December 3, 2005

“open source blogging”: readers’ link page


A lot of peo­ple have been sen­ding me links over the last cou­ple of days. Thanks, Every­body.
The inten­sely frus­tra­ting part is, I simply don’t have time to write about them all. Which is a pity, as you have gone to all that trou­ble wri­ting to me with some really good stuff. And this is something that has REALLY been bug­ging me for a while.
So I’m won­de­ring is there any merit to this idea: Ins­tead of you e-mailing me links in the hope of me pos­ting them later [which is an inef­fi­cient and time-consuming pro­cess, let’s be honest], you go put them up on the wiki, with a one-or-two-sentence blurb about what the link is about, and we can all go look at them together?
These can either be links to your blog or some­body else’s. I’m not fus­sed either way. Though to be honest, I’d rather you link to spe­ci­fic blog posts and sto­ries, rather than just you self-promoting your home­page.
The point of this exer­cise is to help drive traf­fic to more people’s blogs than my time-guzzling, con­ven­tio­nal blog­ging style will allow. A lot of gaping­void rea­ders are wri­ting great stuff, and I want to do a bet­ter job of hel­ping to get the word out etc. If this idea works I might turn it into a regu­lar fea­ture down the line.
Let’s see what hap­pens. Thanks.
[Go post on the wiki here.]
NB: If you find you have trou­ble using the wiki, then just post them in the com­ment sec­tion below. No worries.
[UPDATE:] The first wiki post leads us to here. Rock on.
[NOTE TO SELF:] This is your dum­best idea ever. Good job. Nice going.

6 Responses to ““open source blogging”: readers’ link page”

  1. pheloxi says:

    ahum!
    …sun­day is the 4th of Decem­ber!
    it could start a new ne(a)t idea:
    only alo­wed to e-mail, when cybers­pace is hyber­na­ting*.
    * cyberspace’s ver­sion of “when hell free­zes over”.

  2. pete caputa says:

    I sug­gest that you syn­di­cate a feed from del.icio.us and ask peo­ple to tag their book­marks with the tag, “for:hughmcleod”. If you want to edit it to avoid spam and self-promotion, you could ask peo­ple to do that. Then, read through them. If it is worthy, you could tag it with “public­ga­ping­void” and then syn­di­cate the feed for the tag “/yourusername/publicgapingvoid”.
    This may sound har­der to a non del.icio.us user. But, there are a lot of del.icio.us users with this habit already.

  3. Funny, I just clic­ked through your feed to make the same sug­ges­tion Pete made. Or something similar.

  4. Dave Wheeler says:

    Hugh,
    It sounds like you are in the clas­sic situa­tion of the small entre­pre­neur whose busi­ness is gro­wing to the point that he can’t do everything per­so­nally. I know it will be con­si­de­red blasphemy in the blogsphere, but what about get­ting some help? Perhaps a multi-layered blog where you serve as edi­tor? The wiki idea is a good one, but I don’t think your rea­ders will get the same “Hugh-experience” as your blog.
    Just some thoughts …
    Dave Wheeler

  5. I was just about to chime in with Peter Caputa’s idea. It’s sim­pler for folks like me already tag­ging their links with del.icio.us.
    Kevin Sites, now Yahoo! fame, has 3 folks back home hel­ping him with research & edi­ting while he’s on road blog­ging. Now I don’t have that staff, nor sounds like it you. But it’s more bloggy, open­sour­cey to ask my glo­bal factchec­kers, researchers, edi­tors (ha!!) to be my eyes & ears online for the tsu­nami anni­ver­sary live-blogging tour. Basi­cally tag anything they read that may be reve­lant and I should take a peek at and weave into post with tsunami2005.
    A few years back ins­tead of hiring trans­la­tors for Google’s web­site, they threw it out to their users and had a world­wide (volun­teer) corp of trans­la­tors. They fact-check each other by rating how “good” the trans­la­tion is and the best one is used.

  6. Lisa says:

    Why dum­best idea ever?