January 4, 2006

if you and i were gay men

zzzzzz7654315.jpg
[I ori­gi­nally said this to a female friend of mine. Yes, it got an inte­res­ting reac­tion.]
[UPDATE:] A “cul­tu­ral ste­reoty­ping” debate is raging in the com­ments sec­tion. Rock on.

19 Responses to “if you and i were gay men”

  1. Tim Jackson says:

    Hugh,
    You’ve out­done your­self. THAT is one of the fun­niest ones yet. I don’t even know where to start…

  2. alice says:

    I don’t really find that funny. Are you sug­ges­ting that all gay men are preoc­cu­pied with sex? I feel you are deva­luing gay rela­tionships. Way to pro­mote ste­reoty­pes and cul­tu­ral insensitivity.

  3. Toks says:

    I think this car­toon is a reflec­tion on men unders­tan­ding women Alice… at worst it weighs in at around 0.0001mg of sexism, well within the

  4. I hope her reac­tion didn’t involve an arab strap. Or maybe that’s the sort of dis­rup­tion you’re loo­king for Hugh, I don’t know. Good to see you’re taking your theo­ries offline. :)

  5. alice says:

    Toks, I believe you have mis­sed the point. Yes, the sur­face of the joke is obviously about the void that exists bet­ween men and women. Howe­ver, this “joke” smacks of the ste­reotype that all homo­se­xuals are pro­mis­cuous. Homo­se­xuals are no dif­fe­rent in their sexual exploits than hete­ro­se­xuals. Some peo­ple are pro­mis­cuous, some are not. This “joke” can then be taken a step further to explore the sta­tis­tics of STDs in homo­se­xual and hete­ro­se­xual popu­la­tions. Or you can take it even further with the argue­ment of using “gay” in a pejo­ra­tive sense. Either way, you have ope­ned a can of worms my friend. This is a dia­lo­gue that des­pe­ra­tely needs to sur­face in con­tem­po­rary Ame­ri­can cul­ture as our civil rights, or glimp­ses of civil rights not yet had, slowly slips away.

  6. Analy­sis this: It’s funny! PERIOD.
    p.s. I’m straight but if I was in a room with Hugh.….

  7. Chris says:

    It appears, from a quick poll, that there are many gay men who would kill for that on a tshirt :)

  8. Laura says:

    To me, a gay man wea­ring that t-shirt has a com­ple­tely dif­fe­rent con­no­ta­tion than a straight man and also carries an enti­rely sepa­rate set of ste­reoty­pes; mainly that gay men prey on straight men. So here’s the next ques­tion: Is self-stereotyping okay?
    Oh, and Duarte, I think you meant “analyze this,” not “analy­sis this.”

  9. Toks says:

    Not sure this is even my fight but, Alice, the point [if there really is one, i’m begin­ning to think not]is whether or not the two cha­rac­ters in Hugh’s car­toon are fuc­king because they are gay or because they are men [yeah, its not lost on me either but bear with me].
    If the for­mer is true, i’m frow­ning and stom­ping my large PC feet in time with yours [this is no reflec­tion on the size of your feet.. one way or the other…], if its the lat­ter then please refer to my ear­lier post.
    You have a good cause, just a bad case. IMHO

  10. Daniel says:

    [ ot, a bitsy ]
    Oh, and Laura, did I reach a english gram­mar blog ? ;-)
    [ /ot ]

  11. I’ll have one of those on a t-shirt please Hugh. Should cheer up a few of the mise­ra­ble bug­gers I run into over here. If it doesn’t do that, it might clear a space at the local bar — either way it’s a win-win.

  12. I’ve heard that line before. No, I don’t hang out in bars.. but there’s way more truth in it than many peo­ple are willing to admit. Even peo­ple *with* a sense of humor.
    Rock on, Hugh.

  13. M says:

    :-D
    Happy New Year Hugh!

  14. Jim says:

    It’s fun­nier if you read the set-up.
    It’s also an accu­rate reflec­tion of the way straight men view/envy gay men. And it’s pretty close to the way gay men view gay men.

  15. pieterr says:

    Hmm, being a gay man, I can safely say this is about the dif­fe­rence bet­ween men and women… not bet­ween straight and gay men, who (in gene­ral) are led equally by you know what.

  16. jenna says:

    hey hugh„, funny defi­nitly funny

  17. Daniel says:

    haha.. that was a funny thing to read. I remem­ber saying something simi­lar to a friend of mine… I guess you can take cer­tain things as serious sta­te­ments and start a dis­cus­sion about social para­digms, I don’t think Hugh is aiming that way.
    From Gua­ya­quil, Ecua­dor. Dan.

  18. The best part is that it even works in French.

  19. Rich...! says:

    Dude, it’s been a long time since I’ve lau­ged out loud at a blog post.
    Bring it on…!
    (now, back to being a con­tra­rian before anyone notices)