February 27, 2006

“interpublic, where are your blogs?”

Great post from Mar­ke­ting­Mon­ger:

Inter­pu­blic Group. 91 com­pa­nies. $6 billion in annual reve­nues. 43,000 emplo­yees. 3 cor­po­rate blogs.
Great design still mat­ters. So does bran­ding. And pr. And mar­ke­ting. And these com­pa­nies do all those things very well.
But social media is coming and it’s going to affect them and their clients.

So how come adver­ti­sing agen­cies aren’t get­ting into blog­ging? I’ve said it many times before:

Blog­ging, when done correctly, is CHEAP and EASY. Ad agen­cies are in the busi­ness of selling stuff that is NEITHER.

[Bonus Link:] I love this tagline for The Obli­ga­tory Blog:

These days, if you run a soft­ware com­pany, you have to have a Blog. This is mine.

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

11 Responses to ““interpublic, where are your blogs?””

  1. john says:

    Who would want to read an agency blog?

  2. hugh macleod says:

    Good point.

  3. Eric Mattson says:

    First, Hugh, thanks for the link. I’m glad that you enjo­yed the analy­sis.
    Second, I disa­gree. John does not make a good point.
    There are some bri­lliant peo­ple that work at Interpublic’s com­pa­nies and other agen­cies large and small.
    I want them to blog.
    I want to learn from them.
    I want to hear what they have to say.
    I want them to par­ti­ci­pate because con­ver­sa­tion is NOT a zero sum game.
    Just because they haven’t star­ted yet or are used to doing things a cer­tain way, does not give one the right to con­demn them preemp­ti­vely.
    Eric — MarketingMonger

  4. teeveedubya says:

    blog­ging invol­ves baring one’s soul to some degree. ergo one must have a soul to blog. hence the com­plete and utter absence of the IPG blogs. sim­ple innit. ;-)

  5. AdPulp says:

    IPG Ponies Up

    Adweek reports that Sta­cey Lynn Koer­ner, evp, direc­tor of glo­bal research inte­gra­tion at Inter­pu­blic Group’s Ini­tia­tive, has been named pre­si­dent of the Con­su­mer Expe­rience Prac­tice, a newly for­med unit within IPG Media. “Con­su­mers are moving fluidly a…

  6. john says:

    I didn’t con­demn the inter­pu­blic indi­vi­duals (in fact i know someone very high up in the orga­ni­sa­tion and value his opi­nion on anything) — I was merely impl­ying that an “agency” blog as oppo­sed to indi­vi­duals’ blogs would be focus­sed upon pro­mo­ting a model we all think is doomed.

  7. Eric might want to double-check his facts. Not only does Weber Shand­wick have a blog, but seve­ral emplo­yees who are acti­vely blog­ging from behind our fire­wall (where our soon-to-be-made-public blog sits) and externally.

  8. Eric Mattson says:

    Hey Robert,
    Thanks for par­ti­ci­pa­ting in the dis­cus­sion.
    Here’s the link to Weber Shandick’s web­page.
    http://www.webershandwick.com/
    I made it very clear in my post that I did my research by visi­ting the agen­cies’ web­si­tes and loo­king for blogs.
    I was assu­ming that an agency’s blog was something that they would show­case to pro­mote their posi­tion as a thought lea­der.
    Can you show me the blog on the web­site?
    I don’t see it on the home­page.
    I don’t see it on the site map.
    If I search for the word “blog” on the web­site the only thing that comes up is the press release about Jeremy Pep­per which I noted on my post.
    And I was being gene­rous when I coun­ted Jeremy’s blog as a “cor­po­rate” blog since he’s pretty clear his sta­te­ments are his own.
    My facts are correct.
    You even say that your blog is “soon-to-be-made-public.“
    Can I ask why you’re wai­ting?
    Though I recog­nize the value of inter­nal blogs for team com­mu­ni­ca­tions and colla­bo­ra­tion, I don’t unders­tand the approach of blog­ging inter­nally only to make it public later.
    This is a con­ver­sa­tion.
    It requi­res that you par­ti­ci­pate.
    I want you to par­ti­ci­pate.
    C’mon.
    Eric — MarketingMonger

  9. Eric Mattson says:

    For those of you who are inte­res­ted…
    Robert J. Ricci is head of Weber Shandwick’s Web Rela­tions group.
    His blog, where he’s been blog­ging for the last 4 months, is: http://son-of-a-pitch.blogspot.com/
    Robert, any chance you main­tain a list of all WS emplo­yees who blog about pro­fes­sio­nal topics like PR, mar­ke­ting and such?
    I’d love to add it to my post as addi­tio­nal detail.
    Thanks and take care,
    Eric

  10. In gene­ral, a hearty amen to Hugh’s ini­tial point in the post. Quickly follo­wed, I’m afraid, by some nit­picks, a little puzz­le­ment, and a gene­rally encou­ra­ged air of anti­ci­pa­tion. Viz:
    I hear­tily agree that ad agen­cies should be get­ting dee­per into blog­ging. And not just through the crea­tion of faux cha­rac­ter blogs (the abbre­via­ted tech­ni­cal term for which is: fuxc­logs), or insi­pid, unins­pi­ring, short-lived “blog-like” cam­paigns for their clients. No — I’d like to see real blogs writ­ten by real peo­ple at real agen­cies. I know a lot of these actually exist, but how many of them are overt and/or san­ci­to­ned or embra­ced by the parent agency? There’s some bloody bri­lliant agency supre­mos out there — show us yer bollogs!
    Second, rather odd to see the com­ments quickly hop from a point about ad agen­cies to a rebut­tal using Weber Shand­wick (WSW) as the exam­ple. WSW is a PR firm, last time I chec­ked. Yes — I know the broa­der con­text is the IPG hol­ding com­pany. Per­mit me to digress into WSW space for a while lon­ger (seeing as you’re already there…)
    For a major PR agency to have blog­gers — both inside and outside the fire­wall — is no big sur­pise or inno­va­tion. At the same time, bravo to WSW if they’re about to launch their own more public blog. When I star­ted as an SVP at WSW, I’d already been blog­ging a cou­ple of years. Sadly, I wal­ked the corri­dors of that firm for a further two years, acti­vely blog­ging and blog con­sul­ting the whole time, but found it hard to find anyone willing to share in a clue.
    Larry Weber was a nota­ble excep­tion (although our time at WSW only over­lap­ped by a few months, alas). A few of the peo­ple peo­ple in the group Richard Ricci belongs to also see­med to know their stuff pretty well. So there’s defi­ni­tely hope.
    As for the broa­der Inter­pu­blic, meanwhile, I think Eric’s gene­ral obser­va­tion is still pretty much spot on. But then, IPG of late could well stand in for that com­pany first famously cited all those years ago as currently “free-falling out of the For­tune 500″.
    Bonus snark points if you know the full cita­tion, the quote that goes with it, and the com­pany it ori­gi­nally refe­rred to. Super double-plus extra snark-o-rama points if you know who actually said it :-)
    All, as usual, JMHO.
    /m

  11. Why I Want Inter­pu­blic to Blog

    Since my research on the lack of Inter­pu­blic blogs has been pic­ked up by Hugh and Adpulp and I’ve got­ten some inte­res­ting com­ments, I thought that I’d res­pond here. Objec­tion 1: Who cares if Inter­pu­blic has blogs? Agency blogs are…