January 14, 2007

random notes on blogging

talktalk48.jpg
Ran­dom Notes On Blog­ging.
1. The First Rule of Blog­ging: “Blogs don’t write them­sel­ves.” It’s the har­dest and most frus­tra­ting part of pro­fes­sio­nally hel­ping others to blog.
2. Most blog­gers I have met I would desc­ribe as smart, decent, pas­sio­nate peo­ple. This inc­lu­des blog­gers that I don’t par­ti­cu­larly like on a per­so­nal level. I have yet to meet a blog­ger who I would desc­ribe as a “Tho­rough­bred Scum­bag”.
3. Blog­ging is an art, same as any other method of self-expression. Some are bet­ter at it than others.
4. Stay as honest as you can, for as long as you can. Once you cross the line it’s hard to go back.
5. A lot of serious blog­gers became so because frankly, they had a lot of time on their hands. And often there were good rea­sons for that.
6. Blog­ging is a great way to make things hap­pen indi­rectly. I say that all the time, and will KEEP saying it till peo­ple finally get it [I’m not hol­ding my breath].
7. Far too much time and energy is spent watching peo­ple make money directly off their blogs [e.g. via adver­ti­sing reve­nues etc], as oppo­sed to indi­rectly [e.g. beco­ming an autho­rity on something, and using said autho­rity to enhance your already-existing busi­ness]. I believe the lat­ter [which Doc Searls call The “Because” Effect] is a far more plea­sant, effec­tive and likely way to suc­ceed.
8. So you a read lot of A-Listers. Con­gra­tu­la­tions. You now know a lot of stuff every­body else knows.
9. It’s damn hard not to read a lot of A-Listers. They got to where they are for a rea­son.
10. I hardly ever leave com­ments on other people’s blogs any more.
11. If some­body makes a harsh remark about me in the com­ments or somewhere else, usually my first reac­tion is to ask, “Yeah, and what is it THAT YOU DO that is so fuc­king inte­res­ting, Asshole?”
12. Cube-dwellers-with-attitude are pathe­tic.
13. When I first star­ted blog­ging, I was living the Cum­brian boo­nies, being a bit of a rec­luse. When busi­ness finally pic­ked up, as I star­ted tra­ve­ling more often and mee­ting more peo­ple, my “audience” became far less abs­tract to me. Conc­lu­sion: It’s far nicer wri­ting for real peo­ple that you know per­so­nally, than for demo­graphic “eye­balls”. I think when tal­king about the for­mer, Doc Searls’ embo­dies this bet­ter than any one I know.
14. I agree with Doc Searls’ thought that “Wuf­fie is ear­ned”.
15. Why aren’t there more women blog­gers in the circ­les I tra­vel in? The ans­wer is a three-letter word, begin­ning with the let­ter “M”.
16. The day you can write as com­pe­llingly and con­sis­tently as say, Kathy Sie­rra, Jeff Jar­vis, Guy Kawa­saki or Michael Arring­ton, will be the day I start taking your com­plaints of low traf­fic seriously.
17. Cor­po­rate Ame­rica doesn’t really like blogs. Like I care.
18. If your goal is to have a large, influen­tial online rea­dership, I’d say give your­self five years. That’s how long it took Om Malik. Some do it in less, of course, but they seem to be quite excep­tio­nal.
19. For us serious blog evan­ge­lists, it’s temp­ting to think “Every­body should have a blog”. About as temp­ting as the thought, “Every­body should be able to write well.” And about as rea­lis­tic.
20. Blog­ging will never be a mains­tream acti­vity so long as being able to write [A] well, [B] often and [C] about stuff THAT PEOPLE ACTUALLY CARE ABOUT remain the main barriers to entry.
21. Barely a week goes by without me con­tem­pla­ting per­ma­nently tur­ning off the com­ment sec­tion.
22. How to know you’ve arri­ved: When you sud­denly rea­lize that to stop blog­ging would be tan­ta­mount to an act of eco­no­mic sui­cide. That moment came for me at Les Blogs 1, in Paris back in early 2005.
23. Another way to know you’ve arri­ved: When you rea­lize that every busi­ness rela­tionship you’ve esta­blished in the last twelve months was a direct result of blog­ging.
24. You think A-Listers are arro­gant bas­tards? You should meet the B-List.
25. There is no A-List. If you think there is, you’ve mis­sed the whole point.
26. There is an A-List. Fuck with us and we’ll have you des­tro­yed like stray dogs.
27. The best way to raise you pro­file in the blo­gosphere [besi­des wri­ting good stuff] is to attend the various con­fe­ren­ces; the more, the merrier. I am [at least] fifty times more likely to link to you if I’ve already met you in real life. The other good way is to attend the geek din­ners.
28. I wish I were bet­ter at lin­king to other peo­ple. The list of peo­ple I should have lin­ked to, but haven’t, would fill a phone book.
29. Sixty million blogs. Sixty million busi­ness models.
30. Yes, the blo­gosphere is a great place to get laid. No, I’m not telling you how I found this out.
31. If you ever for­get your man­ners, you will pay, and quickly.
32. You are not car­ving in stone. You die, the blog dies.
33. It’s temp­ting to think that peo­ple read your blog. Sadly, they don’t. They skim them. So always make your con­tent skim-friendly. Write it with “skim­ma­bilty” baked-in.
34. Any­body who har­bors the idea that Madi­son Ave­nue EVEN SLIGHTLY unders­tands the inter­net is a fool. I’ve been loo­king for YEARS for evi­dence to the con­trary and simply can’t find any.
35. In this internet-enabled world of ours, Madison’s Avenue’s loss is PR’s gain. Which is why, as a for­mer adver­ti­sing hack, I follow the Edel­man story very clo­sely.
36. Get­ting other peo­ple to “blog for you” is a big mis­take.
37. Z-Listers are every bit as sel­fish, self-important and psycho­lo­gi­cally fla­wed as A-Listers. Except the for­mer don’t have large armies of peo­ple with real and ima­gi­ned incen­ti­ves for trip­ping them up.
38. I like and res­pect Robert Sco­ble a lot, but I find his high tole­rance for trolls in his com­ments bor­de­ring on the cli­ni­cally insane.
39. If a blog doesn’t allow com­ments, then yes, it’s still a blog. Peo­ple who say other­wise are just get­ting in touch with their “Inner Idea­lis­tic Wan­ker”.
40. When peo­ple ask me what the future of media is, I always ans­wer, “RSS”. Thank you, Winer & Co. Seriously.
41. Most of the stuff on this list is wrong.

38 Responses to “random notes on blogging”

  1. Josh says:

    10. I hardly ever leave com­ments on other people’s blogs any more.
    Is this because you no lon­ger see any rea­son to (for rea­sons of self inte­rest) or because you feel those lea­ving com­ments at your blog are bor­der­line worth­less and you don’t want to add to the detri­tus elsewhere?
    Or something else entirely?

  2. hugh macleod says:

    Mainly because if I see something I feel strongly about, it’ll result in either my own blog post about the sub­ject, or an e-mail…

  3. I’m sure you mis­sed something there, or maybe I just nod­ded off :-)
    Oh I remem­ber — what is it about your blog that makes me read 41 points?

  4. Joaquín says:

    I love the way you don´t love your love for com­ments in your blog.

  5. jon kudelka says:

    The ans­wer to 15 is moo, right?

  6. Dannie Jost says:

    Exce­llent ran­do­min­za­tion of assor­ted loose thoughts about blog­ging!
    Uhm… I like your two cents on com­ments. I have, at best, una­dul­te­ra­ted ambi­guity when it comes to com­ments. One of my favou­rite blog­gers has them off, and I like that. You don’t… but I do not think it would make a dif­fe­rence if you did.

  7. John says:

    Wow, car­toon feed­back. In color.

  8. John Dodds says:

    I agree enti­rely with point 41 and refer you to my semi­nal post entit­led the rules of blog club! But point 7 is unde­nia­ble and a loo­ming pro­blem I think.

  9. Hugh, you should have star­ted with a ran­dom note #0: Start rea­ding at ran­dom note #41. ;-) )

  10. simply scott says:

    So, I ran across this blog a little while back, but I keep coming back because it’s inte­res­ting and I really like the busi­ness card art. I have tried to take my blog seriously for a while, but I keep coming and going with it, so I will have to decide what to do. Other­wise, I only blog because I love to write, and I only read them because I love good wri­ting.
    http://somebodyshero.blogspot.com/

  11. hugh macleod says:

    “Other­wise, I only blog because I love to write, and I only read them because I love good wri­ting.”
    Scott, methinks those are the only real rea­sons you need, frankly ;-)

  12. John says:

    You get my vote for vir­tual blog mentor.

  13. #32 — except you live in the hearts and minds of the peo­ple you touched while doing it. That is the legacy any­way; it starts on the inside.

  14. chantel says:

    I like the feed­back of my rea­ders because I can’t meet them all and some­ti­mes one wouldn’t want too; com­ments is a way for me to stay in touch. Although I do agree, blog­ging has led to a lot of indi­rect growth.

  15. Hans says:

    > 41. Most of the stuff on this list is wrong.
    But 34 and 35 are not. Madi­son Ave­nue knows how to shout, which is no lon­ger the only, nor even the most effec­tive, means of get­ting your mes­sage spread through the market.

  16. Hervé says:

    The First Rule of Blog­ging: “Blogs don’t write them­sel­ves.” This seems obvious, but how this is true !!! As for 41, I would add : and find out which are true.

  17. Sissy Willis says:

    Girls just wanna have fun.

  18. Aircraft Guy says:

    Hey, Just found the site… Love the dra­wings. Thanks…
    Justin

  19. kosso says:

    Unfor­tu­na­tely BILF.com is taken ;)

  20. point 24 — so true.

  21. Kathy Sierra says:

    > 41. Most of the stuff on this list is wrong.
    Thank GOD I read to the end… here I was almost ready to sleep with you after #16.
    ; )

  22. Tony Chung says:

    Great post Hugh, you make some exce­llent points.
    One of my favo­ri­tes is #33. So very true.

  23. Bloody won­der­ful, as (almost) always.
    Reminds me a little of Chris Pirillo’s (or even John Dodd’s) “Rules of Blog Club”

  24. UAE Students says:

    I’m a Middle East Blog­ger. I leave com­ments with the faint hope that someone new will dis­co­ver my blog.
    That doesn’t make a sha­llow blog­ger, does it?

  25. raincoaster says:

    I think Point #42 is that, no mat­ter how far you think you’ve got­ten from your nerdy roots, #42 will always hold sig­ni­fi­cance, even if only mea­nin­gless significance.

  26. dizzy says:

    * you are not as witty as you’d like to be.
    * it is VERY unli­kely you will ever make money from blog­ging.
    * polish your wri­ting!
    * polish your wri­ting again!
    * polish your wri­ting again again!
    * tell me something NEW.

  27. Deanna says:

    Regar­ding #38 — it may be the very fact that Robert has met & got­ten to know so very many peo­ple; THAT is why he allows the com­ments. As he recently com­men­ted, even those who are his so called haters can actually be char­ming and like him in person.

  28. AHCB says:

    I write a small niche blog about life in New York’s famed Hotel Chel­sea. I totally agree that the indi­rect bene­fits are worth far more than the ad revenues.

  29. I am loo­king for­ward to atten­ding my first blog con­fe­rence in February, Northern Voice. Which con­fe­ren­ces (#27) can you recommend?

  30. K says:

    Enjo­yed the rest of the list but the “there are no female blog­gers out there” myth is get­ting old. And no, we aren’t all mommy bloggers.

  31. Lacey says:

    I am not a geek , nor is my blog filled with des­pe­rate musings of my angst-filled life. In fact, my blog is but gig­gles and non­sense, with nothing more than perhaps twice yearly “per­so­nal” con­tent from me.
    Today,for exam­ple, I pos­ted valua­ble infor­ma­tion on how to become your own grand­father, hap­pily spon­so­red by the Red­neck Trai­ler Park Inbree­ders Assoc. I think society needs to know this.
    Does this mean I need to stop refe­rring to myself as a blog­ger and perhaps call myself a noggin-bloggin wan­nabe?
    Does a blog on Yahoo actually COUNT as a blog? Or am I simply delu­ding myself?
    One point of inte­rest tho… it doesn’t count as “get­ting laid” if you are sit­ting at your com­pu­ter screen typing with one hand.
    And yes, the rea­son I am at Yahoo, is that it is so appro­priatly tit­led. ;o)

  32. alan patrick says:

    Good points all, except for the one on com­ments (No. 39). You noted:
    “39. If a blog doesn’t allow com­ments, then yes, it’s still a blog. Peo­ple who say other­wise are just get­ting in touch with their “Inner Idea­lis­tic Wan­ker”.
    Nope, I think its get­ting in touch with your rea­ders ;)
    To me the point of blog­ging is inte­rac­ti­vity rather than mo’ megaphone media. Not quite cer­tain what the effec­tive dif­fe­rence bet­ween an old fashio­ned web­site and a blog with no com­ments is.?
    I think having a blog *without* com­ments is like wan­king — you have no part­ner in your social intercourse.

  33. hugh macleod says:

    “I think having a blog *without* com­ments is like wan­king — you have no part­ner in your social inter­course.”
    Ooh… I have to go wash my mouth out with soap just for READING that sen­tence ;-)

  34. alan patrick says:

    Wash it out with Pino­tage ins­tead ;)

  35. Jim Turner says:

    The ans­wer to the mea­ning of life is 42.

  36. Sarah says:

    Insis­ting on com­ments has always struck me as weird. The web was inte­rac­tive before com­ments. If some­body really wants to join the con­ver­sa­tion, she can start her own blog.

  37. charlie says:

    Thanks for the insights from your experience