March 1, 2006

evil cartoon spree

Pra­sad is not pleased:

Hugh’s gaping­void, was, until a few days back a fun site with good marketing/blogging ideas sprin­kled with some won­der­ful dry satire car­toons. Recently, he’s been on a car­toon spree, and most of them are dry without his tra­de­mark satire, don’t have that rough­ness or rude­ness or arro­gance or irre­ve­rence that he’s known for. The spate of car­toons are tamed ver­sions of inane ideas. I don’t know what struck him or who he’s dating…

38 Responses to “evil cartoon spree”

  1. pieman says:

    Couldn’t dis­ga­ree more. Back and bet­ter than ever, IMHO. Bring on the t-shirts. And what DID hap­pen to those fine art prints? Sorry if I mis­sed it.

  2. Jack Yan says:

    Oh well. One opi­nion from Pra­sad. Not sha­red by me.
       I

  3. Harsh
    It’s called get­ting a new toy and expe­ri­men­ting.
    He must have mis­sed the car­toons where you said it sucks that peo­ple mat­ter, chec­king your ego at the door will never hap­pen, and having a soul while wor­king for a large com­pany would only get in the way.
    Two words.. Link Bait.
    …and it worked!

  4. Stay ahead of the game Hugh…
    Play to your hearts con­tent,
    “Even a blind hen finds a corn now and again…!”

  5. Yep, some folks can’t stand to see someone having a good time.

  6. Yep, some folks can’t stand to see someone having a good time.

  7. Yep, some folks can’t stand to see someone having a good time.

  8. Yep, some folks can’t stand to see someone having a good time.

  9. or says:

    maybe it’s because of his new tablet pc?

  10. ..that relea­ses creativity..

  11. Alex says:

    Don’t take it per­so­nal, Hugh… I guess what he ment we kind of miss the words.
    If it was just expe­ri­men­ting with the cool new toy, it’s cool. But if your blog turns into a drawing-blog, then it would be a bit sad..
    I believe that although a picture/drawing is worth a hun­dred words, it still needs another hun­dred words to make the story worth telling.

  12. Jeff Chausse says:

    I wouldn’t worry too much about cri­ti­cism from a guy who calls him­self “nonen­tity”. I used to come here for the car­toons back in the day (found it via a FARK.com ad). Then I for­got about the site for a while and came back to the wine, and the suits, and the marketing-speak — and won­de­red if I was at the right site (though I’m a big fan of marketing-speak so I’ve been stic­king around). Is it time for two blogs?

  13. John Seiffer says:

    I agree that the newer stuff lacks some of the edge — even though I like some of them. But sheesh — give the guy a break. He’s pla­ying with a new toy.
    But it illus­tra­tes how the web is dif­fe­rent from inter­me­dia­ted media. The good news/bad news about the web vs an edi­ted publi­ca­tion [can you ima­gine us not seeing Hugh’s stuff unless it got in the Bri­tish equi­va­lent of the New Yor­ker?] is that it’s so easy to “publish” that lots of prac­tice and trial and not-ready-for-prime-time stuff gets out. If rea­ders feel there too much noise to sig­nal ratio they stop rea­ding. So it’s pos­ter beware rather than con­su­mer beware.

  14. Warren says:

    I agree with him. The car­toon deluge lately has been inc­re­dibly lame with maybe 1 of them being mildly amu­sing. I love that you have a new toy, but use the power for good.
    The car­toons are like cho­co­late cake. Eat too much at once and you become sick of it.

  15. Scott says:

    I’ve been a visi­tor for a while. Have been influen­ced enough to watch “Young Adam” read “Clue­train Mani­festo” can’t get the wine here in the sta­tes though. I’m not sure how much I like style of car­toons lately but its taking a chance that leads to all things good.

  16. john t unger says:

    It’s unli­kely that you’ll be able to make *ever­yone* happy all at once, if that’s even a goal… Some like the car­toons, some like the text, some like both. Great.
    I sup­pose you could title your posts to dif­fe­ren­tiate the two, as in
    Car­toon: clic­king on a mouse
    Text: mal­colm glad­well has a blog
    Or, you could offer two feeds easily enough.
    Or, peo­ple could just stop che­wing you out for fai­ling to live up to their per­so­nal expec­ta­tions when they read the exce­llent con­tent you’re giving them for free.
    Rea­der feed­back is a good thing, but it’s still just one person’s opi­nion. Rock on.
    (BTW: I’m really quite happy with the new spate of car­toons. Those who think “they’ve lost the edge” should go back to the archi­ves and look again. I think they’re roman­ti­ci­sing the past… the new car­toons seem to me to have about the same mix of edgy, happy and purely graphic.)

  17. Bjorn says:

    I liked the car­toon spree.

  18. Humph. No slack at all. For my part I already sang prai­ses to your new work. It’s edgier and more emo­tio­nally hard hit­ting than ever in my opi­nion. Oh well. “Each to his own boys. I likes mine…raw.”

  19. Thomas says:

    I have to agree with Brad, I see it as expe­ri­men­ting with a new toy. While there have been some decent ones and some bad, it is an expe­ri­men­ting phase.

  20. Hugh MacLeod says:

    Any time you do anything new/different, you get flak. I’m not worried.

  21. I just kind of figu­red you were sha­ring all of your prac­tice crap, and put­ting it somewhere where you can find it later if you nee­ded it. It’s kind of neat to see your pro­cess, per­so­nally. But maybe it takes a fellow car­too­nist to appre­ciate that without some sort of explaination.

  22. Peter Cooper says:

    I think the new ones are bet­ter, to be honest, than all the bit­ter stuff.
    If someone star­ted a blog and threw up simi­lar dra­wings, it pro­bably wouldn’t attract much inte­rest, but because all of us have seen your style deve­lop over time, it beco­mes art.

  23. Katherine says:

    Hmmm.… way back in the day, Hugh pos­ted a list of “How to be crea­tive” tips. One of the key ideas from that list was that expe­ri­men­ting is good, and worr­ying about what other peo­ple think is bad. I’m glad to see he’s get­ting back to his roots.

  24. Hugh’s not here to com­fort the dis­tur­bed but to dis­turb the comfortable.

  25. Warren says:

    “Hugh’s not here to com­fort the dis­tur­bed but to dis­turb the com­for­ta­ble.”
    Right, rah-rah-rah, pur­ple cow and catch phra­ses and all that but the car­toons used to mean something. When I saw one on the blog, I sat up and paid atten­tion because it was likely a wry obser­va­tion of some kind about a current issue or a biting com­ment about some aspect of mar­ke­ting.
    This flood has none of that charm.

  26. Nice thought Katherine

  27. gia says:

    Hell, I only read Hugh for the car­toons. ;)

  28. Ryan says:

    How dare you do wha­te­ver you want on your own blog? Pan­der, damn you! Pander!

  29. triesti says:

    I came here mostly for the cartoons

  30. Mark H says:

    Re: ‘How dare you do wha­te­ver you want on your own blog? Pan­der, damn you! Pan­der!’
    Please turn that into a car­toon! I want that on blog­cards! (Though without the ‘on your blog…’)

  31. Keith Handy says:

    When I chec­ked in the other day, my first thought was “ooh, cool, color!”
    NO DAMMIT I’M NOT ALLOWED TO JUST ENJOY THE COLOR, I HAVE TO BE CYNICAL AND SAY YOU SOLD OUT OR SOMETHING
    Please. Carry on. Do what thou wilt.

  32. Tracy says:

    I love some of them. Cor­po­rate Soul…Higher Beings. Good stuff!
    (How do you handle so much critique?)

  33. Prasad says:

    Hugh,
    Looks like my post ser­ved as a trig­ger to let you know that there are many who love your new expe­ri­ment.
    I ack­now­ledge a weak­ness from my side: I have come to expect a cer­tain type of humour-idea blend from you and when you depart from your style, I (and rea­ders who share my taste) have to make men­tal adjust­ments to look & grasp your new spate of car­toons with a fresh pair of eyes to appreciate/enjoy them… and that’s serious effort. But try, I will.
    Still, if this expe­ri­ment is an indi­ca­tion of your future course, I’d say “there’s nothing like good old days!!”.

  34. YaaL says:

    Bah.
    The car­toons ROCK!

  35. bbm says:

    Go ahead — tell him who you’re dating.

  36. Another Brad says:

    It’s pre­ma­ture to com­plain about chan­ges to the car­toons. It’s also pre­ma­ture to dis­miss the com­plaints as sim­ple fear of change, ’cause in this case the fear of change is quite com­plex.
    We liked what we were get­ting, and now we’re get­ting more for a while, at least until Hugh’s enthu­siasm for his new tool dies down a bit. When it does, I’m sure that he’ll be doing car­toons to match “My cock is mighty” and “Com­plete Fuc­king Asshole” soon enough.
    Hell, he’s almost there already. “Having a soul would just get in the way” is a good exam­ple — if you remove the first sen­tence, it’s on par with the qua­lity of visual poetry I’ve come to expect from gaping­void. Some of the new stuff is a little overtly snarky for my taste.
    [Disc­lo­sure: I am neither a wine drin­ker, nor am I ever likely to buy a $3000 suit.]
    That being said, I am inte­res­ted in seeing Hugh’s sketches. They’re not hur­ting any­body, yet.

  37. Niti Bhan says:

    I second this request, I need new cards :) :
    Re: ‘How dare you do wha­te­ver you want on your own blog? Pan­der, damn you! Pan­der!’
    Please turn that into a car­toon! I want that on blog­cards! (Though without the ‘on your blog…’)
    Pos­ted by: Mark H at March 1, 2006 09:40 PM

  38. MadameD says:

    I come here for the car­toons.
    And the wit.
    And then the car­toons some more.
    Really, to com­plain that you don’t like what someone’s done with the place-it only works if you’re com­plai­ning to the deco­ra­tor who just redid your living room.