January 2, 2007

ok, so what’s the deal…

hardwired316.jpg
…When all you’re trying to do is be a good boyfriend/girlfriend/lover etc, and all the other per­son seems to want to do is drive you nuts?
Is there’s some kind of “It’s impe­ra­tive that I drive your nuts” gene that we inhe­ri­ted from the chimps? Were chimps ever that crazy? What’s the deal with that?
Also, a female friend asked me this last night:
Why is it that so many super-smart women inva­riably insist on being smart in every aspect of their life, EXCEPT when it comes to dating?
“Hi, sorry, but you’re not STUPID or DAMAGED or POVERTY-STRICKEN or INEFFECTUAL enough for me. Get lost.”
Here’s my short ans­wer: Fema­les are gene­rally not encou­ra­ged by society to be super-smart, at least, not overtly. And ESPECIALLY not in the techie/geeky super-smart way.
So as a result, by the time these super-smart young girl geeks have grown up to be women, society will have mana­ged to inject them with all sorts of serious self-esteem issues. Which rarely comes in handy in the mate-choosing depart­ment.
Just my opinion.

24 Responses to “ok, so what’s the deal…”

  1. Oh heck, it sounds like you just met my sis­ter! Worst taste in men ever. She never picks anyone that would actually be good for her.

  2. Leah says:

    I think you’ve been rea­ding my diary again, Hugh.

  3. Michael Neel says:

    the techie/geeky super-smart guys rarely dis­play out­ward con­fi­dence — a trait many women find more attrac­tive than looks. the jerks have the out­ward con­fi­dence even if they lack the jus­ti­fi­ca­tions.
    to any techie/geeky super-smart guys rea­ding this, nail the con­fi­dence and you’ll nail the chicks.

  4. futuregirl says:

    Hugh, I think you hit the nail on the head.

  5. Nia says:

    I agree with you and I have one more rea­son.
    Most men are inti­mi­da­ted by super-smart women. They don’t deal easily with being outshi­ned by a part­ner. This redu­ces dras­ti­cally the amount of men avai­la­ble to those women.

  6. hugh macleod says:

    Inte­res­ting point, Nia. Sort of like what Diana Vree­land, the for­mer edi­tor of U.S. Vogue once said:
    “I married beneath myself. All women do.”

  7. ariel says:

    Hmm… as a sin­gle, smart-tech/geek girl, I find this theory quite intriguing…

  8. Nia’s abso­lu­tely right: It’s very, very hard for a smart woman to find a man to “put up with” her, unless she’s willing to act dumb (and who wants to do that for a life­time?).
    But hang in there, smart girls — some­day your prince will come, most likely when you’re not actually loo­king for him. Had I been acti­vely see­king a hus­band, it would not have occu­rred to me to look at an Ita­lian mathematician!

  9. connectogon says:

    And it’s a damn good thing too. If I didn’t have the con­so­la­tion of being able to date way out of my lea­gue I’d have little con­so­la­tion for being a fai­led artist/menial labou­rer at 31.
    They never stay though.

  10. Pam says:

    This is really bug­ging me and I thin­king I’m star­ting to figure out why. Nerdy/Smart girls often scare the crap out of guys who don’t want to hang out with chicks who are smar­ter than they are.
    Per­fectly decent guys high­tail it the other direc­tion when faced with a woman who will rebuild her own com­pu­ter or write her own code. What’s left? Other nerds (who often have lousy social skills, sorry, and a bin full of seconds.
    Or, what Nia said.

  11. candice says:

    Nia, I’d second that. I work as a pro­gram­mer in a city where most of the men my age cook and wait tables for a living. It gets weird. Fin­ding one that isn’t inti­mi­da­ted and is actually ambi­tious is difficult.

  12. Truth? There’s no accoun­ting for taste or che­mistry.
    That said, a woman’s che­mistry may some­ti­mes be jump star­ted by means of the catalyst of kno­wing a man’s inte­res­ted enough to take a gulp of vul­ne­ra­bi­lity and simply say, “I want you; let us go off together somewhere quiet & figure out why that’s so.”
    Spea­king of smart: wes­tern cul­ture has fai­led to value the brand of smart that goes beyond the collec­tion & reci­ta­tion of fac­toids. I know why that’s hap­pe­ned (edu­ca­tion), my ques­tion is how it’s impac­ted suc­cess, inc­lu­ding che­mi­cal attraction.

  13. Bob the milkman says:

    Smart men aren’t inti­mi­da­ted by smart women — they just get so anno­yed at those women telling ever­yone just how smart they are that they have the choice of either wal­king away or scoo­ping their brains out with a spork to relieve the pain.
    A truly smart woman knows that she doesn’t have to prove her inte­llect at every oppor­tu­nity and then blog about it over and over and over again on a blog that is only ever read by other “smart” women who agree com­ple­tely and also blog about it on their own blogs.

  14. ariel says:

    With the whole “inti­mi­da­tion” fac­tor — what woman would want a man that has that kind of issue any­way? If his dick shrinks because you’re smart, then leave the chump. And if you’re rela­tionships are always going wrong because you believe it’s about you being “smart” — you should re-evalutate, because it could be about the atti­tude you have about being smart.
    I think being smart isn’t unlike being beau­ti­ful — I (and maybe men, too) find it attrac­tive when someone isn’t enti­rely aware of ‘how great they are’.

  15. Sue says:

    Oh, give it a rest…to paraph­rase: “society has made us have low-self esteem…”
    That is really lame. Being human is hard. Being a full human when the ads all show inhu­manly fit/attractive folk having a good time (when you feel small, poor or ina­de­quate etc.) is really hard. Try to rise above it but don’t for­get the peo­ple that didn’t make it because their expec­ta­tions were rai­sed too high by some sh*t trying to sell a Rolex or some other stu­pid bau­ble.
    Sorry, folks. I’m smart, happy, etc. now but wasn’t for­merly. Trust me, it does get better.

  16. Michael Neel says:

    The “guys don’t like smart women” sounds like a nice cover issue, that can hide the real rea­son for the rela­tionship pro­blems.
    Remem­ber the com­mon fac­tor in all your fai­led rela­tionships: you. (that applies to guys and gals)

  17. Sáray Réka says:

    it’ll be a true love!

  18. Jennifer says:

    In my expe­rience, very few smart men actually do want a smart woman. This is in part why my last ex fell into the “inef­fec­tual, poverty-stricken” cate­go­ries– NOBODY ELSE WOULD HAVE ME. If I date way below my “sta­tus,” I can actually get someone to date.
    Course, now I have quit dating enti­rely because I’m sick of peo­ple below me, and nobody equal or above me would have me. So, there ya go. No won­der we’re all neurotic.

  19. vixie says:

    Hey, Bob the Milk­man,
    You sound hot. Wanna screw? I won’t try to prove to you that I’m smart…only in bed. >:)
    Now women, don’t get your britches in a knot. I’m mostly kid­ding.
    But seriously, I agree with you Milk­man. The ones who try to prove they’re smart just come off loo­king like a bit­ter, ugly bitch. Then ever­yone looks at her thin­king, “Oh, no won­der why she’s still sin­gle.”
    Many “smart” women also don’t think it’s all that impor­tant to main­tain their appea­rance. What is up with that? Just because you think you’re smart doesn’t mean you have the right to do such dis­ser­vice to the gene­ral public! Grab some lip gloss for good­ness sakes!
    “Smart” women are such a pain in the ass, too. You try to have a con­ver­sa­tion with them, and when you offer a dif­fe­rent point of view, they POUNCE on you with their uber-multisyllabic words. Then you’re left resig­ning from the con­ver­sa­tion because it’s simply not worth your breath to con­ti­nue, and you think, “Ok, ok. You’ve suc­cess­fully pro­ven your stu­pi­dity.”
    In my expe­rience with guys, the ones who say they “want a smart woman who can debate the issues and main­tain an inte­res­ting con­ver­sa­tion” really mean they want someone who will be cha­llen­ging enough for enter­tain­ment but who they will ulti­ma­tely be able to defeat in the debate.
    Guys my age (early 20’s) tell me to my face that they are inti­mi­da­ted by my beauty and inte­lli­gence. And at this age, most have not achie­ved enough to feel they have enough clout to balance me out.
    The guys who do have the balls to pur­sue me and have the track record of achie­ve­ments along with the bank account to sup­port it are at least 10 years my senior and thus really creepy.
    (sigh) So what is a girl to do? My uncle tells me I will one day find the man who will cha­llenge me and feel equally cha­llen­ged by me, and that we will make each other very happy. But then again, he is my uncle.
    In any case, I hope he’s right.
    And I hope this is true for all the smart women rea­ding this (notice I didn’t use quo­tes, so I don’t mean the “smart” women). And when we find those won­der­ful men, perhaps we can all get together in the Medi­te­rra­nean for a fabu­lous party. =)
    Ciao.

  20. Aya says:

    Meh, if I wanna date, I’ll play by my rules. But, I’d much rather have a career.

  21. Keith Handy says:

    Male 2.0 isn’t inti­mi­da­ted by bri­lliant women.

  22. hugh macleod says:

    That’s right, Keith. Male 2.0 is inti­mi­da­ted by guys with big­ger dicks and bank accounts than them ;-)

  23. Moi says:

    Gah! we all have issues! :p

  24. derangedchicken says:

    Some of it is age/maturity. Ever­yone has to grow up before they are capa­ble of anything decent in terms of a rela­tionship.
    I don’t think (young) men were inti­mi­da­ted by my inte­lli­gence, so much as inti­mi­da­ted by my marria­ga­bi­lity. I was good enough to marry — it was no big thing — but I knew it, and they did too. So they ran. Makes sense, I mean, who wants to get married young?
    Now I’m hap­pily married to a man who loves that I’m smart and type A. It ena­bles him to be funny, laid-back, smart, and type B — which we both prefer.