February 26, 2006

more on the 100 dinners…

zzzzsteak29.jpg
Right now I’m get­ting very exci­ted about the Stormhoek “100 Din­ners” idea.

We’ll supply the wine, the blog­gers supply the peo­ple and the con­ver­sa­tion. The events don’t have to be big, or at a fancy place, we ima­gine that they could be anywhere– a bar, a porch, a beach, park, wha­te­ver, so don’t limit your­self to a restaurant.

Why am I get­ting so exci­ted?
1. How about if it sca­led? How about ins­tead of doing a hun­dred din­ners as a one-off, it beco­mes an ongoing thing? Hun­de­reds and hun­dreds of blog­ger din­ners [Thou­sands?] over the next cou­ple of years?
2. How about if the idea really gelled with every­body, and sud­denly having Stormhoek at a blog­ger din­ner came pretty stan­dard, as ubi­qui­tous as say, wifi at a Mashup?
3. How about if it wor­ked well enough that we could jus­tify spen­ding ALL our mar­ke­ting bud­get on the din­ners, and for­get about all the other options– adver­ti­sing, in-store promo’s, pro­duct pla­ce­ment and all the other mar­ke­ting methods I utterly des­pise?
I can think of worse way to make a living.
When I launched the whole Stormhoek thing, I said:

Will the idea-virus spread far enough that sud­denly, ins­tead of one or two peo­ple kno­wing about the wine, sud­denly tens of thou­sands of smart con­nec­ted peo­ple in the UK know about it, and are tal­king about it?
Is that enough to launch a natio­nal brand?
If it isn’t, well, no great loss. We will have got­ten some PR out of it, and maybe a few long-term Stormhoek cus­to­mers out of the blo­gosphere.
But if it is, then I’m thin­king, Holy Shit, what we’re doing might put a lot of tra­di­tio­nal ad agen­cies out of busi­ness. Seriously.

What? Using the blo­gosphere to launch a natio­nal wine brand… and nothing else? Puting ad agen­cies out of busi­ness? Huh?
I’ll admit it– when this whole idea began it see­med very “out there”.
But since The Tele­graph article came out now I’m star­ting to think, Holy Shit, this is actually star­ting to work.
And that’s scary. In a good way.
Next steps?

20 Responses to “more on the 100 dinners…”

  1. frosty says:

    As I sit here drin­king a cheap-ish French white wine and doing my weekly blog rea­ding, it occurs to me that the “Stormhoek thing” has already achi­ved brand recog­ni­tion out of all pro­por­tion to what I’d guess it’s cost them.
    I get 91,500 results on Goo­gle (but then, Goo­gle knows I drink more wine than the Tele­graph). I get 94,700 on Yahoo. I even get 24,282 on MSN, pro­ving that peo­ple living in caves can also find Stormhoek.
    I’d love to see how that has trans­la­ted (or not) into sales, but for a South Afri­can wine with a goofy name that’s already an insane num­ber of search results.
    And it stri­kes me that this blog-based mar­ke­ting thing can “scale” for wine the way it can’t for a lot of other pro­ducts. Almost by defi­ni­tion, peo­ple who like wine like to try dif­fe­rent wines. I see no rea­son why every winery can’t do exactly the same thing with exactly the same results: “here’s our wine, what do you think?”
    So what if this beco­mes the way new wines are intro­du­ced, period?
    What if 100K Goo­gle results is the base­line and just shows you haven’t scre­wed up?
    More impor­tantly, what if this beco­mes the way peo­ple *find* new wines to try?
    I’m at the super­mar­ket… I see twenty dif­fe­rent white wines for $10 each… I pull out my mobile phone and check Froo­gle Mobile: “Stormhoek vs Plai­sir des Princes” — and Goo­gle tells me which one the online world thinks is better.

  2. frosty says:

    Oh, and before any vinos­cienti slap me down: I paid $7 for the plea­sure of prin­ces, and only ’cause I bought it in Cali­for­nia. But it ain’t bad!

  3. john says:

    Next steps — con­ti­nue doing what you’re doing — if you ramp it up I’m thin­king you run the dan­ger of losing the authen­ticty of voice. And of course once a snow­ball starts rolling.…
    If there were no ad agen­cies, well that would be great — but seriously if there were no ad agne­cies then the tele­graph would have no ads and would not be via­ble so the article wouldn’t have hap­pe­ned. This is dis­rup­tion not demolition.

  4. Eric Mattson says:

    Well, given the research pro­ject about Interpublic’s blog­ging acti­vi­ties (or lack the­reof) that I’ve spent the last cou­ple of hours obses­sing over, I’d say put­ting a few adver­ti­sing agen­cies out of work is a dis­tinct pos­si­bi­lity.
    The research pro­ject is here in case you’re curious. http://www.marketingmonger.com/2006/02/uminterpublic_where_are_your_blogs_1.htm
    Hugh, I need a good car­toon for this. Any ideas?

  5. Next steps? Throw some fer­ti­li­zer on it, have per­so­nal appea­ran­ces by you and/or the Stormhoek folks to leve­rage everybody’s glo­bal microbranding!

  6. Next steps? Throw some fer­ti­li­zer on it, have per­so­nal appea­ran­ces by you and/or the Stormhoek folks to leve­rage everybody’s glo­bal microbranding!

  7. Next steps? Throw some fer­ti­li­zer on it, have per­so­nal appea­ran­ces by you and/or the Stormhoek folks to leve­rage everybody’s glo­bal microbranding!

  8. Next steps? Throw some fer­ti­li­zer on it, have per­so­nal appea­ran­ces by you and/or the Stormhoek folks to leve­rage everybody’s glo­bal microbranding!

  9. Miles Archer says:

    Sit­ting here drin­king something that I bottle myself — albeit the wine was made at a real winery by someone who knows what he’s doing.
    Any­way — what’s the deal with the free wine? My wife blogs. Perhaps we could get a bottle and she could com­plain about it? (SA wine is not a pro­blem. Fruity white isn’t her thing. Espe­cially in the early spring)

  10. ‘They’ say it can’t be done…which sounds like a dam­ned good rea­son to do it…

  11. Sca­ling? OK — send Jeff Nolan at SAP Ven­tu­res a case…

  12. Fraser says:

    Next Steps?
    When I first read about the 100 Din­ners — I thought, if I were to host a din­ner — i’d pro­bably invite a bunch of mates and have a game of golf and then a few drinks after­wards.
    Or maybe i’d invite peo­ple round to watch the 6 Nations rugby or hey, even some of the World Cup matches.
    So seg­ment the drin­king and socia­li­zing occa­sions.
    F.

  13. hugh macleod says:

    “Next steps? Throw some fer­ti­li­zer on it, have per­so­nal appea­ran­ces by you and/or the Stormhoek folks to leve­rage everybody’s glo­bal mic­ro­bran­ding!”
    Yeah, kinda what I’m thin­king (scheme, scheme…)… something like that, anyway.

  14. john says:

    Surely per­so­nal appea­ran­ces are going to be rela­ti­vely expen­sive in terms of tra­vel expen­ses and not sca­lea­ble as you can’t be intwo pla­ces at the same time. So why not think about going witht the techie feel of the din­ners and appear via some form of wifi simul­cast for a Q and A about the wine and the mic­ro­bran­ding concept?

  15. Heiko Hebig says:

    How fast can you ship Stormhoek bott­les to San Diego? E-Tech seems to be a great place to drink some great wine and have inte­res­ting din­ner con­ver­sa­tions. I’ll be there to faci­li­tate, if needed.

  16. “Next steps.…”
    Yes, this is an exam­ple of “Real peo­ple don’t scale”. But you got to be somewhere, and it’s nice to have choi­ces. Scheme on!

  17. “Next steps.…”
    Yes, this is an exam­ple of “Real peo­ple don’t scale”. But you got to be somewhere, and it’s nice to have choi­ces. Scheme on!

  18. “Next steps.…”
    Yes, this is an exam­ple of “Real peo­ple don’t scale”. But you got to be somewhere, and it’s nice to have choi­ces. Scheme on!

  19. “Next steps.…”
    Yes, this is an exam­ple of “Real peo­ple don’t scale”. But you got to be somewhere, and it’s nice to have choi­ces. Scheme on!

  20. Miles Burke says:

    OK, OK, I’ll come to you since I live on the other side of the world. :)
    Will there be a din­ner anywhere near Lon­don bet­ween May 17 — 25th? If so, count me in…