February 19, 2006

shut up and get your checkbook out

zzzlkoshjkd05.jpg
Con­gra­tu­la­tions to PR maven Steve Rubel on his new job. At another large New York PR agency, no less.
A mar­ke­ting pro­fes­sio­nal just sent me the follo­wing note:

Something I’ve noti­ced about the newest class of PR/marketing blog­gers– most of them are in the bowels of big agen­cies and their wri­ting and point of view show it. It’s a lot of “Here’s how to use blogs as tools for our won­der­ful PR pro­grams”, and not at all about what blog­ging IS. Agencythink in new clothes; that’s all it is.
Rubel can’t ever truly be Rubel until he’s on his own– going from one over­lord to another means more of the same com­men­tary on busi­ness as usual. The sad thing is I don’t think he rea­li­zes that.

Well, I don’t think Steve Rubel is a hack [No worse than me, any­way]. I have nothing but res­pect for the guy. And not every­body likes being on their own. Some peo­ple are far bet­ter sui­ted wor­king for big com­pa­nies. Dif­fe­rent stro­kes etc.
Then again, my name­less friend makes a good point about some of the busi­ness blogs I’ve been seeing around.
I sup­pose any hard­core pro­fes­sio­nal blog evan­ge­list will inva­riably end up with the same pitch, like it or not:

“Blogs will dis­rupt and trans­form everything about your busi­ness. Except for the part where you pay me lots of money”.

Nice work if you can get it.

15 Responses to “shut up and get your checkbook out”

  1. Bjorn says:

    Some wri­ters just like to blog on their free time, and aren’t loo­king to gene­rate reve­nue. They just want to be heard or write. They may be experts in their industry or just great wri­ters or have insight because of some rea­son or another. I think these peo­ple make great blogs. Peo­ple who aren’t loo­king to live off of their blog, but still are worth rea­ding as much as those who cover their blogs with ads or, worse, require pay-to-read (like some blogs on searchen­gi­ne­watch or nytimes’s timesselect).

  2. Mar­ke­ting is a Disease.
    http://theheadlemur.typepad.com/ravinglunacy/2006/02/marketing_is_a_.html
    But you are the cure. Don’t worry though, it will be a long time before those guys catch on.

  3. David Burn says:

    Blog­ging IS what you want it to be. You define it. There IS no sin­gle defi­ni­tion.
    To me it’s push but­ton publishing.

  4. hugh macleod says:

    I agree with you, Dave. Which is why I like it.

  5. LOL here. Who knows how some of us are going to make our money with blogs… because they are so dis­rup­tive. What I know is the busi­ness I’ve gai­ned has come in unex­pec­ted ways. Maybe I should just keep space in my wallet and hope for the best.

  6. Suhail Kazi says:

    This doodle is too good. That guy is such a mean suit.

  7. I remem­ber when I had a job, I was 14 years old. At age 16 I bought the com­pany. Now I’m in charge of the entire Inter­net and nobody tells me what to blog about.

  8. Not *all* of the blog­gers at agen­cies simply blog about PR. I find it pretty tedious, at best. (yes, I end up thro­wing PR-related stuff on my dinky per­so­nal blog, but mostly to throw rocks at PR bloggers…I just find out­lets elsewhere)

  9. Walt Kania says:

    I think we should stop blog­ging about blog­ging about blog­ging. Blog­ging about the power of blog­ging is like … well … it’s no bet­ter than com­ments on blogs about blog­ging and blog­ging. And if anyone com­ments on my com­ment about blog­ging on blog­ging, well we might never get anywhere.

  10. Maven sounds so … femi­nine.
    As one of those peo­ple that have jum­ped from indy to cor­po­rate hack and slave … it depends on the per­so­na­lity. I don’t think Steve ever had the besos to go out on his own, and blog what he really thought because he was always caught up in the suc­king up to others, and trying to be an A-lister. I never caught any honesty on his blog, nor any trans­pa­rency or abi­lity to res­pond to cri­ti­cism.
    I expect more of the same (or should it be less). It will be inte­res­ting, though, to see if he can play in a large firm. He’s never been at one, and it’s a whole new can of worms.
    BTW, what’s it cost to get a per­so­nal cartoon?!

  11. Ah, the koo­laid evan­ge­list crowd can go on about “blogs” and their “New PR” revo­lu­tion. Guess I’m guilty of blog­ging about blog­ging in PR, too, howe­ver … even if it is for the sake of my stu­dents. I cer­tainly don’t tout blogs as a pana­cea, though. Just another tool/tactic. And we don’t talk about ‘billa­ble’ value, either.
    One thought on the above, “At another large New York PR agency, no less.” ???
    I think he is ‘now’ at a large firm. The last one was bou­ti­que — at best. Quite a leap.
    Cooper-Katz: Emplo­yees: 20. Foun­ded: 1996.
    Edel­man: Emplo­yees: 1800. Foun­ded: 1952.
    (Source: http://www.odwyerpr.com/members/pr_firms_database/)

  12. Lev says:

    blogs are essen­tially per­so­nal bran­ding.
    When a per­son who comes from a busi­ness back­ground or a cer­tain area of society and blogs about it, are they not just mixing busi­ness with pleasure?

  13. hugh macleod says:

    Coo­per Katz is 10 times the size of English Cut. So I guess that’s “large” to me ;-)

  14. Phil Gomes says:

    You know… You *can* go to a large com­pany, leave the so-called “inde­pen­dent” life and yet main­tain your inde­pen­dent voice. “I know,” as Ron White would say. “I’ve seen me do it!”

  15. But Phil, you, me and Krem­pasky are spe­cial cases: we have the inter­grity to be true.