September 21, 2006

case study: english cut

Send to Kindle

888888970.jpg
I’m spea­king today at the “Social Net­work Tools & Their Busi­ness Appli­ca­tion” con­fe­rence in Lon­don. The title of my talk is: “Case Study: Using Blogs to Create a Glo­bal Micro-Business”. I’ll be tal­king about English Cut, and how it trans­for­med Tho­mas’ tai­lo­ring busi­ness and edu­ca­ted his cus­to­mers.
The story of how Tho­mas, myself and later, New York PR maven Dave Par­met star­ted wor­king together was won­der­fully re-told in Naked Conversations:

Mac­Leod says he “star­ted filling Mahon’s head with Clue­train and blog­ging stuff,” and slowly Mahon got inte­res­ted. “We star­ted thin­king that if Mahon could talk about tai­lo­ring on a blog about the same way that Seth Godin talks about mar­ke­ting, then the peo­ple who care will see it. Mahon wouldn’t try to sell suits on the blog. Ins­tead, he would show his know­ledge and love of the craft. He would explain the labor, and mate­rials invol­ved and why the cost of each suit was jus­ti­fied.” The idea was that the peo­ple who cared either about suits or how a mas­ter crafts­men crea­tes them would find their way to the site.

My father remar­ked to me the other day, “I bet you had no idea in the begin­ning that the blog would work as well as it did, eh?“
True, I had no idea. But loo­king back, we had a few things going for us.

1. A great pro­duct. Tho­mas is one of the best tai­lors in the world. His suits REALLY ARE that good. If we were just selling com­mo­di­fied drek, I doubt if anyone would’ve paid much atten­tion.
2. A uni­que story. When he star­ted, Tho­mas was the only Savile Row tai­lor wri­ting a blog, and this gave him a uni­que voice in the blo­gosphere. This fue­lled the inte­rest. Had mas­ses of tai­lors already been blog­ging, it would’ve been much har­der for his own uni­que “idea-virus” to spread. The first-mover advan­tage rule still applies.
3. Pas­sion & Autho­rity. Tho­mas has both in spa­des. That’s what kept peo­ple coming back. That’s what built up trust. That’s what tur­ned his rea­ders into cus­to­mers. Which is why “Share what you love” is the best advice there is.
4. Con­ti­nuity. He kept at it. He didn’t expect the blog to trans­form his for­tu­nes over­night. As I’m fond of saying, “Blogs don’t write them­sel­ves”. Based on our expe­rience, if you want blogs to trans­form your busi­ness, I’d say give your­self at least a year.
5. Focus. It was always about the suits. It was never about what he had for break­fast, Tech­no­rati rank or frothy gos­sip about other blog­gers.
6. Tho­mas spoke in his own voice. Tho­mas is a straight­for­ward, affa­ble fellow, and the voice on the blog is the same as the voice you meet in real life. He never tried to mis­re­pre­sent him­self on his blog, nor try to create some over-glamorized image of his pro­fes­sion. He just told it like it is. And peo­ple res­pon­ded well to that. As he once put it, “We’re so lucky we don’t have to create the brand out of thin air. We just tell the truth and the brand builds itself.“
7. Sove­reignty. The only peo­ple we had to please were the two of us. No bos­ses or outside inves­tors to keep happy. Bos­ses and inves­tors like gua­ran­tees, but there aren’t any.
8. We were both broke when we star­ted. Had we had mas­ses of money at the begin­ning, we would have had a lot more options on how to get the word out. In all like­lihood, these options would have been a lot more expen­sive and not nearly as effec­tive. Some­ti­mes lack of capi­tal is a defi­nite advantage.

A blog is a great way to build one’s own per­so­nal “glo­bal mic­ro­brand”. As the Job-For-Life no lon­ger exists, as the value of the social “posi­tion” ero­des and the value of the “pro­ject” takes its place, per­so­nal brand deve­lop­ment beco­mes far more impor­tant to one’s career. Blogs are a good place to start.
Hey, if a Savile Row tai­lor can do it, what’s your excuse?

Be Socia­ble, Share!

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

Tags: , , ,

16 Responses to “case study: english cut”

  1. Too true Hugh, and boi­led down so elo­quently by someone you once quo­ted to me in ‘share what you love’
    Good luck at the con­fe­rence today.

  2. Good luck toay Hugh — I’m keen to know *how* you are pre­sen­ting the story? Drea­ded Power­Point, using car­toons, or just win­gin it with the best of ‘em? :)
    Steve

  3. robert says:

    What’s my excuse? I don’t have a Hugh Mac­leod in my camp!
    Booohooo!

  4. Umm, I don’t have an ultra-luxury pro­duct sold to the very well-off, with a super-high barrier to entry in the mar­ket, that’s effec­ti­vely adver­ti­sed with “lifestyle porn”?
    If you do ful­fill all those con­di­tions — GO FOR IT! Blog­ging has great poten­tial for you!
    For every­body else, well, what you’re being sold is a bill of goods.

  5. Yes, share what you love. But in a suit? Come on. I thought you were a rebel…
    Just jokin’… –n.l.

  6. But we can all emu­late the peo­ple we admire, Robert.

  7. Hugh MacLeod says:

    Yes, Seth, having stuff peo­ple want to read and selling stuff peo­ple actually want to buy does fac­tor into it.
    Just like the real world, ima­gine that ;-)

  8. Well, I have no excuse. I try to do it. And thats why this sum­mary of yours is very impor­tant and use­ful for me. I just star­ted, as you can see in my blog.
    Espe­cially the “Focus” point is impor­tant to me and a thing that needs impro­ve­ment, I´m afraid. You are well­come to take a look, though.

  9. Ian Green says:

    Ques­tion: How do we engage with the Lud­di­tes — my defi­ni­tion not their’s — and those not enga­ged with new media.
    I think what you’ve done is fan­tas­tic — for English Cut and Stormhoek — and hope the con­fe­rence went well, but I do won­der some­ti­mes whether tra­di­tio­nal media really get it and, I con­fess, I sup­pose I was a Lud­dite for a long time too. Howe­ver, I do strug­gle over how we bring the two world’s together. When we launched Wensleydaleblog.co.uk it was an act of faith — or, as you would say an “act of love”, and, lar­gely ins­pi­red by your expe­rien­ces.
    But there is an ele­ment of Us and Them in the debate at the moment and I won­der how we over­come that among those who embrace the new tech­no­logy and those,for the time being, who hate it. Wens­ley­dale has 160 staff and we have not be able to con­vice them to go to the blog and post a com­ment or opi­nion — ins­pite of the fact that I have told them they can say anything they like inc­lu­ding one guy (their best wor­ker) who is deaf and dumb. What a great story! Mana­ge­ment love it too but I have to bully them to blog as well.
    I love the poten­tial of blogs, web 2.0 etc — but there are still a lot of peo­ple out there who are bliss­fully una­ware of what’s hap­pe­ning in our world.
    How do we engage with them? Press Relea­ses? Media Brie­fings? Lunch with CEO?
    It doesn’t all tie up at pre­sent. Ans­wer please.

  10. Kathy Sierra says:

    “For every­body else, well, what you’re being sold is a bill of goods.“
    Maybe not… I’ve heard from lots of peo­ple ins­pi­red by Hugh’s “glo­bal mic­ro­brand” thing who’ve had much suc­cess with it without mee­ting the rich-person/high-barrier-to-entry cri­te­ria (a cow­boy and a one-woman jewe­lery maker are two exam­ples). And I cer­tainly wouldn’t con­si­der my pro­gram­ming books in the cate­gory of “lifestyle porn”, but paying atten­tion to Hugh’s list has been more use­ful and suc­cess­ful (not to men­tion fun and rewar­ding) than I could have ima­gi­ned.
    Do *we* really have con­trol over whether we’re suc­cess­ful or not? Not quite… the REAL “gate­kee­pers” are now our readers/users/customers. THEY are the ones who decide whether we have something worth their time, effort, money, etc. What we *can* con­trol is how much we res­pect, lis­ten to, and care about them, cou­pled with the ways in which we demons­trate that.
    Thank-you Hugh!

  11. sbill30 says:

    Having plod­ded through your archi­ves over the past few weeks, I find this as fine a defi­ni­tion as you’ve yet crea­ted to explain your endea­vors.
    During my time in your archi­ves, I’ve made a few notes to myself about puting your theo­ries into action. What’s attrac­tive is that I want to make a home stand in the small Mid­wes­tern (USA) town from which I hail.
    You’re in Cum­bria these days, not Lon­don or New York where you’d been slave to prior. Bravo to that.
    My hope is to do the same. I call it “min­ding the store,” and in my notes, I point out that “min­ding the store” has tra­di­tio­nally meant that we stay behind or close to our geo­graphi­cal roots for something we refuse to relin­quish. Tra­di­tio­nally, this has meant that we give up oppor­tu­ni­ties elsewhere in order to remain with the fami­liar or family ties.
    Cum­bria ain’t Texas, my friend. But it need not be. In the last few days I’ve set in motion a way to make the home stand. It’s a bit of glo­bal mic­ro­bran­ding and a bit of asking what I’m worth from the dimi­nished bar­gai­ning point of tele­com­mu­ting.
    With luck you’ll hear back.

  12. Shazz says:

    While I’ve gotta love the “lifestyle porn” com­ment above for pure cheek ;-) ha! … blog­ging and the micro-approach can be (is) a power­ful human-scale combo for com­mu­ni­ca­ting mea­ning­fully and effec­ti­vely.
    Why, just take a quick peek over at a few blogs like these to unders­tand the (non-luxury) oppor­tu­nity. Blen­ded with micro-preneurship like Lesedi … wow!
    http://www.netsquared.org/
    http://foodmuseum.typepad.com/food_museum_blog/
    http://www.artsjournal.com/man/
    http://www.lesedi.org/
    And, you know, what’s wrong with a little luxury in our lives? Espe­cially when it hasn’t been mar­ked up 800% and deper­so­na­li­zed … pas­sing through imper­so­nal, byzan­tine cor­po­rate chan­nels.
    Have fun!

  13. Sheamus says:

    Well-done Hugh. Best wishes regar­ding your pre­sen­ta­tion at the conference.

  14. Jim Moffat says:

    As someone who was in the audience when Hugh gave this talk, I’d like to thank him for spea­king straight, with pas­sion and autho­rity. What Hugh says makes for a suc­cess­ful business-generating blog is also true for any effec­tive com­mu­ni­ca­tion. Like his blog, he spoke from the heart with con­vic­tion and know­ledge. As a result, he got my vote as the top spea­ker there and should do it more often.

  15. Meikah Delid says:

    Very use­ful tips, Hugh. You have also cap­tu­red very well the thrust of English Cut. Tell you what, the 8 items above has me thin­king of how I can improve my blog to please and help (in some ways) my rea­ders. So, thank you! :)

  16. […] Row tai­lor Tho­mas Mahon with his English Cut blog – I would have refe­ren­ced him (cour­tesy Hugh Macc­Leod) back in 2005 in my “How and why to start a blog” pitch.  In another way I was […]