken care of the pro­blem, but for a few minu­tes there, I had panic flash­backs of New York in 1997, when I had just arri­ved. When I was poor, lonely and des­pe­rate.
8. Wal­king around cons­tantly reminds me of the sec­ret rea­sons why I left New York back in 1999, and my veins pump veno­mous, silent rage towards cer­tain peo­ple who are still not com­ple­tely for­gi­ven.
9. I’d for­got­ten how lousy the food is here. Living in Europe has spoi­led me.
10. I’d for­got­ten how bru­tal and ugly and tatty this town is in pla­ces. But I guess all big cities are.
11. I fell in love with New York once. But one day I came home to find her in bed with someone else. Don’t even ask.
12. For all the per­so­nal bag­gage I have with the place, it’s great to be here again. I love this city. It’s one of the few towns one can never accuse of being ove­rra­ted.
P.S. Looks like the geek din­ner tonight is set for about 20 peo­ple. Should be fun!

March 9, 2007

new york update…

Just had lunch with Steve Rubel and his boss, Rick. Inte­res­ting stuff, most of which I’ll keep off the record.
But really fric­kin’ won­der­ful, I have to say… and so great to meet Steve in per­son, finally.
Tonight I’m just han­ging out in the Village tonight, visi­ting my old haunts. I don’t have my new phone sim­card yet, but if anyone wants to reach me, you can text me at +44 770 309 9462.

i’m in new york!

zzzzazzdggg79.jpg
(Early lami­na­ted busi­ness card dra­wing. NYNY, 1998. Drawn sit­ting at the lunch coun­ter here)
I arri­ved in New York safely. Sta­ying the night in Long Island then hea­ding into the city tomo­rrow mor­ning.
Appa­rently we’ve been having tech­ni­cal trou­bles with the sign-up wiki for Satur­day night’s geek din­ner. If you’re plan­ning on coming, please e-mail BL Och­man and let her know– so she can tell the res­tau­rant how many to expect etc.
Tomo­rrow I’ll have a new US sim card so anyone wishing to phone me will be able to do so.
It’s great being back here… and also kinda weird. Just in case you don’t know, it’s been seven, yes, seven years since I last step­ped foot in the Uni­ted Sta­tes. Which is quite a long time for someone hol­ding an Ame­ri­can passport…

March 8, 2007

welcome to the ‘sphere, mark

backwards.jpg
Hey, all you A-List mar­ke­ting blog­gers, you’d bet­ter watch out. You’ve now got some serious com­pe­ti­tion.
Mark Earls, the author of just about my all-time favo­rite mar­ke­ting book, has star­ted a blog:

“Herd — the hid­den truth about who we are.”

Just added Mark to my blo­groll. Rock on.
[Bonus Link:] Mark spea­king on You­Tube. Video shot by Lloyd Davis.

wine relief cartoon & wine auction

crossblogauction_hughredose_350.jpg
[This is the car­toon in ques­tion etc.]
For Wine Relief [a sub­set of Comic Relief] I’ve dona­ted one of my car­toons for a cha­rity auc­tion. Details here.

Car­too­nist and blog­ger Hugh Mac­Leod of gapingvoid.com and Stormhoek.com fame has drawn a spe­cial Wine Relief car­toon, and wine expert and jour­na­list Tim Atkin has spe­cially selec­ted 12 bott­les of wine from his cellar in aid of Wine Relief.
And we’re brin­ging them together in what may be a web first — a “Cross-Blog-Auction”, where the highest bid­der will win the fan­tas­tic prize of Hugh’s car­toon (above) plus Tim’s wine (lis­ted below)!

It’s all in aid of a good cause, so I hope you’ll check it out. Thanks.
[N.B. I shall also be cross-posting this on to Stormhoek.com]

March 7, 2007

“nyc geek dinner with hugh macleod this saturday night!”

geekdinner1235.jpg
B. L. Och­man has kindly orga­ni­sed a geek din­ner in New York for me this Satur­day night.
Where: Two Boots Pizza, in Grand Cen­tral Sta­tion.
When: 7.30pm.

If you fancy coming along, please sign up on the wiki. I look for­ward to seeing you there!

fast times at stormhoek high

powerpoint322-thumb221.jpg
Two days ago I star­ted work at 8am. I finished work at 5.30am yes­ter­day mor­ning. That’s kind of how it’s been around here recently.
The com­bi­na­tion of so many things going on [moving into a new flat, the film, the day job, me going to Ame­rica tomo­rrow night etc] has made it impos­si­ble to write pro­perly, let alone draw car­toons.
Sure, there’s a lot of good stuff going on, but I’m still hoping to get back to more car­too­ning by this time next week. For all the other things I get up to– mar­ke­ting, blog­ging, etc– I’m a car­too­nist first and fore­most, and I would be loathe to do anything that would make me for­get that.
I’m off to New York tomo­rrow. First time there in years. Having lunch with Steve Rubel on Fri­day.
Fast Times At Stormhoek High etc.

March 5, 2007

a quick question to jeff jarvis


Last night over din­ner I asked Jeff Jar­vis a quick ques­tion…
Also, thanks to David Brain at Edel­man Lon­don for invi­ting me to their wee break­fast talk with Jeff Jar­vis this mor­ning. Great stuff [David has already got­ten it up onto You­Tube here].
[Bonus Link:] PC World publishes “The 50 Most Impor­tant Peo­ple on the Web”. Con­grats to Robert, Gabe, Mike and Nick for making the list.
[NEWSFLASH:] Robert and Mar­yam Sco­ble are expec­ting their first child! Con­gra­tu­la­tions!

cath and colin


Two of my favo­rite peo­ple, Cathe­rine and Colin, in the Stormhoek Lon­don office today.

j.p. rangaswami answers a question


[J.P.‘s blog is here.]

ingredientx.com

ingredientx325.jpg
This is the fun­niest web­site ever. I espe­cially recom­mend “Jea­lous”.
[Cough:] Not exactly safe for work, but not too extreme, either. Thanks to Colin for the link.

March 4, 2007

sunday lunchtime

sexis123.jpg
Sun­day lunch­time. Here’s a list of the usual detri­tus:
1. Both my wri­ting and car­too­ning have been on a rather low ebb these last cou­ple of weeks. I guess that’s nor­mal, life’s been busy. Wri­ting and car­too­ning both take a lot of soli­tude and quiet. I’ve not had much of either since early January.
2. I’ve just moved into my new flat in Holland Park [West Lon­don, very near Not­ting Hill] this wee­kend. Very exci­ting.
3. I’m going to Ame­rica on Fri­day. New York, Miami, and spea­king on a panel at SXSW in Aus­tin [Tues­day 13th March at 5pm] with David Par­met, Kathy Sie­rra and Gabe Rivera.
4. Today I went and wor­ked out with a per­so­nal trai­ner at the gym. It’s an expen­sive way to get exer­cise, but it’s worth it. My trai­ner, James thinks I can easily get back to my old form [Bench pres­sing 8 x 245 lbs was my record back then]. The wea­kest link in the chain is my wrists. They’re not up to the job of hef­ting the weights I hope to be mas­te­ring before too long.
5. Sleep, time and money have become much more impor­tant to me in the last 5 years.
6. I’m mee­ting Jeff Jar­vis for din­ner tonight. Though we’ve spo­ken exten­si­vely via phone and e-mail over the years, this will be the first time we’ve actually met in per­son. I met Mike Arring­ton under simi­lar cir­cums­tan­ces a few weeks ago, who comes to Lon­don a cou­ple of times a year.

March 1, 2007

mr. hell on dvd

mh_blacklookgrey.jpg

[UPDATE: “Mr Hell’s Science”. A six-minute car­toon sketch on You­Tube.]
In the early ‘nine­ties, I crea­ted a car­toon cha­rac­ter on the back of a nap­kin called “Mr Hell”.
Think “Evil Hugh Mac­Leod with all the nice bits remo­ved” and, well, you get the idea.
By 2000, thanks mostly to the intre­pid efforts of my TV direc­tor pal, David Freed­man and his wri­ting part­ner, Alan Gil­bey, our little red friend ended up as an ani­ma­ted sketch series on the BBC. With Bob Monkhouse as the voice of my alter ego, ima­gine that!
The entire series of 13 half hour shows is now avai­la­ble on DVD. Very cool.
[Bonus Links:]
1. Sha­me­less Mr Hell DVD plug/article on Fan­go­ria:

The cult Bri­tish ani­ma­tion AAAGH! IT’S THE MR. HELL SHOW! is finally being relea­sed on DVD in its home country next month, after seven years in legal limbo. Com­mis­sio­ned by the BBC as the world’s first pri­me­time ani­ma­ted sketch show, the series was buried in the sche­du­les when the exe­cu­ti­ves saw how vio­lent it was. With an ave­rage of 19 onsc­reen deaths in each of its half-hour epi­so­des, MR. HELL is belie­ved to be the most vio­lent and blood­soa­ked car­toon ever broad­cast on mains­tream television.”

2. Mr. Hell Wiki­pe­dia entry.