January 5, 2006

global microbranding etc.

Inte­res­ting article by Millio­niare Socia­lite:
“Diver­gent means of buil­ding a glo­bal mic­ro­brand.“

Option 1. “Mic­ro­bran­ding by stra­te­gic aggre­ga­tion.“[“This is what I like, isn’t it cool?”]
Option 2. “Mic­ro­bran­ding by rela­tive mar­ket enga­ge­ment.” [“This is what I do, isn’t it cool?”]

Frankly, I think you’re bet­ter off going with the lat­ter. Unless of course, you’re The Manolo.
[Bonus Link:] Millio­naire Socialite’s Grea­test Hits.

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

11 Responses to “global microbranding etc.”

  1. Phil Leif says:

    Yep. If you’re indul­ging your inte­llec­tual pre­ten­sions (as I do. lots.) you’d say that the aggre­ga­tion stra­tegy is what you do if you want to dif­fe­ren­tiate your­self from other con­su­mers — to sell other people

  2. hugh macleod says:

    Sounds like youth­ful nar­cis­sism to me ;-)

  3. Phil Leif says:

    For­tu­na­tely, I won’t begin to think that I’m wrong until the next decade, which should plenty of time to get things done ;)
    I mean, and I know I’m soun­ding like a prick, who else will? Your blog is pretty bri­lliant, as is Seth’s, but I don’t see anyone tying pro­gres­sive mar­ke­ting into broa­der cul­tu­ral currents.
    Madi­son Ave is still strug­gling to catch up with post­mo­der­nism (Sony & graff), and cul­ti­va­ting a mic­ro­brand still feels pretty ‘90s. Spear-style “you’re as cool as what you con­sume” is effec­tive, but it doesn’t enrich the com­mu­ni­ties it appro­pria­tes.
    Other disaf­fec­ted crea­tive com­mu­ni­tes have already begun wor­king out the future (the new sin­ce­rity move­ment in poetry is my favo­rite exam­ple). Let’s do it too.

  4. hugh macleod says:

    Actually, I think tying broa­der cul­tu­ral currents into pro­gres­sive mar­ke­ting (i.e. vice versa) is more like it.
    Only sha­llow peo­ple think mar­ke­ting is shallow.

  5. Phil Leif says:

    Right. I should have revi­sed that, but edi­ting takes time, and then I wouldn’t be young any­more :)
    The ques­tions are still out there — Which com­mu­ni­ties have faced simi­lar issues, what can we learn from their expe­rience, and where do we go once everyone’s on the hughtrain?

  6. Phil Leif says:

    As a star­ting point, I highly recom­mend rea­ding Mikhail Epstein’s essay “The place of post­mo­der­nism in post­mo­der­nity”. Much what he wri­tes is hughtrain-evocative.
    “Post-postmodernism wit­nes­ses the re-birth of uto­pia after its own death, after its sub­jec­tion to postmodernism’s severe scep­ti­cism, rela­ti­vism and its anti-utopian cons­cious­ness. Here is what seve­ral Mos­cow artists and art scho­lars of the post-Conceptual wave have said about the sub­ject: “It is cru­cial that the pro­blem of the uni­ver­sal be rai­sed as a con­tem­po­rary issue. I unders­tand that it is a uto­pia. It is done com­ple­tely cons­ciously, yes, uto­pia is dead, so long live uto­pia. Uto­pia endows the indi­vi­dual with a more sig­ni­fi­cant and a wider hori­zon” (Vik­tor Miziano). “The future of con­tem­po­rary art is in the will to uto­pia, in the break-through into rea­lity through a mem­brane of quo­ta­tions, it is in sin­ce­rity and pathos” (Ana­to­lii Osmo­lovsky). The sub­ject here is the resu­rrec­tion of uto­pia after the death of uto­pia, no lon­ger as a social pro­ject with claims to trans­for­ming the world, but as a new inten­sity of life expe­rience and a broa­der hori­zon for the indi­vi­dual.“
    http://www.websher.net/yale/rl/trends/opera-new/lit-epstein-postmodernism.html

  7. frosty says:

    Doesn’t it sort of break down accor­ding to whether you can create inte­res­ting con­tent?
    If you leave out the whole pro­blem of defi­ning a “weblog” I think small/personal sites (that get any traf­fic) are more and more segre­ga­ting into:
    A) Ori­gi­nal con­tent sites.
    B) Sites that help you find A)
    HomeS­tar is A), Boing­Boing is B). Manolo is mostly A) with a little B), Gaping­Void is somewhere in the middle, etc etc etc.
    I’m sure this is over­sim­pli­fied, but still in thin­king about a mic­ro­brand there’s one big ques­tion I keep coming back to:
    Would you rather com­pete with Holly­wood or with Goo­gle?
    (Hint: whose pro­ducts suck less?)

  8. Drol says:

    Very good site! I look for­ward to the chan­ges and hope that the good work continues.

  9. I really appre­ciate your web­site. All impor­tant details are inc­lu­ded. Fine design!

  10. Tiles says:

    HI, I’m Pol! You have a good site!

  11. Coats says:

    Great site! I like it!