May 9, 2006

it was not enough to see the stars

15 Comments

it was not enough to see the stars.jpg
[Click on image to enlarge/download/print etc. Licen­sing terms here etc.]

Be Socia­ble, Share!

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

Other Useful Links

Com­mis­sion Hugh.

Buy Hugh’s Art.

About Hugh. Hugh’s Book. Twit­ter. Face­book. Car­toon Archive.

Hugh’s Artist’s Sta­te­ment: “Remem­ber Who You Are”

Be Socia­ble, Share!

15 Responses to “it was not enough to see the stars”

  1. Victor says:
    May 9, 2006 at 4:22 PM

    THE BEST dra­wing you’ve ever done, by far is this roc­ket ship one. Thank you! I want to let you know that I’m put­ting this on my blog with cre­dits, of course, and a link back to Gaping Void.
    Won­der­ful work.

  2. Anand says:
    May 9, 2006 at 4:36 PM

    U defn have a way to put our Tech­ni­cal advan­ce­ment in bad light:)

  3. Idea, Execution, Profit! says:
    May 9, 2006 at 4:45 PM

    And and put it on sale at Ebay.
    Any stars for sale at ebay lately!
    PS: Is there a cele­brity angle to it?

  4. Evelyn Rodriguez says:
    May 9, 2006 at 5:45 PM

    Thanks! Ha, we want to pos­sess what we already are. Being born from the star­dust atoms & cyc­ling back to stars.

  5. nikkirae says:
    May 9, 2006 at 5:49 PM

    Ain’t that the truth.
    –n

  6. Tim says:
    May 9, 2006 at 8:54 PM

    Its easier to seek out more of what we want then to be happy with what we’ve already attained.

  7. hijacked frequencies says:
    May 10, 2006 at 1:45 AM

    i love your work and have for awhile.
    if it was in book form, i’d buy it.

  8. Agarda says:
    May 10, 2006 at 2:07 AM

    Long live Hugh Mac­Leod !! Long live !!

  9. dfarber says:
    May 10, 2006 at 2:26 AM

    A good car­toon for Net neutrality.….it’s not enough to see the pipes, we have to own them

  10. Victor says:
    May 10, 2006 at 3:56 AM

    By the way, here is the link to my blog. The current “most recent” post inc­lu­des your art. I’d love to hear your opi­nion on that post, if you don’t mind.

  11. Justin Kownacki says:
    May 10, 2006 at 9:01 AM

    Isn’t this as ludic­rous a sug­ges­tion as someone “owning” the land we walk on?

  12. shane says:
    May 10, 2006 at 3:27 PM

    Hey Vic­tor, I was trying to check out your blog — but there isn’t anything on that site. did you leave the correct URL (www.serviceknight.com) ?

  13. F. de C. says:
    May 10, 2006 at 3:34 PM

    Didn’t you hear about that guy, about last year, who seriously wan­ted to buy the moon?
    We had no law about that; now, I think we have one.

  14. Brian says:
    May 11, 2006 at 4:06 PM

    I don’t see this as nega­tive at all. What’s wrong with owning the stars?
    Jus­tin, you’re being silly. Of course someone has to own the land you walk on — that’s how our society is built. Only terribly pri­mi­tive soci­ties ope­rate with the phi­losphy you express.
    F. de C. — By treaty the moon is set aside for inter­na­tio­nal use — no state can claim it, or part of it. Which is silly — there is no way to pro­perly use a thing unless you assign pro­perty rights.

  15. Victor says:
    May 12, 2006 at 3:57 PM

    Oh, oops! My blog is here: http://victor.serviceknight.com