May 4, 2006

google’s strength is microsoft’s opportunity

The story here on Bloom­berg is a fami­liar one. Goo­gle domi­na­tes the Adver­ti­sing Search mar­ket, Mic­ro­soft tries to play catch-up with MSN and fails mise­rably.
Wha­te­ver. Google’s neve­ren­ding domi­nance can only mean one thing: it will keep rai­sing its pri­ces, sli­cing value-for-money off the offe­ring, one dis­grunt­led cus­to­mer at a time. It will, because it can.
So if you can’t be the best, Mic­ro­soft, then be chea­per. The­rein lies your oppor­tu­nity. Hey, it wor­ked against Apple.

3 Responses to “google’s strength is microsoft’s opportunity”

  1. How can you be chea­per than free?
    The rea­son Mic­ro­soft won in the great batt­les of the 80’s and 90’s was because of its sophis­ti­ca­ted dis­tri­bu­tion and part­nership stra­tegy, not because the core MS pro­duct was chea­per. While Apple were selling boxes, Mic­ro­soft was hos­ting a whole ecosys­tem of manu­fac­tu­rers, box-assemblers and soft­ware developers.

  2. HOW CAN YOU BE CHEAPER THAN FREE? Reduce hid­den costs.
    Reduce the time it takes to get up-and-running.
    Reduce the time it takes to learn to use the pro­duct.
    Make the pro­duct easier to use, so that its adop­tion doesn’t add to my wor­kload, for­cing me to go from ‘cheer­lea­der’ to ‘coer­ced unpaid sup­port staff mem­ber’.
    Make the pro­duct bet­ter known, so there’s less hassle in selling others on the adop­tion of the product/service.
    Reduce risk, making it easier to switch to the pro­duct and switch back from it.
    Make the pro­duct fle­xi­ble, so that I don’t lose func­tio­na­lity when I switch.
    Make the pro­duct relia­ble. Unre­lia­bi­lity costs time, money and sanity. It dama­ges repu­ta­tions and irri­ta­tes customers.

  3. Sam Sethi says:

    Spot on Hugh. MSN is strug­gling to com­pete right now. It has less than 3% of the UK search traf­fic and its dec­li­ning fast. But one thing MSN is doing well is to make the ad agen­cies happy by sha­ring more of their adver­ti­sing reve­nue which Goo­gle redu­ced dram­ti­cally recently.
    I think of Mic­ro­soft and Goo­gle in the same way as the tor­toise and the hare race. Mic­ro­soft the tor­toise is slow and plod­ding but it has mul­ti­ple other reve­nue streams and they will slowly chip away for years until they catch Goo­gle. Gates admit­ted as much this mor­ning. Just wait for Mic­ro­soft Points (dig­tial currency). That’s when Gates/MSN hands out the candy to the con­su­mers. i.e pays for eyeballs.