March 31, 2006

ama-zone: since when does wage-slave cowardice count as brains?

ama-zone.jpg
[Ins­pi­red by Ama­zon CTO, Wer­ner Vogel’s recent post. More backs­tory from Shel and Rick.]
[Update:] Sco­ble pipes in.

Where I gave them stuff like “blog­ging dou­bled sales at Stormhoek winery, accor­ding to its CEO.” Or “Mun­jal Shah, CEO of Riya, says blog­ging is very impor­tant to his new com­pany.” Or “Axo­soft rai­sed more than $14,000 in just a few days with nothing more than a few links on some blogs.” Or “Fol­dera got more than one million sig­nups for its ser­vice in 17 days by doing nothing more than tal­king to six blog­gers.” Or, a tai­lor in the UK saw his sales go up by 10x by doing a blog. That pro­bably wasn’t well enough com­mu­ni­ca­ted, or it wasn’t the kind of ans­wer that would con­vince Wer­ner. That means I need to go back and do some more homework.

And this is really rich: Here’s some anony­mous Ama­zon folk in the com­ments brag­ging about how smart they are. OK, if they’re so smart, [l.] Why are they wor­king for some­body else? [2.] Why are they pos­ting anony­mously? Since when does wage-slave cowar­dice count as brains?
Sure, Ama­zon offers a great pro­duct for us online shop­ping folk. And I’m sure Werner’s not a bad fellow, just a guy with strong opi­nions who likes a robust debate. But this epi­sode [the anony­mous com­men­ters, more so than Werner’s opi­nions] made me very glad I don’t work for them.
[UPDTE:] Den­nis How­lett pipes in here:

* First it is about ROi (little i is deli­be­rate here.)
* Next it is not about pre­dic­ting out­co­mes in the way Wer­ner wants. It

23 Responses to “ama-zone: since when does wage-slave cowardice count as brains?”

  1. ROI, ROI, ROI, Roi, Roi.…we’ve been there eh Hugh?

  2. Mike says:

    Dead-tree books are dead, any­way.
    Long live e-books. :)

  3. Barry Kelly says:

    Hugh, you’re acting like a child. If you read Werner’s post, it’s quite well rea­so­ned. And the best you can do is try to mock a stance he doesn’t hold!

  4. Peter Cooper says:

    I think the dif­fe­rence is that Ama­zon has already hit it big before the whole blog­ging thing came along, whe­reas the exam­ples you pro­vide were only semi-successful befo­rehand. Blogs are great to pro­mote busi­nes­ses (Tom or Stormhoek) or to pro­mote a new image (Mic­ro­soft, for exam­ple), but I’m not so con­vin­ced they’re par­ti­cu­larly worthwhile in suc­cess­ful, but rela­ti­vely stag­nant busi­nes­ses (such as Ama­zon). Of course, when Ama­zon face some sort of cri­sis in the future, howe­ver, and want to rapidly por­tray a new image, they may be in trouble.

  5. seth godin says:

    i think the real ques­tion is this:
    why is the CTO of Ama­zon being inten­tio­nally rude to guests who came to visit (for free, I’m gues­sing)?
    How does that help ama­zon? or Wer­ner for that matter?

  6. Mike says:

    Well, it sure got him some traf­fic, Seth. I’d never heard of Wer­ner until today.

  7. Hugh MacLeod says:

    Good ques­tion, Seth. I have a fee­ling I know the ans­wer…
    Barry, it looks like you didnt read my post, either.

  8. Miles Barr says:

    I’ve read Vogel’s post and the res­pon­ses, and to me he’s the one coming off as rea­so­na­ble. Ama­zon was/is way ahead of the game when comes to social soft­ware (reviews, list­ma­nia, large edi­to­rial staff) and per­so­na­li­sa­tion (recom­men­da­tions).
    “why cus­to­mers would get a bet­ter Ama­zon pro­duct if we would ins­ti­tu­tio­na­lize blog­ging at a wider scale around Ama­zon?”
    That is a very valid ques­tion for me. Ama­zon is a store not a pro­duct. You go in to find a book, there are lots of peo­ple tal­king about it, good and bad reviews, you’re shown simi­lar books, there’s a lot more going on than just a book desc­rip­tion.
    I do almost all my book shop­ping at Ama­zon because I can dis­co­ver a lot of things I didn’t know about, and I can weed out crap books easily. How would con­ver­sa­tions with peo­ple behind the sce­nes improve the buying expe­rience for me, the cus­to­mer?
    How do you see blog­ging impro­ving Amazon?

  9. hugh macleod says:

    Miles, howe­ver rea­so­na­ble Wer­ner was being or not being, I find the beha­vior of Amazon’s wage-slave cowards FAR, FAR more telling.
    Is that just me?

  10. Werner says:

    Hugh, I per­fectly get the value of blog­ging for a cor­po­ra­tion. The point in the dis­cus­sion was that (I thought) Shel & Robert were not willing to ans­wer that ques­tion in a cohe­rent man­ner, with for exam­ple your 4 points. It went downhill after that.
    The rude­ness part is something strange as that is a new cha­rac­te­ri­sa­tion for me. I don’t believe we were rude to you when you visis­ted Seth?

  11. Werner says:

    ps. can you reuse your dra­wing without you going all cor­po­rate on me and drag me to court?

  12. Miles Barr says:

    The com­ments seem mixed. Post 4 is rea­so­na­ble, post 8 is on a bit of a high horse. I can see why some of them are anno­yed. The talk was essen­tially a sales pitch for the book. It would be a huge coup to say you’ve con­ver­ted Ama­zon to the world of blog­ging, and Shel and Rick do come off as a bit mif­fed that they didn’t suc­ceed.
    Since all the Ama­zo­nian com­ments are anony­mous (except for Vogel) I sus­pect it’s either a cor­po­rate policy, or they’re in fear of doing a Mark Jen. I wouldn’t read too much into it.

  13. Katherine says:

    I’m with Miles. How, exactly, does blog­ging help Ama­zon sell more books? Or make more money on the books that they do sell?

  14. hugh macleod says:

    Yes, Wer­ner, feel free to reuse the dra­wing =)
    Oh, and thanks for stop­ping by…
    Hugh

  15. There’s les­sons for ever­yone here. I didn’t buy the ‘rude’ thing — heck I’m accu­sed of the same when what ‘I’ think is I’m being blunt. But I also didn’t buy what I ‘heard’ in Werner’s post — ‘not made here — f**k off.’
    It’s a bit point­less poking for an ans­wer you already have unless all you’re doing is see­king to ridi­cule someone. I’m sure that’s not the inten­tion but it’s pretty hard to take that kind of ques­tio­ning when you’re in the cross hairs among a large crowd.
    Hugh and I have been here before on this ROi thing. I lear­ned, I chan­ged, I pros­pe­red as a result.
    Ama­zon may be right — for Ama­zon — but that doesn’t negate the value of what Sco­ble and Shel are doing. Next time around though, if they’re not sure of an ans­wer — I’d recom­mend that good old fall­back: “I’ll get back to you on that.” That IS the correct ans­wer in those corcumstances.

  16. Mack Collier says:

    I don’t think the key bene­fit from blogs for Ama­zon is selling more books, I think it’s making Ama­zon a ‘sma­ller’ com­pany. Blogs are great for large com­pa­nies because it gives them a natu­ral defense against beco­ming so large that they lose touch with the indi­vi­dual cus­to­mer. The indi­vi­dual cus­to­mer that gets pis­sed off about his crappy ser­vice, then gets on his blog and broad­casts his expe­rien­ces to the entire inter­net.
    Again, I don’t think the key bene­fit that blogs pro­vide for most large com­pa­nies is gro­wing the bot­tom line, it’s ‘shrin­king’ the size of the company.

  17. Shel Israel says:

    Hugh,
    I love the car­toon. I also love the dia­log it gene­ra­ted. Thanks, Hugh.

  18. i dont know but if i was ama­zon CTO i would be kind of worried that when peo­ple outside the US click on an ama­zon url it takes them to the .com domain — if you are a .co.uk domain cus­to­mer there is no record of your account. so in other words blog recom­men­da­tions to ama­zon urls dont work inter­na­tio­nally, as a few click sce­na­rio. sure i can remem­ber the book or item in ques­tion — and go log into my own domain, search for it, and buy it. but thats the kind of barrier to com­merce that will drop you sales over time. i cant tell you how many times i have said what book is that? oh i must buy that. then i end up not doing so.…
    i think mr wer­ner should maybe think about how to try and solve that pro­blem. maybe if he reached out to blog­gers they could help come up with a solu­tion.
    i would love to see a photo of wer­ner smi­ling.
    while i agree ama­zon was way ahead of the game-that is no excuse for not reaching out to new methods and so on.
    as ama­zon inc­rea­singly tries to build a deve­lo­per com­mu­nity around its APIs such as SSS blogs are an obvious mecha­nism it would make a lot of sense to be more blo­ga­li­cious. but that’s not a hard count bene­fit neces­sa­rily.
    wer­ner could ask claire gior­dano, at a9, about her expe­rien­ces with Sun as it built the open­so­la­ris com­mu­nity…
    just a cou­ple of thoughts

  19. I’ve been a CTO (of a very tiny dot-com so doesn’t com­pare) and my & engi­neers ALWAYS asked tough ques­tions. When sales­per­son from ven­dor wal­ked in the door with the sales engi­neer, we’d already done our home­work, read the white papers, blah blah, and now were on to the real meat, not fluff, on exactly how this pro­duct was going to meet our spe­ci­fic needs and help our busi­ness. I’m not just on a buying spree to buy the next thing (and mind you this was dot-com days).
    I didn’t see anything rude in Werner’s post itself; whether his demea­nor, tone, body lan­guage con­ve­yed that in per­son at the pre­sen­ta­tion, I have no first-hand know­ledge but what others have said.
    Also in giving blog exam­ples, often com­pa­nies aren’t neces­sa­rily loo­king for ROI num­bers or gene­ral exam­ples, but spe­ci­fic ways to use a blog in con­text of their busi­ness.
    English Cut is a great exam­ple that I use to illus­trate the power of blog­ging to a great artist friend of mine — but I wouldn’t use it for Ama­zon. The power of blog­ging is that I have read tons of posts offe­ring great ideas that are tai­lo­red for Amazon’s con­text. Some have never been done before because they are great pre­ci­sely for Ama­zon. (can’t find post had in mind; thought it came from Joe Wikert’s book publishing blog?)
    How small com­pa­nies and large approach blog­ging may bee dif­fe­rent. I once wrote: “Small busi­nes­ses often have the high-touch and infor­mal trust built, but may lack broa­der cre­di­bi­lity and sta­ture. I met the owner of a new dive shop, Wet Zone, in Khao Lak, Thai­land. Michael com­pe­tes against the more-established large ope­ra­tors because of his tai­lo­red approach. He doesn’t have a blog, but he ins­tinctly ‘gets’ the mind­set as word of mouth is spread diver to diver in online diver forums so every cus­to­mer expe­rience counts. His repu­ta­tion is what dri­ves busi­ness, he said.
    You don’t need to be a dive shop — most small biz is dri­ven by reputation-spreading.
    For lar­ger com­pa­nies, they have ‘name’ and cre­di­bi­lity cove­red, but may lack likea­bi­lity and a sense of a per­so­nal touch.”
    p.s. I used to read Werner’s blog when I wor­ked in enter­prise soft­ware; so I don’t believe this was link­bait — it’s known in its own circles.

  20. Rand says:

    Hey Hugh…
    I atten­ded the Lift Con­fe­rence in Geneva via my com­pu­ter a few nights ago. I thought yours and Robert’s pre­sen­ta­tions were bri­lliant. I took care­ful notes and I’m off to buy Robert’s book today. I think it’s inc­re­dibly dif­fi­cult for gar­gan­tuan com­pa­nies (“let’s name the com­pany Ama­zon, then NOTHING can be big­ger.”) to subsc­ribe to the idea that invi­ting and ins­pi­ring great­ness all around you (through trans­pa­rency and blog­ging con­ver­sa­tions) is a great way to do busi­ness. “You can’t teach us anything, we’re Ama­zon” seems to be their mind­set. Let me say, as the owner of a com­pany the size of a speck of dust in a gnats eye, I am VERY ins­pi­red by yours (and Robert’s) ope­ness and ideas. And how cool is it that Robert actually works for Mic­ro­soft, a com­pany that can cast a sha­dow over Ama­zon? Thanks for the ins­pi­ra­tion. Next time I hope to actually be in Geneva. Or wherever.

  21. hugh macleod says:

    Rand,
    “You can’t teach us anything, we’re Ama­zon”
    reminds me of
    “You can’t teach us anything, we’re Leo Bur­nett”.
    Sound fami­liar?
    I hope Ama­zon is lis­te­ning.
    [Rand and I wor­ked at Bur­nett together, years ago.]

  22. Joe Smith says:

    This blog is from a for­mer Ama­zon emplo­yee and addres­ses this issue:
    http://tedder42.livejournal.com/79667.html