May 10, 2006

“microsoft bristles at being cast as a laggard.”

[NYT:] His­tory, then, sug­gests that past suc­cess is often an anchor hol­ding a com­pany back, and that Mic­ro­soft is at risk from the Goo­gle cha­llenge. “The wind is really behind Goo­gle, and Microsoft’s main tool for navi­ga­ting the future is the rear view mirror,” said Paul Saffo, a direc­tor of the Ins­ti­tute for the Future, a fore­cas­ting con­sul­tancy in Sili­con Valley.

[Thanks to Dave Winer for the link.]

2 Responses to ““microsoft bristles at being cast as a laggard.””

  1. frosty says:

    I read that on a nice dead tree this mor­ning, and it’s a really good article.
    OK, not so ama­zingly in-depth, but a good read.
    My favo­rite bit (paraph­ra­sing): Mic­ro­soft and Goo­gle pass each other’s “sil­ver bullet test:” if you had one bullet, whom would you shoot.
    But the main point of the article is that while this show­down is very serious, the long-term win­ner of MS vs Goo­gle could well be some little com­pany you haven’t heard of yet.
    While Mic­ro­soft can’t seem to get anything right lately, I wouldn’t count them out. OTOH, if I were Gates, I’d find something else for Ball­mer to do.

  2. bloglogs says:

    The author of this quote works for the ‘Ins­ti­tute for the Future’, which I think is a very cool name for any orga­ni­za­tion.
    — —  —  —  — –
    bloglogs.net: http://www.bloglogs.net
    blogtricks.net: http://www.blogtricks.net
    — —  —  —  — –