December 17, 2005

$300 shirts

yyyyyyy765125.jpg
As I’ve said before, the trou­ble with English Cut is that making hand-made (“bes­poke”) suits doesn’t scale. We can only make 5 – 6 suits a week, tops. Even if we find more cus­to­mers, there are only so many sewing tai­lors on Savile Row, and they’re all already busy.
And we don’t want to make chea­per, mass-produced suits, either. If you’re making “the best suits in the world” for $3000, and sud­denly you’re cran­king out $400 ready-to-wears, sud­denly your suits are no lon­ger “the best”.
Big. Sca­ling. Issues.
So we deci­ded to not touch the suits. We’ll keep making them the way we always have– by hand, bes­poke, with a 3 – 6 month deli­very time [Heck, we’re even thin­king we’ll have to even­tually impose a six-month wai­ting list on top of that, just to get an appoint­ment etc, if busi­ness keeps gro­wing at the current rate].
We’re sca­ling the busi­ness in other areas, namely, shirts.
A lot of our cus­to­mers want shirts. So we’ll sell them shirts. I’ve just got­ten off the phone with one of the major Jermyn Street shirt who­le­sa­lers, who supply all the major Lon­don shirt­ma­kers– Turn­bull & Asser etc. They want to work with us.
So… anyone want to buy a $300 shirt with an English Cut label?
Before you give me the “this will never work” treat­ment, here’s a story.
One of our cus­to­mers had his suit fit­ted last week. He wan­ted some shirts to go with it. You know, the full-on, fancy, bes­poke, hand-made kind. Retai­ling for about $300.
We’re not in the shirt busi­ness, so we refe­rred him to a shirt­ma­ker friend of ours.
He pla­ced an order for 117 shirts with our shirt­ma­ker friend that very same day.
One. Hun­dred. And. Seven­teen.
At $300 a pop.
Yeah, I was up all night, just thin­king about the pos­si­ble oppor­tu­ni­ties.
Watch this space.
[UPDATE:] English Cut’s next visit to Ame­rica is in late February/early March 2006. We launch the shirt range in time for that. Official.

21 Responses to “$300 shirts”

  1. Love the idea! Ascot Chang is my brand of choice today.

  2. 117? Holy shit!
    I don’t think i have 117 pie­ces of clothing even if i count my socks as sin­gle items!
    But Yeah I can see shirts. Big Time…

  3. Niti Bhan says:

    Hugh, have you thought about the Indian mar­ket? Espe­cially since many are already aware of Savile Row et al due to his­tory, shall we say? Just got back from a week in New Delhi and if they can find a mar­ket for Car­tier and Gucci, why not bes­poke suits and shirts? Let me know if ever you think Tho­mas maybe inte­res­ted in a visit and I can intro­duce you over email to local peo­ple to help set up intro­duc­tions. I have a cou­sin who only wears $1200 suits, why not take it up a notch ?

  4. AGRADA says:

    Hi Hugh
    Armani brand already infec­ted me, Last week I
    bought 2 pairs of armani jeans with 900$..damn
    One should rea­lize that the stu­pid over­pri­cing is nothing but a ” Reverse Psycho­logy “..got it?
    So you try to do the same with English cut? I can gua­ran­tee you that kee­ping it over­pri­ced is more pro­fi­ta­ble since there are infec­ted customers.

  5. Nice idea Hugh — it’s called dis­tri­bu­tion or agency. A few ques­tions seeing as how you’re in the realms of busi­ness advi­sory:
    1. Stock/space?
    2. Mar­gin?
    3. Cash flow mana­ge­ment
    Tire­some I know.…

  6. hugh macleod says:

    1. Stock/Space. Not a pro­blem. The shirts are hand­made, with the cus­to­mers lea­ving an upfront depo­sit. No real added infras­truc­ture nee­ded (for now).
    2. Mar­gins. None of your damn busi­ness ;-)
    3. Cash­flow. Our job is made easier by both Tho­mas and I gene­rally pre­fe­rring low-key, fru­gal lifesty­les.
    4. ROI. Just kidding.

  7. Nia says:

    Are we tal­king very good shirts who hap­pen to have an English Cut label on them, or are we tal­king The Best Shirts Money Can Buy, the exact qua­lity and fit equi­va­lent of English­Cut suits?

  8. hugh macleod says:

    We’re tal­king about the lat­ter, Nia. Uber-high-end stuff.

  9. I thought you were saying there was some who­le­sa­ling deal avai­la­ble? Now you’re saying hand­made. Con­fu­sed. When I said mar­gin, I meant redu­ced by vir­tue of having a who­le­sa­ling arran­ge­ment. Not being tire­some, trying to unders­tand the model. As a semi-recovered accoun­tant! I’m sure the ROi is won­der­ful :)

  10. frosty says:

    What’s the next step down in fancy shirts?
    If you’re selling for $300, does that mean basi­cally you have the same cus­to­mers you’d have for the fancy suits?
    Sorry, I usually buy pretty cheap shirts (under $50), so I’m just curious where $300 fits in to the ove­rall fancy-shirt scene.
    For exam­ple, I have a friend who mostly wears t-shirts and jeans, but spends $300 on the jeans because his favo­rite brand costs that much.

  11. hugh macleod says:

    Den­nis, we can have shirts hand-made at who­le­sale pri­ces, then sell them to our exis­ting cus­to­mers at retail pri­ces. Profit!

  12. hugh macleod says:

    Frosty, for cot­ton, hand­made busi­ness shirts, $300 is pretty stan­dard for Jermyn Street. Anything more and you’re either paying for the desig­ner label, or some exo­tic fabric.
    Though yeah, it’s aimed at the same kind of cus­to­mer that currently buys our suits.
    They buy an English Cut suit, next thing you know thay want a shirt to match. So it’s all demand-driven. We’re not trying to create a new mar­ket, just bet­ter serve our exis­ting one.

  13. frosty says:

    Hmmm…
    If you can sell a lot of $300 EC shirts, most of them pre­su­mably to current/future EC suit owners, wouldn’t the next logi­cal step be to have a shirt­ma­ker do his/her own blog/brand?
    EnglishShirt.com or wha­te­ver. If hand­made shirts scale so much bet­ter than hand­made suits, what about a blog-marketed shirt peo­ple will want as much as they want EC suits? Except not so expen­sive (ergo, more folks can buy one) and not so limi­ted (lots of peo­ple don’t have any use for a suit, no mat­ter how great it is).
    …just thin­king out loud…

  14. Ed Byrne says:

    Go for it Hugh — while I currently wouldn’t spend 3k on a suit — I like qua­lity shirts and Tho­mas Pink seem to be one the best (in Ire­land) at the moment.
    Pre­su­mably you’ll need to get mea­su­red for the first one, but I’d love to see a great web site after that sto­red my details and let me pick mate­rial / style on-line.

  15. hugh macleod says:

    Ed, that’s a cor­ker of an idea =)

  16. hugh macleod says:

    Ed,
    Yeah, Pink’s are good… they’re more the

  17. So what hap­pens when the Jan sales come along — when they do, can I pick up a TM shirt for c

  18. Peter says:

    Word asso­cia­tion… shirts…ties, cuff-links, image, look, sophis­ti­ca­tion, shoes, for­mal, clas­sic, inno­vate. Nothing too cheap, not mass pro­du­ced, sophis­ti­ca­ted, indi­vi­dual. Perhaps you are loo­king for a sta­ble of asso­ciate arti­sans in these fields. Or desig­ners and a good factory.

  19. frosty says:

    Goo­gling around, I found Ascot Chang shirts online in the $150 – 400 range, not bes­poke but you can put in your mea­su­re­ments. (And a really crappy web­site.)
    And I found some fancy east-coast USA custom-shirt guys whose pri­ces start at $650, mini­mum order 3 shirts, who also have a super-crappy web­site but once you find the rele­vant info make an OK pitch.
    I agree with the West Coast USA sen­ti­ment — I’m in SF and there’s just no way I’d ever need a fancy suit here. But I would at least con­si­der a fancy shirt, if you can make it seem as nice to have as the fancy suits sound.

  20. frosty says:

    Self-correction: I know fancy suits aren’t about what you *need* but in Cali­for­nia I’d be hard-pressed to find an occa­sion to even wear one if I had it.

  21. Ed Byrne says:

    Hugh,
    The bes­poke, qua­lity shirt mar­ket hasn’t been tap­ped anywhere that I can see!
    Of course being a web mar­ke­ting per­son I see the great oppor­tu­nity to meet peo­ple once for mea­su­re­ments and intro — and then through a really great web inter­face let peo­ple pick their shirts — from mate­rial and design — through to ‘current fashion in Lon­don is:…; currently recom­men­ded for East Coast USA is:..’