March 3, 2006

stella mccartney wobbles on the catwalk

Oh, the joys of star­ting a glo­bal fashion brand. From The Times (Lon­don):

Pres­sure inc­rea­ses on the desig­ner to make her label pro­fi­ta­ble.
It is no sec­ret within the fashion industry that Ste­lla McCart­ney has been given until next year to break even by Gucci Group, the com­pany that owns 50 per cent of her busi­ness. So have the other, sma­ller brands under the Gucci umbre­lla, inc­lu­ding Ale­xan­der McQueen and Bouche­ron, the jewe­ller.

McCartney

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

4 Responses to “stella mccartney wobbles on the catwalk”

  1. Piers Fawkes says:

    Sure.… I wouldn;t knock Ste­lla too much — the NY & Lon­don sto­res are as much about brand expe­rience as sales. And the effect: brand desire. Would an English Cut H&M line sell out in every H&M store in the world in about 12 hours? Even if it was pro­fi­ta­ble from day 1.

  2. Hugh MacLeod says:

    “The NY & Lon­don sto­res are as much about brand expe­rience as sales.“
    Puts all the Money into the front end. The back end gets made in China. Hello, Com­mo­dity Feed­back Loop!
    Sounds like an expen­sive way to go about it to me. Espe­cially for the customer.

  3. A clue to the ans­wer to Stella’s dif­fi­cul­ties lies in your pre­vious entry, “pull” not push. English Cut pulls, hence pro­fi­ta­bi­lity. Pull vs push has grea­ter impli­ca­tions than just mar­ke­ting– it’s the cul­ture of the entire orga­ni­za­tion of which mar­ke­ting is one part. It’s called “lean pro­duc­tion”; pull, not push is the major tenet. Follow Toyota, not GM –and on a sma­ller scale, emu­late Tho­mas, not Stella.

  4. Fabian says:

    The com­pa­ri­son is not com­ple­tely fair.
    The dif­fe­rence is in the scale and you have to com­pare apples to apples.
    When you have an big guy like Gucci group inves­ting in your com­pany, the tur­no­ver and results expec­ted are a lot big­ger than the num­ber you can get with a small busi­ness and the­re­fore they’ll be mer­ci­less even with a great brand if there’s no return of the invest­ment.
    Any­way the way you and your part­ner manage the mar­ke­tin (g) of english cut is great.
    Cheers