December 3, 2005

high-tech business porn

zzzzazzdggg76.jpg
From Cyber­sel­fish:

What is “busi­ness porn” and how is it rela­ted to the cul­ture of high-tech?
PB: I wrote an essay for the Sep­tem­ber 1999 issue of San Fran­cisco maga­zine on what I term busi­ness porn, and also did a com­men­tary along the same lines for the NPR pro­gram, Beyond Com­pu­ters. Basi­cally, the defi­ni­tion of busi­ness porn cen­ters around the idea that so many busi­ness books and so much media cove­rage of busi­ness follows an enti­rely pre­dic­ta­ble, voyeu­ris­tic arc, where the moves are all rou­ti­ni­zed, details are fetishis­ti­cally exact and there’s a strange repe­ti­tive lack of dis­tinc­tive per­so­na­lity to it all. Plus, there’s always a gua­ran­teed posi­tive out­come. It’s roughly ana­lo­gous to the way Har­le­quin Roman­ces can be thought of as emo­tion porn, or Tom Clancy novels as action porn.

Lee Bryant, a very cle­ver and talen­ted fellow has a low opi­nion about porn, biz porn inc­lu­ded:

Porn is for sad lonely jerk-offs. It is fake, mani­pu­la­tive and de-humanising.

I agree. Which is why it’s abso­lu­tely everywhere.
[Rela­ted Link:] “With porn, all things are possible.”

One Response to “high-tech business porn”

  1. Man, I remem­ber just gob­bling up those HUGE issues of Fast Com­pany back in the 90s. If only they had centerfolds…