December 9, 2006

shirts, shirts, shirts

1144466138.jpg
[Draf­ting pat­terns for bes­poke shirts. Worth their weight in gold, seriously.]
I’ve not writ­ten a lot about English Cut, my $4000 suit enter­prise I share with Savile Row tai­lor, Tho­mas Mahon for a while.
I guess there’s not really been a lot to write about, really. Tom’s been busy, and that’s about it. We’ve been at 100% capa­city for months now.
The bes­poke tai­lo­ring busi­ness doesn’t scale. It really doesn’t. Not unless you want to sac­ri­fice qua­lity big-time. And we don’t.
But this lack of sca­la­bi­lity is what also gives true Savile Row its uni­que charm. In a world of me-too mass pro­duc­tion, with luxury goods an inc­rea­singly dilu­ted, glo­ba­li­sed com­mo­dity, this is an ama­zing com­pe­ti­tive advan­tage, espe­cially for a tiny com­pany like ours.
So as I’ve fond of saying, we have to scale the busi­ness in other ways.
The fact is, we’re making the best suits in the world. Or if we’re not, we’re darn close to it. So we have to take the same atti­tude with the other pro­ducts. Either make the best, or don’t bother.
In 2007, we’ll be get­ting inc­rea­singly into the shirt busi­ness. We’re already making $300 hand-made shirts for our bes­poke suit clients, but there are other shirt oppor­tu­ni­ties out there which we’re pur­suing.
Think about it. We no lon­ger live in a cul­ture where wea­ring a suit and tie to the office is the norm. That being said, peo­ple still like wea­ring nice stuff. A pro­per English shirt goes great with a pair of jeans, good polished oxfords, with perhaps a bla­zer. It’s a clas­sic look for a rea­son. And I think for a small, exc­lu­sive per­cen­tage of the popu­la­tion, it’s a con­ver­sa­tion worth having.
I would like English Cut to be lea­ding this con­ver­sa­tion the future. In 5 years time, I’d like a lot of peo­ple to be saying, “Yeah, well, Tho­mas Pink is cool and all, but if you want the real deal, you have to go to English Cut.”
I think we can do it. I really do.

5 Responses to “shirts, shirts, shirts”

  1. Ian Green says:

    Hi Hugh,
    This is pretty much the co-creation argu­ment we are advo­ca­ting at the Lady­bank Com­pany of Dis­ti­llers with James Thom­son, where I am hel­ping out as a mem­ber and as the PR Man (yes I know!).
    With English Cut I believe you can create a great online com­mu­nity of peo­ple who really appre­ciate fine tai­lo­ring. I know of another tai­lor in Don­cas­ter, Yorkshire doing the same thing as English Cut and what he neatly illus­tra­tes is that peo­ple are pre­pa­red to ignore big brands for LOVE.
    Peo­ple want to engage with peo­ple who are going to make something for them out of an act of res­pect —  and to use your words “ena­gage in a con­ver­sa­tion”.
    I’m not a suit man myself and I’ve always thought that if I had a bes­poke suit made for me I would be spoi­led fore­ver — ie could never go back to off-the-peg.
    Howe­ver, having loo­ked at the English Cut blog I know that if I ever did order a suit off Tho­mas I would look like the Dog’s Bollocks. At pre­sent when I wear a suit I look like Gollum in a Suit — not nice!

  2. Dave Wheeler says:

    Hugh
    ,
    This is pro­bably going to sound like heresy but …
    what if you sca­led English Cut into “casual wear”? Once you have your customer’s mea­su­re­ments, how hard would it be to pro­vide MORE OF THEIR WARDROBE? Think “Share of clo­set”.
    I have spo­ken to some appa­rel peo­ple in the sta­tes and while I don’t wear them, there seems to be a HUGE mar­ket for VERY EXPENSIVE denim jeans. Most of the “cool” stuff is rela­ted to hip-hop artists, but if Savile Row did denim… that would be a BIG STORY!
    [insert “pro­per” res­ponse here .… “You are Crazy”… “That’s not in line with Savile Row”…etc.]
    Just an off-the-wall idea …
    Dave

  3. hmm — Tho­mas Pink is an Irish­man and I star­ted buying his shirts when he just had one Lon­don shop. He was a friend of a friend and so word quickly got around. Now they are owned by LVMH. I still buy their shirts. The other day I pulled out an old one that I hadn’t worn for years. I imme­dia­tey noti­ced that the cloth was bet­ter, the cut more gene­rous (length) and I rea­li­sed that their stan­dards had drop­ped. It seams that the carrier bags, bran­ding and image has got slic­ker while the pro­duct has slip­ped that mains­tream way. I will buy English Cut shirts  — if and when Tho­mas has the time.

  4. malcolm says:

    James — inte­res­ting to see you men­tion qua­lity of cloth. I have an English Cut shirt and more on order. The qua­lity of the cloth is bet­ter than in any shirt I have bought — no ques­tion — no com­pa­ri­son. IMHO these are an abso­lute bar­gain when you com­pare them to off-the-peg shirts from Savile Row.
    Hugh — what next … :) What else does a “gent­le­man” need?
    :bM

  5. The ori­gi­nal Tho­mas Pink shirts were made in Ire­land, in a town with a long tra­di­tion of shirt­ma­king, coin­ci­den­tally in a fac­tory which a rela­tion of mine owns a sig­ni­fi­cant share of. The ori­gi­nal shirts were great, weren’t they? Pink and others moved their busi­ness elsewhere, mainly because of cost fac­tors and the fac­tory moved to a Bal­tic state last year. From what I can see, Tho­mas Pink have cut the qua­lity in order to be able to main­tain the mar­gins which will sus­tain their high-street loca­tions and rela­ti­vely high volu­mes. I think this is a pretty stu­pid thing to do if you ask me, but LVMH obviously know a lot about this stuff.
    Any­way, there is no rea­son why something like the Tho­mas Pink shirts could not be made in a lower cost eco­nomy to the same qua­lity or almost the same qua­lity, for a slightly higher price. I think this is a good oppor­tu­nity, if you approach it the right way.
    We’ve kic­ked another shirts idea around before — http://www.gapingvoid.com/Moveable_Type/archives/002098.html