October 31, 2006

overcoat

888889002overcoat1.jpg
[Click on image to enlarge etc.]
Is this hand-made over­coat the bomb or what?
I could tell you how much it costs, but then I would have to kill you.
[Bonus Link:] “Tho­mas’ Top Ten”. The most popu­lar and infor­ma­tive English Cut artic­les. NB: This is one of the com­pa­nies I’m invol­ved with etc.

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

15 Responses to “overcoat”

  1. Joe Lipka says:

    Beau­ti­ful Coat. I’m trying to ima­gine it in leather.
    Living in the Southern USA, there is no prac­ti­cal use for such a won­der­ful item of clothing.

  2. clementine says:

    oh my yes…it is extraordinary!

  3. Jeez, what a piece! Doesn’t look like I could afford it.

  4. Anonymous says:

    It not the bomb; its the bom­di­gity (gosh!)

  5. Anonymous says:

    Would my soul cover it? Pro­bably not, eh? A coat like that. Nice coat.

  6. Anonymous says:

    Ummm, it’s just a coat?

  7. hugh macleod says:

    Anon, yes, it is just a coat. And a Maze­rati is just a car that gets you from A-B.
    It all depends what geeks you out.

  8. nancy says:

    I still want to know where you can get the thing dryc­lea­ned and pres­sed. Much of tai­lo­ring is done with unders­titching and pres­sing. And lots can be undone with a bad press. Not that a lay per­son would unders­tand that. Not that I could be a tai­lor or anything.
    So, Hugh, you wor­king on that glo­babl mar­ke­ting dryc­lea­ning service?

  9. fg says:

    okay
    I’ve always wan­ted to know the rea­so­ning being the four use­less but­tons that annoy me (both aesthe­ti­cally and func­tio­nally) at the end of each sleeve? it feels so overc­row­ded (and did I men­tion use­less?)
    his­to­ri­cal rea­son?
    I figu­red you would know, with all your tai­lo­ring friends …

  10. hugh macleod says:

    fb, on savile row suits, you can actually unbut­ton the but­tons and roll up the slee­ves of your suit, if you want.
    all design on a sav­lie row suit is influen­ced by early 19th cen­tury mili­tary tai­lo­ring. savile row still makes uni­forms for offi­cers.
    so their func­tion on the sleeve cuff is the same as the func­tion on a shirt sleeve cuff… whether that func­tion is use­ful or not to your­self, only you can decide.
    hugh

  11. nancy says:

    to employ more but­ton makers.

  12. nancy says:

    that pre­vious com­ment was about func­tion.
    aesthe­tics would be to employ more but­ton artists as the bet­ter rose to the top and made pret­tier buttons.

  13. nancy says:

    well i dont believe that story about Napo­lean and snotty noses. Urban myth, I am sure some­body wrote it up the truth on “water­loo fibs revea­led” back then and the file was lost. Oh my, abba.
    You know, as I sit here loo­king at my pirate cos­tume, I am thin­king, those but­tons on the captain’s jac­ket look like gold coins, and others look like pearls and still others could be ivory.
    The but­tons on the shirt under­neath are all mis­sing, though they were cove­red with silk.
    doncha think, but­tons –and a super­fi­cial four in a row– were to flaunt a man’s wealth.
    As for rolling up slee­ves, I guess a norwegian-pattern or irish– cable knit swea­ter is handy in that the cuff and waist rib­bing always gives and takes. Knit­ting was rele­ga­ted to the dames, though. I still believe the fisher­man deve­lo­ped for their net working.

  14. fg says:

    I had a fee­ling it had to do with the mili­tary, but I couldn’t come to the conc­lu­sion that any­body would roll up their suit’s slee­ves. It would bother me to get my slee­ves all wrin­kled; I tend to want to remove the jac­ket alto­gether, but that’s just me.
    It’s actually an inte­res­ting unu­sual per­so­nal ‘hvac’ func­tion.
    Well, thanks a lot for all this info, Hugh.

  15. nancy says:

    Plus +
    Four but­tons in a row is one thing, but four but­tonho­les in a row is another. Hugh wouldn’t that wea­ken the fabric?
    I am assu­ming they are not bound, but hands­titched with a cor­ded but­tonho­les­titch embroi­dery as in stan­dard on men’s tailoring.