August 21, 2006

advertising movies via blogs

zzzzazzdfff06.jpg
Salient point from Robert Sco­ble:

I’ll tell you what exe­cu­ti­ves from big com­pa­nies (like Kraft, Proc­ter and Gam­ble, GM, and others) who were at MSN’s OWN ADVERTISING CONFERENCE told me. An influen­cer is worth THOUSANDS of times more than a non-influencer (influen­cer is someone who tells other peo­ple stuff, which is why blog­ging is get­ting so much adver­ti­sing atten­tion lately). That’s why Goo­gle is char­ging more per click than MSN is (Goo­gle has more influen­tial users). That’s why Fede­ra­ted Media is clo­sing adver­ti­sing deals left and right.

I’m still up in Glas­gow, about to go have a lunch mee­ting with the pro­du­cer of “Hallam Foe”, the new movie coming out that was direc­ted by my old friend, David Mac­ken­zie [I’m actually sta­ying at Colin Kennedy’s flat, the guy who wri­tes most of the blog].
I’m trying to turn the pro­duc­tion com­pany on to adver­ti­sing via Fede­ra­ted Media, Weblogs Inc and Blogads.com, once the movie is relea­sed, for the same rea­sons Robert men­tions above.
Nor­mally in this pos­ti­tion I think, “They’ll either get it or they won’t. If they don’t, no worries, it’s not my pro­blem.” And then move on.
But this time its dif­fe­rent. David’s a dear friend of mine, and I want the movie to be a hit. My ambi­tions here are more per­so­nal than pro­fes­sio­nal.
Howe­ver, one good thing we’ve got going for us is, the rough edit has just come out, and the con­cen­sus seems to be: it’s a good movie. I plan to see the film for the first time in the next cou­ple of days, so I’ll let you know what I think, as well. All very exci­ting.
Will it fly at the box office? I have no idea, but at least we now know that the final pro­duct shouldn’t be too shabby. Watch this space.
[Bonus Link] From Colin:

We have a very impor­tant ques­tion to ans­wer, how do we desc­ribe this film?
It doesn’t sound like a par­ti­cu­larly impor­tant ques­tion but it is, how else do we tell peo­ple about the film? The other aspect of this is that some stra­te­gies to get bums on seats can be mis­lea­ding, they might work for an ope­ning wee­kend but good word-of-mouth is widely recog­ni­sed as being the best mar­ke­ting you can have, so if you’re audience is cued up for an ine­vi­ta­ble disap­point­ment then word-of-mouth will be your downfall. 

I’d say the other impor­tant ques­tion is; how do we want other peo­ple to desc­ribe the film? Yeah, I know, the two are clo­sely related.

8 Responses to “advertising movies via blogs”

  1. John Dodds says:

    Why “once the movie is relea­sed” ? If sna­kes on a plane taught us anything, it’s that you need the buzz early to influence the key ele­ment in all this (the exhi­bi­tors) to actually give the moviue a chance. I think that will be par­ti­cu­larly salient in the case of Hallam Foe.

  2. Hugh MacLeod says:

    There’s a lot stuff we’re hoping to do “in time for the movie’s release”, as well, John. Fret not ;-)
    Too much movie mar­ke­ting is too little, too late. A mere, unwel­come appen­dage to the rest of the pro­duc­tion.
    I think Sna­kes On A Plane was rel wake-up call for a lot of peo­ple in the biz. The movie was men­tio­ned in con­ver­sa­tion more than once over lunch today.

  3. AGRADA says:

    Hey Hugh , [out of context]..What is the rela­tion bet­ween Web 2.0 and Terro­ro­sim 2.0 ? Just seriously curious.

  4. John Dodds says:

    I think Colin makes a very good point — not least because I blog­ged the same point about SOAP at the weekend.

  5. James Gross says:

    Hey Hugh–
    Send me an email in regards to Hallem Foe, we would love to run a cam­paign with them!
    James
    Fede­ra­ted Media

  6. > I think Sna­kes On A Plane was rel wake-up call for a lot of peo­ple in the biz.
    Unfor­tu­na­tely, I think you’re right. But SOaP was a one-time thing, like The Blair Witch Pro­ject. I doubt that a film like “Hallam Foe”, which doesn’t have a high con­cept (sna­kes on a plane! lost foo­tage of terro­ri­zed youth film­ma­kers!) is going to have much trac­tion.
    Play up the indie angle, get the artsy crowd inte­res­ted, and focus more on a few key influen­cers. Don’t expect or worry about get­ting the mas­sive SOaP grounds­well and you’ll do just fine.

  7. peter says:

    hate to burst any bub­bles here guys — but the folks at New Line Cinema are seriously disap­poin­ted over the returns from sna­kes on a plane.

  8. sna­kes on a plane this, sna­kes on a plane that, everyone’s tal­king about sna­kes on a fuc­king plane, I’ve seen the movie and all I’ve done is here the title, I’m not going anywhere near a cinema to see it ‘cos I don’t have to and it sounds shit. I hope our audience has a bit more nous and guts and cool and balls.
    ck