<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: use you</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gapingvoid.com/2007/01/11/use-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2007/01/11/use-you/</link>
	<description>&#34;cartoons drawn on the back of business cards&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:17:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Plummer</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2007/01/11/use-you/#comment-16556</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Plummer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 05:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=3429#comment-16556</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love the raw format if there were not a secondary outline around the image. One or the other.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’d love the raw format if there were not a secondary outline around the image. One or the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dawbie</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2007/01/11/use-you/#comment-16555</link>
		<dc:creator>dawbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 07:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=3429#comment-16555</guid>
		<description>Oh my!  I thought that said &quot;bush&quot;.....oops.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my!  I thought that said “bush”.….oops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guruzilla</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2007/01/11/use-you/#comment-16554</link>
		<dc:creator>Guruzilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=3429#comment-16554</guid>
		<description>Sorry, afraid I&#039;m in the &quot;old school&quot; camp -- it definitely looked much better, imho.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, afraid I’m in the “old school” camp — it definitely looked much better, imho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirk Stoop</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2007/01/11/use-you/#comment-16553</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirk Stoop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 07:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=3429#comment-16553</guid>
		<description>I prefer it &gt;100 times over the tablet images.
the feel of ink/paper suits your style better imo.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer it &gt;100 times over the tablet images.<br />
the feel of ink/paper suits your style better imo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug V</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2007/01/11/use-you/#comment-16552</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 05:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=3429#comment-16552</guid>
		<description>The new raw format look amateur and poorly produced.
The previous &#039;clean&#039; versions looked fantastic (and they looked great pasted into emails).  Now I&#039;d be tempted to clean them up before sending them to anyone..
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new raw format look amateur and poorly produced.<br />
The previous ‘clean’ versions looked fantastic (and they looked great pasted into emails).  Now I’d be tempted to clean them up before sending them to anyone..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2007/01/11/use-you/#comment-16551</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=3429#comment-16551</guid>
		<description>I like it -- they look more like &quot;cartoons drawn on the back of business cards&quot; now, and I love the grain of paper.
I&#039;m betting, though, that widget users prefer the old style, since it might incorporate more easily into blog layouts. And back on white is easier to reproduce.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it — they look more like “cartoons drawn on the back of business cards” now, and I love the grain of paper.<br />
I’m betting, though, that widget users prefer the old style, since it might incorporate more easily into blog layouts. And back on white is easier to reproduce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marti</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2007/01/11/use-you/#comment-16550</link>
		<dc:creator>Marti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 23:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=3429#comment-16550</guid>
		<description>I like it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Em</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2007/01/11/use-you/#comment-16549</link>
		<dc:creator>Em</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=3429#comment-16549</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with Richard - the clean look is better for wallpaper (my work desktop is now &quot;the next google&quot;)
... though the organic look is a little more anarchic (&quot;clean lines? Not on *my* desktop!&quot; etc)
Em
x
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m with Richard — the clean look is better for wallpaper (my work desktop is now “the next google”)<br />
… though the organic look is a little more anarchic (“clean lines? Not on *my* desktop!” etc)<br />
Em<br />
x</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sumeet</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2007/01/11/use-you/#comment-16548</link>
		<dc:creator>Sumeet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=3429#comment-16548</guid>
		<description>I like the old style better. It&#039;s easier to reproduce on posters, cards, etc.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the old style better. It’s easier to reproduce on posters, cards, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fredd Kambo</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2007/01/11/use-you/#comment-16547</link>
		<dc:creator>Fredd Kambo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=3429#comment-16547</guid>
		<description>I love it, removing the unnecessary to add the meaningful etc.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it, removing the unnecessary to add the meaningful etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas R. Clifford</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2007/01/11/use-you/#comment-16546</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas R. Clifford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 20:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=3429#comment-16546</guid>
		<description>I like the space.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shripriya</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2007/01/11/use-you/#comment-16545</link>
		<dc:creator>Shripriya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=3429#comment-16545</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve posted your stuff on blogs and emailed them to friends. I think the old format works better for these purposes. For example if I were to use one of these as a wallpaper, the old format works better.
While I agree that the message is the most important , it also matters how people use it to share/communicate.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve posted your stuff on blogs and emailed them to friends. I think the old format works better for these purposes. For example if I were to use one of these as a wallpaper, the old format works better.<br />
While I agree that the message is the most important , it also matters how people use it to share/communicate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2007/01/11/use-you/#comment-16544</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=3429#comment-16544</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m a fan of quick and dirty (draw it, scan it, post it) so i like it.  fussy while increasing aesthetics doesn&#039;t add to content, and i&#039;m all about the message, story, inspiration, lesson etc...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i’m a fan of quick and dirty (draw it, scan it, post it) so i like it.  fussy while increasing aesthetics doesn’t add to content, and i’m all about the message, story, inspiration, lesson etc…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2007/01/11/use-you/#comment-16543</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=3429#comment-16543</guid>
		<description>Sorry to be a PITA, but I liked the old style much better, especially for wallpaper use.
Love the blog, though.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to be a PITA, but I liked the old style much better, especially for wallpaper use.<br />
Love the blog, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: poldraw</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2007/01/11/use-you/#comment-16542</link>
		<dc:creator>poldraw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=3429#comment-16542</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s organic, and organic things are pleasant.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s organic, and organic things are pleasant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

