October 15, 2006

the cleopatra effect

zzzlkoshjkd02.jpg
One of the main rea­sons I never really pur­sued cor­po­rate blog con­sul­ting as a career, even though I’ve had some defi­nite oppor­tu­ni­ties in this depart­ment, is because of what I call “The Cleo­pa­tra Effect”.
I remem­ber when I was a kid watching this old black & white movie about Cleo­pa­tra. I can’t remem­ber the name of the movie, but one scene always stuck with me:
Cleo­pa­tra is wal­king through the palace, when she’s sud­denly stop­ped by the sound of pretty music, being pla­yed off in the dis­tance.
She follows the sound of the music through the palace, till even­tually she finds one of her cour­tiers in the gar­den, pla­ying the harp.
“What pretty music,” she says to the cour­tier. “You play beau­ti­fully.“
“Thank you, Your Majesty,” says the cour­tier, obviously flat­te­red.
“I would love to play music like that,” says Cleo­pa­tra. “Do you think you could teach me?“
The cour­tier, now that he’s fee­ling flat­te­red, tries to win even more of her favor.
“Well, yes,” he gushes. “I’m sure a Queen as talen­ted as you in so many things, would be talen­ted at this as well.“
“Oh, good,” says Cleo­pa­tra, obviously deligh­ted. “Here’s the deal. You teach me to play the harp. If I can­not play as well as you within one month, I will have you flog­ged. If I can­not play as well as you within three months, I will have you exe­cu­ted.“
The courtier’s face turns white. Cleo­pa­tra gives the cour­tier an evil smirk and then turns and walks off.
Make of this what you will.

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

18 Responses to “the cleopatra effect”

  1. Bah, a ver­bal con­tract isn’t worth the paper it’s writ­ten on ;-)
    Publi­city will build you, adver­ti­sing will main­tain you, but “the media” can des­troy you.
    I don’t give a damn either. But that doesn’t mean I don’t care .…

  2. Exce­llent ana­logy. Keep up the good work.

  3. churchpundit says:

    Maybe the les­son is to play infe­rior to those who are more power­ful than you, but play supe­rior to those you have power over? Umm… I don’t unders­tand what I just said. thus spoke churchpundit!

  4. Jill Drapre says:

    You’ve made a living out of being snide. Bless your soul.

  5. The trou­ble with a lot of ‘ongoing’ cor­po­rate con­sul­ting ser­vi­ces is cor­po­ra­tes require both the crea­tive cle­ver stuff/ideas etc and the regu­lar reports about how clever/effective the ideas they are being sold are. The pro­blem is often that the guys get so good at repor­ting to the client how cle­ver they are they take their eye of the ball and for­get to be cle­ver crea­ti­vely.
    In the Cleo­pa­tra sce­na­rio the cour­tier may need a cle­ver repor­ting assis­tant if he is either a poor teacher or she a hope­less harp pupil. “Oh that sounds so good your majesty — every day you improve so much” gushes the repor­ting assis­tant as the clumsy diva pro­du­ces yet more gut wrenching screeches.
    So many con­sul­ting firms tell their clients what they want to hear, not what they need to hear (ie you mis­ter client are a dumb, sui­ted, power cra­zed, phsycho). I think Gaping­void con­sul­tancy would be great. Hugh might do a great job of telling his clients where to get off as the rea­lity of old power bases crum­bling star­ted to dawn on them.

  6. Veda K says:

    Perhaps a cle­ve­rer reply on the courtier’s behalf would have been that while he was a good musi­cian, he would make a lousy teacher.
    Love your work, by the way.

  7. peter says:

    this seems to me to be the core issue with blog­ging in 2006. Cou­ple of years ago “authen­ti­city” was the defi­ning ele­ment that sepa­ra­ted a blog entry from a press release. The explo­sion in blog­ging con­sul­tants blurs that sepa­ra­tion. Blog­ging has got more to do with chan­ging the way you do busi­ness than fines­sing your cor­po­rate per­sona. Crea­ting the illu­sion that you care is not enough.
    PR man — How do I know that you are authen­tic?
    Blog­ger —  I say “fuck” a lot
    hehe

  8. Adriana says:

    Peter, spot on!
    As someone who soils one’s hands with cor­po­ra­tes, I totally agree with Hugh. The trick is to do that on your own terms, espe­cially if they come to you. Define the con­di­tions and ‘reframe’ the enga­ge­ment. Don’t be a con­sul­tant, that’s just another ‘c-word’. Tell them upfront, what’s going to hap­pen, e.g. my ‘tagline’ is: Implo­ding com­pa­nies, one silo at a time. If they still hire me, there is hope. :)
    In my mind, I don’t deal with cor­po­ra­tes, I deal with indi­vi­duals wor­king within them. They are also peo­ple, just like you and me, some­ti­mes they just need to be de-borged. :)

  9. Jane Greer says:

    Mike Peter Reed gives me an idea for a car­toon, Hugh:
    “Just because I don’t give a damn
    doesn’t mean I don’t care.“
    Love it!

  10. GaryV says:

    Right on! and this not only applies to con­sul­tants but also to emplo­yees who think outside the box and take a risk on behalf of their companies.

  11. The stand out thing about Cleopatra’s com­ment here is that she’s beha­ving like a fuc­king moron and is only out-shone by the stu­pi­dity of the har­pist.
    Unless of course she is laying a trap for the obse­quious little brown-noser in which case he deser­ves everything he gets.

  12. I tend to bide by the ‘Carry on Cleo­pa­tra’ rule:
    If they look like Amanda Barrie circa 1964 I’ll do anything.
    I’m just get­ting to the stage where I’m get­ting asked fre­quently to apply ‘The Tin­basher Effect’ to other small busi­nes­ses.
    As if I’m Paul Daniels.
    I then give them the passive/aggressive Dragon’s Den inter­view tech­ni­que if they sound like they have poten­tial.
    And if they do have poten­tial I won’t touch it unless I get quite a share in the online side of things and I have con­trol.
    I obviously get tur­ned down quite a bit.
    Thanks for the focus poin­ter. I’m just going to tell a pros­pec­tive client to fuck off.

  13. Saira says:

    Hugh Mac­Leod, I abso­lu­tely love your car­toons. Abso­lu­tely ran­dom drop-in. :)

  14. Cassie says:

    You are ama­zing and I am currently doing a english paper on one of your car­toons. I really like this blog though, because it’s not only funny but also true to the core. Thank you!

  15. Daniel K says:

    1. As a greenhorn it took me two dedi­ca­ted nights to find out everything about cor­po­rate blog­ging (blogs are easy to find and well con­nec­ted, duh!). So it does not need a pro con­sul­tant who gets a sh…load of money for it.
    2. It NEEDS some­body who´s blog­ging cons­tantly and honestly — and who has at least some kind of mes­sage. I think you can give the poor to-be cor­po­rate blog­gers gui­de­li­nes on how to be unders­tan­da­ble and somehow cool. The pro­blem is: They need free­dom & trust to be fast as the blog­world is. And peo­ple see if the PR chec­ked the spe­lling first. In the end, they can spoil more than achie­ving anything.
    3. What the hell did I want to say? About Cleo: If you ever make ONE cus­to­mer your ONLY queen, you´ve done something wrong right at the start…
    Yup. Thanks for being an idol com­bi­ning sucess AND coolness.

  16. Samantha says:

    Actually, this reminds me of the ten­dency of con­sul­tants, espe­cially, and some­ti­mes others who are so des­pe­rate for the busi­ness that they hardly hear what they’re com­mit­ting to before screa­ming, “Yes, yes, we can do that, too!” Often, before the check has even clea­red they’re thin­king, “Oh shit, what did I get myself into?!“
    I would say, in my case, half of such enga­ge­ments resul­ted in beau­ti­ful music (’cause I’m so moti­va­ted by pres­sure) and half in, well, near-fatal flog­ging.
    Live and learn, we do.

  17. Alice_no says:

    Halo!
    Check this out!
    *