April 11, 2006

a bottle of stormhoek

a bottle of stormhoek.jpg
[Click on image to enlarge/download/print etc. Licen­sing terms here.]
Here’s the deal with The Stormhoek Bottle Rede­sign [“Why shouldn’t a small wine com­pany see Apple or Goo­gle as its com­pe­ti­tion?”].
When I came on board the Stormhoek pro­ject a year ago, the wea­kest link in the chain was the bottle design. It was, to say the least, unre­mar­ka­ble.
So last autumn we deci­ded to do something about it. First, to stir things up, we offe­red a $2000 prize to any gaping­void rea­der who could help with our thin­king the most. A lot of peo­ple joi­ned in, and pos­ted their thoughts on the wiki. Though no idea in par­ti­cu­lar offe­red the direct solu­tion we were loo­king for, it did jar our thin­king in the right direc­tion. So there will be a prize given, once the new bottle design is relea­sed to the public.
Watch this space etc.
So what’s the new bottle like? Well, don’t expect the glass equi­va­lent to a Web 2.0 logo. It’s not funky or “techie”. It’s sim­ple, classy and ele­gant.
That being said, Phase Two of the rede­sign could be inte­res­ting. Phase Two is when we’re thin­king of launching “Stormhoek Limi­ted Edi­tion”, hope­fully some time this year.
And Limi­ted Edi­tion, so we’re currently thin­king, will fea­ture my car­toons in the design.
Dif­fe­rent car­toons, dif­fe­rent labels. And lots of them. So hope­fuly the bottle with dif­fe­rent car­toons will become some sort of collector’s item. Something like that.
The trick is making the car­toons inte­res­ting, without losing too much rele­vance to the pro­duct, or under­mi­ning the ele­gance of the bottle. Or maybe rele­vance is ove­rra­ted. Who knows. Either way, we’re fashio­ning it in such a way that allows us to try lots of dif­fe­rent alter­na­ti­ves. Allows us to attack the mar­ket in a plethora of new and crea­tive ways.
Like Doc Searls said, this kind of mar­ke­ting isn’t about pushing a rock uphill, it’s about pushing lot of little snow­balls downhill, and seeing which ones gain trac­tion etc.
What sayest thou?

6 Responses to “a bottle of stormhoek”

  1. i’m sure you’ve seen the bonny doon artist labels, but just in case:
    http://www.bonnydoonvineyard.com/dooniversity/content/artists
    in par­ti­cu­lar, the one ralph stead­man did for “car­di­nal zin” is h.s.thompson-worthy…

  2. Alan says:

    Great to hear that the Bottle Inno­va­tion Pro­ject is coming to frui­tion. The current design, while ok, is very easy to miss. I’ve spent quite a while sta­ring at shel­ves of wine loo­king for the Stormhoek and almost mis­sing it enti­rely.
    Loo­king for­ward to seeing the result and hoping it’ll be easier to find on a self!

  3. Slowly the de-comodification is unfol­ding.
    Here the inte­res­ting thing hap­pen­ning is creativity(Hugh’s Car­toons) is com­mo­di­ti­zed( by way of making it widely avai­la­ble, making it free etc) to help a commodity(wine) to be de-commoditized.
    This is like read­jus­ting your home and work loca­tion such that you are in the oppo­site side of the gene­ral com­mute direc­tion.
    Rock on pal!

  4. hugh says:

    I like your way of put­ting it, Balaji. Thanks =)

  5. Mark H says:

    Ever heard of Jones Soda?
    http://www.bradthegame.com/jones/labelfaq.html#1
    (Sorry to be the one saying ‘Nothing new under the sun;’ but I’d say it strongly vali­da­tes your plan.)
    Link is to a fan site, BTW; not the com­pany. As far as I can tell.
    Inci­den­tally, I’ve been thin­king about lin­king to some of your car­toons in a jour­nal that I half-assedly main­tain on a ‘social’ site (VERY few page views.) Because I keep fin­ding myself telling friends about them. But, that site doesn’t store pics on site, so I’d either need to link directly to your ima­ges, or upload them on some other image site. Where would those issues fall in your crea­tive license? Would you allow either of those to happen?

  6. Martin says:

    So you’re saying Anthony Lane is now offi­cially redundant?