October 18, 2006

hughtrain update

zzzzzz7654122.jpg
It’s been well over a year since I’ve added anything to The Hugh­train. My last update was January, 2005.
The rea­son is sim­ple. I had writ­ten everything I had to say to my satis­fac­tion, and then I moved on. English Cut came along, then Stormhoek.
I got busy.
But recently The Hugh­train has been nig­gling me. Not everything on it I’m happy about. Stuff I should have said dif­fe­rently, stuff I should have said but didn’t etc etc.
Time chan­ges everything.
So here’s the ques­tion: Do I re-work The Hugh­train, and improve upon it? Or do I just move on, and write something com­ple­tely new and dif­fe­rent?
Like I said, it’s been nig­gling me.

27 Responses to “hughtrain update”

  1. Dave Wheeler says:

    Hugh,
    My sug­ges­tion would be to create a com­ple­tely new docu­ment that shows what still works and what has chan­ged. It would be inte­res­ting to see the thought pro­cess of the ori­gi­nal Hugh­train pla­yed out against the chan­ging lands­cape of the blogsphere and all of your expe­rien­ces in the past cou­ple years.
    Just my two cents…
    Dave Wheeler

  2. Robert says:

    Hugh,
    Correct and add to the Hugh­train then do the new stuff.
    You’ll satisfy the itch this way.

  3. Hugh:
    I would say to write a new docu­ment. I’m sure much has chan­ged since Hugh­train, and it’d be inte­res­ting to com­pare the two.
    Plus, for sel­fish rea­sons, if you wrote a new one, we’d pro­bably get more to fill the docu­ment rather than just an update!
    Kevin

  4. Andreas says:

    Take a look at the old one, make a few notes,and then start with a fresh piece of paper…kill your darlings.

  5. Dan Robbins says:

    “Hugh­train 2.0″ Enough said!

  6. Hugh­train is a stake in the ground. Don’t go all George Lucas on us just because you can. Create something new.

  7. Sheamus says:

    You wrote “But recently The Hugh­train has been nig­gling me. Not everything on it I’m happy about. Stuff I should have said dif­fe­rently, stuff I should have said but didn’t etc etc.
    Time chan­ges everything.
    So here’s the ques­tion: Do I re-work The Hugh­train, and improve upon it? Or do I just move on, and write something com­ple­tely new and dif­fe­rent?
    Like I said, it’s been nig­gling me.”
    I took the time to re-read “Hugh­train” and ist’s still damn good and damn impor­tant. Within these con­texts:
    You can pay atten­tion to the nig­gling and… Con­si­der addi­tio­nal pos­si­bi­li­ties, not just either/or.
    Peter Druc­ker, although he has pas­sed away, still remains one of the deep thin­kers about mana­ge­ment and social change. A num­ber of his books were revi­sed to update his thin­king over time. And, he con­ti­nued to publish new works on new issues. Further­more, I believe he loo­ked at the body of his wri­tings over a life­time as “a com­plete view”.
    You can iden­tify 3 – 4 hugh­train issues that are nig­gling you… What NEEDS to be chan­ged and WHY? If you find ans­wers then make the revi­sions. If not, don’t change anything until you are CERTAIN.
    I think Hugh­train ought to be published by one of the big repu­ta­ble hou­ses. You need an agent and you need a book deal. In addi­tion, I think your Glo­bal Micro Brand con­cept is worthy of a second book. Ima­gine… Hugh Mac­Leod, your body of wri­tings over a life­time as a com­plete view.
    Rock on Hugh!

  8. Joe Lipka says:

    Another sug­ges­tion for a 2.0 ver­sion with a lis­ting of the chan­ges from 1.0.

  9. If you are satis­fied, move on.
    RE: Car­toonWTF? You tur­ning Love­mar­kian?
    If so Stop!

  10. Jon says:

    “Don’t go all George Lucas on us”
    Good one ;)
    Although I disa­gree on this. Hugh­train is a con­ver­sa­tion, no? Con­ver­sa­tions and opi­nions change as time chugs along. There is no doubt that your influen­ces have been twea­ked since hoo­king up with Stormhoek and English Cut. The term “cut­ting off the head to spite the face” comes to mind.
    Keep Hugh­train a work in pro­gress. It is your baby. Nur­ture it into the full gown adult it can/should be.
    Damn.…full of cliches this morning.

  11. James says:

    Screw it. I love the Hugh­train, and while its cer­tainly on the pro­li­fic side of things, I think it could bene­fit from your con­ti­nued tin­ke­ring. So long as your ins­pi­red while your’e at it, tin­ker away.…The days of “fin­sihed works” are dead.

  12. Alex Krupp says:

    It’s pretty good the way it is. I like the subt­lety in it. Unlike today’s comic.

  13. Alex says:

    As a hacker/programmer, I am always temp­ted to throw out the old and start fresh, but it is almost always the wrong deci­sion.
    How this applies to a mani­festo though I am not sure, surely you main deci­sion is a mar­ke­ting one? How will you reach the most brains?
    My guess is you know the ans­wer to that bet­ter than any of us!

  14. Marti says:

    I’d sug­gest put­ting upda­tes in using a dif­fe­rent color or font. Below the sen­tence or para­graph you’ve re-thought, put, “October18 06 — Upon reflec­tion, I think___”
    Then you can write Hugh Two LOL

  15. Keith Handy says:

    You could treat it like a DVD com­men­tary track, lea­ving the ori­gi­nal intact but adding in com­ments in a dif­fe­rent color.

  16. The Hugh­train is great and it would be bet­ter to do something new. Move on, start again and don’t worry about rew­ri­ting.
    A blank busi­ness card to write on than one that you will rewrite.

  17. Hugh — always follow your nig­glings. You’re ins­tincts will tell you soon enough if you’ve made the wrong choice.

  18. Shazz says:

    Makes me think of the strug­gle archi­tec­tu­ral pre­ser­va­tionsts & com­mu­ni­ties must face when com­mu­nity ‘pro­gress’ knocks at their door. Do they raze and start fresh? or try to refresh and repur­pose the his­to­ri­cal buil­dings? Com­plex and deli­cate pro­blem.
    My vote goes for publishing 1.0 “as is” and star­ting 2.0 fresh. The beauty of wri­ting is that you don’t have to tear down one buil­ding to start another. I agree with your colla­bo­ra­tors above: you have 3 books beg­ging to be published.
    Sug­ges­tion: might it be inte­res­ting to write Hugh­train 2.0 from a dif­fe­rent or point of view? Perhaps the pov of emer­ging eco­no­mies? The con­su­mer? The media? … thin­king out loud whilst typing here. ;-)

  19. bluur says:

    Hugh­train saves! Fill it with the new stuff :)

  20. ‘The days of “fin­sihed works” are dead.’
    Great art isn’t finished, it’s aban­do­ned.
    To be honest, Hugh­train could be totally rewor­ked and I pro­bably wouldn’t even notice, since it’s not the sort of thing I expect to re-read.
    It may be a con­ver­sa­tion, but have you never been irri­ta­ted by con­ver­sa­tions that are just too dar­ned long?!
    Just remem­ber it’s hip to be square.

  21. Now many more peo­ple ‘Get It’ (Clue­train, Hugh­train, wha­te­ver) yet clue­less neverthe­less! Start afresh and clue them up, remem­ber your ‘Note to Self’:
    NOTE TO SELF:
    Your job is no lon­ger about selling. Your job is about firing off as many synap­ses in your client’s brain as pos­si­ble.
    The more synap­ses that are fired off, the more dopa­mi­nes are relea­sed. Dopa­mi­nes are seriously addic­tive. The more dopa­mi­nes you release, the more the client will come back for more. Your client thinks he is coming back to you for sane, ratio­nal, value-driven rea­sons. He is wrong. He is coming back to feed.
    More Dopa­mi­nes please!

  22. You never heard of ver­sion con­trol? :-)
    Why not put set up a Hugh­train wiki and let us have con­trol of it for a few months. See where it goes?
    If you want help doing the set up of this, let me know — I’ll get it sor­ted for you.

  23. Please don’t des­troy my Bible. Ever.
    Sell me a new one. But please don’t erase the past.

  24. mad says:

    IMHO, do a new one. That one’s done, what’s next?
    ps– I am trying to load your wid­get onto my blog. Can I say I am star­ting to hate Blogger?

  25. kyle says:

    I HAVE NO SOUL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.

  26. Elena_gy says:

    Salaam!
    Check this out!
    *