<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ft article on danah boyd, plus calacanis etc</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gapingvoid.com/2006/10/30/ft-article-on-danah-boyd-plus-calacanis-etc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2006/10/30/ft-article-on-danah-boyd-plus-calacanis-etc/</link>
	<description>&#34;cartoons drawn on the back of business cards&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 20:07:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Dodds</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2006/10/30/ft-article-on-danah-boyd-plus-calacanis-etc/#comment-15252</link>
		<dc:creator>John Dodds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=3187#comment-15252</guid>
		<description>Her blog is well worth reading and it&#039;s interesting to note that she&#039;s much more anthropologist than geek and shows that online social networks follow the same &quot;rules&quot; as offline ones.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Her blog is well worth reading and it’s interesting to note that she’s much more anthropologist than geek and shows that online social networks follow the same “rules” as offline ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Thomson</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2006/10/30/ft-article-on-danah-boyd-plus-calacanis-etc/#comment-15251</link>
		<dc:creator>James Thomson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 20:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=3187#comment-15251</guid>
		<description>I read this in print, in the FT colour magazine, and enjoyed it. Seldom can you find, certainly in UK papers, good print articles about the relevance of the latest online trends, such as web 2.0.
This is a great pity as offline writers usually present the online world in a much more jargon free manner. OK they don&#039;t always &#039;get it&#039;, or &#039;get all of it&#039;, but that shouldn&#039;t always matter.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read this in print, in the FT colour magazine, and enjoyed it. Seldom can you find, certainly in UK papers, good print articles about the relevance of the latest online trends, such as web 2.0.<br />
This is a great pity as offline writers usually present the online world in a much more jargon free manner. OK they don’t always ‘get it’, or ‘get all of it’, but that shouldn’t always matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

