February 5, 2006

english shirtmaker

zzzzzz7654155.jpg
English Cut moves the “$300 shirt con­ver­sa­tion” for­ward by revea­ling to the world who will be making them for us. Tho­mas also men­tions why we chose the manu­fac­tu­rers we did.

To make a long story short, my favou­rite shirt is one I’ve owned for over eight years. It still hangs in my war­drobe. It’s all dog-eared and worn, because I’ve enjo­yed wea­ring it so often. Sadly, the label only men­tions the retai­ler who sold it to me, not the actual manau­fac­tu­rer. The retai­ler I bought it from went out of busi­ness a few years ago, howe­ver there was something spe­cial about this one, so I kept it around as a remin­der of how a real shirt should feel.
When I deci­ded to start selling shirts, I pro­mi­sed myself that this old favou­rite shirt would be the ins­pi­ra­tion. This old shirt embo­died everything I was after.
I’m happy to report that after doing some dig­ging and a lot of phone calls later, I finally dis­co­ve­red the manu­fac­tu­rer of the shirt. Ray­ner and Stur­gess Ltd, based in England’s gar­den county of Kent, about an hour South of London.

English Cut is making no claims to being mas­ter shirt­ma­kers [unlike SOME pro­mi­nent English brands that I won’t men­tion].
What we are clai­ming to be is a most exce­llent inter­face bet­ween cus­to­mer and shirt­ma­ker.
If our cus­to­mers go for it, they go for it. If not, at least our los­ses will be mini­mal. Rock on.

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

4 Responses to “english shirtmaker”

  1. frosty says:

    Will there be a lot of dif­fe­rent shirt styles/types, or will it just be “dress shirts?“
    I bet there are a lot of peo­ple out there rea­ding GV and in a posi­tion to at least con­si­der a $300 shirt but only if it can be worn outside the whole office/suit con­text.
    Left-coast USians, peo­ple like Steve Jobs and me… ;-)

  2. Mal says:

    Good stuff. I like that approach, and glad you’re/he’s not taking the cheap route. I remem­ber buying a ready made shirt some time ago from a Savile Row name — it tur­ned out to be one of the worst ones I ever had, like a big tent that you had to wrap two times around your waist (I’m not that thin), the sort of thing you would expect to get from a store for the big & tall. One shouldn’t get it that wrong with even the ready made ones.

  3. hugh macleod says:

    Frosty, the shirts will look won­der­ful with a bla­zer and jeans, and a nice pair of freshly polished oxford shoes.
    The line sepe­ra­ting for­mal from casual is a very sub­jec­tive call…

  4. Gordon says:

    Awe­some stuff Hugh! Your English/British shirts that are actually made in England (i.e. authen­tic) are a great way to go. You’ll also be effec­ti­vely repo­si­tio­ning many of the other brands as “English-brand but mainly foreign”.
    There may be a dan­ger that we don’t want to know that our old bran­ded shirts are made in Peru, though. Is this the “lie we want to believe” that Seth Godin talks about?
    There has to be a mar­ket for the real deal. Small at those pri­ces, but there are plenty of fussy shirt peo­ple around the world. Try it and then you’ll know. Good luck.