March 20, 2006

triple whammy: tom in the times [and the guardian], hugh in the guardian

4 Comments

zzzzsteak19.jpg
Today we had a dou­ble whammy in the natio­nal press. First, Tho­mas was quo­ted in The Times (of Lon­don):

4 Responses to “triple whammy: tom in the times [and the guardian], hugh in the guardian”

  1. Jem Stone says:
    March 20, 2006 at 11:20 am

    I think its a tri­ple whammy cos isn’t there a whole 500 words by Tho­mas in the “Chan­ging Media” sup­ple­ment in the middle of the Guar­dian today (not online as far as I can tell) out­li­ning how English Cut came about.

  2. Hugh MacLeod says:
    March 20, 2006 at 2:28 pm

    Yeah, I couldn’t find it online, either.

  3. Granny Buttons says:
    March 20, 2006 at 7:25 pm

    Bar­ging in on bloggers

    Media Guar­dian today ran a story that caught my eye because of a sin­gle word in the head­line that I thought was a cheap pun on canal boa­ters… (‘bar­ged in’ — ugh) but, mercy!, it wasn’t a pun. It was

  4. Brian Pigeon says:
    March 20, 2006 at 10:15 pm

    I’m a pigeon living in Lon­don and I love to blog. Deci­ded one day to launch a ‘Give Pigeons A Chance’ cam­paign tar­get­ted at our waste of a Mayor, Ken Livings­tone. After 3 weeks I’m just pushing 276 sig­na­tu­res. Being a pigeon this is something I could never have achie­ved with a clip board. Blog­ging ena­bles those who don’t have a voice to speak lou­der than they ever could if they had one. Does that make sense?
    Your pal
    Brian P
    btw — anyone fancy sig­ning my peti­tion go to:
    http://pigeonblog.wordpress.com/give-pigeons-a-chance/