Archive for January, 2006

January 31, 2006

lift notes

zzzzzz7654268.jpg
For my pre­sen­ta­tion at LIFT, I’ll be citing the follo­wing links:
The Hugh­train. ““THE MARKET FOR SOMETHING TO BELIEVE IN IS INFINITE.“
The Glo­bal Mic­ro­brand. “There are thou­sands of rea­sons why peo­ple write blogs. But it seems to me the big­gest rea­son that dri­ves the blog­gers I read the most is, we’re all loo­king for our own per­so­nal glo­bal mic­ro­brand. That is the prize. That is the tic­ket off the tread­mill. And I don’t think it’s a bad one to aim for.“
The Stormhoek Meme. “Blog­ging as a mar­ke­ting tool is easier when you think of it as a che­mi­cal catalyst, not as a ham­mer and nail.” [Bonus Link: The Stormhoek blog­gers wiki page.]
English Cut. “How to create a glo­bal mic­ro­brand on a taco-stand bud­get.” A Savile Row tai­lor starts a blog.
“The Porous Mem­brane.” Why cor­po­rate blog­ging works.
“Bern­bach was Wrong.” The best adver­ti­sing is not “Word Of Mouth”, but “Dis­rup­ting Mar­kets”.
Blog­gers Intro. “Rather than just ratt­ling off a laundry list what to do, ins­tead I’m going to give you a list of blog­gers who I rate highly. Read them reguarly, and after a while you should dis­co­ver why what they do works so well.“
[NOTE TO SELF:] A lot of mar­ke­ting peo­ple seem to be hoping for a pro­ven blog­ging method that is (A) inven­ted by some­body else, (B) easy to repli­cate, © easy to imple­ment, and (D) easy to sell to their boss. Good luck.
[FURTHER READING:]

[KOOL-AID:] “Naked Con­ver­sa­tions on a Bus.” Kathy Sierra’s mar­ve­llous post on why blog­ging works.
[KOOL-AID WITH EXTRA SUGAR:] Robert Scoble’s “Cor­po­rate Blog­ging Mani­festo”.
[KOOL-AID WITH EXTRA SUGAR AND STEROIDS:] The Clue­train Mani­festo. The book that star­ted it all.
[FOOD FOR THOUGHT:] Seth Godin’s “Small Is The New Big”.

My pre­sen­ta­tion is Fri­day at 10.40am.

kill all beta males

zzzzzz7654330.jpg
On my radar today:
1. More “Web 2.0″ filler from SFGate.
2. Stowe Boyd fisks Rick Segal, kinda sorta.
[RELATED:] A very salient point from Sco­ble:

Another cri­ti­cism I saw of my post yes­ter­day? That ideas aren

a glass of wine

zzzzzz7654329.jpg

January 30, 2006

nobody reads my blog 2.0

zzzzzz7654328.jpg

all marketing is disruption. everything else is secondary.

zzzmkghilkj03.jpg
[Haven’t pos­ted this car­toon for a while. It’s one of my favo­ri­tes.]
The Artic Mon­keys make pop music his­tory by having the fastest-selling Bri­tish sin­gle since The Beat­les.

Wha­te­ver Peo­ple Say I Am, That

this moment will never

zzzzzz7654327.jpg

technorati

Tech­no­rati has now reached over 26 million blogs.
What does this mean? I have no idea. Depends how much you’re per­so­nally inves­ted in the whole blog­ging thing wor­king out.

god created the world

zzzzzz7654326.jpg

vc 2.0

Here’s the Memeo­ran­dum link for the whole “Ven­ture Capi­tal 2.0″ thread.
All of the peo­ple cited there are worth rea­ding. Check it out.
So far I’m not seeing any seis­mic shift in the VC industry. I’m just seeing some inte­llec­tual gro­wing pains going on. Fair enough.
[NEWSFLASH:] Everybody’s favo­rite fashion model, Anina has been told by her agency to stop blog­ging.
Another dino­saur doing a power move etc. Sucks.

January 29, 2006

no point watching

zzzzzz7654325.jpg

stormhoek in dallas

Stormhoek makes an appea­rance at Bar­camp Dallas.
Kudos to David Par­met and Brian Ober­kirch for making it hap­pen
[Bonus Link:] Rick Segal speaks more about his “Ven­ture Cap­tial 2.0″ idea. Rick is up to something, this post sheds a little more light on the sub­ject etc. [Also see:] Dave Winer: “How To Reform The VC Industry”. I can’t decide if I love or hate this idea. Blogsha­res with real money. Who knows?

frenetic musicality etc.

zzzzzz7654324.jpg

english cut in the sunday telegraph

zzzbambam21.jpg
English Cut gets a nice men­tion today in The Sun­day Tele­graph, one of the big UK papers.
It’s an article about Prince Char­les no lon­ger wea­ring “bes­poke”, ins­tead opting for the chea­per “made-to-measure”.
Two points of per­so­nal inte­rest:
[1] Tho­mas is cited as “one of Britain’s most res­pec­ted tai­lors, who made Prince Charles’s suits for three years…“
[2] Tho­mas is quo­ted directly:

“Twenty years ago — when he was wea­ring Ander­son & Shep­pard — he loo­ked so ele­gant. But in the pho­to­graph two months ago he loo­ked bloody awful in a made-to-measure suit.”

I’m not sure if desc­ri­bing the Prince’s dress sense as “bloody awful” is good PR for us. Maybe, maybe not. But being called “one of Britain’s most res­pec­ted tai­lors” from a natio­nal Esta­blish­ment news­pa­per isn’t exactly bad news.
[BACKGROUND: Tho­mas used to work for Ander­son & Shep­pard, as under­cut­ter to the great Den­nis Hal­berry. While there he was also the main cut­ter for their most impor­tant client i.e. Prince Charles.]

January 28, 2006

“don’t be an a.t.m.

From Fred Wil­son:

Fra­ser Kel­ton has an exce­llent post on the cha­llen­ges facing the ven­ture busi­ness up on his Dis­rup­tive Thoughts blog.

Fred also adds this thought:

I would sug­gest one rule and only one. Be the entrepreneur’s part­ner. Help him or her. Be there for them. Sup­port them. Coun­sel them. Share the risk with them. Have fun with them. Laugh and cry with them. And make boat­loads of money with them. It’s a time tes­ted for­mula and it will work forever.

Ok, so what sayest Rick Segal And Doc Searls?
[Rick and Doc are having an ongoing con­ver­sa­tion about how the ven­ture capi­tal busi­ness can work in a “Web 2.0″ envi­rion­ment, when large hel­pings of cash aren’t always nee­ded. How then does a VC add value, if his main rai­son d’etre [i.e. Cash] is not nee­ded in the equation?]

“chatroom rubbish”

zzzzzz7654223.jpg
So one of the peo­ple over at Stormhoek told this to me:
The Stormhoek boys were having a mee­ting with one of their lar­gest cus­to­mers, a UK super­mar­ket chain.
After a long pre­sen­ta­tion explai­ning what they were trying to do with the blo­gosphere, an exec at the super­mar­ket called it nothing more than “Cha­troom Rub­bish”.
The guy obviously doesn’t get it. So they sent him a paper­back copy of The Clue­train in the hope that it pro­vi­des him some food for thought.
In super­mar­kets, everything is a com­mo­dity– the mana­ge­ment, the pro­ducts, the cus­to­mers, the sup­pliers, the emplo­yees, and of course, the super­mar­ket itself.
It’s inte­res­ting to me that a exec in a com­mo­dity busi­ness would desc­ribe con­ver­sa­tions bet­ween peo­ple who spend money in their sto­res as “Cha­troom Rub­bish”.
Inte­res­ting, but not sur­pri­sing.
I call this phe­no­me­non “Run­ning up against the Com­mo­dity Wall”. We blog­gers are already very used to it.

January 26, 2006

stowe boyd has left corante

Stowe Boyd has left Corante and star­ted a new thing.
Rock on, Stowe!

the plot thickens…

From Mark Evans:

One thought — and it’s one that came from a recent dis­cus­sion — is the VC is even nee­ded within the Web 2.0 envi­ron­ment. If you can deve­lop and dis­tri­bute a new application/service with little capi­tal, what roles do VCs get to play if they can’t bring money to the table? Maybe this is what Rick is wor­king on.

Enqui­ring minds want to know– is there something afoot in the Ven­ture Capi­tal busi­ness? What sayest Fred Wil­son?

spiers is back!

Blog God­dess Eli­za­beth Spiers is launching a new blog this March.
Gaw­ker, her for­mer emplo­yer, snarks about it.
Peo­ple for­get how influen­tial Gaw­ker was back when Spiers and Den­ton first launched it.

uk national wine geek promo

zzzzzz7654255.jpg
Like I said ear­lier, the folks at Stormhoek are craf­ting some in-store retail pro­mos for major UK retai­lers.
Here’s our idea: Because of our thing we’ve got going with the blo­gosphere, we think it would be a fun idea to maybe cross-promote a “Web 2.0″ pro­ducts in the promo. Something on a case card or on the bottle? Coun­ter dis­play? That kinda thing.
[1.] The offer would be seen by millions of mains­tream UK wine drin­kers.
[2.] Ten dollar wine peo­ple would seem to be the per­fect tar­get for a lot of techie offers, methinks.
Any­body have or know of some pro­ducts they would like to see pro­mo­ted in the UK? Soft­ware, hard­ware, geek toys, web­si­tes, it doesn’t mat­ter.
Drop me an e-mail and let’s talk about it. Thanks.

dugg by digg

zzzamkop07.jpg
“How To Be Crea­tive”, a 10,000-word blog post I wrote a year and a half ago, just got pic­ked up by Digg.
So far, it’s been “Dugg” 1,097 times. Is that a lot? I don’t know much about how Digg works.
[Thanks to Jose for the pointer.]

stormhoek podcast

BAR stormhoekdisruption.jpg
[PODCAST:] John­nie Moore and James Cher­koff inter­view Jason Kor­man from Stormhoek.
Nice to get another pers­pec­tive on it from someone close to the busi­ness. Jason, John­nie and James all had some fas­ci­na­ting thoughts about it.
NB: John­nie and James do this thing called the “Open Sauce Workshop” which is really interesting.

From the highest-spending brands, to the sma­llest agen­cies, ever­yone is won­de­ring how to suc­ceed in a brave new world of mar­ke­ting.
It’s a world where peo­ple are bet­ter infor­med, bet­ter con­nec­ted and have more choice. Where the media are inc­rea­singly frag­men­ted.
Open Sauce workshops are a lively, prac­ti­cal way to get to grips with this world.

[BACKGROUND STORY:] “Blog­ging dou­bles Stormhoek sales in less than twelve months.”

the because effect

Seems a new con­ver­sa­tion is star­ting about Ven­ture Capi­tal bet­ween two of the smar­test peo­ple I know, Doc Searls and Rick Segal. Click on their res­pec­tive links to find out more. Inte­res­ting stuff.
[Bonus Link:] Web 2.0 is dead, it’s offi­cial. Not that it was ever that alive to begin with [Thanks to Fred for the link].

January 25, 2006

avoiding the commodified, fashionista hell hole

zzzzazzdggg26.jpg
Tho­mas is down in Lon­don today, tal­king to a shirt manu­fac­tu­rer.
The current plan:

1. Make a limi­ted num­ber of insa­nely expen­sive bes­poke suits every year.
2. Make an unli­mi­ted num­ber of insa­nely expen­sive shirts every year, selling via an e-commerce web­site.
3. For­get mas­sive retail ope­ra­tions and exten­sive line exten­sions. Just focus on a few core items, and make it easy for peo­ple to shop online.
4. Keep it all “Made in England”.

There’s an inter­play here bet­ween the qua­lity of the suits, the qua­lity of the shirts, the dia­lo­gue hap­pe­ning on Tho­mas’ blog and the actual shirt­ma­ker who manu­fac­tu­res for us.
A rea­der left the follo­wing com­ment on English Cut:

Fas­ci­na­ting post as usual. I get such an edu­ca­tion rea­ding this site. For those of us who grew up well outside the realm of Savile Row, it feels like sec­ret society infor­ma­tion is regu­larly dis­pen­sed here. I’m sure your blog is doing more Savile Row and Jermyn Street than anything else for a cen­tury. I think you really fill a need for peo­ple who want the best, but have remai­ned igno­rant in the dark surroun­dings of today’s popu­lar cul­ture. Thank you for ligh­ting the way for us.

If that’s not our tar­get mar­ket, I don’t know who is. Some­body who wants the best, enjoys lear­ning about it, but still doesn’t want a lot of fuss.
A far cry from the com­mo­di­fied, fashio­nista hell hole that is con­tem­po­rary luxury retail.

this conversation is

zzzzzz7654323.jpg

January 23, 2006

i tried being an artist

zzzzzz7654322.jpg
[Bonus Link:] Rus­sell posts his favo­rite gaping­void car­toons. Thanks, Russell!

adventures are great

zzzzzz7654321.jpg
[Bonus Link:] I’ve been nomi­na­ted for a “Blog­gie” award, under the “Best Bri­tish Blog” cate­gory. Cool.

if i promise anything

zzzzzz7654320.jpg

you fight

zzzzzz7654319.jpg
[One of the car­toons I did for Craven’s.]

how to do what you love

From Paul Graham:

How To Do What You Love.
To do something well you have to like it. That idea is not exactly novel. We’ve got it down to four words: “Do what you love.” But it’s not enough just to tell peo­ple that. Doing what you love is complicated.

Also from Paul:

A Uni­fed Theory of VC Suc­kage.
The pro­blem with VC funds is that they’re funds. Like the mana­gers of mutual funds or hedge funds, VCs get paid a per­cen­tage of the money they manage: about 2% a year in mana­ge­ment fees, plus a per­cen­tage of the gains. So they want the fund to be huge– hun­dreds of millions of dollars, if pos­si­ble. But that means each part­ner ends up being res­pon­si­ble for inves­ting a lot of money. And since one per­son can only manage so many deals, each deal has to be for mul­ti­ple millions of dollars.

[Hat tip to Gavin Bow­man for the link.]

January 22, 2006

one hundred thousand

zzzbambam19.jpg
The English Cut $300 shirt story is moving along quickly.
We’ve been tal­king to lots of shirt­ma­king peo­ple. Going well. Looks like we’ll be launching the shirts when Tom next visits Ame­rica in February.
The mar­ket for $3000 English suits is pretty limi­ted. A cou­ple of thou­sand of peo­ple, tops. But the poten­tial mar­ket for Engish shirts is much grea­ter. Look at Tho­mas Pink.
Our plan is basi­cally to offer a shirt of a higher qua­lity than Pink’s, at much lower overheads for us.
We’re thin­king about ways to scale the busi­ness upwards. We’re going to do it all via online to begin with. If it goes well we’ll see if it warrants ope­ning an offline ope­ra­tion [selling in retail out­lets].
Right now our mai­ling list is a few hun­dred peo­ple. I would like that num­ber to reach well into five-figures before I’m done.
Even the more insane side of me thinks one hun­dred thou­sand could be doa­ble, if we exe­cute it well enough.

about time…

Mar­ke­ting guru, entre­pre­neur and all-tround nethead Jack Yang finally has a blog. Worth a read.
[ALSO:] The Thora Ins­ti­tute, a small think-tank dedi­ca­ted to “ser­ving Black Ame­rica”, is also blogging.

copyright rant

Great Copy­right rant from The Head Lemur:

Pro­tec­ting stuff comes from fear. Belie­ving that someone is out to take it, rai­ses the ques­tion of what led you to the conc­lu­sion that wha­te­ver it is has such a poten­tial for des­tro­ying your way of life? And since you have reached this conc­lu­sion, where did the idea come from to put it on the web?

January 21, 2006

stormhoek coming to america


It’s offi­cial: Stormhoek is coming to Ame­rica in March.
[NOTE TO SELF:] How do I ruth­lessly exploit this for per­so­nal gain?
[ALSO:] I was in Mary­port ear­lier today. I actually saw the now-famous dolphin swim­ming around. Poor creature.

January 20, 2006

once upon a time…

zzzzsteak20.jpg
1. A well known wri­ter has a web­site. Been online for a num­ber of years. Already has a repu­ta­tion for being tech-savvy and “wired”.
2. He starts a blog just over 2 weeks ago.
3. It inc­rea­ses his traf­fic. Just a tad.
4. Make of it what you will.

“marketing in a post-cluetrain era”

zzzzzzzzkjhjk02.jpg
So what hap­pens to mar­ke­ting now that we have all this jolly post–Clue­train action hap­pe­ning? Read this great post from Tara Hunt.
I par­ti­cu­larly like Point Num­ber Six:

6. A good mar­ke­ter gets invol­ved in the com­mu­nity.
I’m not just tal­king thro­wing a few dollars of spon­sorship in their gene­ral direc­tion in exchange for a ban­ner. I’m tal­king about get­ting your hands dirty. Get­ting invol­ved. Taking up the cause for your­self. Star­ting ini­tia­ti­ves. Sup­por­ting ini­tia­ti­ves. Get­ting to know everyone.

I’ve tried taking a simi­lar aproach with Stormhoek and how it inter­fa­ces with the blogging/Web 2.0 crowd.
Who says Web 2.0 is just about inter­net tech­no­logy? Who says wine is just about fer­men­ted grape juice? Where are the edges? The fun thing about the Stormhoek pro­ject is that I get to find out.
[UPDATE:] Taras’s follow-up post on Point Num­ber Six: “How how does a mar­ke­ter get invol­ved in the com­mu­nity without it being a bullshit PR move?“
[Here’s a pic of me and Tara in Lon­don last month.]

January 19, 2006

tech crunch party

yyyyyyy765131.jpg
Already full up:

The fifth TechC­runch Mee­tup is on Fri­day, February 17, 2006 at the TechC­runch house in Ather­ton, Cali­for­nia. We will cele­brate the launch of Naked Con­ver­sa­tions, the new book by Shel Israel and Robert Sco­ble.

I’ve already read Naked Con­ver­sa­tions, thanks to their publishers kindly giving me an advance copy to read. It’s a great book. [Ama­zon link here.]
I get asked this all the time: “Yeah, I’m sure blog­ging is great and all, but how can it make a dif­fe­rence to MY busi­ness?“
And Robert and Shel’s book address this ques­tion bet­ter than anyone I know about.
The thing is, there’s no one sin­gle ans­wer. Every busi­ness has its own issues.
My stan­dard ans­wer these days is, For­get blog­ging for the minute. Think ins­tead about “The Smar­ter Con­ver­sa­tion”.
[Disc­lo­sure:] The “English Cut” story get a lot of ink in the book. That’s thanks mainly to Shel, who follo­wed the story clo­sely from pretty much Day One. Thanks, Shel!

January 18, 2006

Oh my god…

Yes, it really, truly is:
The Best Blonde Joke Ever.
Damn. I’ still laughing.

doc searls was wrong

zzzzazzdggg60.jpg
Go back to my New York days in the late 1990s, long before I had my own web­site.
If I found a cool web­site or pro­duct, I’d tell, I dunno, maybe a few peo­ple about it. Maybe a dozen.
Now when I find something I like and I blog about it, hun­dreds, maybe thou­sands of peo­ple find out. And a lot of the peo­ple I tell have blogs of their own. So that thou­sands of folk might cas­cade into tens of thou­sands quite easily.
In short, my 5-year-old Dell and a sim­ple piece of free blog­ging soft­ware has upped my “viral effect” by many tens of thou­sands of per­cen­tage points since New York. And the same has hap­pe­ned for thou­sands upon thou­sands of other peo­ple. Some more than me, some less, but still, collec­ti­vely it’s huge.
Wha­te­ver busi­ness you’re in, your product’s suc­cess or fai­lure is going to become more and more depen­dant on “snee­zers” like me. We are not going away. We are get­ting more viral by the day, while other ways of sprea­ding ideas– TV, news­pa­pers etc– are beco­ming less effec­tive by the day.
This steady trans­fer of power and influence from big media to the snee­zers won’t hap­pen over­night, but it is a per­ma­nent state of affairs.
And there is nothing, repeat nothing you can do about it.
Doc Searls said back in April that The Clue­train hasn’t left the sta­tion yet. Doc Searls was wrong.

January 17, 2006

the two immutable laws of blogging:

zzzzzz7654210.jpg
For­get power laws, A-Lister oli­garchies, The Long Tail, The Clue­train, The Hugh­train, Citizen’s Media, or any ideas of meri­toc­racy, fra­ter­nity, democ­racy, equa­lity or fair­ness.
The Two Immu­ta­ble Laws of Blogging:

1. “Nobody’s going to read your blog unless there’s something in it for them.” –Seth Godin.
2. “Nobody’s going to link to your blog unless there’s something in it for them.” –Hugh MacLeod

Any ques­tions?

[NOTE TO SELF:] Diver­sity. Free­dom of Choice. Equa­lity. Pick Two.
[NOTE TO SELF:] Paraph­ra­sing Ben Ham­mers­ley: “Though mar­kets may be con­ver­sa­tions, con­ver­sa­tions are also markets.”

a-listology

Here’s a term I just coi­ned:
“A-Listology”. The study of “A-Listers”, and the social dyna­mics that go with them.
Often con­fu­sed with use­ful and ori­gi­nal thought.
[Bonus Link:] Tom Wark, one of the best wine blog­gers out there, does a great job fis­king the Stormhoek story.

more stormhoeky goodness

Decan­ter Maga­zine wri­tes about the “Blog­ging Dou­bles Stormhoek Wine” story.
And one of my favo­rite wri­ters in the Blo­gosphere, Anil Dash wri­tes about it on the Six Apart Blog:

Last year, Stormhoek, a popu­lar South Afri­can wine, star­ted a busi­ness blog powe­red by Mova­ble Type and sent out one hun­dred com­pli­men­tary bott­les of their wine to blog­gers across Europe. With the assis­tance of well-known blog mar­ke­ting expert Hugh Mac­leod, Stormhoek bet big on blog­ging, coun­ting on the influence and voice of those blog­gers to help get their mes­sage out.
The result? As you can see in Hugh’s Mova­ble Type-powered blog and in today’s story on Decan­ter magazine’s web­site, Stormhoek dou­bled sales of their wines.

PS. You should read the blog post Anil wrote the week after he got married. Pos­sibly the most moving blog post I read in 2005.
PPS. Anil wouldn’t know this, but it was him who got me using Mova­ble Type. Long before he went to work for Six Apart [the com­pany that makes MT soft­ware], I read his blog avidly; I was a real fan. Noti­cing that he was an MT user, I said to myself, “Good enough for Anil, good enough for me.” This was the first time I ever came across MT. True Story.

johnnie moore summarizes better than I can:

“Blogs are about being chan­ged, more than chan­ging others.“
This what I mean when I’m tal­king about “Inter­nal Dis­rup­tion”.
John­nie Moore, in my opi­nion is one of the most lucid voi­ces out there, when it comes to new ways to think about mar­ke­ting. I con­si­der him currently the best “mar­ke­ting blog­ger” in the UK. I hope you’ll add him to your blo­groll.
[Bonus Link:] Me and Den­nis “Don’t shoot me because I’m an accoun­tant” How­lett are having an inte­res­ting exchange over here in the com­ment section.

January 16, 2006

top ten reasons why nobody reads your blog

zzzlokjib03.jpg
TOP TEN REASONS WHY NOBODY READS YOUR BLOG:
1. You’re not a good-looking female who likes pos­ting naked pic­tu­res of her­self.
Pretty damn obvious, if you ask me. [Not safe for work. You’ve been war­ned.]
2. There’s nothing in it for them.
Yeah, peo­ple really want to spend the short time they’ve been given on this Earth to find out what an unem­plo­yed mana­ging con­sul­tant dork has to say. Dream on.
3. “Pas­sion & Autho­rity” are just buzz­words to you.
Yeah, I’ve read the Clue­train as well. So has my pet canary. Get back in line.
4. A sec­ret cabal of A-Listers got together and deci­ded that you should be exc­lu­ded from the con­ver­sa­tion.
Yeah, they sit around sip­ping cham­pagne, eating caviar and laughing about you.
5. You have nothing to say.
The fact that you haven’t figu­red this out yet sur­pri­ses ever­yone.
6. You’re not The Assi­mi­la­ted Negro.
TAN is smart and funny. You are not. Get over it.
7. You didn’t recently sell your com­pany to AOL for $25 million.
Somehow your eighth-grade English teacher mana­ged to con­vince you that truth & beauty were more impor­tant to peo­ple than money & power. And you’ve been paying dearly for it ever since.
8. The very fact that you’re whi­ning about traf­fic makes peo­ple not want to read your blog.
Ins­tead it makes them want to emu­late the champagne-swigging A-Listers currently moc­king you.
9. You’ve only been wri­ting the damn thing for a week.
And you’re already whin­ging. See Point Num­ber Eight.
10. The Long Tail is very, very long.
And thanks to folk like you it’s get­ting EVEN LONGER. Rock on.
[FURTHER READING:] “Top Ten Blog­ger Lies.“
[BONUS LINK:] Kent has a very dif­fe­rent take on things.

stormhoek marketing gig

zzzzsteak12.jpg
Stormhoek is loo­king for a mar­ke­ting guy with con­su­mer goods expe­rience to help create and exe­cute in-store pro­mo­tions with some of the large UK retai­lers.
This is not my field at all. Any­body know someone who might be inte­res­ted? Please e-mail me with “mar­ke­ting gig” in the title. Thanks.

blogging is all about “career re-invention”. anything else is a bonus.

It just occu­red to me– gaping­void will be five years old in a cou­ple of months. Wow. That seems like a long time.
It first star­ted life as place to publish my car­toons [Click here to see the old site.]. Then it evol­ved into a kind of mar­ke­ting, “Hugh­train” blog.
Then English Cut and Stormhoek came along in 2005 and chan­ged everything once again.
Went from “car­too­nist” to “copyw­ri­ter” to “mar­ke­ting con­sul­tant” to “entrer­pe­neur” in a few short moves.
I like it when a blog re-invents itself, my own or someone else’s. When that hap­pens, career re-invention ine­vi­tably follows in its wake. And to me that’s what blog­ging is really all about.

remembertogetaclue

Who said com­pa­nies never lis­ten to blog­gers?
This is about as good an exam­ple as I’ve seen lately. Thanks for the heads-up, Mar­koos!
NB: You need to read the com­ments to get the full story.
Con­grats to remem­berthe­milk for get­ting a clue.
[Bonus Link:] Ignore the “Long Tail” at your peril etc.

January 15, 2006

somebody hire sarah

Sarah Blow, everybody’s favo­rite girl geek is loo­king for a job.
She told me it was OK to post this, though for wha­te­ver rea­son her current emplo­yer won’t let her post it on her blog.
She’s 24 and very, very bright. She tells me she’s not adverse to the idea of moving, even moving coun­tries. Here’s her CV.
I told her she should move to Seattle and go work for Mic­ro­soft. Robert?

January 14, 2006

english cut will be making shirts: official

Tho­mas just went public on the shirt thing.

conventional advertising is slow, complicated, inefficient, painful and expensive

envelope.jpg
English Cut has now added a monthly news­let­ter to the equa­tion.
A lot of peo­ple have sig­ned up so far. A cou­ple of hun­dred in the last day or two. I’m hoping we can add a cou­ple of zeros to the final num­ber.
We see it as a good way to touch base with our cus­to­mers, let them know what we’re up to etc, without them having to read the blog on a regu­lar basis [not every­bod wants to read blogs, believe it or not].
Sure, there’s nothing too radi­cal about this approach. It’s just straight ahead “Per­mis­sion Mar­ke­ting”. That being said, it does excite me. I really like the idea of being able to find all the busi­ness you need, just from the sim­ple act of wri­ting an enga­ging e-mail every month and sen­ding it out to a willing audience [wor­king in tan­dem with the blog, of course].
Beats the hell out of con­ven­tio­nal adver­ti­sing, which I usually find slow, com­pli­ca­ted, inef­fi­cient, pain­ful and expen­sive.
Please feel free to sign up. Thanks.

January 13, 2006

as soon as you start cutting corners, you start cutting into your own narrative

yyyyyyy765125.jpg
It was funny wal­king down Savile Row yes­ter­day. There were a lot of “SALE” signs in the win­dows. It’s January, post-Christmas etc, so it wasn’t exactly sur­pri­sing. But this month we’ve been tur­ning down busi­ness. And thin­king about rai­sing our pri­ces. When others zig, zag. Exactly.
Tho­mas and I were down in Lon­don this week visi­ting shirt­ma­kers, to make for us who­le­sale.
We’ve found some­body. And they’re bloody good. And we like them. And they also supply my favo­rite Jermyn Street shirt­ma­ker. And the shirts are all made in England, unlike SOME name­less Jermyn Street com­pa­nies that manu­fa­cure in India, Por­tu­gal, Pakis­tan and China.
[NB: Jermyn Street is to hand-made shirts what Savile Row is to hand-made suits. They’re a few minu­tes’ walk from each other.]
I was hol­ding a competitor’s shirt in my hands yesterday.

1. The company’s illus­trious name was proudly embla­ze­ned on the collar label.
2. “Jermyn Street” was proudly embla­zo­ned on the collar label.
3. The “Made In China” bit was not-so-proudly embla­zo­ned on a tiny, hard-to-find label nowhere near the collar.

Not that there’s anything wrong with having a Chi­nese shirt. The qua­lity in this case was high, and the cost was very com­pe­ti­tive.
But we think our cus­to­mers want the “Made In England” story. So do we. Sure, it’s going to cost more, but we think it makes the “English Cut” story more authen­tic. And “Authen­ti­city” is what peo­ple are ulti­ma­tely buying into, not the actual mole­cu­les.
As soon as you start cut­ting cor­ners, you start cut­ting into your own narra­tive. Some­ti­mes the cost savings jus­tify it, but not always. The world is already awash with com­pro­mi­sed sto­ries and dilu­ted brands. Sure, the accoun­tants love it, but they’re just loo­king at the num­bers. They’re not the ones who have to go out into the big, wide world and find the actual paying customers.