December 16, 2005

update:

yyyyyyy765123.jpg
[The Stormhoek “Fresh­ness Indi­ca­tor”.]
I upda­ted the “If I owned Stormhoek” blog post from 2 days ago, by adding the follo­wing:

3. I would change the copy below the fresh­ness indi­ca­tor to read: “The yellow indi­ca­tes when to enjoy Stormhoek at its freshest and brigh­test.” Just so there can be no doubt etc.

Den­nis How­lett thinks peo­ple already know enough about wine to where the “fresh-o-meter” won’t tell them anything they don’t know already. I disa­gree with Den­nis. Most wine buyer’s know­ledge is pretty sketchy, espe­cially at the $10 mark.
[NOTE TO SELF:] Wine porn and wine selling are NOT the same thing.

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

21 Responses to “update:”

  1. Yup. When I order wine, I wave my hand and say “Red”.

  2. Paul Farnell says:

    Yes, it defi­ni­tely, defi­ni­tely needs an expla­na­tion of what the yellow/green sig­nify. To be honest, I’d have inter­pre­ted that as:
    “Drin­king it bet­ween 2005 – 2008 is ok, but the best time is 2009″
    (Because of the con­no­ta­tions of [red], amber, green)
    Espe­cially con­si­de­ring that before I read about Stormhoek, I was com­ple­tely under the impres­sion that older wine is better.

  3. Hey Hugh — I don’t recall saying that?

  4. James Shaw says:

    1. yellow/green is a really bad choice — much bet­ter to use green then red, or amber if red is a little too strong. I ini­tially thought the yellow band was “ok” but green was “best“
    2. i have NO idea how long wine is sup­po­sed to ask. the fresh-o-meter is defi­na­tely nee­ded for the nor­mal wine drinkers!

  5. hugh macleod says:

    Mea Culpa, Den­nis. I infe­rred that was what you meant at the time (and no, I am not going to spend the next 35 minu­tes dig­ging up the com­ment so we can argue seman­tics after­wards)… though fair enough, maybe you meant something else.

  6. Colours could be ‘wrong’ — when I was doing user tes­ting on a pro­ject recently we gave them a ‘colour swatch’ style ren­di­tion to show how a site would appear in dif­fe­rent in dif­fe­rent comp­bi­na­tions. One combo was yellow/green tones — least favou­rite. What about folk who are colour blind?
    On the other point — I’m more likely to say 1. the com­pe­ti­tion is intense so dif­fern­tia­tion is cru­cial in the fight for shelf space 2. most peo­ple buy what they like (in the UK) but will be influen­ced by pre­sen­ta­tion 3. most wouldn’t con­si­der them­sel­ves as wine buffs though they might pre­tend to be so on occa­sion –if that means saying -‘Hey I found this great wine — it lives up to its fresh­ness rep’ so what? 4. peo­ple can’t pos­sibly have a clue about fresh­ness without trying the wine and then making the asso­cia­tion.
    But I could have chan­ged my mind from a month or two back — mee­ting peo­ple in the flesh does that for you some­ti­mes. I’ve been doing that a lot recently

  7. hugh macleod says:

    If the colors are “wrong”, it’s a pro­blem that’s easy to fix. So I’m not too worried.
    Hmmm… maybe a very intense, light green, ins­tead of yellow?

  8. Andy says:

    At the $10 mark (

  9. Green is bad because ther are a sur­pri­singly large num­ber of peo­ple who are red/green colour blind. To them both appear as a sort of grey. There are other forms. Yellow looks good as it implies sunshine = fresh­ness. Any other colour would be a dif­fi­cult conr­tast I sus­pect. So how about having a fading yellow as you get to the point where it ain’t ‘fresh’ any­more. Junk the meter as it mis­leads — at pre­sent I’m thin­king — ‘oh gotta keep it through 2007 – 8? I wanna drink it now!’

  10. Jon Plummer says:

    The main thing, regard­less of color choi­ces, would be to make the “Ulti­mate Fresh­ness” label the same color as the “Fresh” por­tion of the fresh­ness indi­ca­tor. Right now you are asso­cia­ting “Ulti­mate Fresh­ness” with 2009 whether you change colors or not.

  11. tim kitchin says:

    I’m with Den­nis. I think they should ditch the fresh­ness thing alto­gether.
    Not a pre­mium thing to do.
    The whole ‘fresh­ness’ idea is cheap’n’cheerful.
    It’s tan­ta­mount to saying ‘not well made’.
    Reminds me of beau­jo­lais. So crap you have do drink it very chilled…and very fast.
    Ready wine to go with your ready meal…?
    I didn’t think this was the Stormhoek idea.

  12. AGRADA says:

    Wow, The Ulti­mate Fresh­ness indicator..coool invention..deserve atten­tion.
    but the colors seem like something has to do with dish liquids..something smells like lemon..dont know?! I should try it.
    Anyhow it’s really Great innovation.

  13. Nicole Simon says:

    Amber / green sig­nals green being the correct one. I would not even con­si­der rea­ding that thing, amber is about “wait for green”.
    The same color in dif­fe­rent sha­des is bet­ter in my view because it sup­ports “strong taste / wea­ker taste” better.

  14. Stormhoek fresh­ness indi­ca­tor or how to make your sales pitch even better.

    At Hugh there is a dis­cus­sion about the . Visit the logo and give a quick thought about when you think this logo sig­nals “good to drink” and then come back. :)
    I think a fresh­ness fac­tor is a very good idea, espe­cially with chea­per wines. And while …

  15. peter says:

    ok, i think the fresh­ness idea is spec­ta­cu­lar, because too many peo­ple think (all) wine gets bet­ter with age… tim kitchin’s com­ment that ‘freshness’=not-well-made just rein­for­ces that there is such a ste­reotype… I think it’s great that stormhoek are trying to break down that image, and that alone speaks ‘hac­ker’ to me
    [beau­jo­lais is a pity; the french around here seem to con­si­der it a joke they per­pe­trate on the rest of the world, yearly ;) ]
    on the colours though: (i recei­ved a stormhoek shi­raz in the french blogs mai­lout) my first impres­sion was defi­ni­tely that the yellow (high­ligh­ted, and ‘brigh­test’) was the tar­get period… but a gra­dient or dif­fe­rent sha­des of the one colour might be clea­rer
    –p

  16. frosty says:

    Brigh­test?
    Does that mean it somehow grows dim­mer with time?
    Or brigh­ter and *then* dim­mer?
    I don’t know a thing about how the color/lumens/etc can change over time in a wine… and telling me the “bright­ness” will change just makes me more con­fu­sed.
    Wine Shop Guy: Ignore the funny cap, this is a steal at $10.
    Me: What about the bright­ness?
    WSG: Bright­ness?
    Me: Yeah, when is this wine brigh­test? How long before it grows dim?
    WSG: Ah, yeah. To get the most lumens per hec­tar vini­fac­tor, you gotta move up a little. South Africa’s pretty bright already, but for an extra twenty I can get you something you can even drink in the dark.
    (etc)

  17. frosty says:

    Oh, and I think this has been cove­red but:
    Having “ULTIMATE FRESHNESS” in green and the right-end zone in green is sen­ding a *very clear* visual mes­sage:
    This wine has ULTIMATE FRESHNESS in 2009.
    But wait… how can it be fresher in three years than it is now? What?
    Also, bad serif font choice.
    Hmmm, I do admire the way this design is being pla­yed with out in the open and revie­wed by your blog rea­ders and all that, but I think it may be time for you to bring a pro­fes­sio­nal graphic desig­ner into the loop. Just a sug­ges­tion, but some of the things peo­ple are correc­ting for you would never have been done by a pro­fes­sio­nal in the first place.
    (…off to drink some cheap wine now…)

  18. frosty says:

    Sug­ges­tions:
    1) Ditch the whole Fresho­me­ter thingy, it’s con­fu­sing as hell.
    2) Don’t imply there’s a date *after which* the wine is bet­ter.
    You want me to drink this any­time before now and when it turns to vine­gar, right?
    Soo­ner the bet­ter, right? Want to sell more wine, right?
    3) Remove all refe­ren­ces to the wine’s color and inte­lli­gence, that’s con­fu­sing too.
    4) Somehow tie the “fresh­ness” bit to your com­pe­ti­tive pitch.
    In other words: your “fresh­ness” pitch for wine is *only* not ridi­cu­lous as long as you can make the case that it applies to all wine, and Stormhoek is just more honest.
    Any­way, those are my sug­ges­tions for the moment.
    Here’s a moc­kup:
    http://frostopolis.com/flog/pix/2005/12/stormhoek.jpg
    DISCLAIMERS: I’m not a real graphic desig­ner and I usually don’t play one on TV; I did this in five minu­tes on my sub­no­te­book; and I still don’t know what makes a wine bright.

  19. Nia says:

    Sorry if I have already said this before or if you’re no lon­ger inte­res­ted in ideas about the label/packaging of the wine, but this is what I think:
    –The name is a pain. It is impos­si­ble to remem­ber; it’s weird. Even now after so many months of rea­ding about it, I think I would for­get how to spell it in a day or two. And I cer­tainly don’t know how to pro­nounce it. Your ave­rage per­son quickly loo­king at labels at the super­mar­ket should be able to remem­ber more than “long foreign name with an H on it”. One way of sol­ving this, maybe, would be a label that pla­yed with the first bit of the name, “STORMhoek”. So, a label with some sort of abs­tract design that remin­ded of a storm. Sil­very and blue dia­go­nal lines or dots?
    –Make the fresh­ness indi­ca­tor sky blue-turning-grey.
    –make the bottle slightly thin­ner and lon­ger than ave­rage. Kind of like ita­lian grappa bott­les, but of course big­ger. I don’t know, it just looks ele­gant. We like thin things.
    I hope the sug­ges­tions are useful.

  20. YGG says:

    did you see the Japa­nese whisky (oxy­mo­ron, I know) pro­ject by Sato-san?
    http://www.pingmag.jp/2005/08/22/taku-satoh-graphic-design/

  21. When the words “Ulti­mate Fresh­ness” are in the same color as the 2009, that imme­dia­tely indi­ca­tes (to me) that the peak time is the 2009. If it *is* the other way around, I think this whole info-graphic is abso­lu­tely infu­ria­ting. Bet­ter review it with Edward Tufte