February 15, 2006

the master speaks…

Clay Shirky wri­tes more about power­laws, in res­ponse to all the recent “ine­qua­lity” ker­fuf­fle.

The power law is always there, any time anyone wants to worry about it. Why the worr­ying hap­pens in spasms ins­tead of stea­dily is one of the mys­te­ries of the weblog world.
The only things that are dif­fe­rent in 2006 are the rise of groups and of com­mer­cial inte­rests. Of the top 10 Technorati-measured blogs, (Disc­lo­sure: I am an advi­sor to Tech­no­rati), all but one of them are either run by more than one pos­ter, or gene­rate reve­nue from ads or subsc­rip­tions. (The excep­tion is Pos­tSec­ret, whose reve­nue comes from book sales, not directly from run­ning the site.) Four of the top five and five of the ten are both group and com­mer­cial efforts 

2 Responses to “the master speaks…”

  1. I also agree with Doc Searls.
    And I think it’s funny that we speak of the “shape” of the blo­gosphere, and A Lists, and blo­gosphe­ric con­di­tions and growth…
    …when all any user ever expe­rien­ces is a micro-blogospheria com­po­sed of blo­gro­lled, book­mar­ked favo­ri­tes, SE results sur­fing, and RSS/Atom syn­di­ca­tions feeds.
    In feeds, we don’t even inte­ract with the blog itself, but only a Fed Ver­sion of it in a Feed Reader…often strip­ped of com­ments, always strip­ped of side­bar com­mu­ni­ca­tions.
    We don’t inte­ract with a “blo­gosphere” at all. We inte­ract with a little list of blogs we like, with some excur­sions into the “bad­lands” of unk­nown, and lar­gely unde­si­ra­ble, blogs.

  2. Ric says:

    @steven — won­de­red where you were. Feeds are use­ful to keep you aware of upda­tes without having to check all your favou­rite blogs, but I’m with you here — if the post is even remo­tely inte­res­ting then I want to get the full con­text + com­ments, so head straight to the blog.
    I even find myself visi­ting my favou­rite when they’re not upda­ted … how sad!