June 9, 2006

geek dinners galore etc

nevereatalone481.jpg
The Stormhoek Geek Din­nery Good­ness con­ti­nues:

1. An mp4 video clip of ever­yone at the Miami geek din­ner hol­ding up their gaping­void fine art prints.
2. Looks like the Cork geek din­ner in Ire­land was a huge suc­cess. Microsoft’s Rob Burke also blog­ged about it.
3. There was our largest-so-far geek din­ner in Red­wood City, orga­ni­sed by the very talen­ted Kai Chang. 140 peo­ple tur­ned up, inc­lu­ding of Keith Ferrazzi of “Never Eat Alone” fame, and Char­les Sie­gel of Char­les Cho­co­la­tes, a glo­bal mic­ro­brand if ever there was one.
4. Andy and his friends had the geek din­ner in Tus­con, Ari­zona. They also put a lovely 20-second film short of the event up on You­Tube. Very cool.

I have three thoughts on all this:
1. It’s tur­ning out to be a lot more fun, inte­res­ting and suc­cess­ful than I pre­dic­ted. This is a good thing.
2. I don’t really feel I have any new “Mar­ke­ting 2.0″ theo­ries to explain what’s going on. I just think it’s really cool to meet like-minded peo­ple, and open a dia­lo­gue of sorts with them. If they like the wine, great. If not, no big deal. At least we’re trying to have fun with it. I really don’t think it needs to be any more com­pli­ca­ted than that.
3. I’m won­de­ring if, how and when this thing is going to scale outside of the blo­gosphere, into the mains­tream, where it needs to even­tually end up. Or will it just get stuck in the “Echo Cham­ber Of Death”, like so many other blog-related enter­pri­ses?
What do you think?

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

8 Responses to “geek dinners galore etc”

  1. karl long says:

    Maybe this isn’t such a new con­cept, like min­ded peo­ple get­ting together spon­so­red in some way by a pro­duct. Tup­per­ware party anyone?
    Gene DeRose (ex ceo of jupi­ter back in the day), star­ted up a thing called http://houseparty.com , which is more direc­ted at kids, and around the launch of games, shows etc. Nic­ke­lo­deon has been a big par­ti­ci­pant.
    I guess geek din­ners is like that, but you get to drink, and I assume there is some pos­si­bi­lity of get­ting laid :-)
    Karl

  2. It seems like it is gro­wing out of the blo­gosphere in an orga­nic fashion. That is won­der­ful. You began tal­king about Geek Dinner’s and peo­ple found out about them. The atten­dance is going up and, to me, it seems like these are hap­pe­ning very rapidly. It all seems like a very good, and obvious, way to further the idea / agenda / world domi­na­tion ;)
    Peo­ple are now tal­king about this as an event, so word-of-mouth ought to be hel­ping (unless these are all ‘invite only’ in which case my thoughts are done). After the fact, peo­ple will tell their friends about what they did and the word will tra­vel.
    Blog > Party > Peo­ple
    It seems like that is the tran­si­tion.
    BTW: Your blog is won­der­ful. It solely ins­pi­red me to get my own going. While the topics are dif­fe­rent, I saw how you could mix many inte­rests into one piece and make is cohe­sive. You are the glue and not a niche idea / tech­no­logy / poli­ti­cal stance. My site is now up, though still an infant, and is no lon­ger just a ‘port­fo­lio’ site. Truth­fully, my port­fo­lio is the least deve­lo­ped aspect at this moment. Who’da thunk?

  3. RichW says:

    Great ques­tion — could go either way. I guess you can either cre­dit or blame Stormhoek for not being more aggres­sive in follo­wing up. They didn’t ask for con­tact info on the sig­nup sheets — and they’re not even after the folks who hos­ted the geek din­ners to send the sheets and pho­tos in (I know — I’m one of the lazy bas­tards who haven’t done so yet).
    I can’t talk about the US in gene­ral, but I can talk about the SW Pennsyl­va­nia mar­ket.
    There are a lot more fac­tors that would affect sales here than than just WOM. At $10/bottle (which would pro­bably mean $13 in Pennsyl­va­nia), the wines we tas­ted at our geek din­ner were good, but most not clearly outs­tan­ding in com­pa­ri­son with others in the same price neigh­borhood. Plus you’ve got some naming issues.
    Here in Pitts­burgh, the term “Pino­tage” is rela­ti­vely mea­nin­gless — might as well just put the com­po­nent gra­pes on the label. Peo­ple who tas­ted it liked the wine well enough, but didn’t know what to serve it with. Is it a pinot noir or not? Do I serve it with steak or tur­key?
    Pinot Gris (which around here implies “French sophis­ti­ca­tion” and “qua­lity”) might have been a bet­ter naming choice for this mar­ket than Pinot Gri­gio (which in this mar­ket implies “less expen­sive” and “less fla­vor­ful” and “I’ll only buy Italian-made because Cali­for­nia makes crappy pinot gri­gio”) — but I do think this is pro­bably the wine with most poten­tial in the PA regio­nal mar­ket — it’s clearly dif­fe­rent from most PGs in taste and even color. There’s an upside here that may deserve it’s own cam­paign sepa­rate from the other wines.
    The Sauv Blanc is also OK, but again, up against good Aus­sies and Chi­leans at same price points. That it’s not grassy like so many Cali­for­nians is a good mar­ke­ting point.
    We didn’t get to taste the Shi­raz, which would also be up against stiff com­pe­ti­tion.
    The other thing you’re up against is that in PA (as in some other sta­tes) the wines would be buried in the South African/South Ame­ri­can sec­tion of the state sto­res — where mostly bar­gain hun­ters look.
    Perhaps your puppy car­toons on end­caps would help sales once the wine is avai­la­ble here. And some tra­di­tio­nal advertising/promo allu­ding to “the wine everyone’s been blog­ging about” would be help­ful, even if it’s just POP.
    It’s pro­bably too late to add a per­mis­sion mar­ke­ting com­po­nent to the back end of the cam­paign, but that might’ve been something worth deplo­ying. If I got an email from Stormhoek announ­cing that the wine is (or would be avai­la­ble) on suchand­such date, that would be something I’d read and pro­bably act upon. As it is, unless I see it men­tio­ned on your blog or stum­ble across it in the liquor store, I won’t know when Stormhoek wines have arri­ved here.
    Still, what you’ve done has been extre­mely inte­res­ting on many levels. I hope at the end of the day it’s wildly successful.

  4. Tim Draayer says:

    To me that depends greatly on the expe­rience of the peo­ple that take part in the din­ners because when its all said and done, those peo­ple are the ones that will go out and spread the word. From the sound of it, peo­ple are recie­ving it enthu­sias­ticly.
    That is exci­ting because the velo­city of the word of mouth will only inc­rease as more din­ners are held and more peo­ple expe­rience it.
    Cheers!

  5. john says:

    There’s a dan­ger that it will get caught in the gee­kosphere but some of them must turn out to be socia­ble peo­ple with friends in the real world. Moreo­ver some of them will turn out to have an inor­di­nate appe­tite. The com­bi­na­tion of these two effects will enhance sca­la­bi­lity. Or not.
    But in terms of bang for your buck, it’s wor­ked already.

  6. Hugh…
    There is something much big­ger going on here than these light party dis­cus­sions can glean.
    Sure, maybe as O’Reilly put it, we were in a cul­ture of participation…but where we are moving is much more sig­ni­fi­cant and ties in nicely to your glo­bal mic­ro­brands…
    We are in a cul­ture of colla­bo­ra­tion.
    Look to my Pinko Mar­ke­ting group for the ans­wers to the ques­tions on ‘Mar­ke­ting 2.0′ (although that limits where it can go…I would say the future of mar­ke­ting in gene­ral). There are some really smart peo­ple wor­king on the idea that to effec­ti­vely mar­ket in the future you have to be part of the com­mu­nity you serve. Not merely con­verse with it.

  7. Hugh MacLeod says:

    Thanks for all the great insights, Every­body.…
    Yes, Tara, I cer­tainly feel part of the com­mu­nity I’m mar­ke­ting to.
    Rich W, I think we do OK with the “Qua­lity” angle. We make no claim to be the best in the world, but we like to think we punch above our weight.
    The fact is, there’s a lot of good wines out there, so one has to remain vigilant.

  8. The Stormhoek events com­bine the old drinks busi­ness pro­mo­tion of ‘encou­ra­ga­ging trial’ — an obvious step in buil­ding new cus­to­mers — with the new ‘citizen-centric’ media of blogs, which best tar­gets those peo­ple well tuned into todays con­ver­sa­tio­nal media.
    The result is an online expe­rience (blog media) that enger­gi­ses the phy­si­cal pro­duct; the wine has been intro­du­ced in a res­pect­ful and savvy way to a wide set of rea­ders who like to find out about new things in this ‘blog refe­rral’ way.
    So that’s already a power­ful mix — nice, smart refe­rral (good expe­rience no. 1) follo­wed by even bet­ter ‘trial’ envi­ron­ment with the rea­ders kind of peo­ple (good expe­rience no. 2) where no doubt other net­wor­king and mee­ting bene­fits can also take place. So the brand expe­rience is so far pretty spot on and rele­vant to the peo­ple who turn up. The buzz is good and real and nobody is pushing a crea­tive mar­ke­ting story that can­not be 100% relied on (like big bud­get drinks brands).
    The result is abso­lut­ley first class pro­duct intro­duc­tion; the memory is first rate because the expe­rience all the way along is con­vi­vial, appro­priate and not pushy.
    Lets not for­get either — that this has been hand­led by a pro­ven and top class blog­ging act; how could it do anything but deli­ver ?
    Rock on Stormhoek — Watch out big pla­yers whose “brands con­ti­nue to domi­nate glo­bal sales. Inte­llec­tually and cul­tu­rally, the result is bore­dom.” (quote cour­tesy of FT.com — whisky.co.uk/news/ft.html — excuse the plug)
    James