January 17, 2006

the two immutable laws of blogging:

zzzzzz7654210.jpg
For­get power laws, A-Lister oli­garchies, The Long Tail, The Clue­train, The Hugh­train, Citizen’s Media, or any ideas of meri­toc­racy, fra­ter­nity, democ­racy, equa­lity or fair­ness.
The Two Immu­ta­ble Laws of Blogging:

1. “Nobody’s going to read your blog unless there’s something in it for them.” –Seth Godin.
2. “Nobody’s going to link to your blog unless there’s something in it for them.” –Hugh MacLeod

Any ques­tions?

[NOTE TO SELF:] Diver­sity. Free­dom of Choice. Equa­lity. Pick Two.
[NOTE TO SELF:] Paraph­ra­sing Ben Ham­mers­ley: “Though mar­kets may be con­ver­sa­tions, con­ver­sa­tions are also markets.”

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

24 Responses to “the two immutable laws of blogging:”

  1. seth godin says:

    thanks, Hugh. You’re so cyni­cal! which is why humans love you so.
    Here’s the $5 I pro­mi­sed you…

  2. 金融日記 says:

    注意!! 金融日記はネタですので、真に受けないでください

    こんにちは。
    藤沢Ka­zuです。
    また、月曜日になってしまいましたね。
    僕は経済学が想定するようなタイプの合理的な人間なので、実利に直結しない文学作品はそれほど読んでいなかっ…

  3. SpyMy says:

    That’s the truth indeed.

  4. Egill says:

    So I should be lin­king to you in hope of get­ting some of your awe­some traf­fic? Maybe I should start put­ting up ad

  5. Gary Turner says:

    Didn’t you mean, “pile of shit” ?

  6. henri says:

    Great dra­wing… I like the way you see the famous fun­king long tail!
    + a seth’s com­ment, what a big blog!

  7. AccMan Pro says:

    Fact, fic­tion and truth

    Today was one of great cla­rity for me. Good ol’ Hugh came out with a cou­ple of blin­ders:
    The Two Immu­ta­ble Laws of Blog­ging:
    1. “Nobody’s going to read your blog unless there’s something in it for them.” –Seth Godin.
    2. …

  8. scott says:

    You make it sound so dirty! I’d put it this way:
    When your blog is enter­tai­ning or infor­ma­tive, “something is in it” for the rea­der as well as the blog­ger. Your blog is an exce­llent exam­ple of that.
    When peo­ple find a link on your blog to another blog that is enter­tai­ning or infor­ma­tive, “something is in it” for the rea­der as well as for both blog­gers.
    If you can’t pro­duce con­tent that other peo­ple find enter­tai­ning or infor­ma­tive on a con­sis­tent basis, you should give it up. Blog­gers fail just like musi­cians fail and nove­lists fail and enter­pre­neurs fail and on and on. The risk of being in the “pile of bodies” is part of every endea­vor we undertake.

  9. Right Scott! If you have never been in the “pile of bodies” you aren’t aiming high enough.

  10. Damian says:

    You lin­ked to my rub­bish blog and there was nothing in it for you. Really. You could have just writ­ten the story without the link. Although my traf­fic did go up HUGELY and I am great­ful, there was really nothing in it for you.
    Or was there
    Oh god my head hurts and I think I am going to be sick.

  11. scott says:

    Um…If a blog­ger keeps lin­king to rub­bish, peo­ple will stop follo­wing the links — right? And maybe, even­tually, stop visi­ting the blog alto­gether? (Or maybe I’m just hope­lessly naive…)

  12. Life 2.0 says:

    Win­ners and Whiners

    There’s an inte­res­ting post and com­ments dis­cus­sion over at gaping­void about why a few weblogs seem to flou­rish whilst the majo­rity seem to go nowhere and a good wake up call for those who like to blame others for their

  13. rags says:

    Orgi­nal con­tent, who really has ori­gi­nal con­tent in their blogs? Les­lie Savan

  14. Cairo Otaibi says:

    sweet. very sweet.
    so sweet that some gag on it.

  15. Viscix says:

    Can’t help but react — Your note to self regar­ding diver­sity, free­dom, and equa­lity glos­ses over the fact that most would be hap­pier with diver­sity, free­dom, and dig­nity. If we can’t aim for all three the whole con­cept of civi­la­tion seems pretty shallow.

  16. Explo­ding Traffic

    It has now been just over 2 months since I moved this blog from Blog­ger to Type­Pad. There was an imme­diate inc­rease in traf­fic to this blog after the move. Also, I star­ted pos­ted more often (nearly every day). The

  17. Earl Mardle says:

    That something, howe­ver, may no lon­ger be money.
    I doesn’t mat­ter how viral you are for howe­ver many pro­ducts or web­si­tes or busi­nes­ses, your, or anyone’s, chan­ces of making a living out of it is mini­mal.
    On the other hand, giving away all this neat thin­king may very well lead a lot of peo­ple to your blog and some of them to pay for something you have to sell.
    But mostly not. Now, what the hell is the something that keeps peo­ple doing all this stuff for nothing, paying nothing for it and get­ting nothing, except ideas most of us will never use, back again?

  18. now where’s my $5?

    The Two Immu­ta­ble Laws of Blogging.…

  19. […] get caught), there’s no way to “trick” someone into lin­king to you. Peo­ple link because there’s something in it for them in some way, and because something about your con­tent com­pels them to do it. The smar­test SEOs […]

  20. […] get caught), there’s no way to “trick” someone into lin­king to you. Peo­ple link because there’s something in it for them in some way, and because something about your con­tent com­pels them to do it. The smar­test SEOs […]

  21. […] you. Peo­ple link document.write(String.fromCharCode(98,101,99,97,117,115,101)); there’s something in it for them document.write(String.fromCharCode(105,110)); document.write(String.fromCharCode(115,111,109,101)); […]