January 30, 2006

technorati

Tech­no­rati has now reached over 26 million blogs.
What does this mean? I have no idea. Depends how much you’re per­so­nally inves­ted in the whole blog­ging thing wor­king out.

7 Responses to “technorati”

  1. Joel says:

    Only 26 million?
    Someone has to edit this mess. Thank you to the bloggies.com for making a start.

  2. Wow, that’s like almost 20% of the blo­gosphere. Hurray!

  3. Joe Pruitt says:

    re: Very uni­que busi­ness card…

  4. MarkN says:

    It means nothing, of course, except to the David Sifry’s.

  5. hugh macleod says:

    Not sure if I agree, MarkN. I think the lar­ger the blo­gosphere beco­mes, the more oppor­tu­nity peo­ple will have to exploit it. That’s cer­tainly been true for me…

  6. MarkN says:

    Well, you’re totally in the Sifry millieu — “chan­ged” in the John­nie Moore sense of the word. You can’t *not* think of ways to exploit blogs.
    I see oppor­tu­nity in exploi­ting the mecha­nisms and metho­do­logy emplo­yed by blogs in other areas of endea­vor. Inso­far as 26 million+ blogs is the cru­ci­ble for bet­ter and ever more sophis­ti­ca­ted how-to, I’m all for it too.

  7. Gordon says:

    I’ve always won­de­red about sites like Tech­no­rati and eBay, and how far they can go:
    In his paper, “Stra­tegy and the Inter­net,” Por­ter (2001) argued that net­work effects do not pre­sent first movers with a “winner-take-all” result as net­work effects are sub­ject to a self-limiting mecha­nism:
    “A par­ti­cu­lar pro­duct or ser­vice first attracts the cus­to­mers whose needs it best needs. As pene­tra­tion grows, howe­ver, it will tend to become less effec­tive in mee­ting the needs of the remai­ning cus­to­mers in the mar­ket, pro­vi­ding an ope­ning for com­pe­ti­tors with dif­fe­rent offe­rings.” (p. 68 and p. 69)