April 4, 2006

“business as morality”

image12345679.jpg
“Busi­ness as Mora­lity”.
There’s an inte­res­ting e-mail exchange going on bet­ween Doc Searls and O’Reilly Media. Basi­cally, what sepe­ra­tes Web 2.0 from Web 1.0 is mora­lity, as Doc explains so elo­quently here:

I think some of what we see in Web 2.0 (a term I’ve never liked, much as I like Tim, who has done the most to pro­mul­gate it… I think it’s what we’ll call the current bub­ble and the next crash) is the mora­lity of gene­ro­sity. At eTech, I saw a pre­view of a browser-based Photoshop/Album organizing/print pro­duct front-end ser­vice. The big­gest thing the crea­tor wan­ted to show was how gene­rous Flickr is. “Watch this,” he said, before using Flickr’s API to suck all 6000+ of my pho­tos from Flickr into his pro­duct. All the meta­data, all the tags and asso­cia­tions, were intact. His point: Flickr isn’t a silo. Their clo­sed and pro­prie­tary stuff doesn’t extend, not is it used, to lock up cus­to­mer or user data. It’s wide open. Free-range. Most of all, howe­ver, it is a “good citi­zen”. It is gene­rous where it counts. Nurturing.

Worth a read. Worth a think.
[Doc Searls’ home­page is here.]

2 Responses to ““business as morality””

  1. I couldn’t agree more — busi­nes­ses with a cons­cience are likely to be much more accep­ted by susp­si­cious cus­to­mers. In many cases, cus­to­mers are cus­to­mers because they like the pro­duct, not neces­sa­rily the com­pany. In close com­pe­ti­tion with iden­ti­cal pro­ducts, it is the com­panmy that builds the rela­tionship that wins.
    p.s. can you teach me to draw?!!

  2. So are we saying gene­ro­sity is a new “fea­ture” or “bene­fit,” or do we actually have to care?