December 19, 2005

when I hear the word “conversation”, i reach for my earplugs

Hen­riette is not plea­sed that sud­denly all these cor­po­rate folk are tur­ning up at blog­ging events and [GASP!] paying for things.

I don

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

54 Responses to “when I hear the word “conversation”, i reach for my earplugs”

  1. henriette says:

    then don’t agree Hugh.. the rea­son why geek­din­ners appeal to me ( and why I chose to ini­tiate them in Den­mark) is the sim­ple fact, that it is a event with no reply adress ( I mean there is no “spon­sor” selling anything) except for the per­son who ini­tia­ted the geek­din­ner gets the ” nice one ” cre­dit.
    so if geek­din­ners aren’t peo­ple mee­ting and tal­king.. what is it then ?
    a chance to mar­ket your­self ? — yes off cause, that’s the “net­wor­king” methaphor coming into action.
    frankly Im just a kit­ten who wants to sell stuff, and have fun doing it. I tend to get my con­tacts at con­fe­ren­ces and phy­si­cal appea­rance at geek­din­ners etc. this even­tually leads to busi­ness some­ti­mes.
    but in addi­tion I get to talk to all these really crea­tive peo­ple — who ins­pire me ( inc­lu­ding you Hugh)…
    I just think there should be venues that are left unsponsored…such as geek­din­ners.. other­wise the whole con­cept of geek­din­ners goes up in smoke for me.
    so if the blo­gosphere should work well, it needs to be spon­so­red, bought up and fought for by big­ger com­pa­nies ?
    because that is the real world.
    so what about open — source ?

  2. “It has to somewhat mirror the real world”…(hear, hear — there’s nothing to be sca­red of)…happy christ­mas y’ule…

  3. hugh macleod says:

    Hen­riette, it was a geek din­ner, not a church ser­vice ;-)

  4. my point exactly, nothing new under the sun…
    “busi­ness as usual” -
    I was expec­ting more.
    and church ser­vice ? Hey; I wasn’t the one who tal­ked an evan­ge­list into joi­ning us ;)

  5. ohh yeah, and what about open — source ?

  6. hugh macleod says:

    Open Source is very, very close to beco­ming the “next irri­ta­ting buzz­word” ;-)

  7. henriette says:

    nice one.. I will start using it all the time then..
    “it’s all hap­pe­ning maaan” — “open source”.. .I’ll post a little something on my blog and we can get it going again..

  8. Jacob B says:

    If com­pa­nies are not sup­po­sed to show up at Geek Din­ners, well then count me out next time, every time I go somewhere I repre­sent myself and my com­pany — like it or not.
    But this rings bells of irony in my ears, because as far I remem­ber the tables at the first Copenha­gen Geek Din­ner were all filled up with busi­ness­cards from Nue­vo­lu­tion? And at the after party, the maga­zine Kenzu42 “bought” some whuf­fie (does anyone remem­ber that buzz­word? — http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whuffie) by pro­vi­ding a place to stay and alcohol to drink.
    I think you’re on a holy mis­sion that’s not going to hap­pen in this world Hen­riette. As Hugh sug­gests, you’d only find that in Clue­train Uto­pia. But is this really such an impor­tant dis­cus­sion? I am pretty sure it isn’t.

  9. Jacob B says:

    If com­pa­nies are not sup­po­sed to show up at Geek Din­ners, well then count me out next time, every time I go somewhere I repre­sent myself and my com­pany — like it or not.
    But this rings bells of irony in my ears, because as far I remem­ber the tables at the first Copenha­gen Geek Din­ner were all filled up with busi­ness­cards from Nue­vo­lu­tion? And at the after party, the maga­zine Kenzu42 “bought” some whuf­fie (does anyone remem­ber that buzz­word? — http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whuffie) by pro­vi­ding a place to stay and alcohol to drink.
    I think you’re on a holy mis­sion that’s not going to hap­pen in this world Hen­riette. As Hugh sug­gests, you’d only find that in Clue­train Uto­pia. But is this really such an impor­tant dis­cus­sion? I am pretty sure it isn’t.

  10. Jacob B says:

    If com­pa­nies are not sup­po­sed to show up at Geek Din­ners, well then count me out next time, every time I go somewhere I repre­sent myself and my com­pany — like it or not.
    But this rings bells of irony in my ears, because as far I remem­ber the tables at the first Copenha­gen Geek Din­ner were all filled up with busi­ness­cards from Nue­vo­lu­tion? And at the after party, the maga­zine Kenzu42 “bought” some whuf­fie (does anyone remem­ber that buzz­word? — http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whuffie) by pro­vi­ding a place to stay and alcohol to drink.
    I think you’re on a holy mis­sion that’s not going to hap­pen in this world Hen­riette. As Hugh sug­gests, you’d only find that in Clue­train Uto­pia. But is this really such an impor­tant dis­cus­sion? I am pretty sure it isn’t.

  11. Jacob B says:

    If com­pa­nies are not sup­po­sed to show up at Geek Din­ners, well then count me out next time, every time I go somewhere I repre­sent myself and my com­pany — like it or not.
    But this rings bells of irony in my ears, because as far I remem­ber the tables at the first Copenha­gen Geek Din­ner were all filled up with busi­ness­cards from Nue­vo­lu­tion? And at the after party, the maga­zine Kenzu42 “bought” some whuf­fie (does anyone remem­ber that buzz­word? — http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whuffie) by pro­vi­ding a place to stay and alcohol to drink.
    I think you’re on a holy mis­sion that’s not going to hap­pen in this world Hen­riette. As Hugh sug­gests, you’d only find that in Clue­train Uto­pia. But is this really such an impor­tant dis­cus­sion? I am pretty sure it isn’t.

  12. Jacob B says:

    If com­pa­nies are not sup­po­sed to show up at Geek Din­ners, well then count me out next time, every time I go somewhere I repre­sent myself and my com­pany — like it or not.
    But this rings bells of irony in my ears, because as far I remem­ber the tables at the first Copenha­gen Geek Din­ner were all filled up with busi­ness­cards from Nue­vo­lu­tion? And at the after party, the maga­zine Kenzu42 “bought” some whuf­fie (does anyone remem­ber that buzz­word? — http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whuffie) by pro­vi­ding a place to stay and alcohol to drink.
    I think you’re on a holy mis­sion that’s not going to hap­pen in this world Hen­riette. As Hugh sug­gests, you’d only find that in Clue­train Uto­pia. But is this really such an impor­tant dis­cus­sion? I am pretty sure it isn’t.

  13. Jacob B says:

    If com­pa­nies are not sup­po­sed to show up at Geek Din­ners, well then count me out next time, every time I go somewhere I repre­sent myself and my com­pany — like it or not.
    But this rings bells of irony in my ears, because as far I remem­ber the tables at the first Copenha­gen Geek Din­ner were all filled up with busi­ness­cards from Nue­vo­lu­tion? And at the after party, the maga­zine Kenzu42 “bought” some whuf­fie (does anyone remem­ber that buzz­word? — http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whuffie) by pro­vi­ding a place to stay and alcohol to drink.
    I think you’re on a holy mis­sion that’s not going to hap­pen in this world Hen­riette. As Hugh sug­gests, you’d only find that in Clue­train Uto­pia. But is this really such an impor­tant dis­cus­sion? I am pretty sure it isn’t.

  14. Olle Jonsson says:

    Hm. If geek din­ners fail to reach their goal of get­ting peo­ple to meet, they’ll fail and not be visi­ted. If spon­sorships could lead to that, then they could be a pro­blem. I don’t see that hap­pe­ning.
    And, as the crowd con­sists of early adop­ters, they’ll nimbly move on to the next way of mee­ting if “their thing” got tain­ted and use­less.
    I don’t see a spon­so­red din­ner as use­less.
    I’d be curious to know what kind of com­pa­nies would be inte­res­ted in spon­so­ring geek din­ners. Why? To what end? (I’m not moc­king any intent, just curious.)

  15. A spon­so­red din­ner chan­ges the dyna­mic, or so I assume. In my little town, Ann Arbor, I find that there two types of gathe­rings for the techies and info wor­kers.
    There are birds-of-feather gathe­rings, where we emerge from our cubes, chow down or tip­ple, and talk about work. There are net­wor­king events, were ever­yone says rah-rah, in attempt to trump the next per­son with an out­look more posi­tive.
    The for­mer are worth my time, the lat­ter are not.
    It seems like the new gathe­rings that spring up, start out as casual mee­tings, but even­tually, someone shows up with an agenda, and the dyna­mic changes.

  16. DUST!N says:

    Does spon­so­red = selling out?
    I handle pro­grams for a local b2b mar­ke­ting group. I have soli­ci­ted spea­kers and deve­lo­ped our pro­grams without thought of what spon­sors would want. It’s based on what would rock the world of our mem­bers and guests, while still wal­king away with something.
    We still gar­ner spon­sors, who get a little recog­ni­tion to a prime audience. But, the meat and pota­tos are con­tent and com­mu­nity.
    Con­tent, com­mu­nity, and spon­sors can coexist.

  17. Jon says:

    Hold the train, Hugh !
    I know I have been gone for a few months from your blog, but when did you stop screa­ming, “mar­kets are con­ver­sa­tions”? When did your cliche (or the one you see­med to love), die?
    Me confused.

  18. Anyone who belie­ves this whole blog malar­key is moti­va­ted by enthu­siasm, link love and OSS navel gazing hasn’t had to put food on the table for a long time.
    I take it Hugh that peo­ple gave you a right ear bashing for the free Stormhoek wine or that MSN (god for­bid) coughed up the spon­doo­lies for half the food they all troughed?
    Or am I mis­sing something in this great non-ROi story?

  19. Sam Sethi says:

    I have given a full res­ponse on Henriette’s blog to why MSN sup­por­ted this event. http://henrietteweber.com/2005/12/14/im-being-sponsored-blogging-turned-ugly/
    But if Hugh or a majo­rity of the par­ti­ci­pants would pre­fer MSN not to be invol­ved then I would be happy to with­draw our future sup­port.
    Sam

  20. Fenmere says:

    If blog­ging isn’t con­ver­sa­tion, then maybe, perhaps… it is bazaar.
    ;p
    Hmm.. I’m not sure if that quite cap­tu­res it, but there’s a word out there that’s somewhere bet­ween bazaar and con­ver­sa­tion. But it’s on the tip of my tongue.

  21. frosty says:

    (Having never been to one…)
    It seems to me that a geek din­ner is a geek din­ner (or drink­fest or wha­te­ver) inso­far as it’s orga­ni­zed on the web, the topics of con­ver­sa­tion are likely to be geeky to one degree or another, and it’s open to anyone who wants to come (or at least first-come first-served if the space is limi­ted).
    If a com­pany picks up some or all of the tab, great. If the com­pany wants to give away free stuff, great. If they send some of their peo­ple and those peo­ple talk about the com­pany stuff, fine, everybody’s going to do that for their own company/gig/hobby any­way.
    Howe­ver, if it gets to the point of the com­pany giving some kind of pre­sen­ta­tion, or peo­ple from the com­pany pushing it aggres­si­vely or other­wise pulling sales­man tricks, then I think it’s something else. Then it’s a com­pany event, and they’re paying for your time and not just your good­will. In which case they bet­ter cover the cock­tails:
    http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/18/fashion/sundaystyles/18DRINKS.html
    But if Hugh is orga­ni­zing a din­ner and Stormhoek *doesn’t* pro­vide free wine, or if Sco­ble is and Mic­ro­soft doesn’t pick up the tab, I’d say shame on the com­pa­nies for mis­sing the good­will oppor­tu­nity and for not encou­ra­ging their blog mar­ke­ters.
    (Hmm, how about a shoo­tout where Stormhoek and a cou­ple com­pe­ti­tors pro­vide free wine, and the blog­gers take notes?)

  22. Roman says:

    WE SHOULD ALL SWITCH OFF OUR COMPUTERS AND GET SOME EXERCISE !
    That’s all I had to say.

  23. frosty says:

    If I unders­tood correctly, Henriette’s objec­tion wasn’t to Microsoft’s spon­sorship but rather to MS’s incor­po­ra­ting a pitch and making it some kind of a Mic­ro­soft Event, which it hadn’t been announ­ced as.
    Or am I mis­sing something?
    I still think spon­sorship is fine, sch­wag is fine, but captive-audience pre­sen­ta­tions cross the line. Just let your geeks talk to the other geeks about why they like you; isn’t that enough?
    If it’s not enough, then make it a “Mic­ro­soft Geek Din­ner” and ever­yone knows in advance what to expect.

  24. hugh macleod says:

    You are mis­sing something, Frosty. You weren’t there.
    1. The thing is,

  25. frosty says:

    No, Hugh, I meant “am I mis­sing something about Henriette’s com­plaint?” I did notice that I wasn’t there. ;-)
    Seems to me there are two dis­tinct com­ment threads intert­wi­ned here, one about “what’s an appro­priate level of cor­po­rate invol­ve­ment in an event like a geek din­ner” and another about “was Mic­ro­soft beha­ving badly with this par­ti­cu­lar one.“
    (And the same thing on Henriette’s blog as well.)
    I have an opi­nion on the for­mer thread, and none on the latter.

  26. Jacob, I think your are the most ungra­te­full guest I have ever invi­ted to my pri­vate home.
    The only rea­son why we ended at my place, were that the alter­na­tive, were that peo­ple were split­ting up ins­tead of sta­yid together. I really just wan­ted to be polite, nothing more and nothing else, and is just not a hab­bit of mine, to charge peo­ple for the buzz and liquor, I ALWAYS leave it to ppl, if the wants to give anything back. So no_ it was not the com­pany or the maga­zine who invi­ted you guys, it was me ope­ning my home for stran­gers.
    But for you info, I have sayid no thanks to the next geek­din­ner, becuarse I think and feelt, some of the ppl, really trashed my place, and I really dont want to have that expe­rience again with stran­gers. So you dont have to feel that I “spon­so­red” a good ini­ta­tive.
    Christ!

  27. Jacob, I think your are the most ungra­te­full guest I have ever invi­ted to my pri­vate home.
    The only rea­son why we ended at my place, were that the alter­na­tive, were that peo­ple were split­ting up ins­tead of sta­yid together. I really just wan­ted to be polite, nothing more and nothing else, and is just not a hab­bit of mine, to charge peo­ple for the buzz and liquor, I ALWAYS leave it to ppl, if the wants to give anything back. So no_ it was not the com­pany or the maga­zine who invi­ted you guys, it was me ope­ning my home for stran­gers.
    But for you info, I have sayid no thanks to the next geek­din­ner, becuarse I think and feelt, some of the ppl, really trashed my place, and I really dont want to have that expe­rience again with stran­gers. So you dont have to feel that I “spon­so­red” a good ini­ta­tive.
    Christ!

  28. Jacob, I think your are the most ungra­te­full guest I have ever invi­ted to my pri­vate home.
    The only rea­son why we ended at my place, were that the alter­na­tive, were that peo­ple were split­ting up ins­tead of sta­yid together. I really just wan­ted to be polite, nothing more and nothing else, and is just not a hab­bit of mine, to charge peo­ple for the buzz and liquor, I ALWAYS leave it to ppl, if the wants to give anything back. So no_ it was not the com­pany or the maga­zine who invi­ted you guys, it was me ope­ning my home for stran­gers.
    But for you info, I have sayid no thanks to the next geek­din­ner, becuarse I think and feelt, some of the ppl, really trashed my place, and I really dont want to have that expe­rience again with stran­gers. So you dont have to feel that I “spon­so­red” a good ini­ta­tive.
    Christ!

  29. Jacob, I think your are the most ungra­te­full guest I have ever invi­ted to my pri­vate home.
    The only rea­son why we ended at my place, were that the alter­na­tive, were that peo­ple were split­ting up ins­tead of sta­yid together. I really just wan­ted to be polite, nothing more and nothing else, and is just not a hab­bit of mine, to charge peo­ple for the buzz and liquor, I ALWAYS leave it to ppl, if the wants to give anything back. So no_ it was not the com­pany or the maga­zine who invi­ted you guys, it was me ope­ning my home for stran­gers.
    But for you info, I have sayid no thanks to the next geek­din­ner, becuarse I think and feelt, some of the ppl, really trashed my place, and I really dont want to have that expe­rience again with stran­gers. So you dont have to feel that I “spon­so­red” a good ini­ta­tive.
    Christ!

  30. Jacob, I think your are the most ungra­te­full guest I have ever invi­ted to my pri­vate home.
    The only rea­son why we ended at my place, were that the alter­na­tive, were that peo­ple were split­ting up ins­tead of sta­yid together. I really just wan­ted to be polite, nothing more and nothing else, and is just not a hab­bit of mine, to charge peo­ple for the buzz and liquor, I ALWAYS leave it to ppl, if the wants to give anything back. So no_ it was not the com­pany or the maga­zine who invi­ted you guys, it was me ope­ning my home for stran­gers.
    But for you info, I have sayid no thanks to the next geek­din­ner, becuarse I think and feelt, some of the ppl, really trashed my place, and I really dont want to have that expe­rience again with stran­gers. So you dont have to feel that I “spon­so­red” a good ini­ta­tive.
    Christ!

  31. Jacob, I think your are the most ungra­te­full guest I have ever invi­ted to my pri­vate home.
    The only rea­son why we ended at my place, were that the alter­na­tive, were that peo­ple were split­ting up ins­tead of sta­yid together. I really just wan­ted to be polite, nothing more and nothing else, and is just not a hab­bit of mine, to charge peo­ple for the buzz and liquor, I ALWAYS leave it to ppl, if the wants to give anything back. So no_ it was not the com­pany or the maga­zine who invi­ted you guys, it was me ope­ning my home for stran­gers.
    But for you info, I have sayid no thanks to the next geek­din­ner, becuarse I think and feelt, some of the ppl, really trashed my place, and I really dont want to have that expe­rience again with stran­gers. So you dont have to feel that I “spon­so­red” a good ini­ta­tive.
    Christ!

  32. Hey Sam — keep the free­bies coming — there’s a lot of hungry mouths out there in the blo­gosphere and I per­so­nally would love to tuck into MSNs blog­ger rela­tions bud­get.
    I wasn’t there but I can still say it was a great ges­ture. If I was put­ting one on I’d be calling you to get the free­bies. Not the other way around. And I’d blog about it. And I bet no-one would get snarky, they’d get satisfaction.

  33. hugh macleod says:

    I agree with Dennis…

  34. Jacob B says:

    Ok, seems like peo­ple weren’t hea­ring me. Is this dis­cus­sion really so impor­tant? And oh god, do you have to over inter­pret everything I said? I am not ungra­te­ful that Line made a great venue for the after­party, but neverthe­less it gave Kenzu42 some whuf­fie, just like a posi­tive blog entry would do. My point was not that it was a bad after­party, but that I could hardly ima­gine anyone having trou­ble with sta­ying at a place for free, com­pa­red to being at a bar where you have to pay. It was all posi­tive Line, don’t get me wrong — I think it was great and I only said what I said because I’d like something like that hap­pen again without a big dis­cus­sion on spon­sorships :-)
    Now, I do know that Daen didn’t pay anyone for the allo­wance to drop his busi­ness­cards, but no mat­ter if he did it for fun or for work, it still seems cor­po­rate to me. What if he had been emplo­yed by MSN and not Nue­vo­lu­tion? Would you then have remo­ved the cards? I am just trying to see the balance here, you don’t want a spon­so­red geek din­ner, but you do want a geek din­ner with free adverts? I’d pre­fer that if peo­ple really do want to show up and make an advert out of them­sel­ves, that they then somehow spon­sor the event for the bene­fit of others. For exam­ple a deduc­tion of the price of the din­ner would have been good :-)
    I’d sug­gest that for our own, and Hugh’s sake, that we end the dis­cus­sion, I really didn’t mean to cause any harm — but seems peo­ple are taking this a little bit too lite­ral for my liking. Chill peo­ple, chill :-)

  35. Jacob B says:

    Ok, seems like peo­ple weren’t hea­ring me. Is this dis­cus­sion really so impor­tant? And oh god, do you have to over inter­pret everything I said? I am not ungra­te­ful that Line made a great venue for the after­party, but neverthe­less it gave Kenzu42 some whuf­fie, just like a posi­tive blog entry would do. My point was not that it was a bad after­party, but that I could hardly ima­gine anyone having trou­ble with sta­ying at a place for free, com­pa­red to being at a bar where you have to pay. It was all posi­tive Line, don’t get me wrong — I think it was great and I only said what I said because I’d like something like that hap­pen again without a big dis­cus­sion on spon­sorships :-)
    Now, I do know that Daen didn’t pay anyone for the allo­wance to drop his busi­ness­cards, but no mat­ter if he did it for fun or for work, it still seems cor­po­rate to me. What if he had been emplo­yed by MSN and not Nue­vo­lu­tion? Would you then have remo­ved the cards? I am just trying to see the balance here, you don’t want a spon­so­red geek din­ner, but you do want a geek din­ner with free adverts? I’d pre­fer that if peo­ple really do want to show up and make an advert out of them­sel­ves, that they then somehow spon­sor the event for the bene­fit of others. For exam­ple a deduc­tion of the price of the din­ner would have been good :-)
    I’d sug­gest that for our own, and Hugh’s sake, that we end the dis­cus­sion, I really didn’t mean to cause any harm — but seems peo­ple are taking this a little bit too lite­ral for my liking. Chill peo­ple, chill :-)

  36. Jacob B says:

    Ok, seems like peo­ple weren’t hea­ring me. Is this dis­cus­sion really so impor­tant? And oh god, do you have to over inter­pret everything I said? I am not ungra­te­ful that Line made a great venue for the after­party, but neverthe­less it gave Kenzu42 some whuf­fie, just like a posi­tive blog entry would do. My point was not that it was a bad after­party, but that I could hardly ima­gine anyone having trou­ble with sta­ying at a place for free, com­pa­red to being at a bar where you have to pay. It was all posi­tive Line, don’t get me wrong — I think it was great and I only said what I said because I’d like something like that hap­pen again without a big dis­cus­sion on spon­sorships :-)
    Now, I do know that Daen didn’t pay anyone for the allo­wance to drop his busi­ness­cards, but no mat­ter if he did it for fun or for work, it still seems cor­po­rate to me. What if he had been emplo­yed by MSN and not Nue­vo­lu­tion? Would you then have remo­ved the cards? I am just trying to see the balance here, you don’t want a spon­so­red geek din­ner, but you do want a geek din­ner with free adverts? I’d pre­fer that if peo­ple really do want to show up and make an advert out of them­sel­ves, that they then somehow spon­sor the event for the bene­fit of others. For exam­ple a deduc­tion of the price of the din­ner would have been good :-)
    I’d sug­gest that for our own, and Hugh’s sake, that we end the dis­cus­sion, I really didn’t mean to cause any harm — but seems peo­ple are taking this a little bit too lite­ral for my liking. Chill peo­ple, chill :-)

  37. Jacob B says:

    Ok, seems like peo­ple weren’t hea­ring me. Is this dis­cus­sion really so impor­tant? And oh god, do you have to over inter­pret everything I said? I am not ungra­te­ful that Line made a great venue for the after­party, but neverthe­less it gave Kenzu42 some whuf­fie, just like a posi­tive blog entry would do. My point was not that it was a bad after­party, but that I could hardly ima­gine anyone having trou­ble with sta­ying at a place for free, com­pa­red to being at a bar where you have to pay. It was all posi­tive Line, don’t get me wrong — I think it was great and I only said what I said because I’d like something like that hap­pen again without a big dis­cus­sion on spon­sorships :-)
    Now, I do know that Daen didn’t pay anyone for the allo­wance to drop his busi­ness­cards, but no mat­ter if he did it for fun or for work, it still seems cor­po­rate to me. What if he had been emplo­yed by MSN and not Nue­vo­lu­tion? Would you then have remo­ved the cards? I am just trying to see the balance here, you don’t want a spon­so­red geek din­ner, but you do want a geek din­ner with free adverts? I’d pre­fer that if peo­ple really do want to show up and make an advert out of them­sel­ves, that they then somehow spon­sor the event for the bene­fit of others. For exam­ple a deduc­tion of the price of the din­ner would have been good :-)
    I’d sug­gest that for our own, and Hugh’s sake, that we end the dis­cus­sion, I really didn’t mean to cause any harm — but seems peo­ple are taking this a little bit too lite­ral for my liking. Chill peo­ple, chill :-)

  38. Jacob B says:

    Ok, seems like peo­ple weren’t hea­ring me. Is this dis­cus­sion really so impor­tant? And oh god, do you have to over inter­pret everything I said? I am not ungra­te­ful that Line made a great venue for the after­party, but neverthe­less it gave Kenzu42 some whuf­fie, just like a posi­tive blog entry would do. My point was not that it was a bad after­party, but that I could hardly ima­gine anyone having trou­ble with sta­ying at a place for free, com­pa­red to being at a bar where you have to pay. It was all posi­tive Line, don’t get me wrong — I think it was great and I only said what I said because I’d like something like that hap­pen again without a big dis­cus­sion on spon­sorships :-)
    Now, I do know that Daen didn’t pay anyone for the allo­wance to drop his busi­ness­cards, but no mat­ter if he did it for fun or for work, it still seems cor­po­rate to me. What if he had been emplo­yed by MSN and not Nue­vo­lu­tion? Would you then have remo­ved the cards? I am just trying to see the balance here, you don’t want a spon­so­red geek din­ner, but you do want a geek din­ner with free adverts? I’d pre­fer that if peo­ple really do want to show up and make an advert out of them­sel­ves, that they then somehow spon­sor the event for the bene­fit of others. For exam­ple a deduc­tion of the price of the din­ner would have been good :-)
    I’d sug­gest that for our own, and Hugh’s sake, that we end the dis­cus­sion, I really didn’t mean to cause any harm — but seems peo­ple are taking this a little bit too lite­ral for my liking. Chill peo­ple, chill :-)

  39. Jacob B says:

    Ok, seems like peo­ple weren’t hea­ring me. Is this dis­cus­sion really so impor­tant? And oh god, do you have to over inter­pret everything I said? I am not ungra­te­ful that Line made a great venue for the after­party, but neverthe­less it gave Kenzu42 some whuf­fie, just like a posi­tive blog entry would do. My point was not that it was a bad after­party, but that I could hardly ima­gine anyone having trou­ble with sta­ying at a place for free, com­pa­red to being at a bar where you have to pay. It was all posi­tive Line, don’t get me wrong — I think it was great and I only said what I said because I’d like something like that hap­pen again without a big dis­cus­sion on spon­sorships :-)
    Now, I do know that Daen didn’t pay anyone for the allo­wance to drop his busi­ness­cards, but no mat­ter if he did it for fun or for work, it still seems cor­po­rate to me. What if he had been emplo­yed by MSN and not Nue­vo­lu­tion? Would you then have remo­ved the cards? I am just trying to see the balance here, you don’t want a spon­so­red geek din­ner, but you do want a geek din­ner with free adverts? I’d pre­fer that if peo­ple really do want to show up and make an advert out of them­sel­ves, that they then somehow spon­sor the event for the bene­fit of others. For exam­ple a deduc­tion of the price of the din­ner would have been good :-)
    I’d sug­gest that for our own, and Hugh’s sake, that we end the dis­cus­sion, I really didn’t mean to cause any harm — but seems peo­ple are taking this a little bit too lite­ral for my liking. Chill peo­ple, chill :-)

  40. Ric says:

    Just chec­king something, Hugh …

  41. Ric says:

    Seems your com­ments engine doesn’t like my URL — tried to leave a com­ment here the other day and your spam fil­ter objec­ted. Ended up remo­ving the URL from the post and my test (pre­vious com­ment) wor­ked.
    Now I did have something to say about this, but it’s all a bit tired now … I blog­ged it, but I’m too sca­red to tell you where, other­wise this com­ment won’t be accep­ted either!

  42. Jacob B says:

    And there’s a big dif­fe­rence bet­ween net­wor­king and just trashing out busi­ness­cards to a bunch of stran­gers you don’t know.
    I still don’t see how a spon­sorship could hurt this type of event, I wasn’t really inte­res­ted in a net­wor­king vs. spon­so­ring dis­cus­sion, rather I’d like to see your res­ponse to what the others com­men­ted here.
    Maybe my wri­ting style offends some peo­ple, but I am pretty sure the “get a life”-style doesn’t work that good either. Maybe in kin­der­gar­ten, but oh well.. kin­der­gar­ten vs. blo­gosphere, where’s the dif­fe­rence :-)

  43. Jacob B says:

    And there’s a big dif­fe­rence bet­ween net­wor­king and just trashing out busi­ness­cards to a bunch of stran­gers you don’t know.
    I still don’t see how a spon­sorship could hurt this type of event, I wasn’t really inte­res­ted in a net­wor­king vs. spon­so­ring dis­cus­sion, rather I’d like to see your res­ponse to what the others com­men­ted here.
    Maybe my wri­ting style offends some peo­ple, but I am pretty sure the “get a life”-style doesn’t work that good either. Maybe in kin­der­gar­ten, but oh well.. kin­der­gar­ten vs. blo­gosphere, where’s the dif­fe­rence :-)

  44. Jacob B says:

    And there’s a big dif­fe­rence bet­ween net­wor­king and just trashing out busi­ness­cards to a bunch of stran­gers you don’t know.
    I still don’t see how a spon­sorship could hurt this type of event, I wasn’t really inte­res­ted in a net­wor­king vs. spon­so­ring dis­cus­sion, rather I’d like to see your res­ponse to what the others com­men­ted here.
    Maybe my wri­ting style offends some peo­ple, but I am pretty sure the “get a life”-style doesn’t work that good either. Maybe in kin­der­gar­ten, but oh well.. kin­der­gar­ten vs. blo­gosphere, where’s the dif­fe­rence :-)

  45. Jacob B says:

    And there’s a big dif­fe­rence bet­ween net­wor­king and just trashing out busi­ness­cards to a bunch of stran­gers you don’t know.
    I still don’t see how a spon­sorship could hurt this type of event, I wasn’t really inte­res­ted in a net­wor­king vs. spon­so­ring dis­cus­sion, rather I’d like to see your res­ponse to what the others com­men­ted here.
    Maybe my wri­ting style offends some peo­ple, but I am pretty sure the “get a life”-style doesn’t work that good either. Maybe in kin­der­gar­ten, but oh well.. kin­der­gar­ten vs. blo­gosphere, where’s the dif­fe­rence :-)

  46. Jacob B says:

    And there’s a big dif­fe­rence bet­ween net­wor­king and just trashing out busi­ness­cards to a bunch of stran­gers you don’t know.
    I still don’t see how a spon­sorship could hurt this type of event, I wasn’t really inte­res­ted in a net­wor­king vs. spon­so­ring dis­cus­sion, rather I’d like to see your res­ponse to what the others com­men­ted here.
    Maybe my wri­ting style offends some peo­ple, but I am pretty sure the “get a life”-style doesn’t work that good either. Maybe in kin­der­gar­ten, but oh well.. kin­der­gar­ten vs. blo­gosphere, where’s the dif­fe­rence :-)

  47. Jacob B says:

    And there’s a big dif­fe­rence bet­ween net­wor­king and just trashing out busi­ness­cards to a bunch of stran­gers you don’t know.
    I still don’t see how a spon­sorship could hurt this type of event, I wasn’t really inte­res­ted in a net­wor­king vs. spon­so­ring dis­cus­sion, rather I’d like to see your res­ponse to what the others com­men­ted here.
    Maybe my wri­ting style offends some peo­ple, but I am pretty sure the “get a life”-style doesn’t work that good either. Maybe in kin­der­gar­ten, but oh well.. kin­der­gar­ten vs. blo­gosphere, where’s the dif­fe­rence :-)

  48. hugh macleod says:

    Guys, get a room! Jesus… ;-)

  49. okay Hugh, sorry.. Im done now * brushes the dirt of my clothes* .…

  50. daen says:

    At the risk of reo­pe­ning this debate, which to my dis­may seems to have gone to DEFCON III over some fairly minor points.
    At the Copenha­gen Geek Din­ner, the Nue­vo­lu­tion cards were all I had on me. I apo­lo­gise for being pro­fli­gate with them, but in my expe­rience it’s just one of the things you do when you meet peo­ple for the first time — hand out busi­ness cards, if you have them. And for good­ness sakes, it’s a busi­ness card with a logo on it, which in my world is about as inno­cuous as it gets. I have gathe­red a huge collec­tion from my 10 years wor­king in Lon­don, many of which are asso­cia­ted with happy memo­ries of peo­ple, pla­ces and events. I tend to make notes about people/events on the back of the cards (whe­reas Hugh makes art out of his :-) . Nue­vo­lu­tion, by the way, has no inte­rest in spon­so­ring anything like CGD : it’s a bio­tech com­pany, and I just work there as a labo­ra­tory rat (well, sys­tem admin, but same difference).