October 18, 2006

if you are an atheist

atheism219.jpg
[Click on image to enlarge/download/print etc. Licen­sing terms here etc.]
[Update:] This car­toon has gene­ra­ted 75 com­ments so far, many from atheists. Heh.

109 Responses to “if you are an atheist”

  1. Garth says:

    I more of a deist that atheist. The world had to start somehow ;-)

  2. Robert says:

    Ste­veC — Errr I think the per­son who wrote about Jesus a cou­ple hun­dred years AFTER he alle­gedly lived, was the arro­gant one! The book is a collec­tion of chi­nese whis­pers. My opi­nion.
    Any­way kids, atheists rule OK?!

  3. eio says:

    i think –ist suf­fi­xes are sooo 1.0

  4. Alan says:

    Mmmm… deli­cious con­tro­versy…
    Exce­llent car­toon. Per­so­nally, I’m a non-practicing jew who belie­ves in G-d and science and has no desire to recon­cile the two, let alone anything else. (Or, in the immor­tal [non-quoted] words of one Dou­glas Adams: The mea­ning of life, the uni­verse and everything is 42.
    Like many other things, this is defi­ni­tio­nal. G-d is a fun­da­men­tal aspect of reli­gion. An atheist belie­ves that G-d does not exist. But how does atheism then transc­ribe to reli­gion? If reli­gion is simply a doc­trine of beliefs, then wouldn’t atheism qua­lify as a reli­gion? But if one says that every reli­gion has a G-d, and atheists believe there is no G-d, then what qua­li­fies as an atheist’s G-d? See car­toon.
    I have a soft spot for metaphy­sics. [grin]
    Love the car­toons, love the blog, will have to try the wine some day. Hello from the U.S. & Cheers!
    P.S. I also believe in upping the post count on this by one. I don’t think that helps esta­blish or break down anything but that doesn’t stop it from exis­ting. (Does it?)

  5. HOBOBOH says:

    G*d is made in “our ” image, not the other way around I’m afraid. See, if we write these books (torah, koran, bible) and say the pla­net was “given” to us, well then, we can do as we please…in G*d’s name of course. Reli­gion is a nice way of jus­tif­ying our incom­ple­te­ness as a spe­cies.
    As I watched the sun­set yes­ter­day I became aware of an ant on my forearm. I watched the little guy go back and forth. How ez it would be for me to just squish it and not think twice. I con­ti­nued to watch the sun­set and maybe five minu­tes pas­sed and I noti­ced it was still trying to get somewhere. Anywhere but where it was I sup­pose. Finally, I pic­ked it up and pla­ced it down on the ground. Chalk one up for the little guy, I bow to the ant.

  6. Ya What? says:

    It is not reli­gion, God or the lack the­reof that is the pro­blem, it is what peo­ple do with it that cau­ses it all to go to pot! As can be seen by the irra­tio­nal reac­tion to a car­toon! Goes to show that the reac­tion to the Danish car­toons was not iso­la­ted to Islam. I won­der what God (whoe­ver she, he, it or nothing is) would think of this .…..

  7. MyNameIsMatt says:

    Am I seeing this pic­ture dif­fe­rent than many who’ve com­men­ted already? I see something that’s being said behind some guy’s back, and that seems to have jarred him. So, I’m gues­sing he’s an atheist who gets anno­yed when peo­ple try ratio­na­li­zing atheism in their world of Gods and reli­gion. Is that what others see?
    For myself, an atheist, and my atheist friends, we never talk about God or reli­gion unless con­fron­ted about it by someone who belie­ves in God or some reli­gion. It’s really a mute point to us, and it gets anno­ying when peo­ple talk behind our backs about what atheism really is when they’re not atheists, but peo­ple trying to ratio­na­lize us in their world. Still, cle­ver wor­dings from belie­vers doesn’t change an atheist’s belief in no God(s), and from my point of view, I’m not sure that’s what the pic­ture was trying to do.

  8. Nick says:

    Nice try, Hugh.
    And for my time rea­ding this entry, I will be sen­ding over an invoice for $50,000, as we agreed.
    The bur­den is on you to dis­prove that we ever made such an agree­ment, correct?

  9. mikel evins says:

    If you are a vege­ta­rian, then vege­ta­ria­nism is your meat.
    If you doubt the exis­tence of the Loch Ness Mons­ter, then doubt is your mons­ter.
    If you scoff at the occult, then scof­fing is your occult.
    If you don’t subsc­ribe to Reader’s Digest, then fai­lure to subsc­ribe is your Reader’s Digest.

  10. Jason says:

    One can speak of “the fucked-up world wrought by reli­gious igno­rance and con­flicts,” and one can speak of the equallly fucked-up world wrought by zea­lotry in science and poli­tics. I’m sure you can think of your own exam­ples.
    The pas­sion with with some atheists defend atheism tends to bely the idea that atheism is pure ratio­na­lity. Atheism is one way to inter­pret the data­set of all per­so­nal obser­va­tions; theism is another and it can be just as ratio­nal an interpretation.

  11. “God is dead.”
    Nietzsche or Gill­mor? I’ll leave you to decide.

  12. patrick says:

    Jane Greer — “Proof of God is everywhere.” Sure. In Juve­nile Monocy­tic Mye­loid Leu­kae­mia. In HIV. In cho­lera. In reti­nal blas­toma. In polyps. In schi­zoph­re­nia. In liver flu­kes and tsu­na­mis. In those para­si­tes that eat the ton­gues out of fish and then feed on the food coming into the fish’s mouth. Mala­ria, bilhar­zia and ric­kets. Thanks for those God — they out­weigh the sun­sets for perhaps the majo­rity of the world’s popu­la­tion but hey, I’d bet­ter not men­tion that or it is eter­nal dam­na­tion for me.
    Good grief.

  13. Timmy D says:

    He used a small “g” in “god” here (as oppo­sed to “God” in the pre­vious car­toon). Atheism isn’t my God, but it’s cer­tainly my god.

  14. AGRADA says:

    Why we die ? .

  15. nancy says:

    IF
    God is great and God is good…
    IF
    all that is not i is grea­ter then i
    THEN…
    I can actually ima­gine One or the Other and anything inbetween

  16. Peter says:

    I’d go with MyNa­meIs­Matt on this one.
    What the ‘toon says could be cons­trued as either a pla­ti­tude a reli­gious per­son could say about atheism, or as something an atheist could say about said reli­gious per­son. (I use the term reli­gious per­son very care­fully here). Most peo­ple, it would seem, inter­pre­ted it as the for­mer, so it would be inte­res­ting to see the author’s intent.
    Ciao

  17. Jane Greer says:

    patrick,
    Such pain you’re in! Kind thoughts are coming your way from me.

  18. gavin says:

    Isn’t this the whole point of atheism?
    You don’t need something to fill the void that the theis­tic God fills.
    You’re way off the mark, and the stu­pid image is just another exam­ple of the igno­rance surroun­ding what atheism means and who atheists are.

  19. Holly says:

    God likes me best. No won­der everyone’s so peevish.

  20. av says:

    reli­gious bullshit doesnt kill peo­ple. idiots kill people.

  21. Lemi4 says:

    The­sis the first: hard­line atheists are as easily offen­ded when their atheism is ques­tio­ned as reli­gious fun­da­men­ta­list are when their reli­gio­sity is ques­tio­ned.
    The­sis the second: reli­gious con­tro­versy attracts atten­tion; wether one has a pro­fes­sed reli­gion or not, but even more so when one is clo­ser to either polar end.
    The­sis the third: atten­tion is pre­cious, yet it is easily wrenched when one knows the correct but­tons to push.
    The­sis the fourth: I need to get a life.

  22. Point made, Hugh, but over­sim­plif­ying it like that sure makes it hard to dis­cuss it. Is that the typi­cal “angry atheist?” Be thank­ful you live where you do. Ame­rica is ente­ring a new dark age.

  23. insignificant says:

    Jane, are you trying to help patrick in some way? Perhaps you are trying to con­vince your­self that you have some sig­ni­fi­cance in this world.
    Per­so­nally I believe in rea­lity. Rea­lity has so far not inc­lu­ded any invi­si­ble, all power­ful space aliens. It also does not inc­lude inter­pre­ting patrick’s com­ments as pain. I do admit howe­ver that you have cau­sed me some pain. I will now do my best to for­get I ever read it.

  24. Oorgo says:

    I think if the guys face had been red and he had a gun strap­ped to his back some of the com­men­ters may have unders­tood the joke better.

  25. Patrick says:

    Jane It is a tri­bute to human stead­fast­ness, opti­mism and inge­nuity that those pains of exis­tence I refer to don’t get us (inc­lu­ding me) down all the time; for me hap­pi­ness and sur­vi­val have nothing to do with fairy­tale cha­rac­ters be they God, Allah, Jeho­vah or whoe­ver. Thanks for the kind thoughts but I’m not in pain and rea­lity isn’t so bad — you should try it: it is libe­ra­ting (and would be more so were there not so many reli­gious peo­ple still around exer­ting undue influence on our other­wise rela­ti­vely free lives — check out the nea­rest theoc­racy for more infor­ma­tion about how to make peo­ple mise­ra­ble).
    By the way, if it is a chris­tian fairy­tale you follow you might want to check out your ancestry — accor­ding to the Old Tes­ta­ment, if one of your fore­bears of the last 10 gene­ra­tions was a bas­tard (born out of wed­lock — not the more pro­saic form) you won’t be going to hea­ven. You might cry “foul” when St Peter tells you your name’s not down and your not coming in but the big beardy guy behind him won’t be listening.

  26. Jane Greer says:

    Okay, patrick, let’s deal with rea­lity, as you sug­gest. You sent me a list of mons­tro­si­ties inten­ded to can­cel out my list of mar­vels, and you seem to believe that much of the world con­si­ders you dam­ned. I inter­pre­ted that as a sign that you were in pain – which was a rea­lis­tic assump­tion, whether or not it was correct. For me to res­pond with more reli­gious dis­cus­sion was not at all what I wan­ted to do, so I just wrote what I was fee­ling: kindly towards you. That’s all. I felt that some sort of res­ponse on my part was neces­sary, but I didn’t want to offend you (or bring an attack on myself) by telling you in wri­ting that you were in my pra­yers, so I just sent friendship your way. You res­pon­ded with more angry wri­ting about God and sar­casm about what you assume are my beliefs, and finished up with a long para­graph about how the “big beardy guy” won’t let me into Hea­ven because the odds are that there are bas­tards in my family.
    I don’t think you live in the real world at all. I think you live in anger so thick you can’t see through it to recog­nize a sim­ple ten­ta­tive human ges­ture. So once again I am left with the very rea­lis­tic assump­tion that you are in pain, and along the way you have strengthe­ned the ste­reotype of the angry, defen­sive atheist or agnos­tic or wha­te­ver you believe you are, and presto! we’re back at Hugh’s cartoon.

  27. jb says:

    It would be slightly bet­ter (but less poin­ted) if it read “If you are an atheist, then Logic is your god.”
    Because that is the plain and sim­ple truth — Athiests believe in logic. Based on three thou­sand years of scho­larly inves­ti­ga­tion, expe­ri­men­ta­tion and phi­lo­sophi­cal dis­cus­sion. But a belief nonethe­less, and one that has demands.
    Logic demands that you dis­miss things that can­not fit into its struc­ture. It requi­res that you use its struc­ture to invent and analyze. It com­pels you to accept unplea­sant things if they are dedu­ced through its rules
    Your earthly rewards for belie­ving in Logic are con­si­de­ra­ble. Many jobs require an iron belief in Logic to be done well. An entire industry (com­pu­ter science) is devo­ted to the dis­co­very of ever-more esco­te­ric mani­pu­la­tions of Logic.
    And I should know — I’m a high-level dis­ci­ple in the church of Logic.
    But at the end of the day, Logic is just a belief. It is a fil­ter, a “box” that you live inside, blin­ding you from the pos­si­ble things that exist outside the box.
    Recall the story of the fish who lived in an aqua­rium. His owner took him out of the water, and held him in the air for a moment, before drop­ping him back in. Imme­dia­tely, he swam to his friends and said “Hey guys! Guess what! We live in _water_. There’s _water_ all around us.”
    The other fish thought he was insane, of course.
    I don’t beleive in God, Yah­weh, Allah, Buddha or Shiva. I don’t think any of them have it right. And I use Logic cons­tantly, all day long, every day. But I know that Logic is a belief, something that I accept as true, without any way to *know*.
    Because Logic is my faith, and my reli­gion. And, to some degree, my god.

  28. Shelley Noble says:

    Not to speak for Him, I read Hugh’s car­toon to mean that staunch atheists are often every bit as posi­tio­ned and attached to their point of view about the “folly” of a belief in God as the most reli­gious per­son can be posi­tio­ned and attached to their point of view.
    It’s all indi­vi­dual opinion/experience/belief in the end and that is another bri­lliant obser­va­tion of Hugh’s I think.

  29. CWW says:

    I goo­gled “con­tri­ved reli­gious argu­ments sub­mit­ted by hacks who spent so much time blog­ging that they never lear­ned how to deve­lop a con­cise phi­lo­sophi­cal approach”, and well, here I am.

  30. Patrick says:

    Jane — the car­toon I have no pro­blem with — it’s just a car­toon, let’s not get Isla­mic about it. And I wasn’t sug­ges­ting that your family must be full of bas­tards and nor was I wan­ting to be insul­ting — my apo­lo­gies if that is the way it came across. What I was trying to point out was that a god who made (or allows to con­ti­nue) the mons­tro­si­ties I refe­rred to was no god I wan­ted to know.
    Re: the bas­tard thing — check out the old tes­ta­ment — it is there, honestly. What I meant to sug­gest by this was that a god who could damn you or I to an eter­nity of suf­fe­ring in hell owing to the actions of our for­bears was not the god for me in the same way as his (and it is always a him) allo­wing mons­tro­si­ties and ago­nies to con­ti­nue makes him per­sona non grata in my neck of the woods. Oh, and human sexua­lity being what it is (wahey!), I rec­kon the odds are most of us have bas­tards (in the reli­gious sense) in our family tree. Me inc­lu­ded.
    Re: my conc­lu­sion that you are a chris­tian — if I am wrong, my apo­lo­gies, I based this on the sound of your name and the things you had writ­ten. If you follow another faith so be it — remove the bas­tard stuff, the rest still stands.
    I sus­pect, des­pite all this wri­ting, we aren’t going to see eye to eye but thanks for the kind thoughts.

  31. steve bates says:

    Hugh — I really dig this new style of car­toon — I abso­lu­tely loved the coal mine one.

  32. Keith Handy says:

    I don’t unders­tand why anyone allows them­sel­ves to get so pas­sio­nate and hea­ted in the com­ments when the blog­ger him­self is obviously a button-pusher who likes to incite con­tro­versy while remai­ning emo­tio­nally detached.
    That said, I think Jane and Patrick should just marry each other and get it over with. :)

  33. Avecrien says:

    As defi­ned in the bible, anything anyone builds their life around is their god. What they want most, think about most, care about most.
    So anyone who uses the bible as the expla­na­tion of their god con­cept should be poin­ting to people’s lives much moreso than this ‘prove the nega­tive thing.’ But most peo­ple clai­ming an abraha­mic god have other things in their lives who truly fill that role, no?

  34. Shaymus says:

    Every smart has already been said.…though I would of said…then atheism is your religion…But hey its your joke :)

  35. Jason says:

    If you are a vege­ta­rian, then vege­ta­ria­nism is your meat.
    I like that, and will use it in the future, in bla­tant dis­re­gard of the author’s intent.

  36. Anonymous says:

    I think that the guy in the car­toon is a belie­ver trying to insult the atheist. He is angry because he can see all the great things science has made since rea­son depar­ted from reli­gious faith. Science is deli­ve­ring results and explai­ning things, is very rigu­rous and above all it can change its mind if its pro­ven wrong.
    jb said:
    “But I know that Logic is a belief, something that I accept as true, without any way to *know*.”
    and I add, is a very relia­ble belief.
    Great posts (espe­cially the atheists ones ;-) )

  37. Anonymous says:

    Perhaps bet­ter sta­ted as “If you are an atheist then you rapidly get tired of idiots”.

  38. Jared White says:

    There is one dif­fe­rence bet­ween faith in God and faith in no God, which any true Chris­tian can tell you:
    God is real and we expe­rience His love and power every day of our lives when we give our­sel­ves to Him.
    My faith is in the cha­rac­ter of God and what He is able to accom­plish. But faith that God exists? Not neces­sary: He’s already pro­ven to me that He exists. May He bless those of you who are searching for the truth with a new reve­la­tion of His exis­tance and His love.

  39. Norman says:

    “Jared White” : are you real ?

  40. JDHitSkills says:

    Yes…atheism is not anti-god, it’s more of the fact that god is a non-issue in our lives. I mean, can’t the human race just move on?
    I live in the sta­tes and every Sun­day I see the dro­ves of idiots lining up to go into these huge churches that cost so much to main­tain.
    If you took all of the manhours and money that goes into reli­gion on just ONE SUNDAY…you would have enough cash and man­po­wer to immu­nize all of the chil­dren in Africa from the easily pre­ven­ta­ble disea­ses that kill so many millions of them each year.
    Ima­gine what we could do with the follo­wing Sunday’s money/time?

  41. Norman says:

    JDHitS­kills : these events sure cost money, but they are use­ful at the end for some peo­ple who don’t care at all about Africa.… you end up with Bush men­tion “God” every other word and peo­ple feel all warm inside or something and con­nect with him… .Heck! I remem­ber when I saw a docu­men­tary on TV in which a *luna­tic* said he would vote Bush because “Bush is a mes­sen­ger from God”. Wha­te­ver HE does/decides the­re­fore must be good.
    Sorry I am raving but this dri­ves me mad.
    Peo­ple seem con­tent with sim­plis­tic expla­na­tions.
    You can leave your brain off that way, it’s com­for­ta­ble, no room for doubt.

  42. Anonymous says:

    Love it! I know an atheist who won’t eat meat because it’s cruel to ani­mals, but he pushed me in front of a bus and got me fired. Com­plex indi­vi­dual? Not really, just needs more pro­tein in his diet.

  43. kyle says:

    An atheist is a per­son who belie­ves there is no god. If atheism is a god, then I shall explode because there is no logic in this car­toon. THERE IS NO GOD!!! If there was a god, then he would have sho­wed up by now! From time to time my great grand­mother will tell us that she has heard on the reli­gious news thing that she watches that god is coming. around the time that he is “sche­due­led to arive” the date will be moved ahead another six months! if Santa and The Eas­ter Bunny are real, then god still DOESNT EXIST!!!!! Also, your clock for posts should inc­lude the time­zone or a state in the time­zone. I live in Maine and your clock is five hours ahead of mine.

  44. Anonymous says:

    So much ani­mo­sity, anger, and frus­tra­tion over a sim­ple car­toon — wow.
    It’s as if Hugh has hit a nerve at the core of some people’s BELIEFS …
    I can only ima­gine the res­ponse had he actually made a joke about someone’s reli­gion!!!! LOL!!!

  45. nancy says:

    you read anger?
    God or none I just wan­ted to be com­ment #95 at 9:50. Nume­ro­logy must mean something.
    (my time not your time)
    Under full awa­re­ness that some god may cut in line during mode­ra­tion and alter my perfection.

  46. Anonymous says:

    see, there must be some kind of god in the void, though he lacks my ideal of crea­tive sych­ro­ni­za­tion. He could have been more crea­tive to actually post this at something like 5:09 and hint at the pro­found­ness of num­bers.
    ins­tead 2:43. What kind of time is that?
    This had all the makings to be something mys­tee­rious
    –WIN9OW5 95
    –Mar­tin Luther 95 the­ses
    –9 – 5: time peo­ple pre­tend to work
    –how fast i have to drive to get to Cin­cin­nati in an hour
    –the per­cen­tage of peo­ple who use that Other com­pu­ter sys­tem
    Now this god is just plain cryp­tic!
    2 for 3 or 3 for 2 tur­ned about.

  47. oliver Franks says:

    Ah, my chil­dren gather round and lis­ten to the tale of yore of the car­toon that was spo­ken greatly about in depth and quite point­lessly, but which mean­de­red in such a way that, like this sen­tance, it had some amu­se­ment to it. Perhaps. In fact there was very little evi­dence that either were amu­sing. You see, no-one laughed at either. But is the absence of laugh­ter evi­dence as to the absence of a joke? I don’t know, but inside I’m wet­ting myself. If it’s at all pos­si­ble.
    The car­toon was of a man with a frus­tra­ted and angsty expres­sion his eyes dar­ke­ned with…with…with a pen­cil most pro­bably. The words next to him sta­ted thusly: “If you are an atheist, then atheism is your God”. What did it mean? Did it have two mea­nings? Was it pre­ten­ding to have two mea­nings? Is that iro­nic? What the hell is irony? is it something that’s too cle­ver to make you laugh? Is it defi­ni­tely NOT a fly in your char­don­nay? Who’s to say? You? Me? God? G-d? (Don’t let on, but I heard they’re the same per­son).
    All of these ques­tions remain today, but the impor­tant part is that nobody really cared, it was (like so many things) a bloody good excuse to have a fight. The wea­pons: words, the casual­ties: the vir­tues of com­mu­ni­ca­tion (in this post, see bre­vity) and the spoils of war: 1st prize; tits, 2nd; wine, 3rd; 2 free tic­kets to a place of worship of your choice (atheists will receive a che­que to the equi­va­lent amount, if they can prove banks exist in no more than 7 words).
    And so the battle raged, there were win­ners, there were losers, there were peo­ple making jokes (sic­kos), there were stand offs, com­pro­mi­ses, mutual annihi­la­tions, axis (ed: plu­ral of?), allies, casual acquan­ti­ces, sworn ene­mies, well-spoken ene­mies and tiny little south ame­ri­can peo­ple who worship­ped vene­tian dres­sers.
    In the end only one stood tall. Laughing glee­fully as he sup­ped his wine, his foot on the neck of all who MADE HIS BLOG RELEVANT. He was known only as Mcleod. From the high­lands, but not High­lan­der ™…rather…Bloglander. He had been trai­ned well by a spa­nish blog­ger with a curious scots like accent. He cared not for the tri­via­li­ties of life, but only for his belo­ved dra­wings, which he nur­tu­red with wine and indif­fe­rence. He is a mys­ti­cal figure who lures us into his realm of ani­ma­tion where our heads spin as we attempt to inter­pret sup­po­sed insight until we vomit the con­tents of our half baked notions onto the doors­tep of his palace and he does smugly turn to his pay­mas­ters and dec­lare: “See? Blog­ging is SOOOO hot right now!”
    Beware the Blo­glan­der, for his tan­gled web is well pre­sen­ted and may make you think. Do not think. After all, they say it’s the only thing you can prove exists. What were they thin­king?
    Go now chil­dren. Run and play, and be good. Or the Blo­glan­der will pay you a visit in the night and make you read ALL the res­pon­ses to his car­toon. And thus you will waste your time.
    Espe­cially
    with
    this
    post
    .

  48. karlos says:

    You’re abso­lu­tely right. I used to be an atheist until I rea­li­sed the self same thing. Now my posi­tion is that, most likely, ever­yone is wrong, inc­lu­ding me. And there’s pro­bably some mas­sive octo­pus with the head of a horse, sit­ting on a giant uku­lele in the sky, laughing at the attempts of the poor humans trying to make sense of it all.

  49. Rich...! says:

    I just found my new desk­top wall­pa­per, fuc­king awe­some.
    Rich the atheist…!

  50. martin luther says:

    95. And thus be con­fi­dent of ente­ring into hea­ven rather through many tri­bu­la­tions, than through the assu­rance of peace.