February 19, 2006

shut up and get your checkbook out

zzzlkoshjkd05.jpg
Con­gra­tu­la­tions to PR maven Steve Rubel on his new job. At another large New York PR agency, no less.
A mar­ke­ting pro­fes­sio­nal just sent me the follo­wing note:

Something I’ve noti­ced about the newest class of PR/marketing blog­gers– most of them are in the bowels of big agen­cies and their wri­ting and point of view show it. It’s a lot of “Here’s how to use blogs as tools for our won­der­ful PR pro­grams”, and not at all about what blog­ging IS. Agencythink in new clothes; that’s all it is.
Rubel can’t ever truly be Rubel until he’s on his own– going from one over­lord to another means more of the same com­men­tary on busi­ness as usual. The sad thing is I don’t think he rea­li­zes that.

Well, I don’t think Steve Rubel is a hack [No worse than me, any­way]. I have nothing but res­pect for the guy. And not every­body likes being on their own. Some peo­ple are far bet­ter sui­ted wor­king for big com­pa­nies. Dif­fe­rent stro­kes etc.
Then again, my name­less friend makes a good point about some of the busi­ness blogs I’ve been seeing around.
I sup­pose any hard­core pro­fes­sio­nal blog evan­ge­list will inva­riably end up with the same pitch, like it or not:

“Blogs will dis­rupt and trans­form everything about your busi­ness. Except for the part where you pay me lots of money”.

Nice work if you can get it.

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

15 Responses to “shut up and get your checkbook out”

  1. Bjorn says:

    Some wri­ters just like to blog on their free time, and aren’t loo­king to gene­rate reve­nue. They just want to be heard or write. They may be experts in their industry or just great wri­ters or have insight because of some rea­son or another. I think these peo­ple make great blogs. Peo­ple who aren’t loo­king to live off of their blog, but still are worth rea­ding as much as those who cover their blogs with ads or, worse, require pay-to-read (like some blogs on searchen­gi­ne­watch or nytimes’s timesselect).

  2. Mar­ke­ting is a Disease.
    http://theheadlemur.typepad.com/ravinglunacy/2006/02/marketing_is_a_.html
    But you are the cure. Don’t worry though, it will be a long time before those guys catch on.

  3. David Burn says:

    Blog­ging IS what you want it to be. You define it. There IS no sin­gle defi­ni­tion.
    To me it’s push but­ton publishing.

  4. hugh macleod says:

    I agree with you, Dave. Which is why I like it.

  5. LOL here. Who knows how some of us are going to make our money with blogs… because they are so dis­rup­tive. What I know is the busi­ness I’ve gai­ned has come in unex­pec­ted ways. Maybe I should just keep space in my wallet and hope for the best.

  6. Suhail Kazi says:

    This doodle is too good. That guy is such a mean suit.

  7. I remem­ber when I had a job, I was 14 years old. At age 16 I bought the com­pany. Now I’m in charge of the entire Inter­net and nobody tells me what to blog about.

  8. Not *all* of the blog­gers at agen­cies simply blog about PR. I find it pretty tedious, at best. (yes, I end up thro­wing PR-related stuff on my dinky per­so­nal blog, but mostly to throw rocks at PR bloggers…I just find out­lets elsewhere)

  9. Walt Kania says:

    I think we should stop blog­ging about blog­ging about blog­ging. Blog­ging about the power of blog­ging is like … well … it’s no bet­ter than com­ments on blogs about blog­ging and blog­ging. And if anyone com­ments on my com­ment about blog­ging on blog­ging, well we might never get anywhere.

  10. Maven sounds so … femi­nine.
    As one of those peo­ple that have jum­ped from indy to cor­po­rate hack and slave … it depends on the per­so­na­lity. I don’t think Steve ever had the besos to go out on his own, and blog what he really thought because he was always caught up in the suc­king up to others, and trying to be an A-lister. I never caught any honesty on his blog, nor any trans­pa­rency or abi­lity to res­pond to cri­ti­cism.
    I expect more of the same (or should it be less). It will be inte­res­ting, though, to see if he can play in a large firm. He’s never been at one, and it’s a whole new can of worms.
    BTW, what’s it cost to get a per­so­nal cartoon?!

  11. Ah, the koo­laid evan­ge­list crowd can go on about “blogs” and their “New PR” revo­lu­tion. Guess I’m guilty of blog­ging about blog­ging in PR, too, howe­ver … even if it is for the sake of my stu­dents. I cer­tainly don’t tout blogs as a pana­cea, though. Just another tool/tactic. And we don’t talk about ‘billa­ble’ value, either.
    One thought on the above, “At another large New York PR agency, no less.” ???
    I think he is ‘now’ at a large firm. The last one was bou­ti­que — at best. Quite a leap.
    Cooper-Katz: Emplo­yees: 20. Foun­ded: 1996.
    Edel­man: Emplo­yees: 1800. Foun­ded: 1952.
    (Source: http://www.odwyerpr.com/members/pr_firms_database/)

  12. Lev says:

    blogs are essen­tially per­so­nal bran­ding.
    When a per­son who comes from a busi­ness back­ground or a cer­tain area of society and blogs about it, are they not just mixing busi­ness with pleasure?

  13. hugh macleod says:

    Coo­per Katz is 10 times the size of English Cut. So I guess that’s “large” to me ;-)

  14. Phil Gomes says:

    You know… You *can* go to a large com­pany, leave the so-called “inde­pen­dent” life and yet main­tain your inde­pen­dent voice. “I know,” as Ron White would say. “I’ve seen me do it!”

  15. But Phil, you, me and Krem­pasky are spe­cial cases: we have the inter­grity to be true.