June 15, 2006

good snowballs:

3 Comments

JP Ran­gas­wami hits the bull’s eye:

Coper­ni­cus and Gali­leo and New­ton and even Eins­tein would have had a far easier time if they were able to blog. Because good snow­balls can’t be suppressed.

3 Responses to “good snowballs:”

  1. chris says:
    June 15, 2006 at 8:23 pm

    Bollocks. They’d have been smac­ked down by the Slash­dot pea­nut gallery (or equi­va­lent) before they even had a chance to write anything up.
    Good snow­balls are just as easy to melt as bad snowballs.

  2. hugh macleod says:
    June 15, 2006 at 8:32 pm

    Really, Chris? And how many good snow­balls have you mel­ted recently? ;-)

  3. Matt says:
    June 16, 2006 at 3:47 pm

    Those guys crea­tes ava­lanches, not just snowballs.