May 23, 2006

cultural transformation etc

zzaaaaaaa05.jpg
From The Hugh­train:

THOUGHT: the future of adver­ti­sing is clients inc­rea­singly asking their agen­cies to help re-invent not just their brands, but their actual com­pa­nies. The future is agen­cies being inc­rea­singly una­ble to deli­ver on this.
Out of this wrec­kage a new industry will emerge…

I’m still not sure what to call this new industry, but spen­ding the last few days wor­king at Swiss­com gave me a glimpse.
The phrase I can’t get out my head is “Cul­tu­ral Trans­for­ma­tion”.
[Note To Self:] It’s inte­res­ting being paid to talk about what you actually know about, as oppo­sed to what you pre­tend to know about.

8 Responses to “cultural transformation etc”

  1. I know what you mean, dude! (That’ll be ten quid, please.)
    Blue skies
    love
    Roy

  2. lucie says:

    Nice one Hugh; I’ve been thin­king the same thing. Namely, cor­po­rate social res­pon­si­bi­lity, sus­tai­na­bi­lity, ethi­cal treat­ment of staff and such beco­ming buzz­worthy and capa­ble of gene­ra­ting copious amounts of free PR (cf Ame­ri­can Appa­rel), com­pa­nies are going to want in on that game. But very few truly ethi­cal, sus­tai­na­ble, socially res­pon­si­ble busi­nes­ses exist as yet. If being a “good” com­pany has PR currency, someone’s going to have to help the com­pa­nies figure out how to be genui­nely, more deeply likea­ble before they can pro­mote them­sel­ves as such and cash in.

  3. I also remem­ber a time when agen­cies were mer­ging every­body fus­sed around worr­ying whether or not they could be as good collec­ti­vely at digi­tal, print, out­door, direct mail etc. and I have heard very few horror sto­ries resul­ting from the many mer­gers.
    That said, cul­tu­ral trans­for­ma­tion is a pro­found sub­ject to con­si­der and can only, surely, come from within the orga­ni­sa­tion?
    How many peo­ple have been p*ssed off at a sharp-suited account direc­tor telling the client he is wrong or is doing something wrong?
    Ima­gine now being told that the way you run your busi­ness is now wrong?
    For me, part of the cul­tu­ral trans­for­ma­tion is admit­ting you want to do it…then plan how you can inte­grate it into your busi­ness without hac­king every­body off in the pro­cess.
    The busi­ness owners are in a bet­ter posi­tion than anyone to com­mu­ni­cate the change to empl­yees NOT an agency!

  4. John Dodds says:

    I agree with Paul — it’s an inter­nal thing, it can’t be an expen­sive bolt-on. We’ve been here already in the late 90s when media agen­cies tried to move into stra­tegy consulting.

  5. Hugh MacLeod says:

    I con­cur with John and Paul…

  6. phil jones says:

    Hmm. But then, if you con­cur with John and Paul, what are you really saying?
    Agen­cies need to help clients *be* rather than merely *pre­sent them­sel­ves as*. And yet, attempts by agen­cies to be stra­tegy con­sul­tants or to advise clients what to do, fail.
    So what does the poor agency do?
    I used to have simi­lar pro­blems as a soft­ware deve­lo­per who unders­tood the inter­net bet­ter than my clients back in the 90s. I was always trying to encou­rage them to open up and use the tech­no­logy for two-way com­mu­ni­ca­tion with their vie­wers, and they were always worried about how to avoid nega­tive com­ments and how to make users pay for as much con­tent as pos­si­ble.
    There’s nothing more frus­tratng than *kno­wing* your client is stra­te­gi­cally wrong, but because you’re not being paid to advise stra­te­gi­cally, having your opi­nion igno­red.
    How does someone in this posi­tion break out of their per­cei­ved pigeonhole?

  7. Hugh MacLeod says:

    “So what does the poor agency do?”
    Ans­wer: Work har­der, for less money. Lucky them.

  8. phil jones says:

    Huh?
    Q : how do you expand out of a pigeonhole to have your stra­tegy advice taken more seriously?
    A : be chea­per.
    Hugh, surely you don’t mean this?