<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: wrong question:</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gapingvoid.com/2006/04/23/wrong-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2006/04/23/wrong-question/</link>
	<description>&#34;cartoons drawn on the back of business cards&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:03:19 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BACTRIM</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2006/04/23/wrong-question/comment-page-1/#comment-11771</link>
		<dc:creator>BACTRIM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 18:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=2571#comment-11771</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andres B</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2006/04/23/wrong-question/comment-page-1/#comment-11770</link>
		<dc:creator>Andres B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 23:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=2571#comment-11770</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re extremely right. Nobody cares, because (if I understood well the linked article) the pricing model of TV and the like is as wrong as the question.
Marketing drones would do well if they stop thinking about &quot;hitting retinal tissue&quot; as the way to communicate anything to anyone.
I&#039;m with Jarvis on this one.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You’re extremely right. Nobody cares, because (if I understood well the linked article) the pricing model of TV and the like is as wrong as the question.<br />
Marketing drones would do well if they stop thinking about “hitting retinal tissue” as the way to communicate anything to anyone.<br />
I’m with Jarvis on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotty</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2006/04/23/wrong-question/comment-page-1/#comment-11769</link>
		<dc:creator>Scotty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 09:20:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=2571#comment-11769</guid>
		<description>You know what would have made that linked article that much better? Even MORE useless buzzwords. Gah.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what would have made that linked article that much better? Even MORE useless buzzwords. Gah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sky</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2006/04/23/wrong-question/comment-page-1/#comment-11768</link>
		<dc:creator>sky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 06:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=2571#comment-11768</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say it has a lot more to do with the inevitability of this change.
The bottom line is this: the only people who are going to make money through media in the future are the people who understand the new media forms and use them to their advantage.
Crying about how much money it makes isn&#039;t going to change the fact that people prefer it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’d say it has a lot more to do with the inevitability of this change.<br />
The bottom line is this: the only people who are going to make money through media in the future are the people who understand the new media forms and use them to their advantage.<br />
Crying about how much money it makes isn’t going to change the fact that people prefer it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Karp</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2006/04/23/wrong-question/comment-page-1/#comment-11767</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Karp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 06:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=2571#comment-11767</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m guessing that investors in News Corp and Google (just to name two) care.
But you&#039;re right that the de-hyping of 2.0 is quite tedious.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m guessing that investors in News Corp and Google (just to name two) care.<br />
But you’re right that the de-hyping of 2.0 is quite tedious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
