March 9, 2006

love = 25%

From Euan Semple:

Maybe love does have a place in busi­ness after all. Maybe more and more of us will start to have the cou­rage to begin to talk about what really mat­ters to us about work and our rela­tionships with each other and to push back the ste­rile lan­guage of busi­ness that we have been trai­ned to accept. Maybe we will rea­lise that accep­ting love into the work­place reminds us of the ori­gi­nal pur­pose of work — not to maxi­mise sha­rehol­der value but to come together to do good things, to help each other and hope­fully to make the world a bet­ter place.
Maybe .…
Oh and by the way if the above is too new age and namby pamby for you I rec­kon social com­pu­ting is capa­ble of tal­king 25% out of the run­ning costs of most busi­nes­ses — so there!

4 Responses to “love = 25%”

  1. James Richards says:

    Love costs and it saves.
    It costs a lot to show it but it saves a lot when you give it (I rec­kon’ it can save more than 25% because love leads to mul­ti­pli­ca­tion in more ways than one!)

  2. Tracy says:

    I say keep visio­ning. It looks good to me.

  3. There’s one pro­blem with this argu­ment — Wall Street/Threadneedle Street per­cep­tions of the CEOs role. Not hel­ped by the lan­guage of war so often used inside BIG tech com­pa­nies. (see Oracle — Larry Ellison/SAP — Jeff Nolan?MSFT — Steve Ball­mer)
    But…there is a way around this. 1. Change the role of Chief Infor­ma­tion Offi­cer to Chief Inno­va­tion Offi­cer. 2. Get rid of the HR dro­nes and get a Human Capi­tal Rela­tionship Officer.

  4. Jon Husband says:

    Den­nis .. if I were a Pre­si­dent or CEO who had some sense of where social soft­ware com­bi­ned with busi­ness pur­po­ses were going, I’d think hard about com­bi­ning the two roles you set out above.