<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: while we’re on the subject of blog inequality…</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gapingvoid.com/2006/02/14/while-were-on-the-subject-of-blog-inequality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2006/02/14/while-were-on-the-subject-of-blog-inequality/</link>
	<description>&#34;cartoons drawn on the back of business cards&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:18:51 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MarketingMonger</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2006/02/14/while-were-on-the-subject-of-blog-inequality/comment-page-1/#comment-9892</link>
		<dc:creator>MarketingMonger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 02:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=2063#comment-9892</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Marketing Beyond the Gatekeepers&lt;/strong&gt;

Lately the blogoshere has been buzzing about the New York Magazine article entitled Blogs to Riches - The Haves and Have-Nots of the Blogging Boom. Hugh Macleod talked about it so did Guy Kawasaki and Darren Rowse and Gawker and...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Marketing Beyond the Gatekeepers</strong></p>
<p>Lately the blogoshere has been buzzing about the New York Magazine article entitled Blogs to Riches — The Haves and Have-Nots of the Blogging Boom. Hugh Macleod talked about it so did Guy Kawasaki and Darren Rowse and Gawker and…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Changing Way</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2006/02/14/while-were-on-the-subject-of-blog-inequality/comment-page-1/#comment-9891</link>
		<dc:creator>Changing Way</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 10:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=2063#comment-9891</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Standard Silliness&lt;/strong&gt;

I know I&#039;m late to the party, but I feel moved to say a few words about Andrew Keen&#039;s Weekly Standard/CBS article. Keen criticizes Web 2.0 as a neo-Marxist movement that glorifies bloggers as the proletariat and vilifies traditional media as the bourge...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Standard Silliness</strong></p>
<p>I know I’m late to the party, but I feel moved to say a few words about Andrew Keen’s Weekly Standard/CBS article. Keen criticizes Web 2.0 as a neo-Marxist movement that glorifies bloggers as the proletariat and vilifies traditional media as the bourge…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Egill</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2006/02/14/while-were-on-the-subject-of-blog-inequality/comment-page-1/#comment-9888</link>
		<dc:creator>Egill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=2063#comment-9888</guid>
		<description>Amen to that!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen to that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steven e. streight the Vaspersian Humachine Arche-blogger</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2006/02/14/while-were-on-the-subject-of-blog-inequality/comment-page-1/#comment-9887</link>
		<dc:creator>steven e. streight the Vaspersian Humachine Arche-blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 02:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=2063#comment-9887</guid>
		<description>Any blogger who obsesses with link pop, authority ratings, traffic, blog site stats, A and F lists, clinking (clique/cul-de-sac linking)...is a moron.
Hardcore Bloggers don&#039;t give a fig about number of comments posted at their blog, nor how many RSS subscribers they&#039;ve got, or lost after posting a controversial article.
Hardcore Bloggers blog because, like all great artists, they *must*.
They are in no popularity contest.
Hardcore Bloggers persist, and watch the flakey bloggers fall like flies.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any blogger who obsesses with link pop, authority ratings, traffic, blog site stats, A and F lists, clinking (clique/cul-de-sac linking)…is a moron.<br />
Hardcore Bloggers don’t give a fig about number of comments posted at their blog, nor how many RSS subscribers they’ve got, or lost after posting a controversial article.<br />
Hardcore Bloggers blog because, like all great artists, they *must*.<br />
They are in no popularity contest.<br />
Hardcore Bloggers persist, and watch the flakey bloggers fall like flies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agent Bedhead</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2006/02/14/while-were-on-the-subject-of-blog-inequality/comment-page-1/#comment-9890</link>
		<dc:creator>Agent Bedhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=2063#comment-9890</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;http://agentbedhead.com/index.php/archive/blog-inequality/&lt;/strong&gt;

Blog Inequality: Is it a myth, cyberlegend, or just something to keep bloggers from feeling inadequate about whether we really matter to anyone but ourselves?
...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://agentbedhead.com/index.php/archive/blog-inequality/" rel="nofollow">http://agentbedhead.com/index.php/archive/blog-inequality/</a></strong></p>
<p>Blog Inequality: Is it a myth, cyberlegend, or just something to keep bloggers from feeling inadequate about whether we really matter to anyone but ourselves?<br />
…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cairo Otaibi</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2006/02/14/while-were-on-the-subject-of-blog-inequality/comment-page-1/#comment-9886</link>
		<dc:creator>Cairo Otaibi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=2063#comment-9886</guid>
		<description>Blogs are created like men. Some are more equal than others, thus the inequality. Yes, does size matter?
I am already drowning in all sorts of interesting stuff out there, and what may interest me, may only interest a handful of people. I do not read the A-list blogs anyhow, whatever the A-list is. I filter a lot and I may miss a lot of good stuff. The good mining tools are still missing.
Some people inspire or entertain me, others do not.
Blogging is just a publishing tool available to every half wit with a PC and Internet access. I am still experimenting what good this is going to be for me, but the jury is till out.
Inequality is sort of a good thing.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blogs are created like men. Some are more equal than others, thus the inequality. Yes, does size matter?<br />
I am already drowning in all sorts of interesting stuff out there, and what may interest me, may only interest a handful of people. I do not read the A-list blogs anyhow, whatever the A-list is. I filter a lot and I may miss a lot of good stuff. The good mining tools are still missing.<br />
Some people inspire or entertain me, others do not.<br />
Blogging is just a publishing tool available to every half wit with a PC and Internet access. I am still experimenting what good this is going to be for me, but the jury is till out.<br />
Inequality is sort of a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob - BAPI</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2006/02/14/while-were-on-the-subject-of-blog-inequality/comment-page-1/#comment-9885</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob - BAPI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=2063#comment-9885</guid>
		<description>This is a really interesting article, in same ways it is easy to say some blogs will be more popular than others but surely there are ways we could improve the visibilty of the smaller blogs? BAPI has been set up to look at exacly this sort of issue and we&#039;d be pleased to get your views on this.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a really interesting article, in same ways it is easy to say some blogs will be more popular than others but surely there are ways we could improve the visibilty of the smaller blogs? BAPI has been set up to look at exacly this sort of issue and we’d be pleased to get your views on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Egill</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2006/02/14/while-were-on-the-subject-of-blog-inequality/comment-page-1/#comment-9884</link>
		<dc:creator>Egill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=2063#comment-9884</guid>
		<description>To me, and I&#039;m writing only about what&#039;s interesting to me (music and design), getting a few people every day reading my blogs is great. I live in a nation of 300.000 and here 80 unique hits a day is considered a lot. If I had an audience of a few hundred thousand I&#039;d quit blogging and start a cult.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, and I’m writing only about what’s interesting to me (music and design), getting a few people every day reading my blogs is great. I live in a nation of 300.000 and here 80 unique hits a day is considered a lot. If I had an audience of a few hundred thousand I’d quit blogging and start a cult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ric</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2006/02/14/while-were-on-the-subject-of-blog-inequality/comment-page-1/#comment-9883</link>
		<dc:creator>Ric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=2063#comment-9883</guid>
		<description>@Patrick - no - as a matter of fact I&#039;m having lots of fun with CoComment.
@Hugh - I don&#039;t know whether it&#039;s something Laurent has done, or something that always worked, but when you open a post from a full link (i.e. the &quot;permalink&quot;) the comment form is in-line, and CoComment can pick it up (like this one ...).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Patrick — no — as a matter of fact I’m having lots of fun with CoComment.<br />
@Hugh — I don’t know whether it’s something Laurent has done, or something that always worked, but when you open a post from a full link (i.e. the “permalink”) the comment form is in-line, and CoComment can pick it up (like this one …).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Dodds</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2006/02/14/while-were-on-the-subject-of-blog-inequality/comment-page-1/#comment-9882</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Dodds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 06:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=2063#comment-9882</guid>
		<description>Write something interesting and people will read it. Simple to say, hard to do.
Has everyone given up on coComment yet?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Write something interesting and people will read it. Simple to say, hard to do.<br />
Has everyone given up on coComment yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Verne Gripes</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2006/02/14/while-were-on-the-subject-of-blog-inequality/comment-page-1/#comment-9881</link>
		<dc:creator>Verne Gripes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 02:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=2063#comment-9881</guid>
		<description>Nobody blogging on the lower lists should really be surprised or complain that life in blogging turns out to be just like life outside of blogging.
The article does talk about the &quot;power-law distribution&quot; which is real, but all it means is that as a race we behave like sheep because we&#039;re cowards most of the time.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nobody blogging on the lower lists should really be surprised or complain that life in blogging turns out to be just like life outside of blogging.<br />
The article does talk about the “power-law distribution” which is real, but all it means is that as a race we behave like sheep because we’re cowards most of the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Howlett</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2006/02/14/while-were-on-the-subject-of-blog-inequality/comment-page-1/#comment-9880</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Howlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 02:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=2063#comment-9880</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s unfair...
1. When Telefonica lies to me - every time I COMPLAIN about their crap service - a near daily occurrence
2. When tech companies establish walled gardens inside which favoured hacks - like those at NYT/WSJ get briefed in advance of the rest of us who have an interest in what those companies do
3. When Landrover sends out a seriously crap car and ignores people who COMPLAIN about it despite the safety implications
4. When  packaged application providers raise their maintenance costs at a time when my need for support is in decline - but when their sales models are collapsing...read Oracle/PeopleSoft/SAP
5. When the London Times misrepresents a blogger as racist and then fails to issue an unequivocal retraction.
If those things are of interest to you, talk about them on blogs, with passion and authority. Who knows, someone like Scoble might agree with you, make a fuss and attract attention on your behalf. Or not.
And let&#039;s just be very very cloear here. You try getting an unequivocal retraction out of mainsrteam media? It just doesn&#039;t happen. I should know, I have been part of that world for many years. It&#039;s repugnant. It&#039;s arrogant. It&#039;s shameful.
At least there is a &#039;list&#039; however unfair it may seem where YOU can have your say - mostly at least.
Here&#039;s one Hugh - it&#039;s virtually impossible to successfully copy a plan. I have no way of knowing what goes on in another person&#039;s mind and never will. It&#039;s my secret desire to be a genuine mindreader yet so many of us try and do that every day.
It&#039;s really that simple. It&#039;s one of the reasons your ideas surprise me from time ot time - even if I do think some of them are barking. But then I won&#039;t profess to &#039;get it&#039; first time around on most things.
And Jack&#039;s right on. I made a total balls up of my first attempts at this medium. Because I ASSUMED certain rules I knew applied in one world would apply in another. Doh. I learned.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What’s unfair…<br />
1. When Telefonica lies to me — every time I COMPLAIN about their crap service — a near daily occurrence<br />
2. When tech companies establish walled gardens inside which favoured hacks — like those at NYT/WSJ get briefed in advance of the rest of us who have an interest in what those companies do<br />
3. When Landrover sends out a seriously crap car and ignores people who COMPLAIN about it despite the safety implications<br />
4. When  packaged application providers raise their maintenance costs at a time when my need for support is in decline — but when their sales models are collapsing…read Oracle/PeopleSoft/SAP<br />
5. When the London Times misrepresents a blogger as racist and then fails to issue an unequivocal retraction.<br />
If those things are of interest to you, talk about them on blogs, with passion and authority. Who knows, someone like Scoble might agree with you, make a fuss and attract attention on your behalf. Or not.<br />
And let’s just be very very cloear here. You try getting an unequivocal retraction out of mainsrteam media? It just doesn’t happen. I should know, I have been part of that world for many years. It’s repugnant. It’s arrogant. It’s shameful.<br />
At least there is a ‘list’ however unfair it may seem where YOU can have your say — mostly at least.<br />
Here’s one Hugh — it’s virtually impossible to successfully copy a plan. I have no way of knowing what goes on in another person’s mind and never will. It’s my secret desire to be a genuine mindreader yet so many of us try and do that every day.<br />
It’s really that simple. It’s one of the reasons your ideas surprise me from time ot time — even if I do think some of them are barking. But then I won’t profess to ‘get it’ first time around on most things.<br />
And Jack’s right on. I made a total balls up of my first attempts at this medium. Because I ASSUMED certain rules I knew applied in one world would apply in another. Doh. I learned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Smith</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2006/02/14/while-were-on-the-subject-of-blog-inequality/comment-page-1/#comment-9879</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 02:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=2063#comment-9879</guid>
		<description>Would like to join.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would like to join.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Social Customer Manifesto</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2006/02/14/while-were-on-the-subject-of-blog-inequality/comment-page-1/#comment-9889</link>
		<dc:creator>The Social Customer Manifesto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=2063#comment-9889</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Blogging Power Law Dynamics&lt;/strong&gt;

Great article on blogs and power law dynamics that showed up on my desk this morning, from New York magazine. &quot;When [Clay] Shirky compiled his analysis of links, he saw that the smaller bloggers’ fears were perfectly correct: There is
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Blogging Power Law Dynamics</strong></p>
<p>Great article on blogs and power law dynamics that showed up on my desk this morning, from New York magazine. “When [Clay] Shirky compiled his analysis of links, he saw that the smaller bloggers’ fears were perfectly correct: There is</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hugh macleod</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2006/02/14/while-were-on-the-subject-of-blog-inequality/comment-page-1/#comment-9878</link>
		<dc:creator>hugh macleod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=2063#comment-9878</guid>
		<description>Agreed, Jack. I only wish blogs and PCs had all been invented 20 years earlier.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, Jack. I only wish blogs and PCs had all been invented 20 years earlier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
