September 4, 2006

untitled pyramid

untitledpyramid633.jpg
[Car­toon ins­pi­red by this doo­zie. Man, and you thought A-Listers were up their own ass…]
[Thanks, Kai, for the link.]

19 Responses to “untitled pyramid”

  1. AndrewH says:

    i put forth my favou­rite ques­tion:
    how many third gra­ders (9 year old chil­dren) would it take to kick your ass?
    i doubt those brai­niacs will see the dee­per mea­ning (humi­lity and ego) of my conundrum.

  2. Niko says:

    What’s higher up the ass: trying to ini­tiate world­wide dis­cus­sion about social change, or con­ti­nue world­wide dis­cus­sion about the chan­ging of geeks’ social lives by tech­no­lo­gi­cal “inven­tions” and the ver­sion num­bers involved?

  3. John Dodds says:

    I’d give them some ques­tions to answer!!

  4. You aren’t indi­rectly refe­rring to Jason Fried, are you?

  5. In Como­ros you are favou­rite blog, I like comic books and rude words. Shaum

  6. Chris says:

    Did you see the ques­tions that are vying to by asked to the so-called Great Minds? This is one of them:
    “How do we reduce the eli­tism of know­ledge such as your event? Why do the mas­ses ask you and not the other way around? Can you not ask ques­tions of us and allow us to ans­wer. Car­tainly we have bet­ter ans­wers being more minds than you.”
    (By Peter Timusk, 46, Ottawa, Canada)
    That sounds like the Clue­train pulling into Eli­te­vi­lle station…

  7. jon says:

    never liked direct selling

  8. Niko says:

    I hate to be the one liking the drop­pingk­now­ledge con­cept.. but any­way, if you read further than the pyra­mid, the point of the round table event is to *start* a dis­cus­sion, which should be had bet­ween peo­ple, not the great minds.
    Not everything has to start with hum­ble geeks blog­ging away 3 years, hoping to make the a-list. Some things can be star­ted with a big bang. How effec­tive the “big bang” approach is, is deba­ta­ble. But crea­ting a big atten­tion bang doesn’t auto­ma­ti­cally mean the peo­ple invol­ved are up their asses.

  9. Hugh MacLeod says:

    Big atten­tion bang? What big atten­tion bang?
    http://www.alexaholic.com/gapingvoid.com+www.droppingknowledge.org

  10. Niko says:

    As said, “how effec­tive the big bang approach is, is deba­ta­ble”. But they are free to try, and I argue this trying still keeps their heads below the ass level. Let’s wait and see what the graph looks like next week.

  11. Dan G says:

    Ow that site is pre­ten­tious!
    It seems very left-wing but I love the irony that they’ve been given chauffeur-driven Mer­ce­des to “ride around Ber­lin in”.
    These folks never heard of public trans­port, or, God for­bid, wal­king?

  12. Hugh MacLeod says:

    Disa­gree, Niko.
    One of the most effec­tive ways of kee­ping one’s head up one’s ass is to shroud it all up in good inten­tions. And if you can tie your own puny, por­ten­tous agenda to something of glo­bal import, even bet­ter.
    Just my opinion.

  13. Niko says:

    Gotta love a fore­ver cynic. If nothing comes out of the event, at least it shows no mor­tal should try to make the world a bet­ter place without appro­val from the blog elite. ;)

  14. Hugh MacLeod says:

    Niko– you learn fast ;-)

  15. David Armano says:

    Hugh,
    How come when I put a pyra­mid on my blog, ever­yone freaks out and tells me about fifty dif­fe­rent ways that the blo­gosphere is in no way a pyra­mid.
    But when you put one up on yours, nobody bats an eye­lash? ;)

  16. Hugh MacLeod says:

    David Armano, pyra­mids freak peo­ple out. I blame John Calvin.

  17. Kynthia says:

    “the public iden­ti­fied 500 ques­tions as those most likely to ini­tate open dia­log”
    um… i don’t think “ini­tate” is a word.
    appa­rently there aren’t many copy edi­tors that high up in the ass.

  18. That was terri­ble! I mean, for­get about if it was arro­gant or wha­te­ver, it was just plain boring!

  19. Anonymous says:

    Im pro­bably an idiot, but that wasn’t at all funny.