August 26, 2006

the global microbrand: 10 questions for seth godin

smallis673.jpg
Seth Godin and I had a recent e-mail exchange. I asked him ten ques­tions:
1. QUESTION: Your latest book, “Small Is The New Big”, is not a narra­tive or a the­sis in any sense, but a collec­tion of your favo­rite wri­tings from your blog and your old Fast Com­pany column. A collec­tion of synapse-firings, the way I see it. Is it impor­tant to you to have your work “immor­ta­li­zed” on paper? Do you find the inter­net and maga­zi­nes just too ephe­me­ral, and wan­ted to crea­ted something more “las­ting”? Or was it just simply because, as you say, you wan­ted your ideas to reach beyond the blo­gosphere?

ANSWER:
It’s impor­tant not to unde­res­ti­mate the totem value of a book. The same way a white lab coat makes a pla­cebo more likely to be effec­tive (or a witch doctor’s hat for that mat­ter), a book deli­vers an impact that a blog can’t.
While there’s cer­tainly some ego in wan­ting your thou­sands of posts not to disap­pear, there’s also a real desire on my part to give my exis­ting rea­ders the abi­lity to taunt their co-workers by han­ding them a book ins­tead of emai­ling them a link. If my job is to make change, I need to use the best tools that are avai­la­ble.
It’s also hard to read a blog at the beach.
I want to be clear about something I just dis­co­ve­red though – that there IS a theme. The title really cap­tu­res what the book is about. I’ve been ama­zed that revie­wers (pro­fes­sio­nal and pro-am) have see­med to find something that I didn’t when I was busy wri­ting it… that acting small, trea­ting peo­ple like peo­ple, chan­ging like an indi­vi­dual, not an orga­ni­za­tion… these are attri­bu­tes that are essen­tial now, and they’re on every page of the book. I think I pic­ked the right riff for the title.
2. QUESTION: As a car­too­nist, I find myself quite sur­pri­sed that very few of the more pro­mi­nent blog­gers out there are in the “Arts”. It seems we have lots of busi­ness thin­kers, tech­no­lo­gists, entre­pre­neurs, con­sul­tants etc, but why do we have so sur­pri­singly few film­ma­kers, playw­rights, nove­lists, musi­cians, pain­ters etc at the top of the pyra­mid? I have a few theo­ries myself as to why this is, but may I ask what may be your take on it?
ANSWER: They’re coming, for sure. Pos­tsec­ret is one of the three most popu­lar blogs in the world. I think mains­tream artists are rarely the first to embrace a new medium (silksc­ree­ning, for exam­ple, took a long time to get its Andy Warhol), but they’re coming. It’s going to be a new gene­ra­tion of artists that embrace the nature of the medium, and they’re just get­ting star­ted.
3. QUESTION: Let’s ima­gine, for wha­te­ver rea­son, you had deci­ded not to start blog­ging, and keep on exc­lu­si­vely wri­ting books ins­tead. How dif­fe­rent do you think your career would be today?
ANSWER: My books would be lon­ger, more appre­cia­ted by cri­tics and less popu­lar. I’d have note­books filled with unfi­nished sen­ten­ces and peo­ple wouldn’t mail me ber­muda shorts. Thanks for the shorts, by the way, I love them.
What your rea­ders already rea­lize is that blogs aren’t just a way to waste time at work. It’s a big shift, a change for a gene­ra­tion.
4. QUESTION: From what I can tell, you make a pretty good living from your books and public spea­king gigs. One could inte­lli­gently argue that you don’t really need to set up other enter­pri­ses– Squid­doo etc– in order to main­tain your current stan­dard of living. But you do so any­way. So assu­ming I am correct [I may not be, but hey, it’s not like it’s any of my busi­ness either way], that you’re not doing these enter­pri­ses pri­ma­rily for the money, what do you think moti­va­tes you to inc­rease your wor­kload in this man­ner?
ANSWER: It’s not a wor­kload! Look, there are 8 million millio­nai­res in the USA. Why do these peo­ple go to work every day? Why not down­size appro­pria­tely and just sit on the beach? Because they’re too smart. They rea­lize that the pur­pose of living isn’t to bake in the sun until you die. I write and speak and expe­ri­ment because that’s what I do. I’m thri­lled to have the chance to do it every day. Any day I’m not thri­lled, I’ll stop.
As a result of the trans­pa­rency of blog­ging, a lot of peo­ple have rea­li­zed, almost as an aside, that peo­ple do what they love to do. It’s just now you get to see it on your screen. Some­ti­mes those things appear to have no finan­cial incen­ti­ves (rai­sing gold­fish) and some­ti­mes they do. But let’s be clear… unless you work for Gold­man Sachs or are selling drugs on a street cor­ner in Topeka, you’re almost cer­tainly not in this, wha­te­ver this is, for the money.
Most of the time, for most peo­ple, in most indus­tries, it’s not REALLY about the money.
5. QUESTION: A lot of peo­ple read your books and speak highly of them. But is there any par­ti­cu­lar part of your body of work that you think is misun­ders­tood by a sur­pri­singly high per­cen­tage of your rea­ders?
ANSWER:I’m not sur­pri­sed that a per­cen­tage (not so big, though) of peo­ple who read my books use them and mis­cons­true them to jus­tify their own stra­te­gies. Per­mis­sion Mar­ke­ting is not about spam­ming peo­ple just by clai­ming you have “per­mis­sion.” And a Pur­ple Cow isn’t pur­ple because you think it is… it’s up to the mar­ket. But in gene­ral, I’d say that the ideas are tra­ve­ling pretty well.
On the other hand, my brie­fer riffs, cryp­tic blog posts and such, get me in trou­ble all the time. I make assump­tions about peo­ple unders­tan­ding my train of thought and my tone of voice, and I got caught. I’m trying to walk a fine line bet­ween cla­rity and pithi­ness.
6. QUESTION: Of all your books, which one would you rew­rite, if the publishers would let you?
ANSWER: I wish I had another shot at “Sur­vi­val is Not Enough”. I’m not sure how I would change it, but I think it’s a very strong book, and it wasn’t a total fai­lure.
7. QUESTION: I know for a fact that you ins­pire a lot of blog­gers. Could you name a few of the blog­gers who ins­pire you?
ANSWER: Joi Ito got me star­ted. You cha­llenge me regu­larly to rethink the limits. Tom Peters reminds me that I don’t work hard enough.
I also read dozens of blogs a day, inc­lu­ding: acleareye.com, Joel on Soft­ware, Brand Autopsy, Boing­boing, Spring­wise, Buzz­machine, Pre­sen­ta­tion Zen, Guy Kawa­saki, Kathy Sie­rra, Fred Wil­son, Rick Segal, etc.
Most of my ins­pi­ra­tion, though, comes from wal­king down the street, or wor­king with the gang at Squi­doo or rea­ding my email every day. It’s so easy for a blog­ger to try to be like other blog­gers, merely because there’s so much input avai­la­ble. Resist!
8. QUESTION: If you’re a mar­ke­ter, I believe that thri­ving in the old, top-down “TV-Industrial Com­plex” era, as you call it, and thri­ving in your new world of “Per­mis­sion Mar­ke­ting” and “Idea Viru­ses” require com­ple­tely dif­fe­rent skill sets. So although you may sell a lot of books, do you ever get frus­tra­ted that your ideas are slow to reach the peo­ple who pro­bably could use them the most? [AFTERTHOUGHT: Pos­si­ble title for a future blog post: “The best ideas are always last to reach the peo­ple who need them the most.” Yes? No? Maybe?]
ANSWER: I’m asto­nished at how long it takes an idea to fil­ter from the early adop­ters to the mas­ses. What sort of per­son just read the Da Vinci Code or just dis­co­ve­red the iPod? I was stan­ding in a nice store in a nice suburb and heard one 25 year old explain to a 30 year old what gmail was… it’s so easy to assume that ever­yone already gets it.
9. QUESTION: Was your even­tual tran­si­tion from busi­ness entre­pre­neur to wri­ter a long-held ambi­tion of yours, or did it evolve slowly, perhaps almost hap­pe­ning by acci­dent?
ANSWER: I wrote my first book in 1986… at first, I enjo­yed the entre­pre­neu­rial nature of pac­ka­ging books – the barrier to entry was tiny, the publishers gave you the small stake you nee­ded, and if it wor­ked, you could run with it. In fact, it was just like blog­ging, except it cost more. I have no doubt at all that if there had been blogs in 1986, I would have skip­ped a whole bunch of inter­me­diate steps along the way.
Five years from now, there are going to be at least 2,000 (maybe 20,000) free­lan­cers who have tur­ned blog­ging into a tech­ni­que to leve­rage a suc­cess­ful media busi­ness. First in have a head start.
10. QUESTION: Last year I asked you what effect having a blog has had on your book wri­ting career. Would you mind repea­ting your ans­wer here, for the bene­fit of my rea­ders?
ANSWER: A year ago, I told you that blogs had killed my inte­rest in wri­ting books, because they relie­ved the pres­sure of ideas buil­ding up. My blog got me quick, good feed­back and made it easy to spread ideas without resor­ting to a dying industry.
Since then I’ve lear­ned that books reach a dif­fe­rent popu­la­tion in a dif­fe­rent way. I really need to do both. Live and learn!
11. BONUS QUESTION: What is your defi­ni­tion of a “glo­bal mic­ro­brand”? And do you con­si­der your­self to be one?
ANSWER: A “glo­bal mic­ro­brand” is a little like a jumbo shrimp, I guess.
Brand is an old-fashioned word that was inven­ted for mar­ke­ters who couldn’t mea­sure con­nec­tions bet­ween peo­ple. Brand is a collec­tion of notions and hints and desi­res and wisps that allow a con­su­mer a short­cut when thin­king about an orga­ni­za­tion, pro­duct or even a per­son. So, I don’t really know Sum­ner Reds­tone, but he has a brand, at least in my mind (scary thought).
The thing about these short­cut and pla­cehol­der ideas is that they are always slightly inac­cu­rate, dif­fe­rent for dif­fe­rent peo­ple and not as sub­ject to mani­pu­la­tion as most mar­ke­ters would like. As a result, tal­king about them as a mono­lith is silly.
So, if you’re a brand, Hugh, then I’m a brand. But we’re peo­ple, too, and our only option is to paraph­rase the great grou­pies of the 60s and reply, “I’m with the brand.”

23 Responses to “the global microbrand: 10 questions for seth godin”

  1. anne says:

    another post that i loved rea­ding — thanks.
    i feel very strongly a need to com­ment on ques­tion num­ber 2. there is a another fun­da­men­tal, basic rea­son why artists do not blog. they are busy making art!
    most artists have to work pretty hard to turn their craft. if they ARE well-known, they also MUST par­ti­ciapte in a public life (the kind where you actually phy­si­cally min­gle with the public), in addi­tion to wor­king long days.
    if not well-known yet, they must work all day at a paying job and then work all night at art.
    peo­ple who invest in artists want to see, touch, and be with the ARTIST — the artist’s thoughts are not as mar­ke­ta­ble, as say, seth grodin’s, until they are tur­ned into art.
    let’s face it, blog­ging takes time and energy. many artists just can’t spare it.

  2. Nia says:

    I have two arty blogs: a poetry one and a dance one. I would con­si­der myself a poet but not a dan­cer, in the sense that I don’t know much and I don’t intend to be a pro­fes­sio­nal dan­cer, ever. Both are small, espe­cially the poetry one (few rea­ders, few links). I think some of the rea­sons why there are so few of us and why we have such small blogs is your often-mentioned “the rea­der wants to know what’s in it for them”. I mean, we do things that not a lot of peo­ple care about. Hai­kus, as much as I like them, aren’t going to change the world or anyone’s bank balance.
    In this I see a dif­fe­rence in my two blogs. Even though the dance one makes it clear that I am not an expert and that all I say are my very jud­ge­men­tal opi­nions, and it is in Spa­nish only which limits rea­dership, it has twice as many rea­ders as the other one (older and bilin­gual). There are peo­ple out there who want me to review their semi­nars, recom­mend their teachers, give them advice, or simply give them com­ment space so that they can flame if they feel like it. There’s money, self-esteem, and pres­tige involved.

  3. Pete Gilbert says:

    Nice inter­view with Seth whose wri­tings and videos are always worth stop­ping what you are doing to read/watch.
    As an artist who attempts to blog, I find a real con­flict of inte­rests about what I should be blog­ging about, and what I feel peo­ple are inte­res­ted in. If I con­cen­trate on my art, it feels “bogus” (although I am free to admit that it’s pro­bably my own inse­cu­rity there). If I talk about what is hap­pe­ning in the art world, it’s extre­mely dif­fi­cult to not sound too much like a Guar­dian art cri­tic. The area that I feel most com­for­ta­ble blog­ging about is where art meets tech­no­logy, and there does seem to be sites out there doing OK on that score (http://www.we-make-money-not-art.com and http://www.coolhunting.com) although I agree its a drop in the ocean com­pa­red to all the tech sites.

  4. David Armano says:

    “but why do we have so sur­pri­singly few film­ma­kers, playw­ri­tes, nove­lists, musi­cians, pain­ters etc at the top of the pyra­mid?”
    Whoah. this is freaky. I just did a visual last night that shows dif­fe­rent levels of blog­gers in a kind of “human pyra­mid”
    http://darmano.typepad.com/logic_emotion/2006/08/levels_of_influ.html
    And good inter­view. It’s a remin­der that peo­ple still like to read books. Though, to Seth’s point about taking blogs to the beach, I actually did just that on my sum­mer vaca­tion — using my mobile phone. Then again, I have blog addic­tion issues.

  5. tls says:

    Hugh, I com­ple­tely agree with your obser­va­tion in ques­tion #2. I am wor­king on a pro­ject that goes in that direc­tion. Launch plan­ned for Novem­ber, let me know if you are inte­res­ted to have a sneak peak a cou­ple of weeks before. I would love to have your feed­back. It is not about tech­no­logy though, but you gave me some ins­pi­ra­tion and I will you back the cre­dit…
    tls

  6. Jeff Risley says:

    Nicely done Hugh. I remem­ber rea­ding one of Seth’s early books, published in 1995 (it’s on the book­self next to me now) called “Wis­dom, Inc.; 26 Busi­nes Vir­tues that turn ordi­nary peo­ple into extraor­di­nary lea­ders.” I dis­co­ve­red Seth via his work with Jay Con­rad Levin­son and Gue­ri­lla Mar­ke­ting. I would encou­rage peo­ple to go back and read Seth’s books before he became popu­lar. It’s inte­res­ting to see his thin­king at that time.

  7. pedant says:

    Playw­right is not spe­lled playwrite.

  8. Seth always makes me feel so far behind the curve.
    My hope is to somehow find a way to make my work rele­vant in a world gone won­der­fully mad.
    “If at first the idea is not absurd, then there is no hope for it.” — Albert Einstein

  9. ming says:

    i got an art blog
    30dayartist.com

  10. Ivan Pope says:

    Hugh,
    I star­ted my inter­net life while at art college. I’ve been blog­ging as an artist for years, for the last two and a half at blog.ivanpope.com
    I’m also an inter­net entre­pre­neur — I find the two go very well together, but not so much at the same time. I always thought artists should blog, that it is so rare to hear the real voice of an artist unme­di­ta­ted by media and mana­ger. I star­ted my artist blog to talk about my life as an artist.
    Since I star­ted it I’ve seen many artists start to blog, but so many of them miss the point somewhat. A few are bri­lliant. And we’ll see lots more of this as we just learn to let go a little …

  11. Exce­llent inter­view.
    On Q2, if you click on my name you’ll find a Web Net­work Maga­zine stuf­fed with playw­rights, Sha­kes­pea­rean actors, nove­lists, artists and others of this ilk, all wri­ting blogs. There are also tech­no­lo­gists, entre­pre­neurs, con­sul­tants etc. I think the artists are pro­bably more than a little technophobic.

  12. I’m a musi­cian and I have a blog. It’s true though that most of my peers (in the UK any­way) don’t have blogs. Bli­mey, half of them don’t even have web­si­tes! So often I hear the age old excu­ses of hating tech­no­logy and not be able to “work” com­pu­ters.
    Unfor­tu­na­tely unless you get sig­ned to a record com­pany who’s gonna pay for and imple­ment a web­site for you, musi­cians are going to have to get to grips with this.
    Having said that, even if your record com­pany takes care of the tech­no­logy for you you’re still gonna have to write blog entries your­self. Besi­des, it’s fun.

  13. PJ says:

    There’s not much “art” traf­fic out there yet, so some artist blog­gers will have two blogs, then find ways to use tech­no­logy to talk about art, or art to talk about tech­no­logy.
    My abs­tract artist inter­view blog:
    http://www.knowingart.com/
    My more techy blog:
    http://www.ferodynamics.com/
    Marshall Spon­der runs http://www.webmetricsguru.com/
    He also blogs at
    http://www.artnewyorkcity.com/
    I chec­ked out Seth Godin’s Pur­ple Cow book. The cover caught my eye. There’s a few good quo­tes, and I’m sure he’s inte­lli­gent, but the wri­ting stinks. I wouldn’t want my name on a book so badly writ­ten. He should read more before he opens his mouth and makes a fool of him­self. Blog buzz and a cool cover can’t save a book that essen­tially s_cks.

  14. Hugh MacLeod says:

    PJ, I strongly disa­gree with you about Seth’s wri­ting abi­lity. Tech­ni­cally, I think he’s bri­lliant [whether you like his sub­ject mat­ter is another story, but that’s not his pro­blem]. Sorry you don’t feel the same.

  15. Piers Fawkes says:

    thanks for this H. Great discussion.

  16. nan says:

    Thanks for a great inter­view! Nan

  17. Marc Johns says:

    With regards to Ques­tion #2:
    I’m so glad someone has brought up this issue. It’s true — too few artists are blog­ging, or should I say effec­ti­vely blog­ging. A good exam­ple of an effec­tive blog would have to be Keri Smith’s (http://www.kerismith.com/blog/). She’s an accom­plished illus­tra­tor and wri­ter, and defi­ni­tely ans­wers the reader’s ques­tion “What’s in it for me”. She pours her heart out in every post, get­ting inten­sely per­so­nal, revea­ling her crea­tive pro­cess, her doubts, her frus­tra­tions. She gets loads of traf­fic AND com­ments. By being honest and unfil­te­red, rea­ders can relate. Her audience is pro­bably mostly artists, so it pro­bably doesn’t gene­rate illus­tra­tion gigs, but I bet it boosts sales of her books on creativity.

  18. I disa­gree re Q2. There are lots and lots of artists out there who blog — take a look at the blogs on the blo­groll on my main blog “Making a Mark” (http://makingamark.blogspot.com ) and then the blo­grolls on theirs etc. One of the great things about blog­ging for artists is that peo­ple who tend to work on their own deve­lop a com­mu­nity of their peers who unders­tand the nature of the pro­cess and look at their work and maybe com­ment on it.
    What’s inte­res­ting about artists blog­ging is the dif­fe­rent way peo­ple choose to do it. From the pain­ting a day peo­ple (like Julian Merrow Smith and Duiane Keiser) — who just post an image and a link to where you can buy it (recently cove­red by artic­les in tne New York Times and USA Today res­pec­ti­vely) to those who write about the pro­cess or the crea­tive spark along­side the image — and those who cap­ture epi­so­des in ima­ges as well as words — such as in my second blog Tra­vels with a Sketch­book in… (http://travelsketch.blogspot.com).
    And if you look at Squi­doo you should see that there are rather a lot of arts orien­ted lens — although whether you can find them all easily using the main search faci­lity has been the topic of a recent exchange bet­ween me and Mr Godin! ;)

  19. nexium says:

    Gene­raly its goood site.

  20. zyrtec says:

    Gene­raly its goood site.

  21. lexapro says:

    Gene­raly its goood site.

  22. addic­tion hydrocodone

  23. mikey says:

    g’day guy,
    I doubt there’s a busier per­son on squi­doo… but I’ll send this to you any­way because I saw your offer on squi­doo & ended up here…
    The Squi­dOf­fer thing is a won­der­ful idea & obviously still very new… So I’ve crea­ted this
    http://www.squidoo.com/CreateAGreatSquidooOffer/
    and am hoping that other offer crea­tors might want to add to the dis­cus­sion of how the offers could be even bet­ter…
    I hope you have time to come & check it out
    cheers,
    mikey