October 29, 2006

e-mail of the week

A cer­tain Michael Bal­deon sent me an e-mail, con­si­si­ting of only one sin­gle line:

No talent. None. Way too obs­cure for gene­ral consumption.

Too funny.
I think worr­ying about what inte­rests you, what stirs your pas­sion, is a far more effec­tive recipe for suc­cess than worr­ying about “gene­ral con­sump­tion”. I have a strange fee­ling that Mr Bal­deon hasn’t quite lear­ned this les­son yet. Poor guy.

25 Responses to “e-mail of the week”

  1. churchpundit says:

    Don’t you find it funny when you post things that are simply expres­sions of your­self (that’s what a web-log is after all!), others assume you’re doing it for pro­fi­ta­ble con­sump­tion by the mas­ses? And, beside the point, has he not noti­ced that your car­toons are EVERYWHERE?

  2. Reuben Moore says:

    Well clearly Mr. Bal­deon fails to grasp the dicho­tomy bet­ween “gene­ral con­sump­tion” and your con­cept of the glo­bal mic­ro­brand. Pro­bably a Michael Bol­ton fan.

  3. Peter Bell says:

    Yeah, shame there are always trolls out there. Guess it makes them feel bet­ter about not doing anything them­sel­ves.
    Keep up the ama­zing work!

  4. keep it on, hugh, never mind. ehi you’re for the 2.0 what dil­bert has been for the 1.0… i’m proud to sport your badge on my blog, it’s worth rea­ding every day. thanx! :)

  5. jason says:

    Screw that. Do you think you can get him to buy a bottle of Stormhoek ;-)

  6. Marti says:

    Out of curio­sity, I goo­gled this fellow, and found few refe­ren­ces. He is appa­rently an expert on obs­cu­rity. *snicker*

  7. Rich says:

    Thing is, your blog and blogs like, oh, Brand Autopsy, are often lum­ped together by mar­ke­ting pun­dits on the same shelf in “Bran­ding, Aisle 3″.
    Dif­fe­rent ani­mals to some rea­ders, but to others, it’s more murky. Many peo­ple don’t get that English Cut doesn’t aspire to be the Star­bucks of tai­lo­ring, nor Stormhoek aspire to be Whole Foods of vint­ners.
    Yet sup­po­sedly smart bran­ders in big cities who make good six-figure inco­mes will ask: Why don’t they aspire to riches? Doesn’t ever­yone want to be worth billions? Shouldn’t ever­yone emu­late Star­bucks and Whole Foods?
    Perhaps those mar­ke­ting “pros” are loo­king to your clients’ modest suc­ces­ses as proof that if blogs/market con­ver­sa­tions can help the small guys suc­ceed small, they can help big guys suc­ceed big?
    At least that’s the mes­sage we get from having read GV for the past 3 years. We could be wrong. But if your clients do have those aspi­ra­tions, then maybe Bal­deon is right after all.

  8. niti bhan says:

    what is gene­ral any­more? what isn’t? my new biz cards are hughs [again!] :P

  9. Mike says:

    I sus­pect what he means is “way too inte­lli­gent for peo­ple who don’t like to think.”
    Keep it up.

  10. oliver franks says:

    Gene­ral Con­sump­tion? Wasn’t he defea­ted at the battle of Little Big Intes­tine?
    Or is it something you might pick up in a cheap res­tau­rant?
    Oh no, wait…it was that thing around the 118th cen­tury which wiped out all those ‘gene­ral’ people.

  11. Tara Hunt says:

    Obviously your talents baf­fle and con­fuse Mr. Bal­deon, Hugh…
    The rest of us big fans, well, they dazzle and delight. Thanks for con­ti­nuing to teach us intros­pec­tion through humor. :)

  12. I pity Mr Baldeon .

  13. Simon says:

    Is he Gene­ral Consumption’s Aide de Camp? The Gene­ral pro­bably pre­fers it short sharp and snaaaapppy!!!

  14. KG says:

    Don’t change your humor or pers­pec­tive one bit (well, unless it’s an authen­tic change, then it will still seem like your humor). You gotta be you!
    Those who are remar­ka­ble and inte­res­ting tend not to aim towards plea­sing the “gene­ral con­sump­tion.” They aim to be authen­tic just by being their remar­ka­ble and inte­res­ting sel­ves. Often, their uni­que suc­cess is a happy by-product.
    So, keep up the great work.

  15. I have ONE word: Bri­lliant! (can I count the exc­la­ma­tion point?) — who gives a fuck about “gene­ral consumption” — your audience found you and defi­ned who THEY are. You, in turn con­ti­nue to, una­po­lo­ge­ti­cally, pro­duce Gaping Void to the cha­grin of wit­less cre­tins.
    Rock on!

  16. hugh macleod says:

    Hey Rich, point taken…
    Frankly, I dunno. What I’m doing works for me, and it seems to be wor­king for my clients. Yes, it des have its cha­llen­ges, but com­pa­red to how most poor souls make a living, we’re not com­plai­ning. Whether it works or not for some mid-level cor­po­rate mar­ke­ting dork is frankly not my pro­blem.
    Besi­des, the peo­ple who say “let’s be big­ger than Star­bucks” in cor­po­rate mee­tings are inva­riably never the peo­ple who become big­ger than Star­bucks. Their currency is more about fear, poli­tics, medioc­rity and golf han­di­caps. Their lot is simply not that inte­res­ting to me.
    AFTERTHOUGHT: I know there’s a lot of “caring about the cus­to­mer” talk going on in mar­ke­ting circ­les these days.
    From my expe­rience dea­ling with mains­tream cor­po­rate mar­ke­ting types, hell, these guys find it hard enough caring about their wives, let alone their cus­to­mers.
    Is it just me, or is that a para­dox?
    PS to Every­body else: Thanks for the kind words =)

  17. veedub says:

    bang on hugh. if it doesn’t stir you first it’s never going to move anyone else. you’re proof of that.

  18. Anonymous says:

    Och,perhaps he was tal­king about his own work ? Is that perhaps the case ? And I don’t mean that in a con­des­cen­ding way.

  19. »No talent. None. Way too obs­cure for gene­ral con­sump­tion.
    I love it! It’s going on my chalk­board at work tomo­rrow. Something like this let you know you’re on track and haven’t sold out.

  20. Charles Frith says:

    These are the best car­toons going. I’ve never liked car­toons before!

  21. stam says:

    Sure this B. –yes why men­tion­ning him, it’s doing him a favour, no way– is a grumpy guy somewhere on the pla­net. He should drink this geek wine you are repre­sen­ting, Stormhoek (hoek in fle­mish means “cor­ner”, so it’s storm­cor­ner, it’s exactly what his little mind needs, no ?). I just added today your “thing” on my blog, before I saw this Mr M. curious sen­tence about your dra­wings. Who cares about gene­ral con­sump­tion, any­way. Do we want to wal-martized our lifes & blogs. NEVER.

  22. hugh macleod says:

    At, jud­ging from his second e-mail to me [which inc­lu­ded the words, “Fuck you you stu­pid fuck”], I’m in no doubt wha­tsoe­ver he was tal­king bout my stuff. Heh.

  23. Sheamus says:

    Bal­deon has got to be pulling someone’s leg, quite pos­sibly his own!
    Hugh wri­tes “Is it just me, or is that a para­dox?”!!
    I say “Damn right!!!”

  24. drbrett says:

    Gene­ral con­sump­tion? Mr Bal­deon is wel­come to it. The land of fast moving con­su­mer goods, big brands, mar­ket research, homo­ge­ni­sed crea­ti­vity and safety. Toi­let paper, soap pow­der and dog food.
    All those Stormhoek drin­king, English Cut wea­ring Gaping­Void card carr­ying “stu­pid fucks” like the rest of us, please stand aside for those wise enough to know ahead of time what “works.” Like the crea­tors of Pretty Woman, Lost, You­Tube and Pos­tIt notes before them — none of whom had ANY idea that what they were up to would be hits — I say here’s to Hugh, Ze Frank, Jud­son Lapailly and others for having no idea what works, and stic­king to it.

  25. tarun says:

    Does Michael Bal­deon do this every time he comes across a site he doesn’t like?
    What helpfulness!