April 9, 2006

hallam foe blog

Send to Kindle

dave and giles324.jpg
[Giles Nutt­gens & David Mac­ken­zie dis­cus­sing a shot.]
A few months ago I wrote about my friend, Dave Mac­ken­zie, and his upco­ming movie, Hallam Foe. We even let peo­ple down­load the script and have a read.
Dave, as you might also remem­ber, was also the direc­tor of Young Adam, the movie I kept yam­me­ring on about two or three years ago [“The best Scot­tish movie ever”, which, I’m happy to report, I think still holds true today].
To make a long story short, the shoo­ting of Hallam Foe has begun, and they’ve just star­ted a movie blog, called “Get Your Peo­ple”.
[As in, “Get your peo­ple to call my peo­ple”. Heh.]
David sadly is too busy on the shoot to write and manage the blog. Ins­tead, he’s rec­rui­ted another friend of his, Colin Ken­nedy, to write it. Also, other peo­ple from the pro­duc­tion cast are con­tri­bu­ting. But it’s really Colin’s baby.
The good news is, Colin is actually a full-on mem­ber of the pro­duc­tion crew already, not just a blogger-for-hire. He’s also a film­ma­ker in his own right.
So the blog is now up, in rough form. The wri­ting is coming along nicely, howe­ver the design still need to be done. But I thought I’d let you all have an early peek, any­way.
Get Your Peo­ple is not the first major film blog [Right, Gia?]. That being said, I believe there’s a lot of unex­plo­red terri­tory in the film-blog-as-marketing-device, still wai­ting to be dis­co­ve­red. So I’m inte­res­ted in seeing what hap­pens.
Very inte­res­ted.
More impor­tantly, David is an old and dear friend of mine, and I want this film to be sucess­ful. So I’ll do what I can to help.
What sayest thou? Please let me know your thoughts. Thanks.

Be Socia­ble, Share!

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

Tags: , , , ,

6 Responses to “hallam foe blog”

  1. Yo Hugh…
    Went over to the blog, and find that they’re trun­ca­ting the dam­ned entries. I’ve left a com­ment asking them to not do that.
    I’m sure it’s a won­der­ful blog, but I will cer­tainly not be rea­ding it on the site if the entries are trun­ca­ted.
    I’ve just subsc­ri­bed to the atom feed via blo­gli­nes, and thank­fully they’re not nip­ping off the feed posts. Which is how I’ll be rea­ding the site any­way.
    I’m loo­king for­ward to this film.
    Did you get any further feed­back about the ‘open source scrip­ting’ pro­cess?
    Blue skies
    love
    Roy

  2. Hugh MacLeod says:

    I agree, Roy, and I left a simi­lar comment.

  3. Phil Dale says:

    Good to know about this blog. Thanks for the link.
    I agree that blogs-as-marketing-devise is defi­ni­tely going to be impor­tant in the future.
    Per­so­nally I’m trying a blog-as-film-funding-device. Would love to know what you think Huge?

  4. First off, I’m glad you’re finally making your long-promised appea­rance on the Hallam Foe blog :-) .
    Secondly, I don’t know what the pro­blem is with trun­ca­ted pos­tings. I much pre­fer them when loo­king at a blog directly: that way you can more easily see an over­view of mul­ti­ple pos­tings at once.
    Besi­des, if you want to see pos­tings un-truncated, you can always use an RSS rea­der: isn’t that what “serious” blog-readers do any­way? The Hallam Foe pos­tings always show up untrun­ca­ted for me in Blo­gli­nes (though of course it depends on pre­ci­sely how the RSS feed is published).
    More impor­tantly, I pos­ted a com­ment to that effect at http://www.getyourpeople.com/archives/2006/04/sitting_in_the.html#comments about the above but also about how most blog­ging sys­tems today do not really pro­vide a way to faci­li­tate the CONVERSATION bet­ween com­men­ters to a blog. Nor­mally, only the blog’s author will get noti­fied if someone posts, and the RSS feed is gene­rally not upda­ted when new com­ments are made to a pos­ting. The RSS feed will be upda­ted if the CONTENT to an old pos­ting is chan­ged, but if someone com­ments to an old post, and you are another rea­der of that blog, you will pro­bably not see it. Case in point, Hugh, I’m sure you didn’t see my res­ponse to your com­ment. This is to my mind a mis­sing link of the whole blog­ging expe­rience.
    Lastly: is this kind of thing use­ful and inte­res­ting ONLY as a “mar­ke­ting device”? I thought you and David were onto something much more inte­res­ting than that when you pos­ted the screen­play and refe­rred to it as “Open-source film­ma­king”. Jud­ging by the vitriol of some of the res­pon­ses (“I’ll sue you if you use a com­ment I make”) it defi­ni­tely touched a nerve.

  5. Appa­rently, I’m a spammer…and can’t post.